Affirmative Action should be income-based, not race-based

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Problem is, folks, that we’re talking about the white man’s structurally racist education system. Let’s create something else.

Asians seem to succeed under it.

Then again a person with high future time orientation and high impulse control tends to do better in an academic setting. Those attributes aren't evenly distributed across all populations.

The dumb Asians don’t make it to the US, at least among those that emigrated within the last 50 years or so. Even if they did not have a formal education, they had streets smarts or entrepreneurial talents.

I grew up in Southern California and knew a lot of Japanese and Chinese-Americans who could trace their lineage in the US back to the late 1800s. Those kids had all the same issues you see in white and black populations that have been in the US forever: drug abuse, lack of focus on the education, obsession with pop culture/music/sports ahead of studying, truancy, minor crime, etc. Tons of Asian gangs in California, many of whom have lived in the US for a couple generations.

So when you say “Asians have succeeded!” you’re typically talking about a group with a high degree of selection bias. They had to have the money, intelligence, and/or social capital to get to the US in the 20th century. They are dissimilar from those they left behind in their home countries.

No, you are absolutely incorrect. Most of the Asian immigrants in the last 40 years or so (Asians were not allowed to come until the late 1960s) came under the family based immigrant visas not skilled (bachelors degrees or higher) employment based immigrant visas or investor visas. In addition, many refugees from SE Asian countries who came in 1970s and 1980s were definitely not highly educated or had wealth. Many also came under "unskilled worker" category of the employment based immigration and then used family based immigrant visas once they obtained citizenship.

So no, it's absolutely false that most Asian immigrants to US in the last 40-50 years had "money, intelligence, and/or social capital". I would say that most Asians actually go into the opposite category.

Both of you are stereotyping.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Problem is, folks, that we’re talking about the white man’s structurally racist education system. Let’s create something else.

Asians seem to succeed under it.

Then again a person with high future time orientation and high impulse control tends to do better in an academic setting. Those attributes aren't evenly distributed across all populations.

The dumb Asians don’t make it to the US, at least among those that emigrated within the last 50 years or so. Even if they did not have a formal education, they had streets smarts or entrepreneurial talents.

I grew up in Southern California and knew a lot of Japanese and Chinese-Americans who could trace their lineage in the US back to the late 1800s. Those kids had all the same issues you see in white and black populations that have been in the US forever: drug abuse, lack of focus on the education, obsession with pop culture/music/sports ahead of studying, truancy, minor crime, etc. Tons of Asian gangs in California, many of whom have lived in the US for a couple generations.

Asians succeed despite being racially discriminated against in favor of all other groups and the privileged whites. What do liberals say about that when they talk about how blacks still need special help" after more than decades of special preferences"? Why are Asians doing better than other groups despite racial discrimination and having no political power to try to offset discriminatory acts such as AA?

So when you say “Asians have succeeded!” you’re typically talking about a group with a high degree of selection bias. They had to have the money, intelligence, and/or social capital to get to the US in the 20th century. They are dissimilar from those they left behind in their home countries.

No, you are absolutely incorrect. Most of the Asian immigrants in the last 40 years or so (Asians were not allowed to come until the late 1960s) came under the family based immigrant visas not skilled (bachelors degrees or higher) employment based immigrant visas or investor visas. In addition, many refugees from SE Asian countries who came in 1970s and 1980s were definitely not highly educated or had wealth. Many also came under "unskilled worker" category of the employment based immigration and then used family based immigrant visas once they obtained citizenship.

So no, it's absolutely false that most Asian immigrants to US in the last 40-50 years had "money, intelligence, and/or social capital". I would say that most Asians actually go into the opposite category.

Both of you are stereotyping.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Problem is, folks, that we’re talking about the white man’s structurally racist education system. Let’s create something else.

Asians seem to succeed under it.

Then again a person with high future time orientation and high impulse control tends to do better in an academic setting. Those attributes aren't evenly distributed across all populations.

The dumb Asians don’t make it to the US, at least among those that emigrated within the last 50 years or so. Even if they did not have a formal education, they had streets smarts or entrepreneurial talents.

I grew up in Southern California and knew a lot of Japanese and Chinese-Americans who could trace their lineage in the US back to the late 1800s. Those kids had all the same issues you see in white and black populations that have been in the US forever: drug abuse, lack of focus on the education, obsession with pop culture/music/sports ahead of studying, truancy, minor crime, etc. Tons of Asian gangs in California, many of whom have lived in the US for a couple generations.

So when you say “Asians have succeeded!” you’re typically talking about a group with a high degree of selection bias. They had to have the money, intelligence, and/or social capital to get to the US in the 20th century. They are dissimilar from those they left behind in their home countries.

No, you are absolutely incorrect. Most of the Asian immigrants in the last 40 years or so (Asians were not allowed to come until the late 1960s) came under the family based immigrant visas not skilled (bachelors degrees or higher) employment based immigrant visas or investor visas. In addition, many refugees from SE Asian countries who came in 1970s and 1980s were definitely not highly educated or had wealth. Many also came under "unskilled worker" category of the employment based immigration and then used family based immigrant visas once they obtained citizenship.

So no, it's absolutely false that most Asian immigrants to US in the last 40-50 years had "money, intelligence, and/or social capital". I would say that most Asians actually go into the opposite category.

y
By that same token, what about the Jews? They certainly had no social capital or money when they arrived en mass veteen 1880 and 1920. They are mostly dirt-poor peasants from Easfern Europe. A generation later their kids were college graduates, and a ge erstion after that, they were doctors and lawyers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Problem is, folks, that we’re talking about the white man’s structurally racist education system. Let’s create something else.

Asians seem to succeed under it.

Then again a person with high future time orientation and high impulse control tends to do better in an academic setting. Those attributes aren't evenly distributed across all populations.

The dumb Asians don’t make it to the US, at least among those that emigrated within the last 50 years or so. Even if they did not have a formal education, they had streets smarts or entrepreneurial talents.

I grew up in Southern California and knew a lot of Japanese and Chinese-Americans who could trace their lineage in the US back to the late 1800s. Those kids had all the same issues you see in white and black populations that have been in the US forever: drug abuse, lack of focus on the education, obsession with pop culture/music/sports ahead of studying, truancy, minor crime, etc. Tons of Asian gangs in California, many of whom have lived in the US for a couple generations.

So when you say “Asians have succeeded!” you’re typically talking about a group with a high degree of selection bias. They had to have the money, intelligence, and/or social capital to get to the US in the 20th century. They are dissimilar from those they left behind in their home countries.

No, you are absolutely incorrect. Most of the Asian immigrants in the last 40 years or so (Asians were not allowed to come until the late 1960s) came under the family based immigrant visas not skilled (bachelors degrees or higher) employment based immigrant visas or investor visas. In addition, many refugees from SE Asian countries who came in 1970s and 1980s were definitely not highly educated or had wealth. Many also came under "unskilled worker" category of the employment based immigration and then used family based immigrant visas once they obtained citizenship.

So no, it's absolutely false that most Asian immigrants to US in the last 40-50 years had "money, intelligence, and/or social capital". I would say that most Asians actually go into the opposite category.

y
By that same token, what about the Jews? They certainly had no social capital or money when they arrived en mass veteen 1880 and 1920. They are mostly dirt-poor peasants from Easfern Europe. A generation later their kids were college graduates, and a ge erstion after that, they were doctors and lawyers.

Shouldn’t you all be on 4chan or 8chan or wherever it is that you people go?

Yes, we know you think black people suck. Maybe you even think all “POC” suck, including white Hispanics. Maybe even women.

Why do you insist on demonstrating that you are DBs again and again and again? We already know that.

[Anonymous]

This whole thread itself is justification that we still need to include racial preference for college. Look at all of the proud racists right here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This whole thread itself is justification that we still need to include racial preference for college. Look at all of the proud racists right here.

Aren’t racial preferences racist by definition?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole thread itself is justification that we still need to include racial preference for college. Look at all of the proud racists right here.

Aren’t racial preferences racist by definition?

No:
“a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race”

Some of the recent posts clearly are racist based on the definition.

For college admissions, race is just one factor considered so it’s not discrimination.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Problem is, folks, that we’re talking about the white man’s structurally racist education system. Let’s create something else.

Asians seem to succeed under it.

Then again a person with high future time orientation and high impulse control tends to do better in an academic setting. Those attributes aren't evenly distributed across all populations.

The dumb Asians don’t make it to the US, at least among those that emigrated within the last 50 years or so. Even if they did not have a formal education, they had streets smarts or entrepreneurial talents.

I grew up in Southern California and knew a lot of Japanese and Chinese-Americans who could trace their lineage in the US back to the late 1800s. Those kids had all the same issues you see in white and black populations that have been in the US forever: drug abuse, lack of focus on the education, obsession with pop culture/music/sports ahead of studying, truancy, minor crime, etc. Tons of Asian gangs in California, many of whom have lived in the US for a couple generations.

So when you say “Asians have succeeded!” you’re typically talking about a group with a high degree of selection bias. They had to have the money, intelligence, and/or social capital to get to the US in the 20th century. They are dissimilar from those they left behind in their home countries.

No, you are absolutely incorrect. Most of the Asian immigrants in the last 40 years or so (Asians were not allowed to come until the late 1960s) came under the family based immigrant visas not skilled (bachelors degrees or higher) employment based immigrant visas or investor visas. In addition, many refugees from SE Asian countries who came in 1970s and 1980s were definitely not highly educated or had wealth. Many also came under "unskilled worker" category of the employment based immigration and then used family based immigrant visas once they obtained citizenship.

So no, it's absolutely false that most Asian immigrants to US in the last 40-50 years had "money, intelligence, and/or social capital". I would say that most Asians actually go into the opposite category.

y
By that same token, what about the Jews? They certainly had no social capital or money when they arrived en mass veteen 1880 and 1920. They are mostly dirt-poor peasants from Easfern Europe. A generation later their kids were college graduates, and a ge erstion after that, they were doctors and lawyers.

Shouldn’t you all be on 4chan or 8chan or wherever it is that you people go?

Yes, we know you think black people suck. Maybe you even think all “POC” suck, including white Hispanics. Maybe even women.

Why do you insist on demonstrating that you are DBs again and again and again? We already know that.

Dp

If a people who have been oppressed since ancient Egypt and we're nearly genocided away into history can come here and succeed despite 3000 years of being persecuted, anyone can.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Problem is, folks, that we’re talking about the white man’s structurally racist education system. Let’s create something else.

Asians seem to succeed under it.

Then again a person with high future time orientation and high impulse control tends to do better in an academic setting. Those attributes aren't evenly distributed across all populations.

The dumb Asians don’t make it to the US, at least among those that emigrated within the last 50 years or so. Even if they did not have a formal education, they had streets smarts or entrepreneurial talents.

I grew up in Southern California and knew a lot of Japanese and Chinese-Americans who could trace their lineage in the US back to the late 1800s. Those kids had all the same issues you see in white and black populations that have been in the US forever: drug abuse, lack of focus on the education, obsession with pop culture/music/sports ahead of studying, truancy, minor crime, etc. Tons of Asian gangs in California, many of whom have lived in the US for a couple generations.

So when you say “Asians have succeeded!” you’re typically talking about a group with a high degree of selection bias. They had to have the money, intelligence, and/or social capital to get to the US in the 20th century. They are dissimilar from those they left behind in their home countries.

No, you are absolutely incorrect. Most of the Asian immigrants in the last 40 years or so (Asians were not allowed to come until the late 1960s) came under the family based immigrant visas not skilled (bachelors degrees or higher) employment based immigrant visas or investor visas. In addition, many refugees from SE Asian countries who came in 1970s and 1980s were definitely not highly educated or had wealth. Many also came under "unskilled worker" category of the employment based immigration and then used family based immigrant visas once they obtained citizenship.

So no, it's absolutely false that most Asian immigrants to US in the last 40-50 years had "money, intelligence, and/or social capital". I would say that most Asians actually go into the opposite category.

y
By that same token, what about the Jews? They certainly had no social capital or money when they arrived en mass veteen 1880 and 1920. They are mostly dirt-poor peasants from Easfern Europe. A generation later their kids were college graduates, and a ge erstion after that, they were doctors and lawyers.

Shouldn’t you all be on 4chan or 8chan or wherever it is that you people go?

Yes, we know you think black people suck. Maybe you even think all “POC” suck, including white Hispanics. Maybe even women.

Why do you insist on demonstrating that you are DBs again and again and again? We already know that.

Dp

If a people who have been oppressed since ancient Egypt and we're nearly genocided away into history can come here and succeed despite 3000 years of being persecuted, anyone can.

Yes, we know there are a few Jewish people on here who hate black people. 4Chan is perfect for you, too!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Problem is, folks, that we’re talking about the white man’s structurally racist education system. Let’s create something else.

Asians seem to succeed under it.

Then again a person with high future time orientation and high impulse control tends to do better in an academic setting. Those attributes aren't evenly distributed across all populations.

The dumb Asians don’t make it to the US, at least among those that emigrated within the last 50 years or so. Even if they did not have a formal education, they had streets smarts or entrepreneurial talents.

I grew up in Southern California and knew a lot of Japanese and Chinese-Americans who could trace their lineage in the US back to the late 1800s. Those kids had all the same issues you see in white and black populations that have been in the US forever: drug abuse, lack of focus on the education, obsession with pop culture/music/sports ahead of studying, truancy, minor crime, etc. Tons of Asian gangs in California, many of whom have lived in the US for a couple generations.

So when you say “Asians have succeeded!” you’re typically talking about a group with a high degree of selection bias. They had to have the money, intelligence, and/or social capital to get to the US in the 20th century. They are dissimilar from those they left behind in their home countries.

No, you are absolutely incorrect. Most of the Asian immigrants in the last 40 years or so (Asians were not allowed to come until the late 1960s) came under the family based immigrant visas not skilled (bachelors degrees or higher) employment based immigrant visas or investor visas. In addition, many refugees from SE Asian countries who came in 1970s and 1980s were definitely not highly educated or had wealth. Many also came under "unskilled worker" category of the employment based immigration and then used family based immigrant visas once they obtained citizenship.

So no, it's absolutely false that most Asian immigrants to US in the last 40-50 years had "money, intelligence, and/or social capital". I would say that most Asians actually go into the opposite category.

y
By that same token, what about the Jews? They certainly had no social capital or money when they arrived en mass veteen 1880 and 1920. They are mostly dirt-poor peasants from Easfern Europe. A generation later their kids were college graduates, and a ge erstion after that, they were doctors and lawyers.

Shouldn’t you all be on 4chan or 8chan or wherever it is that you people go?

Yes, we know you think black people suck. Maybe you even think all “POC” suck, including white Hispanics. Maybe even women.

Why do you insist on demonstrating that you are DBs again and again and again? We already know that.

Dp

If a people who have been oppressed since ancient Egypt and we're nearly genocided away into history can come here and succeed despite 3000 years of being persecuted, anyone can.

Yes, we know there are a few Jewish people on here who hate black people. 4Chan is perfect for you, too!

So why can they succeed when others fail?

AA of Caribbean descent/immigrant origin do well, why might that be?

[Anonymous]

have you seen those insane scholarships for chinese student descendants of those who were forced to build the Great Wall?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Problem is, folks, that we’re talking about the white man’s structurally racist education system. Let’s create something else.

Asians seem to succeed under it.

Then again a person with high future time orientation and high impulse control tends to do better in an academic setting. Those attributes aren't evenly distributed across all populations.

The dumb Asians don’t make it to the US, at least among those that emigrated within the last 50 years or so. Even if they did not have a formal education, they had streets smarts or entrepreneurial talents.

I grew up in Southern California and knew a lot of Japanese and Chinese-Americans who could trace their lineage in the US back to the late 1800s. Those kids had all the same issues you see in white and black populations that have been in the US forever: drug abuse, lack of focus on the education, obsession with pop culture/music/sports ahead of studying, truancy, minor crime, etc. Tons of Asian gangs in California, many of whom have lived in the US for a couple generations.

So when you say “Asians have succeeded!” you’re typically talking about a group with a high degree of selection bias. They had to have the money, intelligence, and/or social capital to get to the US in the 20th century. They are dissimilar from those they left behind in their home countries.

No, you are absolutely incorrect. Most of the Asian immigrants in the last 40 years or so (Asians were not allowed to come until the late 1960s) came under the family based immigrant visas not skilled (bachelors degrees or higher) employment based immigrant visas or investor visas. In addition, many refugees from SE Asian countries who came in 1970s and 1980s were definitely not highly educated or had wealth. Many also came under "unskilled worker" category of the employment based immigration and then used family based immigrant visas once they obtained citizenship.

So no, it's absolutely false that most Asian immigrants to US in the last 40-50 years had "money, intelligence, and/or social capital". I would say that most Asians actually go into the opposite category.

y
By that same token, what about the Jews? They certainly had no social capital or money when they arrived en mass veteen 1880 and 1920. They are mostly dirt-poor peasants from Easfern Europe. A generation later their kids were college graduates, and a ge erstion after that, they were doctors and lawyers.

Shouldn’t you all be on 4chan or 8chan or wherever it is that you people go?

Yes, we know you think black people suck. Maybe you even think all “POC” suck, including white Hispanics. Maybe even women.

Why do you insist on demonstrating that you are DBs again and again and again? We already know that.

Dp

If a people who have been oppressed since ancient Egypt and we're nearly genocided away into history can come here and succeed despite 3000 years of being persecuted, anyone can.

Yes, we know there are a few Jewish people on here who hate black people. 4Chan is perfect for you, too!

First, you have no idea if that poster is Jewish; and second, why is admiring a people so persecuted for millennia for their ability to succeed means he/she hates black people? I think Jews are deserving of admiration for their success in the face of such persecution.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Problem is, folks, that we’re talking about the white man’s structurally racist education system. Let’s create something else.

Asians seem to succeed under it.

Then again a person with high future time orientation and high impulse control tends to do better in an academic setting. Those attributes aren't evenly distributed across all populations.

Very well put “bingo”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes, in western culture there is White privilege. In eastern culture there is Asian privilege. Why is that?

In the Middle East, there is rich male, Muslim privilege. Why is that?

In India there are castes, with certain castes having much greater privilege than others. Why is that?

Why is there ever privilege and why does it persist?

Answering this question and then pursuing in the manner by which those groups gained their privilege is the only way another group’s status will rise. I can tell you that none of those groups became privileged by having an affirmative action program. AA programs inherently say the following, without admitting it, “you’re not as good as the rest of us, so we’re going to give you an unfair paper advantage, based not on merit but on a natural born trait.” This does two things: it reinforces to the oppressed that they are not considered equal and cannot compete on level terms and makes the privileged class resent the underprivileged even more. While it may have some success stories, it has a net negative affect overall.

How dare you compare Whitness and its violence to social issues in the Middle East and India?!? Where is the Lebanese Empire? The Indian colonies? Are their slaves in Iraq? Who is more likely to be assaulted, a young woman in Manhattan or Riyadh?

White culture = Violence

If you truly believe that, and you choose to live here, you are deeply dumb.

No affirmative action will ever help you. Other than a one-way ticket to the non-white country of your choosing.

PP doesn't have to wait long for things to change:
https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2012/05/17/explaining-why-minority-births-now-outnumber-white-births/

Some groups are too busy chasing material goods to make babies. They are old, tired and wanting to rest.

Not to mention they are too busy building things, inventing things, making the world go around, and supporting everyone else.

Oh look, David Duke joined us. Aren't we lucky?

So you respond to hard truths that you don’t like by calling someone a white supremacist? You are mentally and intellectually weak.

That's what liberals have been doing for three years. It's especially ridiculous when they accuse Jewish posters of being neo-Nazis (which, yes....I have seen on this forum) if they don't agree with Democratic socialism. (Ironic, in a way....demonizing Jews by calling them Nazis while at the same time essentially criticizing Nazis for demonizing Jews.)

Yes, and how can the David Duke PP explain away that most of the world would kill to live in the US, Canada, Europe, or Australia (majority white places)? Hmmm...

Sorry, I have to go vomit. Did you really just write that? And you really think that.



We have much bigger issues that affirmative action. WTAF.

Go vomit but accept the reality that white countries are the wealthy desirable countries that everyone wants. My DH’s Hong Kong colleagues are scrambling to get out of Hong Kong to Australia, Canada, or the States.

Now this really is clear to me. You are just a racist looking for a forum.

OK. Why don’t you pack up and move. to a nonwhite country? Come on, get going now! What’s the problem? You don’t want to go?

Since when is this a “white” country? Slaves built this country and whites profited.

Had traders not purchased enslaved humans from their African captors, and no such slaves come to the US, plantations would have been just fine with indentured and/or low-paid European immigrants, or perhaps something modeled on the feudal system. (NY and NE had Feudal Manors -- with "Lords" and tenants, until the revolutionary war). Recall that Europe was teaming with desperate peasants.

Perhaps we all would have been happier and better off that way.

The whole economy wouldn't have flourished without the perpetual supply of slave labor.

That explains Canada's prosperity....

You can’t say that!

/s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Problem is, folks, that we’re talking about the white man’s structurally racist education system. Let’s create something else.

Asians seem to succeed under it.

Then again a person with high future time orientation and high impulse control tends to do better in an academic setting. Those attributes aren't evenly distributed across all populations.

The dumb Asians don’t make it to the US, at least among those that emigrated within the last 50 years or so. Even if they did not have a formal education, they had streets smarts or entrepreneurial talents.

I grew up in Southern California and knew a lot of Japanese and Chinese-Americans who could trace their lineage in the US back to the late 1800s. Those kids had all the same issues you see in white and black populations that have been in the US forever: drug abuse, lack of focus on the education, obsession with pop culture/music/sports ahead of studying, truancy, minor crime, etc. Tons of Asian gangs in California, many of whom have lived in the US for a couple generations.

So when you say “Asians have succeeded!” you’re typically talking about a group with a high degree of selection bias. They had to have the money, intelligence, and/or social capital to get to the US in the 20th century. They are dissimilar from those they left behind in their home countries.

No, you are absolutely incorrect. Most of the Asian immigrants in the last 40 years or so (Asians were not allowed to come until the late 1960s) came under the family based immigrant visas not skilled (bachelors degrees or higher) employment based immigrant visas or investor visas. In addition, many refugees from SE Asian countries who came in 1970s and 1980s were definitely not highly educated or had wealth. Many also came under "unskilled worker" category of the employment based immigration and then used family based immigrant visas once they obtained citizenship.

So no, it's absolutely false that most Asian immigrants to US in the last 40-50 years had "money, intelligence, and/or social capital". I would say that most Asians actually go into the opposite category.

y
By that same token, what about the Jews? They certainly had no social capital or money when they arrived en mass veteen 1880 and 1920. They are mostly dirt-poor peasants from Easfern Europe. A generation later their kids were college graduates, and a ge erstion after that, they were doctors and lawyers.

Shouldn’t you all be on 4chan or 8chan or wherever it is that you people go?

Yes, we know you think black people suck. Maybe you even think all “POC” suck, including white Hispanics. Maybe even women.

Why do you insist on demonstrating that you are DBs again and again and again? We already know that.

Dp

If a people who have been oppressed since ancient Egypt and we're nearly genocided away into history can come here and succeed despite 3000 years of being persecuted, anyone can.

Yes, we know there are a few Jewish people on here who hate black people. 4Chan is perfect for you, too!

The only one demonstrating any sort of inferiority is you, with your lame ad hominem slurs and inability to engage in reasoned discourse.