Charlie Kirk shot at Utah Valley University

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I don’t understand this at all. Why are they celebrating someone who probably hated them for the color of their skin?

Because they know the truth. He didn't hate anyone. He considered all of us God's children.
Sorry you have been so brainwashed with lies.

Sure, he didn't hate anyone. He just thought black women had less brain capacity than other God's children. That's not hate at all.

Candace and Charlie were good friends dummy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mass shootings and school shootings were not a thing until our politicians let the assault weapons ban expire instead of renewing it. We reap what they sowed.

In 1966 a man went to the top of an observation tower on the campus of UT Austin with a semiautomatic rifle, a bolt action rifle, a shotgun and several pistols. He shot and killed 15 people and injured 31 others.

The Wiles-Barre shootings happened in 1982. The hooter used a semiautomatic rifle to kill 13 people and wound one other.

The San Ysidro McDonald’s massacre happened in 1984. It was perpetrated with a semiautomatic rifle, shotgun and pistol. There were 22 people killed and 19 injured.

In 1990 a shooter in Jacksonville, FL killed 11 and wounded 6 with a semiautomatic rifle and a pistol.

These are just the major semiautomatic rifle mass shootings prior to the AWB. School shootings and Mass shootings were “a thing” decades before the end of the ban.

Another mass shooting with an AK-47 happened in 2000, during the AWB, in Massachusetts. A guy killed 7 people at his office.

Guns have been around for literally hundreds of years. I actually find it no coincidence that these mass shootings only began around the time they started phasing out insane asylums.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:NP. Are people saying the shooter was really a leftist and it was over trans rights? Is this accurate??

Sorry I’m just catching up

He was radicalized and wanted to kill someone he never met but didn’t like. Apparently hated him because of what he said and how he was a right wing political activist on debate tours.

Or it could have been because Charlie Kirk was too far to the left. We don't really know yet. Or, it might not have been about politics but about some online weirdo club the shooter was in. We don't quite know about the roommate. The roommate turned him in and may be his boyfriend. But, regardless, he might not have been part of the same online small group thing.

The roommate didn’t “turn him in.” His father and their pastor did. The roommate did not contact authorities, but offered up messages to authorities at some point afterward when questioned by police.

This is all false. Yes, someone turned him in yet he is not the killer. He was a friend or ally of Kirk.

He confessed to father, father called pastor who called US Marshalls and they came to get him. Investigators contacted the roommate where he shared the messages, the roommate didn’t call them.

The father identified Tyler in the video but may not have even been aware of what his job even really was. Tyler explained everything, the truth, but still had to turn himself in. The roommate/colleague, Lance had no idea what went down. He thought Tyler was going to exchange info with Kirk or Kirk’s assistants. Tyler could have been carrying a laptop with him.

You’re so far down Crazy Lane I guess there’s no turning back.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the Governor of Utah says the suspect is not cooperating, I think that means tbe suspect is not going along with the government's preconceiived storyline.

Exactly.

+1

I fear for his life. Dead men tell no tales.

Right on cue

He's being seen by psychiatrist Wolly Jest to make sure he gets the best treatment and nothing happens to him before we get a clear and rational explanation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the Governor of Utah says the suspect is not cooperating, I think that means tbe suspect is not going along with the government's preconceiived storyline.

Exactly.

+1

I fear for his life. Dead men tell no tales.

Right on cue

He's being seen by psychiatrist Wolly Jest to make sure he gets the best treatment and nothing happens to him before we get a clear and rational explanation.

Rational is subjective. To Trump and the right, the only rational explanation is it was carried lut by the left. They just can't deal with the possibility that it was their own who killed Kirk.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mass shootings and school shootings were not a thing until our politicians let the assault weapons ban expire instead of renewing it. We reap what they sowed.

In 1966 a man went to the top of an observation tower on the campus of UT Austin with a semiautomatic rifle, a bolt action rifle, a shotgun and several pistols. He shot and killed 15 people and injured 31 others.

The Wiles-Barre shootings happened in 1982. The hooter used a semiautomatic rifle to kill 13 people and wound one other.

The San Ysidro McDonald’s massacre happened in 1984. It was perpetrated with a semiautomatic rifle, shotgun and pistol. There were 22 people killed and 19 injured.

In 1990 a shooter in Jacksonville, FL killed 11 and wounded 6 with a semiautomatic rifle and a pistol.

These are just the major semiautomatic rifle mass shootings prior to the AWB. School shootings and Mass shootings were “a thing” decades before the end of the ban.

Another mass shooting with an AK-47 happened in 2000, during the AWB, in Massachusetts. A guy killed 7 people at his office.

Guns have been around for literally hundreds of years. I actually find it no coincidence that these mass shootings only began around the time they started phasing out insane asylums.

While that is true, no one was taking that shot or committing mass murder with a musket.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This case won’t close until Patel, the FBI, and Utah police firmly blame liberals.

Maybe, but Patel doesn’t seem to very good at opsec. Everything is going leak.

[Anonymous]

It's all "the libs, the libs, the libs" yet nobody on the right wants to acknowledge the online right wing radicalization and brainwashing out there leading to violence. The mass shooter at Evergreen high school in Colorado last week was a white supremacist. https://www.denver7.com/news/evergreen/report-reveals-evergreen-high-school-shooters-alarming-online-activity-linked-to-violence-and-white-supremacy

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the Governor of Utah says the suspect is not cooperating, I think that means tbe suspect is not going along with the government's preconceiived storyline.

Exactly.

+1

I fear for his life. Dead men tell no tales.

Right on cue

He's being seen by psychiatrist Wolly Jest to make sure he gets the best treatment and nothing happens to him before we get a clear and rational explanation.

Rational is subjective. To Trump and the right, the only rational explanation is it was carried lut by the left. They just can't deal with the possibility that it was their own who killed Kirk.

Gov Cox (not exactly Mr MAGA) who is leading the investigation said the killer was indoctrinated online by leftist ideology on every Sunday show. How was he one of their own?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the Governor of Utah says the suspect is not cooperating, I think that means tbe suspect is not going along with the government's preconceiived storyline.

Exactly.

+1

I fear for his life. Dead men tell no tales.

Right on cue

He's being seen by psychiatrist Wolly Jest to make sure he gets the best treatment and nothing happens to him before we get a clear and rational explanation.

Rational is subjective. To Trump and the right, the only rational explanation is it was carried lut by the left. They just can't deal with the possibility that it was their own who killed Kirk.

Gov Cox (not exactly Mr MAGA) who is leading the investigation said the killer was indoctrinated online by leftist ideology on every Sunday show. How was he one of their own?

Cox changed his tune after Trump.called and spoke to him. What did Trump tell him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the Governor of Utah says the suspect is not cooperating, I think that means tbe suspect is not going along with the government's preconceiived storyline.

Exactly.

+1

I fear for his life. Dead men tell no tales.

Right on cue

He's being seen by psychiatrist Wolly Jest to make sure he gets the best treatment and nothing happens to him before we get a clear and rational explanation.

Rational is subjective. To Trump and the right, the only rational explanation is it was carried lut by the left. They just can't deal with the possibility that it was their own who killed Kirk.

Gov Cox (not exactly Mr MAGA) who is leading the investigation said the killer was indoctrinated online by leftist ideology on every Sunday show. How was he one of their own?

Cox changed his tune after Trump.called and spoke to him. What did Trump tell him?

Ok 👍

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's all "the libs, the libs, the libs" yet nobody on the right wants to acknowledge the online right wing radicalization and brainwashing out there leading to violence. The mass shooter at Evergreen high school in Colorado last week was a white supremacist. https://www.denver7.com/news/evergreen/report-reveals-evergreen-high-school-shooters-alarming-online-activity-linked-to-violence-and-white-supremacy

Yes, why are MAGA spawn shooting up high schools and college speakers?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Here's a helpful explainer for the slow ones on here:

probably need to repost this one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the Governor of Utah says the suspect is not cooperating, I think that means tbe suspect is not going along with the government's preconceiived storyline.

Exactly.

+1

I fear for his life. Dead men tell no tales.

Right on cue

He's being seen by psychiatrist Wolly Jest to make sure he gets the best treatment and nothing happens to him before we get a clear and rational explanation.

Rational is subjective. To Trump and the right, the only rational explanation is it was carried lut by the left. They just can't deal with the possibility that it was their own who killed Kirk.

Gov Cox (not exactly Mr MAGA) who is leading the investigation said the killer was indoctrinated online by leftist ideology on every Sunday show. How was he one of their own?

I just read an article that investigators are pointing to gaming and the dark internet subculture as the source of that indoctrination. Even Cox recently made that reference. It doesn’t seem unlikely that they misunderstood the nature of the radicalization early on by thinking in conventional terms (investigators probably understood). Hopefully the poster who was celebrating yesterday about wasting “350 pages” on the topic sticks around.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When the Governor of Utah says the suspect is not cooperating, I think that means tbe suspect is not going along with the government's preconceiived storyline.

Exactly.

+1

I fear for his life. Dead men tell no tales.

Right on cue

He's being seen by psychiatrist Wolly Jest to make sure he gets the best treatment and nothing happens to him before we get a clear and rational explanation.

Rational is subjective. To Trump and the right, the only rational explanation is it was carried lut by the left. They just can't deal with the possibility that it was their own who killed Kirk.

Gov Cox (not exactly Mr MAGA) who is leading the investigation said the killer was indoctrinated online by leftist ideology on every Sunday show. How was he one of their own?

I just read an article that investigators are pointing to gaming and the dark internet subculture as the source of that indoctrination. Even Cox recently made that reference. It doesn’t seem unlikely that they misunderstood the nature of the radicalization early on by thinking in conventional terms (investigators probably understood). Hopefully the poster who was celebrating yesterday about wasting “350 pages” on the topic sticks around.

They won't. "Confirmation Bias" has entered the conversation.