With Love, Meghan on Netflix

[Anonymous]

Good god, the conspiracy theorists have arrived. Unhinged.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You would think that a site like this one would choose to uplift not tear down another mom no matter how petty or judgemental you are.

I’ve always stayed clear of these H&M threads, now I know why.

I don't know why you think we should uplift someone who ridicules their friends and family on TV.

Never heard her ridicule her family. She called them out for bad behavior, like telling her to get on with it while she was suicidal and pregnant.

I really don’t care that she said curtsying is like going to Medieval Times. Do you?

It was a pretty rude thing to say about meeting your future 90 something year old grandmother-in-law. And Harry looked very uncomfortable bc it WAS uncomfortable. And the way sue addressed Mindy isn't how I would speak to my friend, in public or private. But that's fine if you act like that, just expect it to raise eyebrows.

It was not uncomfortable at all. She said the Queen was lovely but that curtsying was weird to her. If that makes you uncomfortable you need to toughen up and get a thicker skin.

I would absolutely be fine joking around with a friend. I’m sorry that you don’t seem to get along with other women so you don’t get female friendships as like an overarching concept. Maybe you should take a cue from Hillaria and go to a yoga class to make some friends there?

Did you even watch the show? Meghan said she met Mindy when she came on her podcast and that they were "email pen pals." She barely knows her. Mindy took the comment in stride but it was a very weird scene. It actually looked edited, there may have been more dialogue. I can't imagine why the whole thing wasn't just cut.

Because MM wanted the Sussex issue out there to make a point. She went on Drew Barrymore show now as Megan Sussex. She intentionally raised the issue with Mindy (making her uncomfortable) and then kept it in.

I agree with her. The family needs to share a last name.
They can’t really use Windsor or Sade-Coburg-Gotha. Even Mountbatten was Battenberg.
Is Harry expected to start using the last name of Markle?

But never mind, the British tabloids still write about her every week.

Ok so the family can share a name. If someone in my professional (or personal) network called me by my maiden name, I wouldn’t have a hissy fit and lecture them on my married name and how precious it is to share a name as a family unit. Spare me.

Also, if she was the royal one, she’d still be using the markle name. She tries so hard to make things seem like it’s not about the Royal status, but it is.

Her act about the “sacred” family time around dinnertime was also so sanctimonious. Most parents are exhausted at the end of the day balancing getting home from work, their kids homework, preparing and feeding them dinner, cleaning from dinner, cleaning up after their kids, then spending time together as a family before bedtime and preparing for the next day. If you aren’t, you are probably only doing a fraction of those things because you either outsource them or stay at home and can do them during the day - both luxuries and she’s trying to share her privilege through nuggets like this, if they’re even true. She just gives off such phony vibes.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She was sort of snarky when Mindy Kaling called her "Meghan Markle" and Meghan's response was "it's funny you keep saying that because I am Sussex now."

Cringe.

It’s even cringier because Sussex isn’t even their last name. Their last name is “Mountbatten-Windsor.”

Is it also cringe when they call the William and Kate family “Cambridge” or “Wales?”

The cringe factor is the demand to be called Sussex.

No, you're wrong. The cringe factor is literally just the way she said it to her supposed friend on the tv show. If her last name is Sussex, she should ask people to use her last name, but the way she said it was so condescending and fake. I don't know how they didn't make her redo that scene.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The exact statement in May 2023 was that Charles wished a happy birthday to Archie, "wherever he was." That sounds like Charles did not even buy into the existence of Archie.

What a stupid interpretation. He never gets to see the child and it’s obviously a reference to that.

How deliberately obtuse. No wonder we are a nation of total idiots.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, so I have never gone down the Meghan rabbit hole. But in the last few weeks I have read numerous articles and listened to a bunch of podcasters, and time after time I keep hearing that so many of these Meghan&Harry followers think the kids Archie and Lillibet are fake!

I can totally buy that Meghan wore a moonbump (like Hilaria Baldwin, Beyonce, Amal Clooney, etc) or even that they used donated eggs/surrogates, who cares.

But so many of these long-term Meghan followers think the kids might be totally fake. Like they are using stand-in actors for their Christmas cards, or maybe there is a boy but he's not the Archie that has been pictured.

At first I thought they were just one-off ridiculous crazies/haters, but I am finding that long-term royal podcasters one after another keep tossing off comments that the kids don't really exist. Like, what???

Again, using a surrogate (and moonbump) or donor-egg..., so what. But to imply that one or both kids don't exist and they are using actor stand-ins for the Christmas Cards? That can't be possible, right?

Of course their kids are real. Do people really believe that not just Harry & Meghan but their entire extended families and their friends are all in on some elaborate lie? The King of England and Harry’s estranged brother and even Camilla are keeping up this facade just for funsies? Her friend / makeup artist Daniel goes on a Netflix special and lied about knowing the kids?

I don’t know why people are so stupid. It’s like life is not exciting enough for them, they need to make up lies that are so practically impossible.

The reality, which is 1000x more likely, is that they want to keep their kids out of the spotlight. With Harry’s life experience, that makes even more sense.

Ugh people are so dumb. We are doomed as a species.

I would not put anything past Meghan. One of the reasons people buy into this is because they have never taken the children to see King Charles or Thomas Markle. Charles referenced in a statement that he did not know anything about the kids..It is very odd to have kids and not take them to visit any family members. Most people are proud to share their kids with their family.

I just do not buy Meghan as a cooking and lifestyle expert. It looks so idiotic having garden parties in silk dresses with 4 friends. It's just a total fantasy land.

I do not believe that Harry and Meghan have full custody of two children. The whole charade of being parents is creepy and performative. There is no proof that either exist. The “friends” she invited into her set piece home were only told about the children. No teacher/nanny/neighbor/household employee has ever spoken about either child.

[Anonymous]

Some of you need serious professional help. Now why don’t you toddle back to your theories of how Kate is a stand in because William murdered the real one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, so I have never gone down the Meghan rabbit hole. But in the last few weeks I have read numerous articles and listened to a bunch of podcasters, and time after time I keep hearing that so many of these Meghan&Harry followers think the kids Archie and Lillibet are fake!

I can totally buy that Meghan wore a moonbump (like Hilaria Baldwin, Beyonce, Amal Clooney, etc) or even that they used donated eggs/surrogates, who cares.

But so many of these long-term Meghan followers think the kids might be totally fake. Like they are using stand-in actors for their Christmas cards, or maybe there is a boy but he's not the Archie that has been pictured.

At first I thought they were just one-off ridiculous crazies/haters, but I am finding that long-term royal podcasters one after another keep tossing off comments that the kids don't really exist. Like, what???

Again, using a surrogate (and moonbump) or donor-egg..., so what. But to imply that one or both kids don't exist and they are using actor stand-ins for the Christmas Cards? That can't be possible, right?

Of course their kids are real. Do people really believe that not just Harry & Meghan but their entire extended families and their friends are all in on some elaborate lie? The King of England and Harry’s estranged brother and even Camilla are keeping up this facade just for funsies? Her friend / makeup artist Daniel goes on a Netflix special and lied about knowing the kids?

I don’t know why people are so stupid. It’s like life is not exciting enough for them, they need to make up lies that are so practically impossible.

The reality, which is 1000x more likely, is that they want to keep their kids out of the spotlight. With Harry’s life experience, that makes even more sense.

Ugh people are so dumb. We are doomed as a species.

I would not put anything past Meghan. One of the reasons people buy into this is because they have never taken the children to see King Charles or Thomas Markle. Charles referenced in a statement that he did not know anything about the kids..It is very odd to have kids and not take them to visit any family members. Most people are proud to share their kids with their family.

I just do not buy Meghan as a cooking and lifestyle expert. It looks so idiotic having garden parties in silk dresses with 4 friends. It's just a total fantasy land.

I do not believe that Harry and Meghan have full custody of two children. The whole charade of being parents is creepy and performative. There is no proof that either exist. The “friends” she invited into her set piece home were only told about the children. No teacher/nanny/neighbor/household employee has ever spoken about either child.

This theory is unhinged. Of course they have kids. There is zero chance they could get away with faking kids forever. Not to mention, Meghan undoubtedly wanted to have kids with Harry as soon as she could to lock in her place in the royal family forever.

While I do believe they’re “hiding” the kids for privacy reasons (at least as far as Harry knows), I also think Meghan has a strategy behind it. The less we see them, the higher the value of their coming out in the public one day. There were multiple rumors that Meghan was hiding Archie until she got her desired price for a photo op and also that she was upset with the BRF because they wouldn’t allow her to accept an offer of payment for Archie photos. The less we see and know about the kids, the more intrigue builds. Mark my words, there will be a Sussex family reality show featuring the kids one day when the money and attention start drying up.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, so I have never gone down the Meghan rabbit hole. But in the last few weeks I have read numerous articles and listened to a bunch of podcasters, and time after time I keep hearing that so many of these Meghan&Harry followers think the kids Archie and Lillibet are fake!

I can totally buy that Meghan wore a moonbump (like Hilaria Baldwin, Beyonce, Amal Clooney, etc) or even that they used donated eggs/surrogates, who cares.

But so many of these long-term Meghan followers think the kids might be totally fake. Like they are using stand-in actors for their Christmas cards, or maybe there is a boy but he's not the Archie that has been pictured.

At first I thought they were just one-off ridiculous crazies/haters, but I am finding that long-term royal podcasters one after another keep tossing off comments that the kids don't really exist. Like, what???

Again, using a surrogate (and moonbump) or donor-egg..., so what. But to imply that one or both kids don't exist and they are using actor stand-ins for the Christmas Cards? That can't be possible, right?

Of course their kids are real. Do people really believe that not just Harry & Meghan but their entire extended families and their friends are all in on some elaborate lie? The King of England and Harry’s estranged brother and even Camilla are keeping up this facade just for funsies? Her friend / makeup artist Daniel goes on a Netflix special and lied about knowing the kids?

I don’t know why people are so stupid. It’s like life is not exciting enough for them, they need to make up lies that are so practically impossible.

The reality, which is 1000x more likely, is that they want to keep their kids out of the spotlight. With Harry’s life experience, that makes even more sense.

Ugh people are so dumb. We are doomed as a species.

I would not put anything past Meghan. One of the reasons people buy into this is because they have never taken the children to see King Charles or Thomas Markle. Charles referenced in a statement that he did not know anything about the kids..It is very odd to have kids and not take them to visit any family members. Most people are proud to share their kids with their family.

I just do not buy Meghan as a cooking and lifestyle expert. It looks so idiotic having garden parties in silk dresses with 4 friends. It's just a total fantasy land.

I do not believe that Harry and Meghan have full custody of two children. The whole charade of being parents is creepy and performative. There is no proof that either exist. The “friends” she invited into her set piece home were only told about the children. No teacher/nanny/neighbor/household employee has ever spoken about either child.

Their household employees surely have signed confidentiality agreements that prevent them from speaking about the Sussex family. And the school they attend certainly holds its employees to a similar standard. This would be standard for high-profile families. I don't think the fact that teachers/nannies/employees haven't spoken about the kids is suspicious at all.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love how Meghan haters are funding her lifestyle. I suspect there will also be 3rd season of her show.

LOL so true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Good god, the conspiracy theorists have arrived. Unhinged.

That is why we are in this timeline right now.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, so I have never gone down the Meghan rabbit hole. But in the last few weeks I have read numerous articles and listened to a bunch of podcasters, and time after time I keep hearing that so many of these Meghan&Harry followers think the kids Archie and Lillibet are fake!

I can totally buy that Meghan wore a moonbump (like Hilaria Baldwin, Beyonce, Amal Clooney, etc) or even that they used donated eggs/surrogates, who cares.

But so many of these long-term Meghan followers think the kids might be totally fake. Like they are using stand-in actors for their Christmas cards, or maybe there is a boy but he's not the Archie that has been pictured.

At first I thought they were just one-off ridiculous crazies/haters, but I am finding that long-term royal podcasters one after another keep tossing off comments that the kids don't really exist. Like, what???

Again, using a surrogate (and moonbump) or donor-egg..., so what. But to imply that one or both kids don't exist and they are using actor stand-ins for the Christmas Cards? That can't be possible, right?

Of course their kids are real. Do people really believe that not just Harry & Meghan but their entire extended families and their friends are all in on some elaborate lie? The King of England and Harry’s estranged brother and even Camilla are keeping up this facade just for funsies? Her friend / makeup artist Daniel goes on a Netflix special and lied about knowing the kids?

I don’t know why people are so stupid. It’s like life is not exciting enough for them, they need to make up lies that are so practically impossible.

The reality, which is 1000x more likely, is that they want to keep their kids out of the spotlight. With Harry’s life experience, that makes even more sense.

Ugh people are so dumb. We are doomed as a species.

I would not put anything past Meghan. One of the reasons people buy into this is because they have never taken the children to see King Charles or Thomas Markle. Charles referenced in a statement that he did not know anything about the kids..It is very odd to have kids and not take them to visit any family members. Most people are proud to share their kids with their family.

I just do not buy Meghan as a cooking and lifestyle expert. It looks so idiotic having garden parties in silk dresses with 4 friends. It's just a total fantasy land.

I do not believe that Harry and Meghan have full custody of two children. The whole charade of being parents is creepy and performative. There is no proof that either exist. The “friends” she invited into her set piece home were only told about the children. No teacher/nanny/neighbor/household employee has ever spoken about either child.

Their household employees surely have signed confidentiality agreements that prevent them from speaking about the Sussex family. And the school they attend certainly holds its employees to a similar standard. This would be standard for high-profile families. I don't think the fact that teachers/nannies/employees haven't spoken about the kids is suspicious at all.

+1

When have you ever heard a celeb nanny or teacher speaking about the kids they watch or teach? That would be at a minimum incredibly unprofessional and unethical. Besides the fact they probably sign NDAs or something.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She was sort of snarky when Mindy Kaling called her "Meghan Markle" and Meghan's response was "it's funny you keep saying that because I am Sussex now."

Cringe.

It’s even cringier because Sussex isn’t even their last name. Their last name is “Mountbatten-Windsor.”

Is it also cringe when they call the William and Kate family “Cambridge” or “Wales?”

The cringe factor is the demand to be called Sussex.

Maybe she does not like her last name with a dad like that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, so I have never gone down the Meghan rabbit hole. But in the last few weeks I have read numerous articles and listened to a bunch of podcasters, and time after time I keep hearing that so many of these Meghan&Harry followers think the kids Archie and Lillibet are fake!

I can totally buy that Meghan wore a moonbump (like Hilaria Baldwin, Beyonce, Amal Clooney, etc) or even that they used donated eggs/surrogates, who cares.

But so many of these long-term Meghan followers think the kids might be totally fake. Like they are using stand-in actors for their Christmas cards, or maybe there is a boy but he's not the Archie that has been pictured.

At first I thought they were just one-off ridiculous crazies/haters, but I am finding that long-term royal podcasters one after another keep tossing off comments that the kids don't really exist. Like, what???

Again, using a surrogate (and moonbump) or donor-egg..., so what. But to imply that one or both kids don't exist and they are using actor stand-ins for the Christmas Cards? That can't be possible, right?

Of course their kids are real. Do people really believe that not just Harry & Meghan but their entire extended families and their friends are all in on some elaborate lie? The King of England and Harry’s estranged brother and even Camilla are keeping up this facade just for funsies? Her friend / makeup artist Daniel goes on a Netflix special and lied about knowing the kids?

I don’t know why people are so stupid. It’s like life is not exciting enough for them, they need to make up lies that are so practically impossible.

The reality, which is 1000x more likely, is that they want to keep their kids out of the spotlight. With Harry’s life experience, that makes even more sense.

Ugh people are so dumb. We are doomed as a species.

I would not put anything past Meghan. One of the reasons people buy into this is because they have never taken the children to see King Charles or Thomas Markle. Charles referenced in a statement that he did not know anything about the kids..It is very odd to have kids and not take them to visit any family members. Most people are proud to share their kids with their family.

I just do not buy Meghan as a cooking and lifestyle expert. It looks so idiotic having garden parties in silk dresses with 4 friends. It's just a total fantasy land.

I do not believe that Harry and Meghan have full custody of two children. The whole charade of being parents is creepy and performative. There is no proof that either exist. The “friends” she invited into her set piece home were only told about the children. No teacher/nanny/neighbor/household employee has ever spoken about either child.

I would like to know why they have never been caught on camera taking the kids to and from school. To be clear, I think some kids might exist. I don't think that Meghan birthed them. She had surrogates. I also don't believe that Meghan and Harry are caring for them full time since they have never been caught on camera taking the kids to school or doing normal things that parents do. The only pictures are from holiday events or the weird photoshopped Christmas cards. The degree of hiding is weird and that's why I think they are covering for something. Will and Kate release photos for each birthday and have even allowed the press to take photos on the first day of school. I don't see why they are not doing something similar with the Sussex/Mountbatten/ mini Princess Di moneymaker.

[Anonymous]

She is trying to rebrand herself (again) away from Meghan Markle. That is basically what it comes down to. And she is merching off of the Sussex title.

She was over-explaining about how amazing it was to share a last name with her kids as an 'excuse'.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok, so I have never gone down the Meghan rabbit hole. But in the last few weeks I have read numerous articles and listened to a bunch of podcasters, and time after time I keep hearing that so many of these Meghan&Harry followers think the kids Archie and Lillibet are fake!

I can totally buy that Meghan wore a moonbump (like Hilaria Baldwin, Beyonce, Amal Clooney, etc) or even that they used donated eggs/surrogates, who cares.

But so many of these long-term Meghan followers think the kids might be totally fake. Like they are using stand-in actors for their Christmas cards, or maybe there is a boy but he's not the Archie that has been pictured.

At first I thought they were just one-off ridiculous crazies/haters, but I am finding that long-term royal podcasters one after another keep tossing off comments that the kids don't really exist. Like, what???

Again, using a surrogate (and moonbump) or donor-egg..., so what. But to imply that one or both kids don't exist and they are using actor stand-ins for the Christmas Cards? That can't be possible, right?

Of course their kids are real. Do people really believe that not just Harry & Meghan but their entire extended families and their friends are all in on some elaborate lie? The King of England and Harry’s estranged brother and even Camilla are keeping up this facade just for funsies? Her friend / makeup artist Daniel goes on a Netflix special and lied about knowing the kids?

I don’t know why people are so stupid. It’s like life is not exciting enough for them, they need to make up lies that are so practically impossible.

The reality, which is 1000x more likely, is that they want to keep their kids out of the spotlight. With Harry’s life experience, that makes even more sense.

Ugh people are so dumb. We are doomed as a species.

I would not put anything past Meghan. One of the reasons people buy into this is because they have never taken the children to see King Charles or Thomas Markle. Charles referenced in a statement that he did not know anything about the kids..It is very odd to have kids and not take them to visit any family members. Most people are proud to share their kids with their family.

I just do not buy Meghan as a cooking and lifestyle expert. It looks so idiotic having garden parties in silk dresses with 4 friends. It's just a total fantasy land.

I do not believe that Harry and Meghan have full custody of two children. The whole charade of being parents is creepy and performative. There is no proof that either exist. The “friends” she invited into her set piece home were only told about the children. No teacher/nanny/neighbor/household employee has ever spoken about either child.

I would like to know why they have never been caught on camera taking the kids to and from school. To be clear, I think some kids might exist. I don't think that Meghan birthed them. She had surrogates. I also don't believe that Meghan and Harry are caring for them full time since they have never been caught on camera taking the kids to school or doing normal things that parents do. The only pictures are from holiday events or the weird photoshopped Christmas cards. The degree of hiding is weird and that's why I think they are covering for something. Will and Kate release photos for each birthday and have even allowed the press to take photos on the first day of school. I don't see why they are not doing something similar with the Sussex/Mountbatten/ mini Princess Di moneymaker.

I am no Meghan fan but if they allowed the press to take photos of their first day of school or whatever they would get mocked even more as trying to import royalty to Cali because it would be super cringe. My guess is they have threatened the press to the nth degree not to release papped pics of the kids.