Girls, 13 and 15, Charged With Murder After Armed Carjacking Near Nationals Park

[Anonymous]

Hey, they just had another youth Murder suspect escape last week. He was caught the next day I believe.

https://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/homicide-suspect-escapes-in-northwest-dc/2621562/

A homicide suspect escaped custody in Northwest D.C. Friday evening, police said. He has been apprehended, police said early Saturday morning.

Aaron Adgerson, 17, was last seen about 6:45 p.m. at the Psychiatric Institute of Washington in the 4200 block of Wisconsin Avenue NW, where he was being held pending trial.

Police haven't described when, where or how he was caught.

Adgerson stands 5-feet-4-inches tall and weighs 122 pounds. He has black hair, brown eyes and a light brown complexion. He was wearing blue scrubs, a light gray jacket and a pair of slip on shoes.

[Anonymous]

I don't get this. How can they show his face and give his name if he's a juvenile? Could someone please explain? I'm confused how this works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't get this. How can they show his face and give his name if he's a juvenile? Could someone please explain? I'm confused how this works.

Because they need to find him?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I don't get this. How can they show his face and give his name if he's a juvenile? Could someone please explain? I'm confused how this works.

He was charged as an adult.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sad news.

Also doesn’t help efforts for statehood

What does this have to do with statehood?

The poor response to this situation on all levels does not broadcast to the rest of the country that DC is ready to be a state

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was a sophomore at Georgetown in the mid 90s I was arrested with a little less than a half pound of weed in my backpack.

My family spent close to $30,000 keeping me from going to jail. And I still plead guilty and was on probation for 2 years. This was a nonviolent crime and the search that turned up the pot was 100% illegal, though allowed anyway.

I'm a white male. Tell me about privilege. These pieces of sh*t will walk.

If you were black you might still be in jail for that crime.

Not if $30k was spent on an attorney. You might still be in jail for this crime if you couldn't afford an competent lawyer (public defenders).

Exactly and I am not a drug user, nor dealer now, nor was I one in the 90s, but was an attempt to distribute part of your charge? If so you were a drug dealer under the laws at the time and if you were a college student then you most likely were no longer a juvenile. In Va you would still be tried as a felon "If a person is caught holding more than half an ounce but fewer than five pounds of cannabis, they may be charged with a Class 5 felony under Virginia law"

Obviously, you broke the law, why should you not have to face consequences, plenty of non-white people have spent a lot of time in jail for such non-violent offenses, perhaps because they got caught more than once with a bit too much weed in their possession, you know because they are more likely to get stopped and searched because they weren't white. Yes the fact that you only have one conviction for such an offense on your record and that you didn't go to jail is probably in large part due to your privilege... so stop your whining already and grow up your sound very immature still. Perhaps your parents did you a bid disservice by bailing you out and preventing you from feeling the full ramifications of your criminal misconduct. Your post screams of privilege and entitlement.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:When I was a sophomore at Georgetown in the mid 90s I was arrested with a little less than a half pound of weed in my backpack.

My family spent close to $30,000 keeping me from going to jail. And I still plead guilty and was on probation for 2 years. This was a nonviolent crime and the search that turned up the pot was 100% illegal, though allowed anyway.

I'm a white male. Tell me about privilege. These pieces of sh*t will walk.

If you were black you might still be in jail for that crime.

Not if $30k was spent on an attorney. You might still be in jail for this crime if you couldn't afford an competent lawyer (public defenders).

Exactly and I am not a drug user, nor dealer now, nor was I one in the 90s, but was an attempt to distribute part of your charge? If so you were a drug dealer under the laws at the time and if you were a college student then you most likely were no longer a juvenile. In Va you would still be tried as a felon "If a person is caught holding more than half an ounce but fewer than five pounds of cannabis, they may be charged with a Class 5 felony under Virginia law"

Obviously, you broke the law, why should you not have to face consequences, plenty of non-white people have spent a lot of time in jail for such non-violent offenses, perhaps because they got caught more than once with a bit too much weed in their possession, you know because they are more likely to get stopped and searched because they weren't white. Yes the fact that you only have one conviction for such an offense on your record and that you didn't go to jail is probably in large part due to your privilege... so stop your whining already and grow up your sound very immature still. Perhaps your parents did you a bid disservice by bailing you out and preventing you from feeling the full ramifications of your criminal misconduct. Your post screams of privilege and entitlement.

You are an idiot.

Yeah, lets incarcerate someone with great promise for a nonviolent, victimless crime. And lets set free people that have committed multiple violent crimes, including one murder.

I hope your wife gets raped by a cousin of these girls.

You are a loon and obviously off your meds. In calm and soothing voice. "Sssshhh... Everything is going to be okay. Let me take you to a nice quiet place where you will be safe, and we can get some help, but before we get there why don't put the nice comfy jacket with no arms on... there there now that's better" Quick someone grab the net! Grumpy Granpa forgot to take his meds again!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sad news.

Also doesn’t help efforts for statehood

What does this have to do with statehood?

The poor response to this situation on all levels does not broadcast to the rest of the country that DC is ready to be a state

Poor leadership is not an excuse to disenfranchise 700,000+ people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sad news.

Also doesn’t help efforts for statehood

What does this have to do with statehood?

The poor response to this situation on all levels does not broadcast to the rest of the country that DC is ready to be a state

Poor leadership is not an excuse to disenfranchise 700,000+ people.

They're not disenfranchised, they don't live in a US State, and so don't elect voting representatives to the United States. They can move. Canadians can't vote for a representative to the United States, either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sad news.

Also doesn’t help efforts for statehood

What does this have to do with statehood?

The poor response to this situation on all levels does not broadcast to the rest of the country that DC is ready to be a state

Poor leadership is not an excuse to disenfranchise 700,000+ people.

They're not disenfranchised, they don't live in a US State, and so don't elect voting representatives to the United States. They can move. Canadians can't vote for a representative to the United States, either.

Canadians aren't living under the jurisdiction of the Senate.

Anyway, D.C. residents are subject to the laws created by the Senate and should be able to send representation to the Senate. They are disenfranchised.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sad news.

Also doesn’t help efforts for statehood

What does this have to do with statehood?

The poor response to this situation on all levels does not broadcast to the rest of the country that DC is ready to be a state

Poor leadership is not an excuse to disenfranchise 700,000+ people.

They're not disenfranchised, they don't live in a US State, and so don't elect voting representatives to the United States. They can move. Canadians can't vote for a representative to the United States, either.

Canadians aren't living under the jurisdiction of the Senate.

Anyway, D.C. residents are subject to the laws created by the Senate and should be able to send representation to the Senate. They are disenfranchised.

I'm sorry if you were unaware when you moved there, but you can move to VA or MD.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sad news.

Also doesn’t help efforts for statehood

What does this have to do with statehood?

The poor response to this situation on all levels does not broadcast to the rest of the country that DC is ready to be a state

Poor leadership is not an excuse to disenfranchise 700,000+ people.

They're not disenfranchised, they don't live in a US State, and so don't elect voting representatives to the United States. They can move. Canadians can't vote for a representative to the United States, either.

Canadians aren't living under the jurisdiction of the Senate.

Anyway, D.C. residents are subject to the laws created by the Senate and should be able to send representation to the Senate. They are disenfranchised.

Are the girls being charged under Federal law?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sad news.

Also doesn’t help efforts for statehood

What does this have to do with statehood?

The poor response to this situation on all levels does not broadcast to the rest of the country that DC is ready to be a state

Poor leadership is not an excuse to disenfranchise 700,000+ people.

Then be reabsorbed into VA or MD.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sad news.

Also doesn’t help efforts for statehood

What does this have to do with statehood?

The poor response to this situation on all levels does not broadcast to the rest of the country that DC is ready to be a state

Poor leadership is not an excuse to disenfranchise 700,000+ people.

Then be reabsorbed into VA or MD.

Yes, let’s vote on that. All in DC and Maryland in favor? No? Didn’t think so. Next idea.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sad news.

Also doesn’t help efforts for statehood

What does this have to do with statehood?

The poor response to this situation on all levels does not broadcast to the rest of the country that DC is ready to be a state

Poor leadership is not an excuse to disenfranchise 700,000+ people.

They're not disenfranchised, they don't live in a US State, and so don't elect voting representatives to the United States. They can move. Canadians can't vote for a representative to the United States, either.

Canadians aren't living under the jurisdiction of the Senate.

Anyway, D.C. residents are subject to the laws created by the Senate and should be able to send representation to the Senate. They are disenfranchised.

I'm sorry if you were unaware when you moved there, but you can move to VA or MD.

This is just a terrible idea. “I’m sorry if you knew you’d be paying the same taxes as the rest of us but not get equal rights.” Lots of people who like to show themselves as woke are okay with DC citizens (who are largely minority) not having full rights.