YouTube Influencer Myka Stauffer "rehomes" adopted son

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d like to know what kind of training the adoption agency required. I had friends that did a domestic adoption and were required to attend many classes about inter-racial adoption, even though one of the parents was the same race as the child. Did these parents have training on international adoption? On parenting special needs children, particularly children with neurological differences?
I agree the child is almost certainly better off without them which is probably why a professional recommended it. I am also curious whether the mom who is taking him was one pf his former service providers who formed a better attachment than the adoptive parents, as they said the new person has a medical baclground.

One, they are LYING when they say a “medical professional” told them to abandon this child.

Two, she’s a trained nurse. She has a medical background.

They adopted a child for profit and are getting rid of him because he’s too much for these selfish people.

The only “fact” here is that she was a nurse. Everything else is just your opinion....

[Anonymous]

Their adopted son didn't fit in with their perfect blonde youtube life and also made it harder to keep up appearances. So they made the choice to give him away.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d like to know what kind of training the adoption agency required. I had friends that did a domestic adoption and were required to attend many classes about inter-racial adoption, even though one of the parents was the same race as the child. Did these parents have training on international adoption? On parenting special needs children, particularly children with neurological differences?
I agree the child is almost certainly better off without them which is probably why a professional recommended it. I am also curious whether the mom who is taking him was one pf his former service providers who formed a better attachment than the adoptive parents, as they said the new person has a medical baclground.

One, they are LYING when they say a “medical professional” told them to abandon this child.

Two, she’s a trained nurse. She has a medical background.

They adopted a child for profit and are getting rid of him because he’s too much for these selfish people.

The only “fact” here is that she was a nurse. Everything else is just your opinion....

Just because she is a nurse, doesn't mean she has any specific training to deal with a child with SN.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d like to know what kind of training the adoption agency required. I had friends that did a domestic adoption and were required to attend many classes about inter-racial adoption, even though one of the parents was the same race as the child. Did these parents have training on international adoption? On parenting special needs children, particularly children with neurological differences?
I agree the child is almost certainly better off without them which is probably why a professional recommended it. I am also curious whether the mom who is taking him was one pf his former service providers who formed a better attachment than the adoptive parents, as they said the new person has a medical baclground.

One, they are LYING when they say a “medical professional” told them to abandon this child.

Two, she’s a trained nurse. She has a medical background.

They adopted a child for profit and are getting rid of him because he’s too much for these selfish people.

Not all nurses are trained for those kind of SN. She/they may be able to handle it no problem but nursing training doesn't prepare you for what is going on.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Their adopted son didn't fit in with their perfect blonde youtube life and also made it harder to keep up appearances. So they made the choice to give him away.

You know them personally? She told you this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d like to know what kind of training the adoption agency required. I had friends that did a domestic adoption and were required to attend many classes about inter-racial adoption, even though one of the parents was the same race as the child. Did these parents have training on international adoption? On parenting special needs children, particularly children with neurological differences?
I agree the child is almost certainly better off without them which is probably why a professional recommended it. I am also curious whether the mom who is taking him was one pf his former service providers who formed a better attachment than the adoptive parents, as they said the new person has a medical baclground.

One, they are LYING when they say a “medical professional” told them to abandon this child.

Two, she’s a trained nurse. She has a medical background.

They adopted a child for profit and are getting rid of him because he’s too much for these selfish people.

The only “fact” here is that she was a nurse. Everything else is just your opinion....

Just because she is a nurse, doesn't mean she has any specific training to deal with a child with SN.

She said it herself in a video that she was able to care for a child with SN because of her being a nurse. At the time she made that statement she wasn't even a licensed nurse. She was a nurse for a very short time before she had her license removed for assaulting a pregnant co-worker. She's nuts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d like to know what kind of training the adoption agency required. I had friends that did a domestic adoption and were required to attend many classes about inter-racial adoption, even though one of the parents was the same race as the child. Did these parents have training on international adoption? On parenting special needs children, particularly children with neurological differences?
I agree the child is almost certainly better off without them which is probably why a professional recommended it. I am also curious whether the mom who is taking him was one pf his former service providers who formed a better attachment than the adoptive parents, as they said the new person has a medical baclground.

One, they are LYING when they say a “medical professional” told them to abandon this child.

Two, she’s a trained nurse. She has a medical background.

They adopted a child for profit and are getting rid of him because he’s too much for these selfish people.

The only “fact” here is that she was a nurse. Everything else is just your opinion....

No, they are lying. Medical professionals don’t give advice to abandon children. These people are narcissists. They took a vacation to Bali within weeks of “rehoming” their kid. They are just horrible.

[Anonymous]

Was she expected to keep the kid after she had made money off of him and he was no longer useful? She could have easily killed or drowned him but she did not do that. We have to understand that there are worse people than her. Like Amy Cooper or the cop Chauvin.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Was she expected to keep the kid after she had made money off of him and he was no longer useful? She could have easily killed or drowned him but she did not do that. We have to understand that there are worse people than her. Like Amy Cooper or the cop Chauvin.

You’re an idiot

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d like to know what kind of training the adoption agency required. I had friends that did a domestic adoption and were required to attend many classes about inter-racial adoption, even though one of the parents was the same race as the child. Did these parents have training on international adoption? On parenting special needs children, particularly children with neurological differences?
I agree the child is almost certainly better off without them which is probably why a professional recommended it. I am also curious whether the mom who is taking him was one pf his former service providers who formed a better attachment than the adoptive parents, as they said the new person has a medical baclground.

One, they are LYING when they say a “medical professional” told them to abandon this child.

Two, she’s a trained nurse. She has a medical background.

They adopted a child for profit and are getting rid of him because he’s too much for these selfish people.

The only “fact” here is that she was a nurse. Everything else is just your opinion....

Just because she is a nurse, doesn't mean she has any specific training to deal with a child with SN.

She said it herself in a video that she was able to care for a child with SN because of her being a nurse. At the time she made that statement she wasn't even a licensed nurse. She was a nurse for a very short time before she had her license removed for assaulting a pregnant co-worker. She's nuts.

She actually admitted to this on camera?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agree they should lose the other children.

Because they gave up their adopted child that they couldn’t take care of due to his medical issues? There was no abuse or neglect. So no, they shouldn’t lose their other kids and it’ll never happen. But nice try.

Take all their biological children away. The are not fit. You would make a terrible adoptive parent. Nice try.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agree they should lose the other children.

Because they gave up their adopted child that they couldn’t take care of due to his medical issues? There was no abuse or neglect. So no, they shouldn’t lose their other kids and it’ll never happen. But nice try.

Take all their biological children away. The are not fit. You would make a terrible adoptive parent. Nice try.

lmao ok? I’d never adopt a child so that’s not a problem. But no, they shouldn’t lose their kids. They did nothing to any of their children so there is no reason that they WOULD be taken away. You’re a gross person for even suggesting that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Agree they should lose the other children.

Because they gave up their adopted child that they couldn’t take care of due to his medical issues? There was no abuse or neglect. So no, they shouldn’t lose their other kids and it’ll never happen. But nice try.

Take all their biological children away. The are not fit. You would make a terrible adoptive parent. Nice try.

lmao ok? I’d never adopt a child so that’s not a problem. But no, they shouldn’t lose their kids. They did nothing to any of their children so there is no reason that they WOULD be taken away. You’re a gross person for even suggesting that.

How do you know that.

[Anonymous]

As a mother of an international adopted now teen, I find this Story very sad.

I do agree with inferences from OP that this social media influencer should have made more of an effort to provide a stable home and to bond with the child.

However, I do not wish to be too judgy as being an adoptive parent is Both extremely challenging and rewarding. We have both: biological and adoptive children with special needs and there are definitely extra hurdles in helping the adoptive child to flourish (Such as being sensitive to different life experiences for people of color and making sure they have friends and role models who look like them). Nonetheless, there are more similarities than differences in duties for parenting biological and adopted children.

Regarding the negativity and hysteria around international adoptions, there are many Thousands of positive success stories. It took us many years to adopt as good agencies are so vigilant in ensuring that prospective parents have the emotional, physical, Psychological and financial resources to successfully adopt and raise children. They do home studies to check that your home is safe and welcoming. They interview existing children to ensure that they are well adjusted, perform criminal background checks, test for alcohol/ substance abuse and require clean medical bills of health.They also require social workers in the countries of the biological mothers ascertain that the mother really believes adoption is the best solution for her and take DNA tests of both biological mother and child to confirm the identity of the mother is true and that she willingly gives her child up for adoption. Of course, it is better for children to stay with their biological parents if that is possible but in many cases it is not. In countries where international adoptions have been closed down due to Den Hague Treaty Violations, their orphanages are overflowing.

International is not the only way to combat poverty but it can be one tool of many. However, adoptive parents need to take their duties profoundly seriously. Children are not status objects but complex sentient beings who need love, understanding and discipline.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’d like to know what kind of training the adoption agency required. I had friends that did a domestic adoption and were required to attend many classes about inter-racial adoption, even though one of the parents was the same race as the child. Did these parents have training on international adoption? On parenting special needs children, particularly children with neurological differences?
I agree the child is almost certainly better off without them which is probably why a professional recommended it. I am also curious whether the mom who is taking him was one pf his former service providers who formed a better attachment than the adoptive parents, as they said the new person has a medical baclground.

One, they are LYING when they say a “medical professional” told them to abandon this child.

Two, she’s a trained nurse. She has a medical background.

They adopted a child for profit and are getting rid of him because he’s too much for these selfish people.

The only “fact” here is that she was a nurse. Everything else is just your opinion....

Just because she is a nurse, doesn't mean she has any specific training to deal with a child with SN.

She said it herself in a video that she was able to care for a child with SN because of her being a nurse. At the time she made that statement she wasn't even a licensed nurse. She was a nurse for a very short time before she had her license removed for assaulting a pregnant co-worker. She's nuts.

She actually admitted to this on camera?

Public court records. Why would she admit that on camera, it doesn't align well with her fabricated lifestyle.