Stefanik Ivy Presidentd

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:It’s great she resigned, but she needs to be prosecuted for her actions facilitating the ongoing genocide being perpetrated against Jews.


Not to mention adding additional charges for her roles in the Donner Party tragedy, and the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand!

When will she be held to account for these crimes!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:U. Of Chicago:

https://chicago.suntimes.com/2006/3/6/18469992/argosy-university-changes-mind-fires-official-accused-of-plagiarism


Did you just google "plagiarism + academic" and paste the first results without even looking into what happened in each case?

Don't answer. We already know lol.


NP; why? What did you find??


I found Francesca Gino of HBS, who is currently embroiled in a huge data falsification scandal and is suing Harvard for sanctions they imposed after they investigated her subsequent to some some bloggers exposing her. Kind of undermines the narrative that Harvard doesn't or won't ever hold academics accountable though.


You obviously know nothing about the Gino case if that’s your example of the system supposedly working.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:U. Of Chicago:

https://chicago.suntimes.com/2006/3/6/18469992/argosy-university-changes-mind-fires-official-accused-of-plagiarism


Did you just google "plagiarism + academic" and paste the first results without even looking into what happened in each case?

Don't answer. We already know lol.


NP; why? What did you find??


I found Francesca Gino of HBS, who is currently embroiled in a huge data falsification scandal and is suing Harvard for sanctions they imposed after they investigated her subsequent to some some bloggers exposing her. Kind of undermines the narrative that Harvard doesn't or won't ever hold academics accountable though.


You obviously know nothing about the Gino case if that’s your example of the system supposedly working.


Can you read?
Anonymous
Harvard may have opted to keep Gay, but its brand has been damaged. It could have avoided this entire situation by giving Gay better talking points.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Harvard may have opted to keep Gay, but its brand has been damaged. It could have avoided this entire situation by giving Gay better talking points.


Harvard is a very strong brand. I don’t think it will be affected much. No one will turn Harvard down if admitted
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Harvard may have opted to keep Gay, but its brand has been damaged. It could have avoided this entire situation by giving Gay better talking points.


Harvard is a very strong brand. I don’t think it will be affected much. No one will turn Harvard down if admitted


True. Harvard's leaders know they're basically accountable to no one.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:U. Of Chicago:

https://chicago.suntimes.com/2006/3/6/18469992/argosy-university-changes-mind-fires-official-accused-of-plagiarism


Did you just google "plagiarism + academic" and paste the first results without even looking into what happened in each case?

Don't answer. We already know lol.


NP; why? What did you find??


I found Francesca Gino of HBS, who is currently embroiled in a huge data falsification scandal and is suing Harvard for sanctions they imposed after they investigated her subsequent to some some bloggers exposing her. Kind of undermines the narrative that Harvard doesn't or won't ever hold academics accountable though.


You obviously know nothing about the Gino case if that’s your example of the system supposedly working.


Can you read?


Read what, specifically? You obviously know nothing about the Gino case. I assume you found out about its existence tonight, based on the obvious ignorance you are displaying.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Harvard may have opted to keep Gay, but its brand has been damaged. It could have avoided this entire situation by giving Gay better talking points.


I assure you Harvard's brand is just fine.
Anonymous
Harvard is showing that to be truly elite, you need diverse leadership. Harvard is also showing that some groups cannot cope with a loss of control, and you need to ignore the clanging on their idiot bells.

Bravo Harvard!
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Harvard may have opted to keep Gay, but its brand has been damaged. It could have avoided this entire situation by giving Gay better talking points.


Harvard is a very strong brand. I don’t think it will be affected much. No one will turn Harvard down if admitted


Correct! But I will be advising my children to not apply in the first place.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:U. Of Chicago:

https://chicago.suntimes.com/2006/3/6/18469992/argosy-university-changes-mind-fires-official-accused-of-plagiarism


Did you just google "plagiarism + academic" and paste the first results without even looking into what happened in each case?

Don't answer. We already know lol.


NP; why? What did you find??


I found Francesca Gino of HBS, who is currently embroiled in a huge data falsification scandal and is suing Harvard for sanctions they imposed after they investigated her subsequent to some some bloggers exposing her. Kind of undermines the narrative that Harvard doesn't or won't ever hold academics accountable though.


You obviously know nothing about the Gino case if that’s your example of the system supposedly working.


Can you read?


Read what, specifically? You obviously know nothing about the Gino case. I assume you found out about its existence tonight, based on the obvious ignorance you are displaying.


Nope, known about it. Do you care to stop putting words into people's mouths?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Harvard may have opted to keep Gay, but its brand has been damaged. It could have avoided this entire situation by giving Gay better talking points.


Harvard is a very strong brand. I don’t think it will be affected much. No one will turn Harvard down if admitted


Correct! But I will be advising my children to not apply in the first place.


That’s nice! Your kids could not get in.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Harvard is showing that to be truly elite, you need diverse leadership. Harvard is also showing that some groups cannot cope with a loss of control, and you need to ignore the clanging on their idiot bells.

Bravo Harvard!


Here's to elitism of a different kind.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Harvard is showing that to be truly elite, you need diverse leadership. Harvard is also showing that some groups cannot cope with a loss of control, and you need to ignore the clanging on their idiot bells.

Bravo Harvard!


Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Harvard is showing that to be truly elite, you need diverse leadership. Harvard is also showing that some groups cannot cope with a loss of control, and you need to ignore the clanging on their idiot bells.

Bravo Harvard!


Harvard is showing the world that certain groups are favored and certain viewpoints are permissible on their campus. Its leaders are as biased as any others.
Forum Index » Political Discussion
Go to: