To you, what's the bottom of the "elite" colleges?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dear Northeastern booster, you would do yourself & your school a bigger favor if you just cooled it. You’re not convincing anybody that NEU is elite.

I am from MA and agree. We never thought it elite, and they have been trying the ratings game for years to little or no affect. People still consider BC, Tufts, BU and (if creeping a bit west) Holy Cross better than NEU. That is by local reputation. If someone went to NEU they would get the same reaction if the kid went to StoneHill or Assumption colleges.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear Northeastern booster, you would do yourself & your school a bigger favor if you just cooled it. You’re not convincing anybody that NEU is elite.

I am from MA and agree. We never thought it elite, and they have been trying the ratings game for years to little or no affect. People still consider BC, Tufts, BU and (if creeping a bit west) Holy Cross better than NEU. That is by local reputation. If someone went to NEU they would get the same reaction if the kid went to StoneHill or Assumption colleges.

Check that…effect not affect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear Northeastern booster, you would do yourself & your school a bigger favor if you just cooled it. You’re not convincing anybody that NEU is elite.

I am from MA and agree. We never thought it elite, and they have been trying the ratings game for years to little or no affect. People still consider BC, Tufts, BU and (if creeping a bit west) Holy Cross better than NEU. That is by local reputation. If someone went to NEU they would get the same reaction if the kid went to StoneHill or Assumption colleges.

Check that…effect not affect.

Last though…doesn’t matter. All these are good schools (including NEU) and the focus on “elitism” and “prestige” is arbitrary and sad. You are a lot of sad strivers who really think brand rather than skills make the difference. I think life shows skills trump brand over time. Kids…go to a school that fits you personally and apply yourself to the best of your ability. Then…maybe focus on brand for grad school where it begins to make more of a difference.

Your welcome.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear Northeastern booster, you would do yourself & your school a bigger favor if you just cooled it. You’re not convincing anybody that NEU is elite.

LOL NWU psychology graduate got so mad making $40k with $150k debt in hand lol

Still doesn't make Northeastern an "elite" school by any standards. More like a solid safety school for kids who didn't get into BU.

LMFAO NEU is a safety for BU that doesn't even have a campus

[Anonymous]

Forbes "Presidential Cabinets Have Been Dominated By College Elites Long Before Joe Biden And Donald Trump. Why That’s A Problem."

Bower-Bir coded the colleges these senior appointees attended as being either “elite” or “common.” The elite schools included the eight universities in the Ivy League (Brown, Columbia, Cornell, Dartmouth, Pennsylvania, Harvard, Princeton, Yale) plus 17 others determined through commonly understood academic groupings and a scientific survey of the American public (Duke, Georgetown, U. Chicago, MIT, Johns Hopkins, Cambridge, London School of Economics, Oxford, Vanderbilt, Notre Dame, Boston College, Boston University, Carnegie Mellon, New York University, Northwestern, Stanford and U. California, Berkeley). “Common” schools were simply everyplace else.

Seems like Berkeley is the only US public to make the list. The list does, however, include the UK's University of Oxford, University of Cambridge, and LSE (all public).

RIP UVA, UMich, Williams and Amherst

[Anonymous]

BOSTON COLLEGE AND BOSTON UNIVERSITY

LOL

[Anonymous]

Not to mention NYU

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Dear Northeastern booster, you would do yourself & your school a bigger favor if you just cooled it. You’re not convincing anybody that NEU is elite.

LOL NWU psychology graduate got so mad making $40k with $150k debt in hand lol

Still doesn't make Northeastern an "elite" school by any standards. More like a solid safety school for kids who didn't get into BU.

LMFAO NEU is a safety for BU that doesn't even have a campus

https://www.parchment.com/c/college/tools/college-cross-admit-comparison.php?compare=Boston+University&with=Northeastern+University

Northeastern: 58%
BostonU: 42%

More students now choose the backup school

[Anonymous]

Elite is roughly the Top 25. It’s definitely not just Ivy. Ivy is discussed in it’s own right. But, when kids are trying to get into schools, getting accepted at a Top 25 is oftentimes a goal. If people didn’t believe there was prestige in attending Top 25 beyond Ivy, the application numbers, low acceptance rates, and willingness to pay would not be there.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HYPSM, caltech, chicago, Columbia, Williams.

That's my list.

+1 as defined by the academic cohort at the top 10% (arbitrary) of their respective classes

Pomona has more students in the top 10% of the class than Williams. There are plenty of others as well like Dartmouth and Brown. If that's your criteria, you're clearly not informed.

I'm referring to the top 10% of the college's own classes (not entry HS grades or SAT scores for admissions to the institutions).
My personal opinion is that the cohort at the top are strongest at the schools listed because it's a mix of our best plus the top international students. I'm not saying that there aren't brilliant students at other schools but I think there are less of them and they are not tested on a daily basis in the same way. Williams is also rated as one of the most rigorous schools in the country among universites and LACs. For their grade inflation alone I agreed with the original posters assessment. Ther are plenty of students at Pomona, Brown and Dartmouth that go on to have successful and lucrative careers but that's not the same as the academic elites who are game changers. IMO.

I agree that HYPMS and maybe UChicago/Caltech/Columbia are in a tier of their own. I only disagree with Williams. It's really not at the HYPMS level in terms of selectivity/strength of student body, and not so much higher than Amherst/Pomona/Swarthmore/Bowdoin at this day and time. Here's the list of colleges sorted by average SAT of enrolled students: http://www.businessinsider.com/the-50-smartest-colleges-in-america-2016-10 Williams is 17th.

Also, just a side-note that HYS all have median GPAs above 3.6 and are known for having a ton of grade inflation. I've heard that less than 10% of grades given out there are C's or below. If you want to identify the most rigorous elite schools by a combination of workload and average GPA, that'd be Reed, Swarthmore, UChicago, Princeton, and Davidson. I'd include Williams too- it's definitely rigorous- but being rigorous and attracting the smartest students are two different measures.

This is old information and not very useful.

[Anonymous]

Dumbest, most useless thread ever.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:HYPSM, caltech, chicago, Columbia, Williams.

That's my list.

+1 as defined by the academic cohort at the top 10% (arbitrary) of their respective classes

Pomona has more students in the top 10% of the class than Williams. There are plenty of others as well like Dartmouth and Brown. If that's your criteria, you're clearly not informed.

I'm referring to the top 10% of the college's own classes (not entry HS grades or SAT scores for admissions to the institutions).
My personal opinion is that the cohort at the top are strongest at the schools listed because it's a mix of our best plus the top international students. I'm not saying that there aren't brilliant students at other schools but I think there are less of them and they are not tested on a daily basis in the same way. Williams is also rated as one of the most rigorous schools in the country among universites and LACs. For their grade inflation alone I agreed with the original posters assessment. Ther are plenty of students at Pomona, Brown and Dartmouth that go on to have successful and lucrative careers but that's not the same as the academic elites who are game changers. IMO.

I agree that HYPMS and maybe UChicago/Caltech/Columbia are in a tier of their own. I only disagree with Williams. It's really not at the HYPMS level in terms of selectivity/strength of student body, and not so much higher than Amherst/Pomona/Swarthmore/Bowdoin at this day and time. Here's the list of colleges sorted by average SAT of enrolled students: http://www.businessinsider.com/the-50-smartest-colleges-in-america-2016-10 Williams is 17th.

Also, just a side-note that HYS all have median GPAs above 3.6 and are known for having a ton of grade inflation. I've heard that less than 10% of grades given out there are C's or below. If you want to identify the most rigorous elite schools by a combination of workload and average GPA, that'd be Reed, Swarthmore, UChicago, Princeton, and Davidson. I'd include Williams too- it's definitely rigorous- but being rigorous and attracting the smartest students are two different measures.

This is old information and not very useful.

In fact, this is about right before test optional, so very meaningful and useful.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Dumbest, most useless thread ever.

+1 Who revived this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Forbes "Presidential Cabinets Have Been Dominated By College Elites Long Before Joe Biden And Donald Trump. Why That’s A Problem."

Bower-Bir coded the colleges these senior appointees attended as being either “elite” or “common.” The elite schools included the eight universities in the Ivy League (Brown, Columbia, Cornell, Dartmouth, Pennsylvania, Harvard, Princeton, Yale) plus 17 others determined through commonly understood academic groupings and a scientific survey of the American public (Duke, Georgetown, U. Chicago, MIT, Johns Hopkins, Cambridge, London School of Economics, Oxford, Vanderbilt, Notre Dame, Boston College, Boston University, Carnegie Mellon, New York University, Northwestern, Stanford and U. California, Berkeley). “Common” schools were simply everyplace else.

Seems like Berkeley is the only US public to make the list. The list does, however, include the UK's University of Oxford, University of Cambridge, and LSE (all public).

RIP UVA, UMich, Williams and Amherst

I hope you had a great time at BU but this doesn't mean anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:HYPSM, caltech, chicago, Columbia, Williams.

That's my list.

South doesn't exist in your world.