
This is correct. The comparison to gay students is invalid because the point of social transition is to bring something out into the open. Changing names, using different bathrooms, overnight sleeping arrangements, all of these are official acts by the school that are visible and apparent. That's very different from confessing some feelings and expecting the person to whom you're speaking to respect that confidence. In the former case, deliberately keeping parents in the dark about all of these official actions by the school means that the parents have less right to know what's going on in their kids' lives than their own classmates do. |
Time for unisex bathrooms. |
+1 |
People can be “out” in different ways with different people. Coming out at school is different than at home. Again, schools are not there to fix your family’s issues. And they shouldn’t “out” a kid without their permission. |
No. School systems should not spend what would amount to millions of dollars in infrastructure changes to appease a fad. |
Correct, teachers are not co-parents. If they see a student struggling with mental issues, gender confusion, this should be reported to the parent for them to "fix the family issues". Your words, not mine. |
+1 |
Mental issues are complicated. Teachers can share some observations but aren’t diagnosticians so they can only say so much. Gender identity isn’t necessarily a “mental issue”. Only if the person is struggling. Schools aren’t there to facilitate discussions for dysfunctional families. If your kid doesn’t want to come out to you then that’s on you. They can’t fix intolerant parents. |
PP here, you're totally twisting this. I only added the parenthetical as a clarification because some posters on here got mixed up when I just used the term "trans boys." You can't win for trying on DCUM! |
I have to wonder how many of the posters with purported concerns for cis girls' rights are also fine with females' rights being taken away in other contexts like abortion. If you're truly concerned for girls, there are so many other things you could focus on.
|
Yes, issues like that are a parent's responsibility. How, exactly, can the parents fix that communication problem if the government is actively concealing all information related to it? Once again, you're claiming that the school system has the right to take official actions on a child's behalf, actions that are themselves not secret and are apparent to anyone in the school, conceal those actions from the parents to the point of even lying about them (like using the birth name when talking with parents even though the school officially changed it), all without any sort of official finding of parental abuse or neglect? That's not "staying out of it". That's not the school system saying families need to fix their own issues. That is the school system deliberately placing itself between a child and their parents. And if they think that's necessary, then they need to put up or shut up and declare the parents unfit or report to CPS. The fact that they don't, that they want to carve out this in-between space tells us everything we need to know, because everyone knows that would be drastic and harmful to the kid, and would produce a massive backlash. |
+1 They don't actually care about girls. They are just anti trans. |
|
The main reason boys and girls have always been separated for locker rooms, overnight accommodations, etc. is to eliminate sexual behaviors. And that has dictated others' interactions by way of chaperones, managing seating on buses, segregated bathrooms, segregated locker rooms. But all you people saying this is only about gender identification, I guess you don't care about that because you're fine with homosexual teens sleeping with same-sex peers on field trips and showering and changing clothes in front of same-sex peers? |
Personally, I wouldn't want to use community unisex bathrooms; but policy-wise, I agree. |