Fairfax County Double Murder

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Defense to investigator:”do you find it odd the lead investigator and a head digital forensics investigator were removed from the investigation?”
Witness: “no, that happens all the time”.

😂

Lmao! I can't watch today, so appreciate these updates.

[Anonymous]

Has this attorney ever questioned a witness before? He has the hardest time cobbling coherent questions together.

[Anonymous]

Does the prosecutor not own any proper professional clothes? Today is an upgrade but she’s wearing the female equivalent of khakis and a blazer.

[Anonymous]

This witness just confirmed that Juliana told the CW about the windows. They had no idea before. Another score for prosecution.

[Anonymous]

This is just brutal.

Defense lawyer's belief his client is guilty is showing and/or he was hoping his client would take a plea and didn't prep at all??

[Anonymous]

She's tagged in the IG account. Cassie. She looks about like what one would expect. What an interesting group of "friends."

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She's tagged in the IG account. Cassie. She looks about like what one would expect. What an interesting group of "friends."

Guess I should meander over to the Relationships forum to see if someone is posting about finding out their wife had an affair with an accused murderer...

[Anonymous]

Sally F-the boss bangin’ patty boy. I wonder if that’s gonna come out?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:why don't they have a witness on this issue of the Feti account not being consistent with how she writes. There are experts on this. Basic thing to do. Maybe it is coming.

+1

It wouldn't be that difficult to get a linguistics professor or something to explain this.

The prosecution clearly made a strategic decision to keep their case as simple as possible. Bringing in a linguistics professor, or witnesses to say Christine would never do this just opens the door for the defense to argue. Julianna tells the story, and the most important digital forensics completely support it. So do the crime scene forensics. The defense has failed to make any significant inroads against the prosecution’s version. In the end, Christine, Joe, Julianna, and BB were in the house. Christine and Joe are dead. There is no forensic story that can support Joe stabbing Christine. Who is left? Ultimately the prosecution has done a good job giving the jury what they need to convict.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:why don't they have a witness on this issue of the Feti account not being consistent with how she writes. There are experts on this. Basic thing to do. Maybe it is coming.

+1

It wouldn't be that difficult to get a linguistics professor or something to explain this.

The prosecution clearly made a strategic decision to keep their case as simple as possible. Bringing in a linguistics professor, or witnesses to say Christine would never do this just opens the door for the defense to argue. Julianna tells the story, and the most important digital forensics completely support it. So do the crime scene forensics. The defense has failed to make any significant inroads against the prosecution’s version. In the end, Christine, Joe, Julianna, and BB were in the house. Christine and Joe are dead. There is no forensic story that can support Joe stabbing Christine. Who is left? Ultimately the prosecution has done a good job giving the jury what they need to convict.

Personally I would find it so much easier to follow "these messages have the grammatical indicators of a Portuguese native speaker, while these messages don't" than forensics stuff. That would prove to me beyond reasonable doubt that JM sent the messages and is therefore telling the truth. Just how my brain works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, they had an Intel person at the lobby where JB, BB and the little one were at the night of the crime.

The kid asked Juliana: “Can I call you mommy now?”
JB said “yes”
Kid: “are you gonna marry my dad?”
JB: “I wish”


What’s going on?
Why did everyone hate CB so much? Bc shortly after Tess moves in and they play house all of them together.

Wtf?!

WTAF?!?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, they had an Intel person at the lobby where JB, BB and the little one were at the night of the crime.

The kid asked Juliana: “Can I call you mommy now?”
JB said “yes”
Kid: “are you gonna marry my dad?”
JB: “I wish”


What’s going on?
Why did everyone hate CB so much? Bc shortly after Tess moves in and they play house all of them together.

Was this part of the trial??

Yes, it just happened. Last question of Saly Fayez (the head of the victim’s services) testimony. During cross examination.

[Anonymous]

I wonder if BB and JM coached the little girl to say that?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So, they had an Intel person at the lobby where JB, BB and the little one were at the night of the crime.

The kid asked Juliana: “Can I call you mommy now?”
JB said “yes”
Kid: “are you gonna marry my dad?”
JB: “I wish”


What’s going on?
Why did everyone hate CB so much? Bc shortly after Tess moves in and they play house all of them together.

Was this part of the trial??

Yes! It was a defense witness who was the victim advocate. The defense attorney badgered her for 10 minutes asking when she came up with or at what point in time the catfish theory came up and got nowhere with her. During cross examination just took two questions to get this out of her from the prosecution! She asked The witness what made you think Christine may have been set up and then she spills this juicy info.

[Anonymous]

Is there not a YouTube that just posts highlights like this, instead of slogging through the 8 hour court TV feeds?