
It was protracted because it was a robbery gone wrong. They didn't expect to encounter a martial artist on the other side of the door. No doubt that he fought to the death. He probably held them at bay with all his samurai swords and ninja weapons but they probably had the upper hand by taking his wife and child hostage. No doubt they were simply after $$$, like all thugs. I saw a pic of the house and it is uncomfortably close to a public sidewalk. If I had that kind of wealth, no way would I choose a house that vulnerable. |
You have just revealed yourself to be writing from a place far away from Washington DC. I'm also sure that you watch a lot of TV in your small town.
|
not the PP, but I live in DC and that was my first thought as well when i saw the picture of the house - very close to the sidewalk. very easy access. |
Try to get one.....friends have....DCPD said with minors in the house, that would be irresponsible, and DC child protective services has to randomly check your house...true story. They thumb their nose at Heller. |
LOL! I never watch TV dramas. I barely watch TV. We don't even have cable. Nice try, though. |
My point is that if you "live in DC", you know that with a precious few exceptions, ALL homes "in DC" are very very close to the sidewalk. Including the large majority of the mulitmillion properties (Kalorama, Georgetown, Cap Hill, Logan, Dupont, Cathedral, Woodley, Cleveland Park and so on). The rolling lawn thing is not an urban feature and a tiny percentage of homes with an actual DC address have such a buffer. |
Anytime a crime happens in a major city the press has to try play some sort of terrorist angle, no matter how attenuated it seems--so we'll keep hearing the absurd references to Biden and Clinton's house--even though it has zero relevance. |
so, you could have made your point as stated above instead of being snarky. also, i disagree. amazing properties along Foxhall, parts of Kalorama, and 16th street that aren't right on the sidewalk. maybe YOU should get out in DC a bit more... |
Exactly. One of the reasons that I got rid of cable. |
I have spent a lot of time in Latin America and every single one of those houses - without exception - would be surrounded by very high walls with very sharp material at top and with viscious dogs and/or guards at the ready. If you've got that kind of wealth, instead of wasting it on Van Gogh's and Picasso prints, get yourself better security. |
Take a look at the story on recent murders in Rockville Maryland. House set back far from street. |
Yes. DC is the same as NYC or Paris in that way--but most tourists never see it. They think there is just the Mall, some museums and then an urban ghetto hellscape beyond. |
3rd world countries have a lot of crime including kidnapping for ransom which is an industry in itself in some latin american countries thus the high walls and security for houses.
In DC, even the mansions are close to the sidewalk. |
I live in NW DC in a home that isn't as close to neighbors/sidewalk and I was actually thinking it's more vulnerable to be this way - their home was close to neighbors and hustle and bustle/people walking by etc. We have a good security system as well as cameras in our home...most of our neighbors do too. I wonder if this family did...you'd think so. |
Why would a lawn make you safer? It isn't a moat with a drawbridge. I would think that being set back from the road/sidewalk with a big lot would make it harder for neighbors or passersby to hear if there was something wrong. |