HS Party with Alcohol... Death

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What surprise evidence might still be lurking in the woods, at this point? Yes, let's be wildly imaginative.

I don't know exactly what they are looking for, but the road was blocked off late this morning and police were clearly analyzing the scene.

Do you mean the road where the accident happened or the street where the party took place?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is not witch hunting. The name of the family that hosted the party and the person that bought the alcohol should be published just the same as the driver's name was published.
In my opinion, these people are even more guilty.

For them to be guilty, they first have to be charged with something.

If/when they are charged with something, it will be in the news. Then your desires for punishment can begin to be satisfied.

The police and media had no problem publishing the name of the driver and saying it was alcohol related, but not who supplied the booze or where the party was at. This makes me sick.

Those adults who bought the booze and allowed this to go on their home are the reason we have teen drinking issues.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is not witch hunting. The name of the family that hosted the party and the person that bought the alcohol should be published just the same as the driver's name was published.
In my opinion, these people are even more guilty.

For them to be guilty, they first have to be charged with something.

If/when they are charged with something, it will be in the news. Then your desires for punishment can begin to be satisfied.

The police and media had no problem publishing the name of the driver and saying it was alcohol related, but not who supplied the booze or where the party was at. This makes me sick.

Those adults who bought the booze and allowed this to go on their home are the reason we have teen drinking issues.

Absolutely agree!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is not witch hunting. The name of the family that hosted the party and the person that bought the alcohol should be published just the same as the driver's name was published.
In my opinion, these people are even more guilty.

For them to be guilty, they first have to be charged with something.

If/when they are charged with something, it will be in the news. Then your desires for punishment can begin to be satisfied.

The police and media had no problem publishing the name of the driver and saying it was alcohol related, but not who supplied the booze or where the party was at. This makes me sick.

Those adults who bought the booze and allowed this to go on their home are the reason we have teen drinking issues.

Absolutely agree!

Me too!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What surprise evidence might still be lurking in the woods, at this point? Yes, let's be wildly imaginative.

I don't know exactly what they are looking for, but the road was blocked off late this morning and police were clearly analyzing the scene.

Legal maneuvering. Just watch...

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is not witch hunting. The name of the family that hosted the party and the person that bought the alcohol should be published just the same as the driver's name was published.
In my opinion, these people are even more guilty.

For them to be guilty, they first have to be charged with something.

If/when they are charged with something, it will be in the news. Then your desires for punishment can begin to be satisfied.

The police and media had no problem publishing the name of the driver and saying it was alcohol related, but not who supplied the booze or where the party was at. This makes me sick.

Those adults who bought the booze and allowed this to go on their home are the reason we have teen drinking issues.

You're wrong on multiple levels. But, whatever: Off with their heads!!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is not witch hunting. The name of the family that hosted the party and the person that bought the alcohol should be published just the same as the driver's name was published.
In my opinion, these people are even more guilty.

For them to be guilty, they first have to be charged with something.

If/when they are charged with something, it will be in the news. Then your desires for punishment can begin to be satisfied.

The police and media had no problem publishing the name of the driver and saying it was alcohol related, but not who supplied the booze or where the party was at. This makes me sick.

Those adults who bought the booze and allowed this to go on their home are the reason we have teen drinking issues.

You're wrong on multiple levels. But, whatever: Off with their heads!!

Please explain yourself...? How are the kids getting the alcohol, if not from adults?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is not witch hunting. The name of the family that hosted the party and the person that bought the alcohol should be published just the same as the driver's name was published.
In my opinion, these people are even more guilty.

For them to be guilty, they first have to be charged with something.

If/when they are charged with something, it will be in the news. Then your desires for punishment can begin to be satisfied.

The police and media had no problem publishing the name of the driver and saying it was alcohol related, but not who supplied the booze or where the party was at. This makes me sick.

Those adults who bought the booze and allowed this to go on their home are the reason we have teen drinking issues.

You're wrong on multiple levels. But, whatever: Off with their heads!!

Please explain yourself...? How are the kids getting the alcohol, if not from adults?

I am not the PP but...

Fresh and Soph: Steal liquor from their house, the house they baby sit/house sit/grandma/aunts/etc, etc. It does not take a lot of liquor to get drunk at this age and between 10 friends, it takes parents until Soph year to figure it out, then they lock it up or stop buying it but still they seem to be able to get it. You think that parents are buy liquor?

After that: friends that are 21 that are not parents and older siblings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is not witch hunting. The name of the family that hosted the party and the person that bought the alcohol should be published just the same as the driver's name was published.
In my opinion, these people are even more guilty.

For them to be guilty, they first have to be charged with something.

If/when they are charged with something, it will be in the news. Then your desires for punishment can begin to be satisfied.

The police and media had no problem publishing the name of the driver and saying it was alcohol related, but not who supplied the booze or where the party was at. This makes me sick.

Those adults who bought the booze and allowed this to go on their home are the reason we have teen drinking issues.

You're wrong on multiple levels. But, whatever: Off with their heads!!

Please explain yourself...? How are the kids getting the alcohol, if not from adults?

I am not the PP but...

Fresh and Soph: Steal liquor from their house, the house they baby sit/house sit/grandma/aunts/etc, etc. It does not take a lot of liquor to get drunk at this age and between 10 friends, it takes parents until Soph year to figure it out, then they lock it up or stop buying it but still they seem to be able to get it. You think that parents are buy liquor?

After that: friends that are 21 that are not parents and older siblings.

Like I said, parents, especially if they're self-absorbed, are duped into stupidity.

[Anonymous]

The Sherwood kid plead guilty.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/teen-driver-was-going-119-mph-in-crash-that-killed-sherwood-high-student/2015/07/17/38e8728e-2c1b-11e5-bd33-395c05608059_story.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is not witch hunting. The name of the family that hosted the party and the person that bought the alcohol should be published just the same as the driver's name was published.
In my opinion, these people are even more guilty.

For them to be guilty, they first have to be charged with something.

If/when they are charged with something, it will be in the news. Then your desires for punishment can begin to be satisfied.

The police and media had no problem publishing the name of the driver and saying it was alcohol related, but not who supplied the booze or where the party was at. This makes me sick.

Those adults who bought the booze and allowed this to go on their home are the reason we have teen drinking issues.

You're wrong on multiple levels. But, whatever: Off with their heads!!

Please explain yourself...? How are the kids getting the alcohol, if not from adults?

I am not the PP but...

Fresh and Soph: Steal liquor from their house, the house they baby sit/house sit/grandma/aunts/etc, etc. It does not take a lot of liquor to get drunk at this age and between 10 friends, it takes parents until Soph year to figure it out, then they lock it up or stop buying it but still they seem to be able to get it. You think that parents are buy liquor?

After that: friends that are 21 that are not parents and older siblings.

A friend that is 21 is an adult and if they provide alcohol to those under 21, it is a big problem.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The Sherwood kid plead guilty.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/education/teen-driver-was-going-119-mph-in-crash-that-killed-sherwood-high-student/2015/07/17/38e8728e-2c1b-11e5-bd33-395c05608059_story.html

Interesting article and I think the boy handled it correctly. Again, what I don't get is why no charges to the provider of the alcohol or the house the kids were drinking at. I believe that was a house party too.

[Anonymous]

If law enforcement would start to treat this like the CRIME it is, we'd have less of a problem here.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It is not witch hunting. The name of the family that hosted the party and the person that bought the alcohol should be published just the same as the driver's name was published.
In my opinion, these people are even more guilty.

For them to be guilty, they first have to be charged with something.

If/when they are charged with something, it will be in the news. Then your desires for punishment can begin to be satisfied.

The police and media had no problem publishing the name of the driver and saying it was alcohol related, but not who supplied the booze or where the party was at. This makes me sick.

Those adults who bought the booze and allowed this to go on their home are the reason we have teen drinking issues.

You're wrong on multiple levels. But, whatever: Off with their heads!!

Please explain yourself...? How are the kids getting the alcohol, if not from adults?

I am not the PP but...

Fresh and Soph: Steal liquor from their house, the house they baby sit/house sit/grandma/aunts/etc, etc. It does not take a lot of liquor to get drunk at this age and between 10 friends, it takes parents until Soph year to figure it out, then they lock it up or stop buying it but still they seem to be able to get it. You think that parents are buy liquor?

After that: friends that are 21 that are not parents and older siblings.

A friend that is 21 is an adult and if they provide alcohol to those under 21, it is a big problem.

An 18 yo is an adult, i did not say that 21 is not an adult I said they are not a parent.

[Anonymous]

Please stop with the assumption that parents "provide" or serve kids alcohol. I do not know of that ever happening. News flash: Kids take alcohol from their own homes is common. Older sibs/friends buying for the teens is common. Also the kids have fake IDs.