Idaho Murder Suspect Bryan Kohberger - arrest warrant affadavit

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Again the accused must be proven guilty by the state. The speculation continues in this thread based on his looks of what someone thinks they know about the case. Police make mistakes.

which is why quite quickly, it became an FBI case.
far less likely to fail.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again the accused must be proven guilty by the state. The speculation continues in this thread based on his looks of what someone thinks they know about the case. Police make mistakes.

WTH are you taking this personally??? Creepy!!

DP. What's creepier is your eagerness to convict someone without giving them a chance to defend themselves.

We aren’t the jury. We don’t have to keep an open mind. We can decide who did it whenever and however we like. BK is as guilty as the day is long. So so so guilty.

+1

Unlike the court system, we are not bound to disregard relevant information that doesn’t make it into the court. This guy is guilty.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again the accused must be proven guilty by the state. The speculation continues in this thread based on his looks of what someone thinks they know about the case. Police make mistakes.

which is why quite quickly, it became an FBI case.
far less likely to fail.

Do you honestly think the FBI makes no mistakes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:https://slate.com/technology/2023/01/bryan-kohberger-university-idaho-murders-forensic-genealogy.html

Here’s an interesting Slate piece about the use of genetic genealogy in this case. It had been reported by CNN and others that, according to sources, genetic genealogy was used in the case - but then it was not mentioned in the affidavit.

Maybe the link is not precise enough to hold up as evidence in court, but it is used by police to find suspects that they can then investigate to find strong evidence (which is what happened here, such as getting the father's DNA).

Well, yes - what the genetic genealogy work does is provide leads that can then be further investigated by law enforcement. The interesting thing is that other investigative leads that helped lead to the suspect are described on the affidavit, but any genetic genealogy work that was performed is not.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again the accused must be proven guilty by the state. The speculation continues in this thread based on his looks of what someone thinks they know about the case. Police make mistakes.

WTH are you taking this personally??? Creepy!!

DP. What's creepier is your eagerness to convict someone without giving them a chance to defend themselves.

We aren’t the jury. We don’t have to keep an open mind. We can decide who did it whenever and however we like. BK is as guilty as the day is long. So so so guilty.

Good for you. It's still creepy.

Not nearly as creepy as your inexplicable desire to defend someone so obviously guilty of a truly gruesome and heinous crime.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again the accused must be proven guilty by the state. The speculation continues in this thread based on his looks of what someone thinks they know about the case. Police make mistakes.

WTH are you taking this personally??? Creepy!!

DP. What's creepier is your eagerness to convict someone without giving them a chance to defend themselves.

We aren’t the jury. We don’t have to keep an open mind. We can decide who did it whenever and however we like. BK is as guilty as the day is long. So so so guilty.

Good for you. It's still creepy.

Not nearly as creepy as your inexplicable desire to defend someone so obviously guilty of a truly gruesome and heinous crime.

Actually, yeah, it is more creepy. Because he's entitled by law to a fair trial, which is hardly "inexplicable". So if you're calling me creepy for saying he deserves a chance to defend himself, then you're calling the Constitution creepy. And that's something a terrorist would do. And, as we all know, terrorists are creepy.

[Anonymous]

Could you two take it outside.

This is super boring, and immature.

"You're a creep,"

"No, you're the creep,"

"Oh yeah, well you are a terrorist."

Get a life.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again the accused must be proven guilty by the state. The speculation continues in this thread based on his looks of what someone thinks they know about the case. Police make mistakes.

WTH are you taking this personally??? Creepy!!

DP. What's creepier is your eagerness to convict someone without giving them a chance to defend themselves.

We aren’t the jury. We don’t have to keep an open mind. We can decide who did it whenever and however we like. BK is as guilty as the day is long. So so so guilty.

Good for you. It's still creepy.

Not nearly as creepy as your inexplicable desire to defend someone so obviously guilty of a truly gruesome and heinous crime.

Actually, yeah, it is more creepy. Because he's entitled by law to a fair trial, which is hardly "inexplicable". So if you're calling me creepy for saying he deserves a chance to defend himself, then you're calling the Constitution creepy. And that's something a terrorist would do. And, as we all know, terrorists are creepy.

No one is saying he doesn’t deserve the chance to defend himself.

[Anonymous]

Maybe he will accept a plea deal, if not, I hope they are able to keep the suffering of the victims and their families at the forefront of the trial. I worry when a defendant is even slightly telegenic and even more so when they are ostensibly polite and respectful.

[Anonymous]

He knew he f-ed up dropping that knife thing. That sealed his fate. That's about as close to a smoking gun as there is.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again the accused must be proven guilty by the state. The speculation continues in this thread based on his looks of what someone thinks they know about the case. Police make mistakes.

which is why quite quickly, it became an FBI case.
far less likely to fail.

Do you honestly think the FBI makes no mistakes?

The FBI does not make mistakes.

They ARE the law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Again the accused must be proven guilty by the state. The speculation continues in this thread based on his looks of what someone thinks they know about the case. Police make mistakes.

WTH are you taking this personally??? Creepy!!

DP. What's creepier is your eagerness to convict someone without giving them a chance to defend themselves.

We aren’t the jury. We don’t have to keep an open mind. We can decide who did it whenever and however we like. BK is as guilty as the day is long. So so so guilty.

Good for you. It's still creepy.

Not nearly as creepy as your inexplicable desire to defend someone so obviously guilty of a truly gruesome and heinous crime.

Actually, yeah, it is more creepy. Because he's entitled by law to a fair trial, which is hardly "inexplicable". So if you're calling me creepy for saying he deserves a chance to defend himself, then you're calling the Constitution creepy. And that's something a terrorist would do. And, as we all know, terrorists are creepy.

You sound like his dad or something. My belief that he is a guilty, depraved, psychotic murderer in no way impacts his ability to have a fair trial. Again, I'm not on the jury. And neither are you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He knew he f-ed up dropping that knife thing. That sealed his fate. That's about as close to a smoking gun as there is.

There are SO many mistakes here -- who keeps his phone on the entire time as you stake out the place TWELVE times, drops the knife, and drives the SAME car around.

It's like he wanted to get caught. I think he had these sick thoughts and tried to deal with them with school, but then wanted help. He's been screaming for help for decades but his dad keeps making excuses for him instead of getting his poor son help.

[Anonymous]

DP- I can’t dig up the source right now. Initially, the phone pings were noted in affidavit as being in the “vicinity.” This morning it’s been reported (speculated) that the suspect may not have turned his cell phone off, rather set it to airplane mode so he could quickly access alternate routes, if necessary. Allegedly, his cell phone connected at some point or intermittently to the 1122 WiFi (crime scene). There was a valuable Reddit discussion by experts who explained it in laymen’s terms. Again, he may have left phone in car, but most agree that he had it on him at the crime scene. This makes more sense if he needed to flee on foot.

Couple of other factors that I can’t seem to shake off because I’m connecting them to his EQ vs IQ (some claim he’s high IQ). Maybe he’s 2E if that’s the right code. I’m not sure. While he seemed introspective and smart in his early writings, I think he was very much parroting in those writings (posted a few pages back). I had read them earlier when they first surfaced. It’s fascinatingly haunting and self aware. Irrelevant now, of course.

Do you know that his sister was in a slasher movie (2011)? The film's director, Kevin Boon, reportedly said, “You’re f**king kidding me, her brother is that guy? Goddamn man, holy cow.” I also read that a classmate pointed out that he and/or siblings were horror movie buffs. Visual snow or feeling of dissociation could have played into him fetishizing his own sister in a horror movie about college students being hunted and stabbed to death. His sister survived in her role. It’s an incredibly strange coincidence. As he matured physically and academically, he may have remained stunted emotionally and socially causing him to hyper focus on the movie, “Two Days Back.” He self identified in his earlier writings as a drug user. Others confirmed they knew him to be a heroin addict. Being 17 at the time of the movie release may coincide with him becoming addicted to heroine.

And, this is very telling! According to a first hand police source and without provocation, BK said of the victims, “it’s really sad what happened to them.” He was also self soothing and talking to himself, “I'm fine, this is okay.”

From source:
“He seemed really nervous," a police source who was involved in the process tells PEOPLE. "He was narrating to himself everything that was happening. At one point, he was saying something to himself like 'I'm fine, this is okay.' Like he was reassuring himself that this whole thing wasn't awful."

Kohberger was read his Miranda rights during his arrest, and cannot be questioned about the case without an attorney present. He didn't speak directly to officers about the case, but the police source says that he did make an offhand comment about it. "He did say, 'It's really sad what happened to them,' but he didn't say anything more," the source says. https://people.com/crime/idaho-murder-suspect-spoke-about-slain-students-during-extradition/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:DP- I can’t dig up the source right now. Initially, the phone pings were noted in affidavit as being in the “vicinity.” This morning it’s been reported (speculated) that the suspect may not have turned his cell phone off, rather set it to airplane mode so he could quickly access alternate routes, if necessary. Allegedly, his cell phone connected at some point or intermittently to the 1122 WiFi (crime scene). There was a valuable Reddit discussion by experts who explained it in laymen’s terms. Again, he may have left phone in car, but most agree that he had it on him at the crime scene. This makes more sense if he needed to flee on foot.

Couple of other factors that I can’t seem to shake off because I’m connecting them to his EQ vs IQ (some claim he’s high IQ). Maybe he’s 2E if that’s the right code. I’m not sure. While he seemed introspective and smart in his early writings, I think he was very much parroting in those writings (posted a few pages back). I had read them earlier when they first surfaced. It’s fascinatingly haunting and self aware. Irrelevant now, of course.

Do you know that his sister was in a slasher movie (2011)? The film's director, Kevin Boon, reportedly said, “You’re f**king kidding me, her brother is that guy? Goddamn man, holy cow.” I also read that a classmate pointed out that he and/or siblings were horror movie buffs. Visual snow or feeling of dissociation could have played into him fetishizing his own sister in a horror movie about college students being hunted and stabbed to death. His sister survived in her role. It’s an incredibly strange coincidence. As he matured physically and academically, he may have remained stunted emotionally and socially causing him to hyper focus on the movie, “Two Days Back.” He self identified in his earlier writings as a drug user. Others confirmed they knew him to be a heroin addict. Being 17 at the time of the movie release may coincide with him becoming addicted to heroine.

And, this is very telling! According to a first hand police source and without provocation, BK said of the victims, “it’s really sad what happened to them.” He was also self soothing and talking to himself, “I'm fine, this is okay.”

From source:
“He seemed really nervous," a police source who was involved in the process tells PEOPLE. "He was narrating to himself everything that was happening. At one point, he was saying something to himself like 'I'm fine, this is okay.' Like he was reassuring himself that this whole thing wasn't awful."

Kohberger was read his Miranda rights during his arrest, and cannot be questioned about the case without an attorney present. He didn't speak directly to officers about the case, but the police source says that he did make an offhand comment about it. "He did say, 'It's really sad what happened to them,' but he didn't say anything more," the source says. https://people.com/crime/idaho-murder-suspect-spoke-about-slain-students-during-extradition/

*heroin