Fairfax County Double Murder

[Anonymous]

Defense witness introduces some interesting points in support of the catfish theory.

-Christine’s accounts and activity were reviewed for years prior to the murders, no evidence she visited or made accounts on any similar sites

-when the defendants went on their trip to NY, the accounts related to the murders weren’t accessed during that period

Just confirms what we already knew. In my opinion now having read the telegram transcript, there are clearly two people communicating on the Annastasia account. One is Juliana and can be recognized by wording that isn’t consistent with a native English speaker. Examples : “one of my pajamas” “that’ why you are saying this huh.” This wording is more consistent with native speakers of other languages.

In other messages, the sender strikes me as a native speaker and to be honest, some of these messages are very explicit. I would imagine that is Brendan. The Annastasia account also sends a bunch of messages with character emojis like . I find that interesting and wonder if that was common for Christine to do, but regardless Brendan would know that.

[Anonymous]

This site autocorrected my attempt at a character emoji, but in the transcript it was like : D (I put the space so it won’t autocorrect)

Just seems like a quirk

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Before he was an agent for the IRS he worked for the IRS just as like a regular employee and before that he and Christine owned a Mathnasium tutoring place. He dropped out of college.

Ick, access to young girls.
I mean he seems like a psychopath who murdered his wife in an elaborate and gruesome way but I don’t think there is anyone saying he was also a pedophile. He’s pretty awful enough without having to make up stuff.

I know many people will roll their eyes but I truly dislike it when people add on fake or exaggerated claims to something that’s already bad. It makes the actual evidence of bad-ness also seem less credible. He is a cold blooded murderer and pulled off a very personal murder- a BLUNT KNIFE. Way more depraved than a gunshot to the chest from 10 feet away. By insinuating he is also a child molester with no evidence, it cheapens the actual evidence of the actual terrible stuff that he did.

[Anonymous]

^^ formatting is weird? Sorry. This comment is in response to “ick, he had access to young girls!” Comment

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Before he was an agent for the IRS he worked for the IRS just as like a regular employee and before that he and Christine owned a Mathnasium tutoring place. He dropped out of college.

Ick, access to young girls.

I mean he seems like a psychopath who murdered his wife in an elaborate and gruesome way but I don’t think there is anyone saying he was also a pedophile. He’s pretty awful enough without having to make up stuff.

I know many people will roll their eyes but I truly dislike it when people add on fake or exaggerated claims to something that’s already bad. It makes the actual evidence of bad-ness also seem less credible. He is a cold blooded murderer and pulled off a very personal murder- a BLUNT KNIFE. Way more depraved than a gunshot to the chest from 10 feet away. By insinuating he is also a child molester with no evidence, it cheapens the actual evidence of the actual terrible stuff that he did.

Fair enough and I'm not rolling my eyes.

I wrote that. I was not saying he WAS a pedophile. I was saying that he had ACCESS to young girls. I would not have wanted my daughter to be around someone like him. DCUM, for better or worse, is not a court of law.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Defense witness introduces some interesting points in support of the catfish theory.

-Christine’s accounts and activity were reviewed for years prior to the murders, no evidence she visited or made accounts on any similar sites

-when the defendants went on their trip to NY, the accounts related to the murders weren’t accessed during that period

Just confirms what we already knew. In my opinion now having read the telegram transcript, there are clearly two people communicating on the Annastasia account. One is Juliana and can be recognized by wording that isn’t consistent with a native English speaker. Examples : “one of my pajamas” “that’ why you are saying this huh.” This wording is more consistent with native speakers of other languages.

In other messages, the sender strikes me as a native speaker and to be honest, some of these messages are very explicit. I would imagine that is Brendan. The Annastasia account also sends a bunch of messages with character emojis like . I find that interesting and wonder if that was common for Christine to do, but regardless Brendan would know that.

Exactly. Very on point. Another detail is that Brazilians can’t use only one exclamation or question mark for the love of god. It is always followed by 2 or 3!!! This is such a Brazilian way to write and some messages are like that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:BB dropped out of college?
How did he get this high profile job at IRS?

Yes he dropped out. Did he take college courses over the years after? Maybe. His mom was a “big wig” at the IRS for about 40 years. He got a regular IRS desk job first and then over the years trained to be an IRS special agent.

i understand he was a tax compliance officer (tco) prior to being a special agent with irs ci.

A tco is a type of auditor that generally does less complex examinations for the irs. complex exams are generally done by revenue agents.

i also understand that after brendan transferred to be a special agent, the irs became aware he did not have the educational background for the position. the details and timing are not clear, but i understand he was removed from the position for misrepresenting his education. he was able to come back to the irs.

i find it interesting that bb had his duty weapon, ( i assume belt badge) two magazines and handcuffs on him at the time of the murders. in my experience, very very few ci agents wear this level of gear on a daily basis.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I’ve read all of the evidences.
I am in shock. Evidence 44 shows Juliana telling her friend about one of Christine’s best friend who Brendan cheated on Christine with. That woman is featured on CB’s Instagram. On the photos she is tagged, at a cruise.
This woman was betrayed in so many ways.
This is beyond disgusting!

Which instagram post is this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Defense witness introduces some interesting points in support of the catfish theory.

-Christine’s accounts and activity were reviewed for years prior to the murders, no evidence she visited or made accounts on any similar sites

-when the defendants went on their trip to NY, the accounts related to the murders weren’t accessed during that period

Just confirms what we already knew. In my opinion now having read the telegram transcript, there are clearly two people communicating on the Annastasia account. One is Juliana and can be recognized by wording that isn’t consistent with a native English speaker. Examples : “one of my pajamas” “that’ why you are saying this huh.” This wording is more consistent with native speakers of other languages.

In other messages, the sender strikes me as a native speaker and to be honest, some of these messages are very explicit. I would imagine that is Brendan. The Annastasia account also sends a bunch of messages with character emojis like . I find that interesting and wonder if that was common for Christine to do, but regardless Brendan would know that.

Pretty early on someone ( I can’t remember who exactly) reviewed the messages who frequently corresponds with Christine and they said it sounds nothing like her – wording, emoji use, punctuation use, etc.

[Anonymous]

why don't they have a witness on this issue of the Feti account not being consistent with how she writes. There are experts on this. Basic thing to do. Maybe it is coming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:why don't they have a witness on this issue of the Feti account not being consistent with how she writes. There are experts on this. Basic thing to do. Maybe it is coming.

The prosecution rested. They get a chance for rebuttle but why they didn’t bring this up initially makes little sense.

[Anonymous]

"Anonymous wrote:
I’ve read all of the evidences.
I am in shock. Evidence 44 shows Juliana telling her friend about one of Christine’s best friend who Brendan cheated on Christine with. That woman is featured on CB’s Instagram. On the photos she is tagged, at a cruise.
This woman was betrayed in so many ways.
This is beyond disgusting!"

I went through all of CB's Instragram and could not find a post like this, where they were on a cruise. Do you know the date of the post? It made me sick when I read that in JPM's letter.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:why don't they have a witness on this issue of the Feti account not being consistent with how she writes. There are experts on this. Basic thing to do. Maybe it is coming.

+1

It wouldn't be that difficult to get a linguistics professor or something to explain this.

[Anonymous]

Defense to investigator:”do you find it odd the lead investigator and a head digital forensics investigator were removed from the investigation?”
Witness: “no, that happens all the time”.

😂

[Anonymous]

This defense lawyer seems to be making a great case that his client is guilty.