. It works.. we get PM SHYT |
Correct. All the arguing is really about someone who went to an elite second-tier school trying to burnish their credential by associating it with HYPSM. Put differently, no one who went to HYPSM has anything to gain by the arguments offered here. |
I think you nailed it. Elites: Harvard Yale Princeton Stanford MIT Just missed the cut: Columbia UPenn Caltech Chicago Duke Northwestern Dartmouth Brown Cornell Hopkins Berkeley |
Only true inside the US. Global prestige is a whole different topic. |
PP here. Point taken, and I guess it makes me even worse. |
This seems more correct than US news |
Brown is way too high and Columbia is way too low, but otherwise I'm inclined to agree. |
Agree swap brown and Columbia. This list is better then us news |
US News gets it right. That’s why its rankings carry the most weight. |
Here's the list of schools (minus Cal Tech, which didn't report) that had less than 10% acceptance last year. Brown's graduate programs are nothing special but people on this forum continually underrate its status as an undergraduate institution. It combines the best aspects of a liberal arts college and a research university. Columbia- 3.9% Stanford- 3.9% Harvard- 4% MIT- 4.1% Princeton- 4.4% Yale- 4.6% Brown- 5.5% UPenn 5.9% Duke- 6% Dartmouth- 6.2% U'Chicago- 6.5% Pomona- 6.5% Northwestern- 7% Vanderbilt- 7.1% Johns Hopkins- 7.4% Colby- 8% Swarthmore- 8% Amherst- 8.5% Cornell- 8.7% Bowdoin- 8.8% Williams- 9% Rice- 9.5% |
This is like 4 years stale |
https://www.usnews.com/best-colleges/rankings/national-universities |
|
+1 |