What happens to Kamala’s momentum now the DNC is over?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m 28 weeks pregnant.

Out of curiosity and for the sake of not just assuming this is possible in America, I called two different random clinics in Colorado about late term abortions.

Both said I could come in and get the procedure done, there wasn’t a limit on gestational age. Both said I didn’t need any medical or health reason, simply a personal decision.

10k and I could go kill my baby who at this stage is more than viable outside the womb, simply because I wanted to.

And now you've got no choice but to do it, to really own the libs?

Take video when you go to one of the clinics and you can get lots of social media hits. You can be a star of the right wing firmament. Trump will probably give you a cabinet position.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Kamala giving an interview today?

Tomorrow?

She said before the end of the month.

I know you are trying to make this a thing.

Just so you, I am not worried. She is a candidate that keeps her word and pays attention to details so she would not have made this commitment without planning to meet it.

I realize this is confusing to Trump supporters as he was always promising some sort of plan (e.g. healthcare, infrastructure) in two weeks and that two weeks never came.

Harris will keep her word and she will show up at the debate prepared and she will share more policy details.

The thing is, the vast majority of people calling for these details do not care, they support a candidate that provides no details, flips wherever and whenever is serves his interest.

You are not looking for solutions to the country’s issues, you are looking for sound bites that misconstrue the policies.

She has said what she intends to do and that she is pragmatic and will govern with common sense.

Everything else is MAGA flailing for a sound bite.

Exactly.

+1. She’s obviously smarter, more articulate and more capable of governing than Trump has ever beebn, nor will ever be. Sounding confident is not the same as competence.
There are strategic reasons for including Walz in interviews that have nothing to do with lack of competence to govern with respect to Harris.

She failed the bar exam.

Trump, however, lost the last time he ran for President. It is very rare that a party is willing to renominate the person who cost them the last presidential election.

The Republican party wanted nothing LESS than to nominate Trump. However, their voters voted for him so what they were willing to do was of no consequence. See how that works?

The GOP wanted to nominate the former loser and they did. They probably will lose this election. See how that works?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Kamala giving an interview today?

Tomorrow?

She said before the end of the month.

I know you are trying to make this a thing.

Just so you, I am not worried. She is a candidate that keeps her word and pays attention to details so she would not have made this commitment without planning to meet it.

I realize this is confusing to Trump supporters as he was always promising some sort of plan (e.g. healthcare, infrastructure) in two weeks and that two weeks never came.

Harris will keep her word and she will show up at the debate prepared and she will share more policy details.

The thing is, the vast majority of people calling for these details do not care, they support a candidate that provides no details, flips wherever and whenever is serves his interest.

You are not looking for solutions to the country’s issues, you are looking for sound bites that misconstrue the policies.

She has said what she intends to do and that she is pragmatic and will govern with common sense.

Everything else is MAGA flailing for a sound bite.

Exactly.

+1. She’s obviously smarter, more articulate and more capable of governing than Trump has ever beebn, nor will ever be. Sounding confident is not the same as competence.
There are strategic reasons for including Walz in interviews that have nothing to do with lack of competence to govern with respect to Harris.

She failed the bar exam.

Trump, however, lost the last time he ran for President. It is very rare that a party is willing to renominate the person who cost them the last presidential election.

The Republican party wanted nothing LESS than to nominate Trump. However, their voters voted for him so what they were willing to do was of no consequence. See how that works?

The MAGA party doesn’t know how to govern. That’s what’s happened. They could have gotten rid of Trump at any time but they are weak losers.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Kamala giving an interview today?

Tomorrow?

She said before the end of the month.

I know you are trying to make this a thing.

Just so you, I am not worried. She is a candidate that keeps her word and pays attention to details so she would not have made this commitment without planning to meet it.

I realize this is confusing to Trump supporters as he was always promising some sort of plan (e.g. healthcare, infrastructure) in two weeks and that two weeks never came.

Harris will keep her word and she will show up at the debate prepared and she will share more policy details.

The thing is, the vast majority of people calling for these details do not care, they support a candidate that provides no details, flips wherever and whenever is serves his interest.

You are not looking for solutions to the country’s issues, you are looking for sound bites that misconstrue the policies.

She has said what she intends to do and that she is pragmatic and will govern with common sense.

Everything else is MAGA flailing for a sound bite.

Exactly.

+1. She’s obviously smarter, more articulate and more capable of governing than Trump has ever beebn, nor will ever be. Sounding confident is not the same as competence.
There are strategic reasons for including Walz in interviews that have nothing to do with lack of competence to govern with respect to Harris.

She failed the bar exam.

Trump, however, lost the last time he ran for President. It is very rare that a party is willing to renominate the person who cost them the last presidential election.

The Republican party wanted nothing LESS than to nominate Trump. However, their voters voted for him so what they were willing to do was of no consequence. See how that works?

And if voters are upset, they can choose to vote for someone else or not vote at all. That’s our right, and yours too. As long as the votes all counted and there’s a peaceful transition of power, we remain a democracy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Kamala giving an interview today?

Tomorrow?

She said before the end of the month.

I know you are trying to make this a thing.

Just so you, I am not worried. She is a candidate that keeps her word and pays attention to details so she would not have made this commitment without planning to meet it.

I realize this is confusing to Trump supporters as he was always promising some sort of plan (e.g. healthcare, infrastructure) in two weeks and that two weeks never came.

Harris will keep her word and she will show up at the debate prepared and she will share more policy details.

The thing is, the vast majority of people calling for these details do not care, they support a candidate that provides no details, flips wherever and whenever is serves his interest.

You are not looking for solutions to the country’s issues, you are looking for sound bites that misconstrue the policies.

She has said what she intends to do and that she is pragmatic and will govern with common sense.

Everything else is MAGA flailing for a sound bite.

Exactly.

+1. She’s obviously smarter, more articulate and more capable of governing than Trump has ever beebn, nor will ever be. Sounding confident is not the same as competence.
There are strategic reasons for including Walz in interviews that have nothing to do with lack of competence to govern with respect to Harris.

She failed the bar exam.

And then she passed, and then had a career.

Trump failed at everything except inheriting $400M from his father and keeping some of the money he stole from business projects.

Good God. You cannot possibly make this statement in any seriousness if you know anything about his business.

Which business exactly. Trump university-fraud. Trump airlines - bust. Trump steaks- bust. Trump casino - bankrupt. Trump real estate -bankrupt seven times. Trump trading cards -grifter 101. Trump social media- stock down 70% and Trump currently being sued by the actual founders.

And yet, he’s still worth upwards of 5+ billion. Total failure he is.

Someone who inherited more than $400 million in 1999 and is only worth (probably a lot less than) $5 billion now is absolutely a failure, yes.

This actually made me laugh. What is your net worth?

A lot more than 10x my net worth in 1999. My investments are more than 10x my net worth from 15 years ago.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Kamala giving an interview today?

Tomorrow?

She said before the end of the month.

I know you are trying to make this a thing.

Just so you, I am not worried. She is a candidate that keeps her word and pays attention to details so she would not have made this commitment without planning to meet it.

I realize this is confusing to Trump supporters as he was always promising some sort of plan (e.g. healthcare, infrastructure) in two weeks and that two weeks never came.

Harris will keep her word and she will show up at the debate prepared and she will share more policy details.

The thing is, the vast majority of people calling for these details do not care, they support a candidate that provides no details, flips wherever and whenever is serves his interest.

You are not looking for solutions to the country’s issues, you are looking for sound bites that misconstrue the policies.

She has said what she intends to do and that she is pragmatic and will govern with common sense.

Everything else is MAGA flailing for a sound bite.

Exactly.

+1. She’s obviously smarter, more articulate and more capable of governing than Trump has ever beebn, nor will ever be. Sounding confident is not the same as competence.
There are strategic reasons for including Walz in interviews that have nothing to do with lack of competence to govern with respect to Harris.

She failed the bar exam.

Trump, however, lost the last time he ran for President. It is very rare that a party is willing to renominate the person who cost them the last presidential election.

The Republican party wanted nothing LESS than to nominate Trump. However, their voters voted for him so what they were willing to do was of no consequence. See how that works?

The MAGA party doesn’t know how to govern. That’s what’s happened. They could have gotten rid of Trump at any time but they are weak losers.

How would you propose they "get rid" of Trump? Ban him from social media? Indict him with multiple felonies? Assassin's gun?

[Anonymous]

If Kamala was actually ahead in the polls, they would not be:

-Copying Trump’s policies
-Trying to appear moderate
-Forcing RFK Jr. to stay on the ballot
-Weaponizing DOJ against Trump
-Attempting to assassinate Trump

The enemy’s behavior tells the story.

They are afraid.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Kamala giving an interview today?

Tomorrow?

She said before the end of the month.

I know you are trying to make this a thing.

Just so you, I am not worried. She is a candidate that keeps her word and pays attention to details so she would not have made this commitment without planning to meet it.

I realize this is confusing to Trump supporters as he was always promising some sort of plan (e.g. healthcare, infrastructure) in two weeks and that two weeks never came.

Harris will keep her word and she will show up at the debate prepared and she will share more policy details.

The thing is, the vast majority of people calling for these details do not care, they support a candidate that provides no details, flips wherever and whenever is serves his interest.

You are not looking for solutions to the country’s issues, you are looking for sound bites that misconstrue the policies.

She has said what she intends to do and that she is pragmatic and will govern with common sense.

Everything else is MAGA flailing for a sound bite.

Exactly.

+1. She’s obviously smarter, more articulate and more capable of governing than Trump has ever beebn, nor will ever be. Sounding confident is not the same as competence.
There are strategic reasons for including Walz in interviews that have nothing to do with lack of competence to govern with respect to Harris.

She failed the bar exam.

Trump, however, lost the last time he ran for President. It is very rare that a party is willing to renominate the person who cost them the last presidential election.

The Republican party wanted nothing LESS than to nominate Trump. However, their voters voted for him so what they were willing to do was of no consequence. See how that works?

The MAGA party doesn’t know how to govern. That’s what’s happened. They could have gotten rid of Trump at any time but they are weak losers.

How would you propose they "get rid" of Trump? Ban him from social media? Indict him with multiple felonies? Assassin's gun?

The poster meant nominate Haley or someone other then the candidate that lost last time around. Too late now

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Kamala giving an interview today?

Tomorrow?

She said before the end of the month.

I know you are trying to make this a thing.

Just so you, I am not worried. She is a candidate that keeps her word and pays attention to details so she would not have made this commitment without planning to meet it.

I realize this is confusing to Trump supporters as he was always promising some sort of plan (e.g. healthcare, infrastructure) in two weeks and that two weeks never came.

Harris will keep her word and she will show up at the debate prepared and she will share more policy details.

The thing is, the vast majority of people calling for these details do not care, they support a candidate that provides no details, flips wherever and whenever is serves his interest.

You are not looking for solutions to the country’s issues, you are looking for sound bites that misconstrue the policies.

She has said what she intends to do and that she is pragmatic and will govern with common sense.

Everything else is MAGA flailing for a sound bite.

Exactly.

+1. She’s obviously smarter, more articulate and more capable of governing than Trump has ever beebn, nor will ever be. Sounding confident is not the same as competence.
There are strategic reasons for including Walz in interviews that have nothing to do with lack of competence to govern with respect to Harris.

She failed the bar exam.

Trump, however, lost the last time he ran for President. It is very rare that a party is willing to renominate the person who cost them the last presidential election.

The Republican party wanted nothing LESS than to nominate Trump. However, their voters voted for him so what they were willing to do was of no consequence. See how that works?

The MAGA party doesn’t know how to govern. That’s what’s happened. They could have gotten rid of Trump at any time but they are weak losers.

How would you propose they "get rid" of Trump? Ban him from social media? Indict him with multiple felonies? Assassin's gun?

The poster meant nominate Haley or someone other then the candidate that lost last time around. Too late now

I know that, but the majority didn't vote for Haley. What do you do if the dogs don't like the dog food?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Kamala was actually ahead in the polls, they would not be:

-Copying Trump’s policies
-Trying to appear moderate
-Forcing RFK Jr. to stay on the ballot
-Weaponizing DOJ against Trump
-Attempting to assassinate Trump

The enemy’s behavior tells the story.

They are afraid.

“The enemy.”
Okay, Sun Tzu.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:If Kamala was actually ahead in the polls, they would not be:

-Copying Trump’s policies
-Trying to appear moderate
-Forcing RFK Jr. to stay on the ballot
-Weaponizing DOJ against Trump
-Attempting to assassinate Trump

The enemy’s behavior tells the story.

They are afraid.

No, comrade, we aren't afraid of the fat fraud and his weird VP candidate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Kamala giving an interview today?

Tomorrow?

She said before the end of the month.

I know you are trying to make this a thing.

Just so you, I am not worried. She is a candidate that keeps her word and pays attention to details so she would not have made this commitment without planning to meet it.

I realize this is confusing to Trump supporters as he was always promising some sort of plan (e.g. healthcare, infrastructure) in two weeks and that two weeks never came.

Harris will keep her word and she will show up at the debate prepared and she will share more policy details.

The thing is, the vast majority of people calling for these details do not care, they support a candidate that provides no details, flips wherever and whenever is serves his interest.

You are not looking for solutions to the country’s issues, you are looking for sound bites that misconstrue the policies.

She has said what she intends to do and that she is pragmatic and will govern with common sense.

Everything else is MAGA flailing for a sound bite.

Exactly.

+1. She’s obviously smarter, more articulate and more capable of governing than Trump has ever beebn, nor will ever be. Sounding confident is not the same as competence.
There are strategic reasons for including Walz in interviews that have nothing to do with lack of competence to govern with respect to Harris.

She failed the bar exam.

Trump, however, lost the last time he ran for President. It is very rare that a party is willing to renominate the person who cost them the last presidential election.

The Republican party wanted nothing LESS than to nominate Trump. However, their voters voted for him so what they were willing to do was of no consequence. See how that works?

The MAGA party doesn’t know how to govern. That’s what’s happened. They could have gotten rid of Trump at any time but they are weak losers.

How would you propose they "get rid" of Trump? Ban him from social media? Indict him with multiple felonies? Assassin's gun?

Uhhh - nominate someone else and stop letting him lead them all into the deep blue sea? It's not that hard.

[Anonymous]

I see more yard signs now for Harris than Trump

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Kamala giving an interview today?

Tomorrow?

She said before the end of the month.

I know you are trying to make this a thing.

Just so you, I am not worried. She is a candidate that keeps her word and pays attention to details so she would not have made this commitment without planning to meet it.

I realize this is confusing to Trump supporters as he was always promising some sort of plan (e.g. healthcare, infrastructure) in two weeks and that two weeks never came.

Harris will keep her word and she will show up at the debate prepared and she will share more policy details.

The thing is, the vast majority of people calling for these details do not care, they support a candidate that provides no details, flips wherever and whenever is serves his interest.

You are not looking for solutions to the country’s issues, you are looking for sound bites that misconstrue the policies.

She has said what she intends to do and that she is pragmatic and will govern with common sense.

Everything else is MAGA flailing for a sound bite.

Exactly.

+1. She’s obviously smarter, more articulate and more capable of governing than Trump has ever beebn, nor will ever be. Sounding confident is not the same as competence.
There are strategic reasons for including Walz in interviews that have nothing to do with lack of competence to govern with respect to Harris.

She failed the bar exam.

Trump, however, lost the last time he ran for President. It is very rare that a party is willing to renominate the person who cost them the last presidential election.

The Republican party wanted nothing LESS than to nominate Trump. However, their voters voted for him so what they were willing to do was of no consequence. See how that works?

The MAGA party doesn’t know how to govern. That’s what’s happened. They could have gotten rid of Trump at any time but they are weak losers.

How would you propose they "get rid" of Trump? Ban him from social media? Indict him with multiple felonies? Assassin's gun?

Uhhh - nominate someone else and stop letting him lead them all into the deep blue sea? It's not that hard.

As I keep saying, they CAN'T nominate someone else when the VOTERS KEEP PICKING TRUMP. Unless they skip primaries altogether. Hmm

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is Kamala giving an interview today?

Tomorrow?

She said before the end of the month.

I know you are trying to make this a thing.

Just so you, I am not worried. She is a candidate that keeps her word and pays attention to details so she would not have made this commitment without planning to meet it.

I realize this is confusing to Trump supporters as he was always promising some sort of plan (e.g. healthcare, infrastructure) in two weeks and that two weeks never came.

Harris will keep her word and she will show up at the debate prepared and she will share more policy details.

The thing is, the vast majority of people calling for these details do not care, they support a candidate that provides no details, flips wherever and whenever is serves his interest.

You are not looking for solutions to the country’s issues, you are looking for sound bites that misconstrue the policies.

She has said what she intends to do and that she is pragmatic and will govern with common sense.

Everything else is MAGA flailing for a sound bite.

Exactly.

+1. She’s obviously smarter, more articulate and more capable of governing than Trump has ever beebn, nor will ever be. Sounding confident is not the same as competence.
There are strategic reasons for including Walz in interviews that have nothing to do with lack of competence to govern with respect to Harris.

She failed the bar exam.

Trump, however, lost the last time he ran for President. It is very rare that a party is willing to renominate the person who cost them the last presidential election.

The Republican party wanted nothing LESS than to nominate Trump. However, their voters voted for him so what they were willing to do was of no consequence. See how that works?

The MAGA party doesn’t know how to govern. That’s what’s happened. They could have gotten rid of Trump at any time but they are weak losers.

How would you propose they "get rid" of Trump? Ban him from social media? Indict him with multiple felonies? Assassin's gun?

The Senate Republicans could have convicted him and barred him from office following the January 6 impeachment.