Fairfax County Double Murder

[Anonymous]

I recall that JPM had trained as a nurse before coming to US and that that fact had appealed to CB. I sincerely hope she will never work in healthcare in Brazil. Or anywhere else. I hope her media deals make her notorious.

[Anonymous]

Why would he talk about their rx being closest of any he had, male or female? What middle aged dude says that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:BB’s letters to JM are vomit inducing. Glad the jurors get to read them. He doesn’t mention Christine,
or his daughter for that matter. He speaks a lot about how he has never had a connection with anyone like he does with JM. How deranged to not just get a divorce and choose murder.

The letters read as if they were written by an infatuated 16-year-old boy. I just can’t make up my mind if any part of them is genuine, or they are all geared at making sure she is confident enough in his feelings for her to be willing to protect him.

[Anonymous]

Is my understanding correct that BB was not required to provide an official statement to ANY organization within days of the killings? Did FCPD request an official statement and he refused?

Would Treasury not require their own internal investigation given he used his Treasury firearm?

If he is considered law enforcement, I’m having trouble understanding why he wasn’t required to provide a statement of events. Especially given he freely admitted to shooting Joe with his Treasury firearm.

(Apologies if this has been addressed already.)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is my understanding correct that BB was not required to provide an official statement to ANY organization within days of the killings? Did FCPD request an official statement and he refused?

Would Treasury not require their own internal investigation given he used his Treasury firearm?

If he is considered law enforcement, I’m having trouble understanding why he wasn’t required to provide a statement of events. Especially given he freely admitted to shooting Joe with his Treasury firearm.

(Apologies if this has been addressed already.)

This was covered in testimony, he refused to speak with Fairfax. The internal investigation did not require testimony. He appeared at a hearing for Juliana but would not even confirm he was married to Christine. Last week he claimed that he planned to testify at Juliana’s trial. Before she took the plea.

For those that knew him, what do you think of his letters to JPM? Sincere or another long con?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is my understanding correct that BB was not required to provide an official statement to ANY organization within days of the killings? Did FCPD request an official statement and he refused?

Would Treasury not require their own internal investigation given he used his Treasury firearm?

If he is considered law enforcement, I’m having trouble understanding why he wasn’t required to provide a statement of events. Especially given he freely admitted to shooting Joe with his Treasury firearm.

(Apologies if this has been addressed already.)

The guy from the IRS who testified said there was an investigation. However, you can't be forced to speak in another court proceeding due to your 5th Amendment right so he either pled the 5th or they are holding off on completing the investigation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Is my understanding correct that BB was not required to provide an official statement to ANY organization within days of the killings? Did FCPD request an official statement and he refused?

Would Treasury not require their own internal investigation given he used his Treasury firearm?

If he is considered law enforcement, I’m having trouble understanding why he wasn’t required to provide a statement of events. Especially given he freely admitted to shooting Joe with his Treasury firearm.

(Apologies if this has been addressed already.)

According to the CW, on the stand the other day was the first time he told that whole story. I don’t know if I would say he didn’t give ANY statement though, for example I’m pretty sure on the 911 call and/or bodycam he says stuff like I shot him, he was stabbing my wife. I don’t remember exactly what he said on which one, but he definitely said stuff.

Soon after that he must have lawyered up and given very minimal statements/explanations besides whatever he had already said. He was driving for Uber to make money while Juliana was in jail. I would assume if he did not give any statements (that added up) he would have been on unpaid admin leave pretty quickly. But even if he did still get his salary, imo it would be pretty tight to pay all their bills plus lawyer bills but I guess that’s where Tess comes in. Christine could have had life insurance but what happens with that when there’s such an investigation? I’m not sure.

I think if he had told that story or even half of it on record anywhere before, the CW case would be somewhat different and stronger (so even if he does appeal or has a hung jury here, I think the evidence would be more overwhelming next time because of this statement).

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is my understanding correct that BB was not required to provide an official statement to ANY organization within days of the killings? Did FCPD request an official statement and he refused?

Would Treasury not require their own internal investigation given he used his Treasury firearm?

If he is considered law enforcement, I’m having trouble understanding why he wasn’t required to provide a statement of events. Especially given he freely admitted to shooting Joe with his Treasury firearm.

(Apologies if this has been addressed already.)

According to the CW, on the stand the other day was the first time he told that whole story. I don’t know if I would say he didn’t give ANY statement though, for example I’m pretty sure on the 911 call and/or bodycam he says stuff like I shot him, he was stabbing my wife. I don’t remember exactly what he said on which one, but he definitely said stuff.

Soon after that he must have lawyered up and given very minimal statements/explanations besides whatever he had already said. He was driving for Uber to make money while Juliana was in jail. I would assume if he did not give any statements (that added up) he would have been on unpaid admin leave pretty quickly. But even if he did still get his salary, imo it would be pretty tight to pay all their bills plus lawyer bills but I guess that’s where Tess comes in. Christine could have had life insurance but what happens with that when there’s such an investigation? I’m not sure.

I think if he had told that story or even half of it on record anywhere before, the CW case would be somewhat different and stronger (so even if he does appeal or has a hung jury here, I think the evidence would be more overwhelming next time because of this statement).

During the testimony the CW basically said he listened to the CW's evidence throughout the whole trial and then crafted his story around it for his testimony.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is my understanding correct that BB was not required to provide an official statement to ANY organization within days of the killings? Did FCPD request an official statement and he refused?

Would Treasury not require their own internal investigation given he used his Treasury firearm?

If he is considered law enforcement, I’m having trouble understanding why he wasn’t required to provide a statement of events. Especially given he freely admitted to shooting Joe with his Treasury firearm.

(Apologies if this has been addressed already.)

According to the CW, on the stand the other day was the first time he told that whole story. I don’t know if I would say he didn’t give ANY statement though, for example I’m pretty sure on the 911 call and/or bodycam he says stuff like I shot him, he was stabbing my wife. I don’t remember exactly what he said on which one, but he definitely said stuff.

Soon after that he must have lawyered up and given very minimal statements/explanations besides whatever he had already said. He was driving for Uber to make money while Juliana was in jail. I would assume if he did not give any statements (that added up) he would have been on unpaid admin leave pretty quickly. But even if he did still get his salary, imo it would be pretty tight to pay all their bills plus lawyer bills but I guess that’s where Tess comes in. Christine could have had life insurance but what happens with that when there’s such an investigation? I’m not sure.

I think if he had told that story or even half of it on record anywhere before, the CW case would be somewhat different and stronger (so even if he does appeal or has a hung jury here, I think the evidence would be more overwhelming next time because of this statement).

During the testimony the CW basically said he listened to the CW's evidence throughout the whole trial and then crafted his story around it for his testimony.

I wonder then, why make up something like the work meeting? I don't think it was necessary based on the CW's case, was it? The birthday party in NY I assume was real because he and Juliana discussed it on Discord before the murderers.

He was smart about most of the details, so I wonder why he made up a meeting with his manager, when he knew his managers were both out of town.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who are Miller and SF? Good analysis!

Miller is the re-assigned detective who made the report about the devices that concluded Christine would have been the source of the fetlock and telegram activity. He made this conclusion based on digital returns that showed the activity was done from her devices only when she was home.

There was internal dissent over this because the catfish theory had already emerged. Miller is still employed with the department as far as I know.

On the stand Carroll left a question way too open ended and instead of just asking whether the digital data changed, he just generally asked if anything changed. And Miller said something like “yes, the co-defendant testified that they were the ones using the devices.” So then Carroll quickly said something like “well okay but the data didn’t change, right” and Miller said no but you can only establish that a device did something and you can’t put a person behind a device without outside corroboration which now we have.

None of these are exact quotes obviously

SF is the victim services coordinator with FCPD who arranged the hotel room for Brendan, Juliana, and the child that night and Juliana and the child were waiting in their office too. Carroll brought her in because she is apparently a catfish theory truther, having become aware of some info that day/night and testifying that she had serious concerns for the child’s safety from the beginning (very valid, in my opinion. I was extremely concerned for the physical safety of the child every day that Brendan was out between the murders and his arrest). There were some text exchanges between her and others basically showing their belief in the catfish theory. I get what Carroll was trying to do, but imo because he was kind of disorganized and asking extremely open ended questions, it didn’t work out at all.

Thank you! So interesting.

I never paid enough attention to understand what the kerfuffle was with Miller but wow. How ridiculous for him to assert that it had to be Christine doing the fetlife activity. All you can assert is the timelines and say we can't know who was doing the activity. For him to assert it had to be her, shows he isn't very analytical.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is my understanding correct that BB was not required to provide an official statement to ANY organization within days of the killings? Did FCPD request an official statement and he refused?

Would Treasury not require their own internal investigation given he used his Treasury firearm?

If he is considered law enforcement, I’m having trouble understanding why he wasn’t required to provide a statement of events. Especially given he freely admitted to shooting Joe with his Treasury firearm.

(Apologies if this has been addressed already.)

This was covered in testimony, he refused to speak with Fairfax. The internal investigation did not require testimony. He appeared at a hearing for Juliana but would not even confirm he was married to Christine. Last week he claimed that he planned to testify at Juliana’s trial. Before she took the plea.

For those that knew him, what do you think of his letters to JPM? Sincere or another long con?

Who are you people who think he is actually capable of loving someone? Look at her. Is he engaged to her? He stopped talking to her at some point and she realized their relationship was going nowhere. The love letters and everything he says now are part of his game. He was hoping she wouldn't testify against him and is now hoping that she recants because I'm sure he and his attorney feel like they have a strong case to appeal if he is convicted.

[Anonymous]

Omg this murderer was driving for Uber while waiting for his court date?!?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is my understanding correct that BB was not required to provide an official statement to ANY organization within days of the killings? Did FCPD request an official statement and he refused?

Would Treasury not require their own internal investigation given he used his Treasury firearm?

If he is considered law enforcement, I’m having trouble understanding why he wasn’t required to provide a statement of events. Especially given he freely admitted to shooting Joe with his Treasury firearm.

(Apologies if this has been addressed already.)

This was covered in testimony, he refused to speak with Fairfax. The internal investigation did not require testimony. He appeared at a hearing for Juliana but would not even confirm he was married to Christine. Last week he claimed that he planned to testify at Juliana’s trial. Before she took the plea.

For those that knew him, what do you think of his letters to JPM? Sincere or another long con?

But he certainly suggested in the stand no one asked him and that is why he was telling the story for the first time.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is my understanding correct that BB was not required to provide an official statement to ANY organization within days of the killings? Did FCPD request an official statement and he refused?

Would Treasury not require their own internal investigation given he used his Treasury firearm?

If he is considered law enforcement, I’m having trouble understanding why he wasn’t required to provide a statement of events. Especially given he freely admitted to shooting Joe with his Treasury firearm.

(Apologies if this has been addressed already.)

This was covered in testimony, he refused to speak with Fairfax. The internal investigation did not require testimony. He appeared at a hearing for Juliana but would not even confirm he was married to Christine. Last week he claimed that he planned to testify at Juliana’s trial. Before she took the plea.

For those that knew him, what do you think of his letters to JPM? Sincere or another long con?

But he certainly suggested in the stand no one asked him and that is why he was telling the story for the first time.

Yes, he maintained that other than at Juliana hearing, he was always perfectly willing to talk, but no one ever asked. I don't understand how he wasn't asked to give q play by play the day he confessed to the shooting.

[Anonymous]

He refused to speak with Fairfax County, it was a n news accounts. Just another fact he has lied about. Had he spoken with LE the CW would not have referred to his telling story as “new.”