
I think the leagues like NPL and CCL will be somewhat of a shifting sands. CCL has to make a decision if they are going to be "regional" in nature or condense down to a more local level league. NPL has a different battle but will be held up on the boys side with ENPL, ECNL's sister counterpart. NPL has a more regional to national level format that will help the league maintain their regional focus. Half the battle for these leagues is determining their own scope and what they really want to be. NPL at least knows what it wants to be even if the DA on the girls side muddies the waters for them. CCL, in my opinion, has a little more soul searching to do. Does it consider NPL its competition now or is NCSL its competition? With two of the three DA clubs in NPL that can make CCL a harder sell to some parents. |
BRYC has not had the same historical success on the boys side as it has had on the girls side. Fewer State Cups, fewer regional titles, fewer national team players, no national championships, and fewer boys going on to play in college. That said, the last few years have been very good for BRYC boys teams, and the boys are currently pretty close to the girls side when it comes to the results the boys teams are producing. |
Thanks for a thoughtful response. Very interesting points. I think that CCL would strive to compete with NPL so they will have to find what their competitive edge is going to be. I say NPL and not NCSL because most of the clubs in CCL already compete in NCSL with their lower teams. I think CCL needs to do better to ensure that all clubs in CCL/CCLII are fielding teams for all age groups. I've heard that NPL tends to have more 1 sided games than CCL (although they have them as well). Maybe CCL does need to find a pathway to higher level regional competition. Are the different leagues discussing where they stand in comparison to others and how they are addressing the growth of others in comparison to theirs? |
This year, BRYC had 3 boys teams in National League -- 1 won their division and will be playing at Nationals this summer |
My honest guess is that Leagues are not as concerned about the "competition" as we would like to believe. I think Leagues tend to look for like minded clubs that field teams at a similar competitive level. One sided games happen in every league so lets please dispel that as any kind of proof. I am speaking more towards "Club based" leagues like CCL and NPL and to a larger extent ECNL and DA. NCSL is team based and serves a function. It can field teams for large and small clubs and all can be competitive but it at least offers promotion relegation to fix any errors along the way. That said, all leagues do want to thrive but only within their stated goals or focus. I think we as parents see the comparisons between leagues and formulate some kind of power struggle that I'm not sure exists in the way that we imagine. The fact of the matter is clubs will field teams in nearly all the leagues if they could. |
And the boys have won a national championship - http://championships.usyouthsoccer.org/PastNationalChamps/PastUSYouthSoccerNationalChampionshipWinners19352007/ |
It's not easy to get accepted into the DA, especially around here. You need more than just a high quality program, which BRYC undoubtedly has. You need to offer fields both practices and games, and you need to be in a position to subsidize your DA teams so there is little to no financial burden on players (ideally--you at least need to charge a lot less than the average for area travel clubs). That's hard to do if you are a smaller club, unless you have a really generous donor or sponsorship agreements. Geographic placement is also an issue. DC United and Arlington (though it's a partial DA only) are reasonably convenient for most people who would play for BRYC. |
|
In response to the DA costs cited above, are you talking about U12 and U13? At DC United and Bethesda at least (and I assume most other full DAs) the fees go down significantly for the older, more competitive age groups. |
I agree CCL will outlast NPL with most of it's clubs staying put. I think NPL and ECNL will eventually have to combine to stay relevant. |
Please don't use ECNL and NPL in the same sentence. Thank you. |
Your statement screams ignorance. VPL is a league made by teams in southern VA that wanted better competition, NOVA clubs later joined in. ECNL is specifically to have higher level competition for girls in their latter stages of their youth in order to showcased, scouted, and play in college. The identification for NPL is through the PDP and Id2 programs for individuals, not team focused. For boys, a newly created ENPL will allow teams in NPL's across the nation compete for national level status. It is to compete with USYS National competition and US soccer DA programs. The structure is already in place for ECNL for scouts to come, why would a few girls moving from ECNL to DA disrupt that. Everyone seems to think if you're not in ECNL it's probably because you can't cut it. I a would argue the more elite level of platforms available, the more players will be interested in competing at that level. |
One reason NPL has staying power is that its a national league and is ultimately backed by U.S. Soccer. One school of thought is that they will continue to invest in this league as a feeder to DA that they can control. |
Wow. Don't forget that for many clubs NPL teams are their A teams. While ECNL is generally a higher level of play than NPL, I see NPL teams beat ECNL teams all the time. I would bet that NPL national finalist teams would give many ECNL teams a good run for their money. BTW, that's four uses of ECNL and NPL in the same sentence. |
VPL was created for better competition ? Isn't that the league that most of the clubs with ECNL and DA put their second tier teams ? |