FCPS comprehensive boundary review

Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Draft resolution


Resolution No.
A Resolution to Limit School Transfers Based on Program Preference and Foreign Language Curriculum Offerings

WHEREAS, the Fairfax County School Board is committed to ensuring that all students have access to a high-quality, equitable education that prepares them for success in their academic and post-secondary endeavors;

WHEREAS, the current policy permitting high school students to transfer between schools based on program preference (e.g., International Baccalaureate (IB) vs. Advanced Placement (AP)) or foreign language curriculum offerings has resulted in an unsustainable volume of transfers, often used by students to avoid schools with lower performance rather than for legitimate academic needs;

WHEREAS, these transfers undermine efforts to create stable learning environments and equitable opportunities for all students, and may exacerbate the academic challenges faced by underperforming schools;

WHEREAS, the Fairfax County School Board believes that all schools should be supported to provide rigorous academic programs and equitable access to high-quality instruction, regardless of their program offerings;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that effective [Insert Date], the Fairfax County School Board will limit student transfers between schools based solely on program preference (e.g., IB vs. AP) or foreign language curriculum offerings. Transfers may only be granted under the following circumstances:
• Documented academic deficiencies or special educational needs that cannot be addressed at the assigned school;
• A family hardship that requires a change in school assignment, as determined by the regional superintendent;
• Other exceptions as deemed necessary by the regional superintendents.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fairfax County School Board directs the superintendent to enforce this policy and to provide the necessary resources to support underperforming schools in meeting the academic needs of all students, including the development of targeted intervention programs.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the superintendent shall prepare a comprehensive communication plan to inform students, parents, and the community of this policy change, and to outline available academic support programs at each school.


Where did this come from? Is this is a real draft resolution?


I assumed it was the work of a clever poster. FCPS doesn’t refer to “underperforming schools.”
Anonymous
I can’t find the post with the “leaked maps” info— can anyone kindly tell me the the date/timestamp for it?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I can’t find the post with the “leaked maps” info— can anyone kindly tell me the the date/timestamp for it?


https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1255416.page?fbclid=IwY2xjawIYWYdleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHel1JOIwXZE4MhilDTYBqmlJRtwychHU2yf0bOFf6I51illMd9C-w2uTGQ_aem_KMXSPqtGQVIcyMIZf9yWGQ
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The “leaked” map creates even more high school attendance islands. Moving Waples Mill severs Oakton’s boundaries to Crossfield/Navy and Oakview to Robinson cuts off Woodson from Fairfax Villa. Also, why move Fairhill from newly expanded Falls Church HS (which also would be an attendance island to Fairfax HS?)

They’d need to drastically shift elementary school boundaries for any of this to make sense.


Hunt Valley is the farthest WSHS school from Lewis.

This leaked map just does not make sense.


It's also the farthest from WSHS.....


It doesn't make sense to me either, but if they are really looking to move a whole elementary school out of WSHS, Hunt Valley is the only option. I think there are better ways to alleviate the "crowding" (which I'm not fully convinced of) at WSHS, but nonetheless, if a whole elementary is gonna go, it's gonna be HV.


You really aren't making any sense.

If you were arguing to move HV to South County or Keene Mill to Lewis, you might have credibility.

But arguing that Hunt Valley should be moved past 5 other WSHS zoned elementary schools all the way to Lewis completely destroys any argument you have.


Makes perfect sense. The farthest school from WSHS should move to Lewis . How does that not make sense. We need more kids at Lewis, not South County. Stop with this argument.


No it doesn't.

They are the farthest elementary school to Lewis.


The person who is insistent on this has argued it for months and says that the entirety of the HV boundary should be bussed to key and Lewis because they are out of walking zone to WSHS and Irving.

I am a HV parent and plan to move but I’m thinking SC.

But I also don’t trust or believe Reid and I’m sure she already has a plan and will do what she wants.


I actually believe it’s more that there are a few school board members (Sandy Anderson, St John Cunning, McDaniel) who want to stick it to certain schools. I’m thinking that Reid and other school board members are just negligent bystanders. Though Robyn Lady is likely looking to get a boost in her own property value.

I really believe that the SB member’s kids should all be required to move schools as part of this process. Since they don’t see any downside to the changes they should be fine with this.


Sandy Anderson is not looking to stick it to HV. If anything, she reassured the dozens of HV parents who contacted her after that fake news article published last Summer about HVES moving to Lewis. Her office created a statement to the effect of "Lewis is not the closest or second closest HS to HVES, and HVES is not the closest or second closest WSHS pyramid ES to Lewis, so it would not make sense to move it to Lewis."



Honestly don’t know why the HVES rumor started. It physically cannot be all of HVES.

Lewis has ~230 extra seats right now. HVES is the largest ES in the WSHS pyramid and contributes ~500 HS students to WSHS. They are not going to move 500 kids into 230 seats.

It’s that simple.


Lewis current enrollment - 1631
Lewis design capacity (CIP) - 2139

Room for 508 more students. The number you are using is Program Capacity (the one that gives you 230 available seats), but that can grow or shrink.

The design capacity was expanded in the 2005 timeframe at the same time they ended up moving out over three hundred students in the wake of South County opening. In the 2005 timeframe Lee had around 2100 students. So they expanded it and then immediately moved out students so that the expansion was wasted. But they can fix that now.

County did a similar thing with Springfield Estates. It was overcrowded because of the AAP program. They expanded it to hold all of those students, then turned around and opened another AAP center in the Edison pyramid and pulling students away from Springfield Estates, wasting the expansion. This county has been a terrible steward of our tax dollars.


My point is that moving the entirety of HVES is not feasible.

Adding 500 kids to Lewis puts it at 113% program capacity and 100% design capacity. Why set up overcrowding? They’re more likely to nibble at the edges. Or move a smaller, closer school like WSES.


Despite what some CIP report says there’s not room for 500 more students at Lewis. 200-250 maybe but not 500.

But that’s the problem when you have internet experts who’ve never actually set foot in the spaces in question, I guess.


I used to teach at Lewis in the mid-2000s when they were at their peak size of 2100+ kids for a few years, before the first boundary change to remove Daventry. Has something changed about the building? Did some wings get permanently closed off or converted? Lewis currently has 1630 kids, and has definitely held it's building capacity above 2100.


Many classrooms have been changed to offices, Leadership academy, interagency and other programs. They had to put all the theater costumes and supplies in shipping container outside because of lack of space.

Also the place is falling apart. It hasn’t had a substantial “renovation” since who knows when, cracks on the walls, buckled tiles, plumbing that’s as likely to squirt you as it is to work properly and when I was there last year I felt sick every day I was in the building and miraculously better when not in the building, but any mention of mold in the clearly dirty air vent got shut down immediately.

Tl;dr it’s not the mid-2000s anymore.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:I can’t find the post with the “leaked maps” info— can anyone kindly tell me the the date/timestamp for it?


There are no leaked maps, just someone trolling.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The “leaked” map creates even more high school attendance islands. Moving Waples Mill severs Oakton’s boundaries to Crossfield/Navy and Oakview to Robinson cuts off Woodson from Fairfax Villa. Also, why move Fairhill from newly expanded Falls Church HS (which also would be an attendance island to Fairfax HS?)

They’d need to drastically shift elementary school boundaries for any of this to make sense.


Hunt Valley is the farthest WSHS school from Lewis.

This leaked map just does not make sense.


It's also the farthest from WSHS.....


Most of it is actually closer to WSHS than Daventry and a lot of Keene Mill


That’s not true. Keene mill are walkers.


To WSHS?

Most of Keene Mill is miles away from WSHS.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The “leaked” map creates even more high school attendance islands. Moving Waples Mill severs Oakton’s boundaries to Crossfield/Navy and Oakview to Robinson cuts off Woodson from Fairfax Villa. Also, why move Fairhill from newly expanded Falls Church HS (which also would be an attendance island to Fairfax HS?)

They’d need to drastically shift elementary school boundaries for any of this to make sense.


Hunt Valley is the farthest WSHS school from Lewis.

This leaked map just does not make sense.


It's also the farthest from WSHS.....


It doesn't make sense to me either, but if they are really looking to move a whole elementary school out of WSHS, Hunt Valley is the only option. I think there are better ways to alleviate the "crowding" (which I'm not fully convinced of) at WSHS, but nonetheless, if a whole elementary is gonna go, it's gonna be HV.


You really aren't making any sense.

If you were arguing to move HV to South County or Keene Mill to Lewis, you might have credibility.

But arguing that Hunt Valley should be moved past 5 other WSHS zoned elementary schools all the way to Lewis completely destroys any argument you have.


Makes perfect sense. The farthest school from WSHS should move to Lewis . How does that not make sense. We need more kids at Lewis, not South County. Stop with this argument.


No it doesn't.

They are the farthest elementary school to Lewis.


The person who is insistent on this has argued it for months and says that the entirety of the HV boundary should be bussed to key and Lewis because they are out of walking zone to WSHS and Irving.

I am a HV parent and plan to move but I’m thinking SC.

But I also don’t trust or believe Reid and I’m sure she already has a plan and will do what she wants.


I actually believe it’s more that there are a few school board members (Sandy Anderson, St John Cunning, McDaniel) who want to stick it to certain schools. I’m thinking that Reid and other school board members are just negligent bystanders. Though Robyn Lady is likely looking to get a boost in her own property value.

I really believe that the SB member’s kids should all be required to move schools as part of this process. Since they don’t see any downside to the changes they should be fine with this.


Sandy Anderson is not looking to stick it to HV. If anything, she reassured the dozens of HV parents who contacted her after that fake news article published last Summer about HVES moving to Lewis. Her office created a statement to the effect of "Lewis is not the closest or second closest HS to HVES, and HVES is not the closest or second closest WSHS pyramid ES to Lewis, so it would not make sense to move it to Lewis."



Honestly don’t know why the HVES rumor started. It physically cannot be all of HVES.

Lewis has ~230 extra seats right now. HVES is the largest ES in the WSHS pyramid and contributes ~500 HS students to WSHS. They are not going to move 500 kids into 230 seats.

It’s that simple.


Lewis current enrollment - 1631
Lewis design capacity (CIP) - 2139

Room for 508 more students. The number you are using is Program Capacity (the one that gives you 230 available seats), but that can grow or shrink.

The design capacity was expanded in the 2005 timeframe at the same time they ended up moving out over three hundred students in the wake of South County opening. In the 2005 timeframe Lee had around 2100 students. So they expanded it and then immediately moved out students so that the expansion was wasted. But they can fix that now.

County did a similar thing with Springfield Estates. It was overcrowded because of the AAP program. They expanded it to hold all of those students, then turned around and opened another AAP center in the Edison pyramid and pulling students away from Springfield Estates, wasting the expansion. This county has been a terrible steward of our tax dollars.


My point is that moving the entirety of HVES is not feasible.

Adding 500 kids to Lewis puts it at 113% program capacity and 100% design capacity. Why set up overcrowding? They’re more likely to nibble at the edges. Or move a smaller, closer school like WSES.


WS is currently well over its Design Capacity.


Parents will flip out if FCPS moves them from a high performing neighborhood school less than 10 minutes away, which does not feel crowded because the newly renovated classrooms are spacious and the overcapacity translates to only 1 or 2 additional students per classroom, that families actively selected knowing the size of the high school, to a low performing school across town over 20-25 minutes away, in an unrenivated building that currently feels crowded, where the rezoning would put the new school far over capacity, more crowded than their neighborhood school due to smaller classrooms and hallways.

What about Key's capacity?

Can they support an extra 250+ students without overcrowding?
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The “leaked” map creates even more high school attendance islands. Moving Waples Mill severs Oakton’s boundaries to Crossfield/Navy and Oakview to Robinson cuts off Woodson from Fairfax Villa. Also, why move Fairhill from newly expanded Falls Church HS (which also would be an attendance island to Fairfax HS?)

They’d need to drastically shift elementary school boundaries for any of this to make sense.


Hunt Valley is the farthest WSHS school from Lewis.

This leaked map just does not make sense.


It's also the farthest from WSHS.....


It doesn't make sense to me either, but if they are really looking to move a whole elementary school out of WSHS, Hunt Valley is the only option. I think there are better ways to alleviate the "crowding" (which I'm not fully convinced of) at WSHS, but nonetheless, if a whole elementary is gonna go, it's gonna be HV.


You really aren't making any sense.

If you were arguing to move HV to South County or Keene Mill to Lewis, you might have credibility.

But arguing that Hunt Valley should be moved past 5 other WSHS zoned elementary schools all the way to Lewis completely destroys any argument you have.


Makes perfect sense. The farthest school from WSHS should move to Lewis . How does that not make sense. We need more kids at Lewis, not South County. Stop with this argument.


No it doesn't.

They are the farthest elementary school to Lewis.


The person who is insistent on this has argued it for months and says that the entirety of the HV boundary should be bussed to key and Lewis because they are out of walking zone to WSHS and Irving.

I am a HV parent and plan to move but I’m thinking SC.

But I also don’t trust or believe Reid and I’m sure she already has a plan and will do what she wants.


I actually believe it’s more that there are a few school board members (Sandy Anderson, St John Cunning, McDaniel) who want to stick it to certain schools. I’m thinking that Reid and other school board members are just negligent bystanders. Though Robyn Lady is likely looking to get a boost in her own property value.

I really believe that the SB member’s kids should all be required to move schools as part of this process. Since they don’t see any downside to the changes they should be fine with this.


Sandy Anderson is not looking to stick it to HV. If anything, she reassured the dozens of HV parents who contacted her after that fake news article published last Summer about HVES moving to Lewis. Her office created a statement to the effect of "Lewis is not the closest or second closest HS to HVES, and HVES is not the closest or second closest WSHS pyramid ES to Lewis, so it would not make sense to move it to Lewis."



Honestly don’t know why the HVES rumor started. It physically cannot be all of HVES.

Lewis has ~230 extra seats right now. HVES is the largest ES in the WSHS pyramid and contributes ~500 HS students to WSHS. They are not going to move 500 kids into 230 seats.

It’s that simple.


Lewis current enrollment - 1631
Lewis design capacity (CIP) - 2139

Room for 508 more students. The number you are using is Program Capacity (the one that gives you 230 available seats), but that can grow or shrink.

The design capacity was expanded in the 2005 timeframe at the same time they ended up moving out over three hundred students in the wake of South County opening. In the 2005 timeframe Lee had around 2100 students. So they expanded it and then immediately moved out students so that the expansion was wasted. But they can fix that now.

County did a similar thing with Springfield Estates. It was overcrowded because of the AAP program. They expanded it to hold all of those students, then turned around and opened another AAP center in the Edison pyramid and pulling students away from Springfield Estates, wasting the expansion. This county has been a terrible steward of our tax dollars.


My point is that moving the entirety of HVES is not feasible.

Adding 500 kids to Lewis puts it at 113% program capacity and 100% design capacity. Why set up overcrowding? They’re more likely to nibble at the edges. Or move a smaller, closer school like WSES.


WS is currently well over its Design Capacity.


It translates to only 1-2 students per classroom, so no, it is not overcrowded.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The “leaked” map creates even more high school attendance islands. Moving Waples Mill severs Oakton’s boundaries to Crossfield/Navy and Oakview to Robinson cuts off Woodson from Fairfax Villa. Also, why move Fairhill from newly expanded Falls Church HS (which also would be an attendance island to Fairfax HS?)

They’d need to drastically shift elementary school boundaries for any of this to make sense.


Hunt Valley is the farthest WSHS school from Lewis.

This leaked map just does not make sense.


It's also the farthest from WSHS.....


Most of it is actually closer to WSHS than Daventry and a lot of Keene Mill


That’s not true. Keene mill are walkers.


To WSHS?

Most of Keene Mill is miles away from WSHS.


If 1.3 miles is miles and miles sure. From what I can tell, part of cardinal forest goes to Keene Mill. Almost all of Keene mill is walk zone to Irving. The thought of having kids go from Keene mill to Key when they share a field with Irving is ridiculous. If they decide to split feeder Irving, that would create, not eliminate a split feeder.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Draft resolution


Resolution No.
A Resolution to Limit School Transfers Based on Program Preference and Foreign Language Curriculum Offerings

WHEREAS, the Fairfax County School Board is committed to ensuring that all students have access to a high-quality, equitable education that prepares them for success in their academic and post-secondary endeavors;

WHEREAS, the current policy permitting high school students to transfer between schools based on program preference (e.g., International Baccalaureate (IB) vs. Advanced Placement (AP)) or foreign language curriculum offerings has resulted in an unsustainable volume of transfers, often used by students to avoid schools with lower performance rather than for legitimate academic needs;

WHEREAS, these transfers undermine efforts to create stable learning environments and equitable opportunities for all students, and may exacerbate the academic challenges faced by underperforming schools;

WHEREAS, the Fairfax County School Board believes that all schools should be supported to provide rigorous academic programs and equitable access to high-quality instruction, regardless of their program offerings;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that effective [Insert Date], the Fairfax County School Board will limit student transfers between schools based solely on program preference (e.g., IB vs. AP) or foreign language curriculum offerings. Transfers may only be granted under the following circumstances:
• Documented academic deficiencies or special educational needs that cannot be addressed at the assigned school;
• A family hardship that requires a change in school assignment, as determined by the regional superintendent;
• Other exceptions as deemed necessary by the regional superintendents.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fairfax County School Board directs the superintendent to enforce this policy and to provide the necessary resources to support underperforming schools in meeting the academic needs of all students, including the development of targeted intervention programs.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the superintendent shall prepare a comprehensive communication plan to inform students, parents, and the community of this policy change, and to outline available academic support programs at each school.


Yeah, no. When they have the same programs at all the schools you can limit this. We are stuck at an IB school and would strongly prefer AP. As long as FCPS insists on continuing a program 90% of the kids are not using, then FCPS can suck up kids transferring out. IB is meant to be a diploma path not an ala carte program. Kids taking a few IB classes and tests is not what the program was meant to be. Hardly anyone completes the diploma. Remove IB and then you can make a case for limiting transfers.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Can we report Fairfax One to the White House DEI email? This will massively impact his federal workers. Can you picture Elon Musk showing up at Gatehouse?


If you look at the BRAC committee, all of the superintendent special interest groups (roughly half the committee) are selected based of DEI requirements/One Fairfax.

Some, like the special ed reps and military family reps make perfect sense as they have some unique education issues that are tied to rezoning.

Others, such as the lbgtq representatives, should not be given special consideration or an elevated voice in the rezoning process, but are there just for "equity"
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:The “leaked” map creates even more high school attendance islands. Moving Waples Mill severs Oakton’s boundaries to Crossfield/Navy and Oakview to Robinson cuts off Woodson from Fairfax Villa. Also, why move Fairhill from newly expanded Falls Church HS (which also would be an attendance island to Fairfax HS?)

They’d need to drastically shift elementary school boundaries for any of this to make sense.


Hunt Valley is the farthest WSHS school from Lewis.

This leaked map just does not make sense.


It's also the farthest from WSHS.....


It doesn't make sense to me either, but if they are really looking to move a whole elementary school out of WSHS, Hunt Valley is the only option. I think there are better ways to alleviate the "crowding" (which I'm not fully convinced of) at WSHS, but nonetheless, if a whole elementary is gonna go, it's gonna be HV.


You really aren't making any sense.

If you were arguing to move HV to South County or Keene Mill to Lewis, you might have credibility.

But arguing that Hunt Valley should be moved past 5 other WSHS zoned elementary schools all the way to Lewis completely destroys any argument you have.


Makes perfect sense. The farthest school from WSHS should move to Lewis . How does that not make sense. We need more kids at Lewis, not South County. Stop with this argument.


No it doesn't.

They are the farthest elementary school to Lewis.


The person who is insistent on this has argued it for months and says that the entirety of the HV boundary should be bussed to key and Lewis because they are out of walking zone to WSHS and Irving.

I am a HV parent and plan to move but I’m thinking SC.

But I also don’t trust or believe Reid and I’m sure she already has a plan and will do what she wants.


I actually believe it’s more that there are a few school board members (Sandy Anderson, St John Cunning, McDaniel) who want to stick it to certain schools. I’m thinking that Reid and other school board members are just negligent bystanders. Though Robyn Lady is likely looking to get a boost in her own property value.

I really believe that the SB member’s kids should all be required to move schools as part of this process. Since they don’t see any downside to the changes they should be fine with this.


Sandy Anderson is not looking to stick it to HV. If anything, she reassured the dozens of HV parents who contacted her after that fake news article published last Summer about HVES moving to Lewis. Her office created a statement to the effect of "Lewis is not the closest or second closest HS to HVES, and HVES is not the closest or second closest WSHS pyramid ES to Lewis, so it would not make sense to move it to Lewis."



Honestly don’t know why the HVES rumor started. It physically cannot be all of HVES.

Lewis has ~230 extra seats right now. HVES is the largest ES in the WSHS pyramid and contributes ~500 HS students to WSHS. They are not going to move 500 kids into 230 seats.

It’s that simple.


Lewis current enrollment - 1631
Lewis design capacity (CIP) - 2139

Room for 508 more students. The number you are using is Program Capacity (the one that gives you 230 available seats), but that can grow or shrink.

The design capacity was expanded in the 2005 timeframe at the same time they ended up moving out over three hundred students in the wake of South County opening. In the 2005 timeframe Lee had around 2100 students. So they expanded it and then immediately moved out students so that the expansion was wasted. But they can fix that now.

County did a similar thing with Springfield Estates. It was overcrowded because of the AAP program. They expanded it to hold all of those students, then turned around and opened another AAP center in the Edison pyramid and pulling students away from Springfield Estates, wasting the expansion. This county has been a terrible steward of our tax dollars.


My point is that moving the entirety of HVES is not feasible.

Adding 500 kids to Lewis puts it at 113% program capacity and 100% design capacity. Why set up overcrowding? They’re more likely to nibble at the edges. Or move a smaller, closer school like WSES.


Despite what some CIP report says there’s not room for 500 more students at Lewis. 200-250 maybe but not 500.

But that’s the problem when you have internet experts who’ve never actually set foot in the spaces in question, I guess.


I used to teach at Lewis in the mid-2000s when they were at their peak size of 2100+ kids for a few years, before the first boundary change to remove Daventry. Has something changed about the building? Did some wings get permanently closed off or converted? Lewis currently has 1630 kids, and has definitely held it's building capacity above 2100.


Many classrooms have been changed to offices, Leadership academy, interagency and other programs. They had to put all the theater costumes and supplies in shipping container outside because of lack of space.

Also the place is falling apart. It hasn’t had a substantial “renovation” since who knows when, cracks on the walls, buckled tiles, plumbing that’s as likely to squirt you as it is to work properly and when I was there last year I felt sick every day I was in the building and miraculously better when not in the building, but any mention of mold in the clearly dirty air vent got shut down immediately.

Tl;dr it’s not the mid-2000s anymore.


Annandale and McLean are older than Lewis and their next renovations should precede Lewis. Lewis shouldn’t leapfrog them in the next queue just because it might make the school more palatable to West Springfield families. All three got cheap “renovations” around 2005 that were far less extensive than the later renovations of schools built in the 1960s.

Honestly, sending some WS families to Lewis so they can experience those conditions first-hand might have a silver lining. Maybe then more people would object when dolts on the School Board like Karl Frisch want to waste $85 million on a new school in Dunn Loring for which there is no need - all while the needs of existing schools go unmet.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Draft resolution


Resolution No.
A Resolution to Limit School Transfers Based on Program Preference and Foreign Language Curriculum Offerings

WHEREAS, the Fairfax County School Board is committed to ensuring that all students have access to a high-quality, equitable education that prepares them for success in their academic and post-secondary endeavors;

WHEREAS, the current policy permitting high school students to transfer between schools based on program preference (e.g., International Baccalaureate (IB) vs. Advanced Placement (AP)) or foreign language curriculum offerings has resulted in an unsustainable volume of transfers, often used by students to avoid schools with lower performance rather than for legitimate academic needs;

WHEREAS, these transfers undermine efforts to create stable learning environments and equitable opportunities for all students, and may exacerbate the academic challenges faced by underperforming schools;

WHEREAS, the Fairfax County School Board believes that all schools should be supported to provide rigorous academic programs and equitable access to high-quality instruction, regardless of their program offerings;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that effective [Insert Date], the Fairfax County School Board will limit student transfers between schools based solely on program preference (e.g., IB vs. AP) or foreign language curriculum offerings. Transfers may only be granted under the following circumstances:
• Documented academic deficiencies or special educational needs that cannot be addressed at the assigned school;
• A family hardship that requires a change in school assignment, as determined by the regional superintendent;
• Other exceptions as deemed necessary by the regional superintendents.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fairfax County School Board directs the superintendent to enforce this policy and to provide the necessary resources to support underperforming schools in meeting the academic needs of all students, including the development of targeted intervention programs.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the superintendent shall prepare a comprehensive communication plan to inform students, parents, and the community of this policy change, and to outline available academic support programs at each school.


Where did this come from? Is this is a real draft resolution?


I assumed it was the work of a clever poster. FCPS doesn’t refer to “underperforming schools.”


Not a clever poster. FCPS doesn’t do resolutions.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I can’t find the post with the “leaked maps” info— can anyone kindly tell me the the date/timestamp for it?


There are no leaked maps, just someone trolling.


To me, the giveaway was the claim that FCPS was going to move three more ES (Bren Mar Park, Weyanoke, and Hunt Valley) into Lewis. It may be under-enrolled but it can’t possibly take on three more feeders.
Anonymous
Anonymous wrote:Hunt Valley is the farthest WSHS school from Lewis.
This leaked map just does not make sense.


But arguing that Hunt Valley should be moved past 5 other WSHS zoned elementary schools all the way to Lewis completely destroys any argument you have.

But I also don’t trust or believe Reid and I’m sure she already has a plan and will do what she wants.

"Lewis is not the closest or second closest HS to HVES, and HVES is not the closest or second closest WSHS pyramid ES to Lewis, so it would not make sense to move it to Lewis."

Honestly don’t know why the HVES rumor started. It physically cannot be all of HVES.

Lewis has ~230 extra seats right now. HVES is the largest ES in the WSHS pyramid and contributes ~500 HS students to WSHS. They are not going to move 500 kids into 230 seats.

It’s that simple.

Lewis current enrollment - 1631
Lewis design capacity (CIP) - 2139

Room for 508 more students. The number you are using is Program Capacity (the one that gives you 230 available seats), but that can grow or shrink.

The design capacity was expanded in the 2005 timeframe at the same time they ended up moving out over three hundred students in the wake of South County opening. In the 2005 timeframe Lee had around 2100 students. So they expanded it and then immediately moved out students so that the expansion was wasted. But they can fix that now.

County did a similar thing with Springfield Estates. It was overcrowded because of the AAP program. They expanded it to hold all of those students, then turned around and opened another AAP center in the Edison pyramid and pulling students away from Springfield Estates, wasting the expansion. This county has been a terrible steward of our tax dollars.

My point is that moving the entirety of HVES is not feasible.

Adding 500 kids to Lewis puts it at 113% program capacity and 100% design capacity. Why set up overcrowding? They’re more likely to nibble at the edges. Or move a smaller, closer school like WSES.

WS is currently well over its Design Capacity.

Parents will flip out if FCPS moves them from a high performing neighborhood school less than 10 minutes away, which does not feel crowded because the newly renovated classrooms are spacious and the overcapacity translates to only 1 or 2 additional students per classroom, that families actively selected knowing the size of the high school, to a low performing school across town over 20-25 minutes away, in an unrenivated building that currently feels crowded, where the rezoning ould put the new school far over capacity, more crowded than their neighborhood school due to smaller classrooms and hallways.

Can they support an extra 250+ students without overcrowding?

All of the above. There is no room in a crumbling, low performing HS for HVES students. Busses and student drivers going through the Mixing Bowl during both rush hours, no available student parking at Lewis, no AP or high level courses for students at Lewis. Lewis has been low performing for years, moving high performing students in to prop it up is Reid's solution?
Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Go to: