Trump wanted to release immigration detainees onto the streets of “sanctuary cities"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we are to believe that this is a 36 page thread because some are mad that Trump was mean?

What is the difference between this topic and literally every other day?

The issue is that you dont want your schools and neighborhoods going to the crapper. Its okay to admit.

You are projecting, MAGA trash!!

And, phew! Finally! It took 36 pages for you to realize that we are outraged by Trump’s vindictiveness, not the immigrants. Not the brightest bunch, are you?

Riiiiight. If the idea of sending these immigrants to sanctuary cities had come from the Democrats, you’d be falling all over yourselves to show your approval. The only reason you’re outraged (as usual) is because your favorite person to hate suggested it. Get real. We see straight through your faux outrage.
-DP

Why do you think Trump wants to send them?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's funny that Trumpkins are delighted at the thought of "punishing" sanctuary cities by sending illegal immigrants to us ...

You do realize that sanctuary cities are by and large cities where immigrants - both legal and illegal - ALREADY live. They are already here. And many of our communities are rallying to make it possible for them to live their fullest lives and become contributors to our regions. It's not a punishment - it's the American way.

Exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They just dropped 200 migrants at a homeless shelter in Las cruces new Mexico

They are asking for donations.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/new-mexico-city-asks-donations-after-more-migrants-dropped-n994211

The statement said needed items included utensils, napkins, paper plates, sanitary napkins, shampoo, clothing, towels, blankets, canned food, bottled water, foam padding for bedding and stuffed toys.

interesting . . .

The Border Patrol announced Thursday it would release migrants in southern New Mexico and in El Paso, Texas, pending their future court hearings Immigration and Customs "capacity issues."

I expect to see lots of people in NM putting their homes on the market.

Excellent. I would expect it to be Republicans to leave. Turn NM solidly blue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Where did OP say she doesn’t want immigrants sent to blue areas? She’s talking about Trump’s behavior.

This is has been copied and pasted before.

from OP's post

Trump wants to use the apprehended immigrants as if they are wild animals to release them in "sanctuary cities" to punish Democrats and blue states!!! WTF!

OP is taking liberties with Trump's wording. OK, Trump used the word, animals, in regard to MS 13 (he claimed). People didn't believe him, as they claimed he used the term to describe ALL migrants. fine . . . (I'm not a Trump supporter, but I do look at the hypocrisy stemming from both sides.)

So OP then used some charged language - the use of "wild animals" and "punish."

OP "softened" the blow by inserting "as if," which isn't a direct comparison. But the comparison is there nonetheless.

So on a psychological level, OP is indeed characterizing these folks as animals who will punish all the liberals. But OP deflects by blaming Trump.

A truly compassionate liberal would have questioned Trump's motives w/o using harsh word choice.

And let's just call a spade a spade, folks. The point of sanctuary cities was to allow illegal immigrants to feel comfortable around police (and other service workers) w/o fear of some sort of retribution. So of course these welcoming environments would be number one choices in relocation efforts.

I was called a liar b/c of something I apparently said about sanctuary cities - but was never given the specifics. (I was only attacked, which isn't a way to argue.) Therefore, I'm addressing this topic here, as it's fitting.

The issue was Trump wanting to treat humans like pawns. Is that really that difficult for you to comprehend?

No, we GET it. You don't.

The point is that DESPITE Trump's MOTIVATION, if liberals are so compassionate, you included, that hate toward Trump would be channeled into good. In other words, your hate will amount to nothing other than wasted energy.

Take that energy and begin thinking of ways to introduce these folks into the community.

b/c they WILL enter welcoming communities

So you're getting what you asked for. Who cares what Trump thinks or says? He isn't changing! But YOU ALL can indeed make good on your word.

Now get to work!

I already know how this will impact my life - my job in particular. But I'm not obsessing over Trump's motivation.

Great. Send them. We will support them. As we’ve said again and again.

Yes, we all know Trump and Miller will continue to be amoral POSs who look for ways to punish Dems. And you will continue to support them and defend them given that you’re also an amoral POS. You all deserve each other.

The stupidity on these threads is astonishing.

I did NOT vote for Trump. Yet, if I disagree with the hypocrisy of the liberal, I'm a Trumpster.

love the name-calling - I'm a piece of sh*t. Thanks!

Now get to work! lots of work to accomplish in a short period

You support Trump. You put him on office. You defend him. He’s yours.

Great. Tell Trump to gas up the buses.

OK! YOU FIGURED ME OUT!!

I voted for Trump. I ride around in my truck, wearing a MAGA hat, with a bumper sticker from 2016. (searching for the 2020 sticker right now)

I shoot deer in my back yard and then hand them over to my nephew to skin. And there's an American flag on my porch!

You clearly know all about stereotypes and I fit this one so well - similar to the way my Deluth underwear hug my ass cheeks so tightly.

You are BRILLIANT, PP! F-ing brilliant!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Where did OP say she doesn’t want immigrants sent to blue areas? She’s talking about Trump’s behavior.

This is has been copied and pasted before.

from OP's post

Trump wants to use the apprehended immigrants as if they are wild animals to release them in "sanctuary cities" to punish Democrats and blue states!!! WTF!

OP is taking liberties with Trump's wording. OK, Trump used the word, animals, in regard to MS 13 (he claimed). People didn't believe him, as they claimed he used the term to describe ALL migrants. fine . . . (I'm not a Trump supporter, but I do look at the hypocrisy stemming from both sides.)

So OP then used some charged language - the use of "wild animals" and "punish."

OP "softened" the blow by inserting "as if," which isn't a direct comparison. But the comparison is there nonetheless.

So on a psychological level, OP is indeed characterizing these folks as animals who will punish all the liberals. But OP deflects by blaming Trump.

A truly compassionate liberal would have questioned Trump's motives w/o using harsh word choice.

And let's just call a spade a spade, folks. The point of sanctuary cities was to allow illegal immigrants to feel comfortable around police (and other service workers) w/o fear of some sort of retribution. So of course these welcoming environments would be number one choices in relocation efforts.

I was called a liar b/c of something I apparently said about sanctuary cities - but was never given the specifics. (I was only attacked, which isn't a way to argue.) Therefore, I'm addressing this topic here, as it's fitting.

The issue was Trump wanting to treat humans like pawns. Is that really that difficult for you to comprehend?

No, we GET it. You don't.

The point is that DESPITE Trump's MOTIVATION, if liberals are so compassionate, you included, that hate toward Trump would be channeled into good. In other words, your hate will amount to nothing other than wasted energy.

Take that energy and begin thinking of ways to introduce these folks into the community.

b/c they WILL enter welcoming communities

So you're getting what you asked for. Who cares what Trump thinks or says? He isn't changing! But YOU ALL can indeed make good on your word.

Now get to work!

I already know how this will impact my life - my job in particular. But I'm not obsessing over Trump's motivation.

Great. Send them. We will support them. As we’ve said again and again.

Yes, we all know Trump and Miller will continue to be amoral POSs who look for ways to punish Dems. And you will continue to support them and defend them given that you’re also an amoral POS. You all deserve each other.

The stupidity on these threads is astonishing.

I did NOT vote for Trump. Yet, if I disagree with the hypocrisy of the liberal, I'm a Trumpster.

love the name-calling - I'm a piece of sh*t. Thanks!

Now get to work! lots of work to accomplish in a short period

You support Trump. You put him on office. You defend him. He’s yours.

Great. Tell Trump to gas up the buses.

Can you even read? PP said she did not vote for Trump, but because she doesn’t agree with liberals, you insist she did (vote for him). This lunacy is why you have become the laughingstock of this country. Guess what? Plenty of people who didn’t actually vote for Trump may very well do so in 2020 because nutters like you make the alternative completely unacceptable.
-DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They just dropped 200 migrants at a homeless shelter in Las cruces new Mexico

They are asking for donations.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/new-mexico-city-asks-donations-after-more-migrants-dropped-n994211

The statement said needed items included utensils, napkins, paper plates, sanitary napkins, shampoo, clothing, towels, blankets, canned food, bottled water, foam padding for bedding and stuffed toys.

interesting . . .

The Border Patrol announced Thursday it would release migrants in southern New Mexico and in El Paso, Texas, pending their future court hearings Immigration and Customs "capacity issues."

Happy to donate to support those communities.

Write those checks and start sending supplies! Be sure to document everything on social media, too.

I don’t post on social media. But Trump sure does...

So do AOC and Omar.

your point is?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's funny that Trumpkins are delighted at the thought of "punishing" sanctuary cities by sending illegal immigrants to us ...

You do realize that sanctuary cities are by and large cities where immigrants - both legal and illegal - ALREADY live. They are already here. And many of our communities are rallying to make it possible for them to live their fullest lives and become contributors to our regions. It's not a punishment - it's the American way.

Exactly - it’s NOT a punishment. So why are Democrats so very outraged?? They should be tickled pink.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Where did OP say she doesn’t want immigrants sent to blue areas? She’s talking about Trump’s behavior.

This is has been copied and pasted before.

from OP's post

Trump wants to use the apprehended immigrants as if they are wild animals to release them in "sanctuary cities" to punish Democrats and blue states!!! WTF!

OP is taking liberties with Trump's wording. OK, Trump used the word, animals, in regard to MS 13 (he claimed). People didn't believe him, as they claimed he used the term to describe ALL migrants. fine . . . (I'm not a Trump supporter, but I do look at the hypocrisy stemming from both sides.)

So OP then used some charged language - the use of "wild animals" and "punish."

OP "softened" the blow by inserting "as if," which isn't a direct comparison. But the comparison is there nonetheless.

So on a psychological level, OP is indeed characterizing these folks as animals who will punish all the liberals. But OP deflects by blaming Trump.

A truly compassionate liberal would have questioned Trump's motives w/o using harsh word choice.

And let's just call a spade a spade, folks. The point of sanctuary cities was to allow illegal immigrants to feel comfortable around police (and other service workers) w/o fear of some sort of retribution. So of course these welcoming environments would be number one choices in relocation efforts.

I was called a liar b/c of something I apparently said about sanctuary cities - but was never given the specifics. (I was only attacked, which isn't a way to argue.) Therefore, I'm addressing this topic here, as it's fitting.

The issue was Trump wanting to treat humans like pawns. Is that really that difficult for you to comprehend?

No, we GET it. You don't.

The point is that DESPITE Trump's MOTIVATION, if liberals are so compassionate, you included, that hate toward Trump would be channeled into good. In other words, your hate will amount to nothing other than wasted energy.

Take that energy and begin thinking of ways to introduce these folks into the community.

b/c they WILL enter welcoming communities

So you're getting what you asked for. Who cares what Trump thinks or says? He isn't changing! But YOU ALL can indeed make good on your word.

Now get to work!

I already know how this will impact my life - my job in particular. But I'm not obsessing over Trump's motivation.

Great. Send them. We will support them. As we’ve said again and again.

Yes, we all know Trump and Miller will continue to be amoral POSs who look for ways to punish Dems. And you will continue to support them and defend them given that you’re also an amoral POS. You all deserve each other.

The stupidity on these threads is astonishing.

I did NOT vote for Trump. Yet, if I disagree with the hypocrisy of the liberal, I'm a Trumpster.

love the name-calling - I'm a piece of sh*t. Thanks!

Now get to work! lots of work to accomplish in a short period

You support Trump. You put him on office. You defend him. He’s yours.

Great. Tell Trump to gas up the buses.

Can you even read? PP said she did not vote for Trump, but because she doesn’t agree with liberals, you insist she did (vote for him). This lunacy is why you have become the laughingstock of this country. Guess what? Plenty of people who didn’t actually vote for Trump may very well do so in 2020 because nutters like you make the alternative completely unacceptable.
-DP

I didn’t say she voted for him.

I said she supports him (vs HRC). Puts him in office (didn’t vote or voted 3rd party), and defends him (see above).

What was untrue?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we are to believe that this is a 36 page thread because some are mad that Trump was mean?

What is the difference between this topic and literally every other day?

The issue is that you dont want your schools and neighborhoods going to the crapper. Its okay to admit.

Exactly. And let’s not forget who started this thread - a liberal who was outraged (wow, is that redundant) that Trump would have the audacity to suggest bringing immigrants to sanctuary cities. They don’t want them any more than the next person, but using Trump as their constant scapegoat allows them to pretend otherwise.

You just don't get it. Is it your attempt to willfully twist the message or are you just stupid.

Many of us can make inferences simply by examining word choice.

Either OP (and many of you) are obsessed with Trump's every word - finding anything about which to complain - or he has indeed created fear in those living in (or near) sanctuary cities.

I said this before. Rather than focusing on his "evil intent," just push forward. You can't change him, but you can change the lives of those who will be arriving.

Am I right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m a Moderate who voted for Hillary, but I think Trump has the right idea.

I am very anti-illegal immigration, and live in a stupidly liberal area of MoCo. Neighbors with signs up everywhere about how ‘We Welcome All Immigrants’ etc, etc.

Maybe Trump could choose each of these houses to accept the illegal immigrants? They are advertising a welcome. Makes perfect sense to me.

Couldn’t agree more.

Welcoming immigrants and illegal immigrants are two different things. Those signs - and I know what you’re referring to - are calling out the xenophobia that has characterized and been stoked by this administration from day one. They popped up shortly after Trump was elected and enacted the “Muslim ban”. Funny how you twist a sign and message intended to impart community into “it’s now liberals responsibility to clothe and shelter illegal immigrants.”

But while we’re on the topic of liberal charity, what about our collective blue state contributions to keep red states on the dole? I’ll use my tax dollars to house, clothe, and educate a family from Central America that desperately wants a life in the US and is willing to put everything on the line to have it in exchange for not having to support freeloading red staters who vote against their best interest and fall for Trump’s demagoguery while he establishes a kleptocracy at the expense of all but the very wealthy. Deal?

That’s a good idea. Agree to support an immigrant family and get a tax credit. It would be like a childcare credit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They just dropped 200 migrants at a homeless shelter in Las cruces new Mexico

They are asking for donations.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/new-mexico-city-asks-donations-after-more-migrants-dropped-n994211

The statement said needed items included utensils, napkins, paper plates, sanitary napkins, shampoo, clothing, towels, blankets, canned food, bottled water, foam padding for bedding and stuffed toys.

interesting . . .

The Border Patrol announced Thursday it would release migrants in southern New Mexico and in El Paso, Texas, pending their future court hearings Immigration and Customs "capacity issues."

I expect to see lots of people in NM putting their homes on the market.

I have a friend who just moved there, too. I'll have to check in with her to get some insider info.

I have an acquaintance who is building a house there for her retirement in a few years. She’s a HUGE liberal so I’m sure she’ll be super excited to share her new home with these immigrants. Very happy for her!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Where did OP say she doesn’t want immigrants sent to blue areas? She’s talking about Trump’s behavior.

This is has been copied and pasted before.

from OP's post

Trump wants to use the apprehended immigrants as if they are wild animals to release them in "sanctuary cities" to punish Democrats and blue states!!! WTF!

OP is taking liberties with Trump's wording. OK, Trump used the word, animals, in regard to MS 13 (he claimed). People didn't believe him, as they claimed he used the term to describe ALL migrants. fine . . . (I'm not a Trump supporter, but I do look at the hypocrisy stemming from both sides.)

So OP then used some charged language - the use of "wild animals" and "punish."

OP "softened" the blow by inserting "as if," which isn't a direct comparison. But the comparison is there nonetheless.

So on a psychological level, OP is indeed characterizing these folks as animals who will punish all the liberals. But OP deflects by blaming Trump.

A truly compassionate liberal would have questioned Trump's motives w/o using harsh word choice.

And let's just call a spade a spade, folks. The point of sanctuary cities was to allow illegal immigrants to feel comfortable around police (and other service workers) w/o fear of some sort of retribution. So of course these welcoming environments would be number one choices in relocation efforts.

I was called a liar b/c of something I apparently said about sanctuary cities - but was never given the specifics. (I was only attacked, which isn't a way to argue.) Therefore, I'm addressing this topic here, as it's fitting.

The issue was Trump wanting to treat humans like pawns. Is that really that difficult for you to comprehend?

No, we GET it. You don't.

The point is that DESPITE Trump's MOTIVATION, if liberals are so compassionate, you included, that hate toward Trump would be channeled into good. In other words, your hate will amount to nothing other than wasted energy.

Take that energy and begin thinking of ways to introduce these folks into the community.

b/c they WILL enter welcoming communities

So you're getting what you asked for. Who cares what Trump thinks or says? He isn't changing! But YOU ALL can indeed make good on your word.

Now get to work!

I already know how this will impact my life - my job in particular. But I'm not obsessing over Trump's motivation.

Great. Send them. We will support them. As we’ve said again and again.

Yes, we all know Trump and Miller will continue to be amoral POSs who look for ways to punish Dems. And you will continue to support them and defend them given that you’re also an amoral POS. You all deserve each other.

The stupidity on these threads is astonishing.

I did NOT vote for Trump. Yet, if I disagree with the hypocrisy of the liberal, I'm a Trumpster.

love the name-calling - I'm a piece of sh*t. Thanks!

Now get to work! lots of work to accomplish in a short period

You support Trump. You put him on office. You defend him. He’s yours.

Great. Tell Trump to gas up the buses.

Can you even read? PP said she did not vote for Trump, but because she doesn’t agree with liberals, you insist she did (vote for him). This lunacy is why you have become the laughingstock of this country. Guess what? Plenty of people who didn’t actually vote for Trump may very well do so in 2020 because nutters like you make the alternative completely unacceptable.
-DP

I didn’t say she voted for him.

I said she supports him (vs HRC). Puts him in office (didn’t vote or voted 3rd party), and defends him (see above).

What was untrue?

I'm sorry. I must have missed this exchange while airing out my Deluth underwear.

Hey, PP, I appreciate the obsession with my so-called political motives, but you really need to refocus by transferring that energy back to Trump himself.

Now, if you'll excuse me - I have a deer to shoot, and those suckers are FAST!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we are to believe that this is a 36 page thread because some are mad that Trump was mean?

What is the difference between this topic and literally every other day?

The issue is that you dont want your schools and neighborhoods going to the crapper. Its okay to admit.

Exactly. And let’s not forget who started this thread - a liberal who was outraged (wow, is that redundant) that Trump would have the audacity to suggest bringing immigrants to sanctuary cities. They don’t want them any more than the next person, but using Trump as their constant scapegoat allows them to pretend otherwise.

You just don't get it. Is it your attempt to willfully twist the message or are you just stupid.

On the contrary, YOU just don’t get it. It’s not a punishment, right? So embrace this opportunity to show your fellow humans how virtuous you are! As another PP said, get to it!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we are to believe that this is a 36 page thread because some are mad that Trump was mean?

What is the difference between this topic and literally every other day?

The issue is that you dont want your schools and neighborhoods going to the crapper. Its okay to admit.

You are projecting, MAGA trash!!

And, phew! Finally! It took 36 pages for you to realize that we are outraged by Trump’s vindictiveness, not the immigrants. Not the brightest bunch, are you?

Riiiiight. If the idea of sending these immigrants to sanctuary cities had come from the Democrats, you’d be falling all over yourselves to show your approval. The only reason you’re outraged (as usual) is because your favorite person to hate suggested it. Get real. We see straight through your faux outrage.
-DP

Why do you think Trump wants to send them?

Because there’s no more room at the border and because Democrats have made it clear they will happily take them. Win-win. Right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Where did OP say she doesn’t want immigrants sent to blue areas? She’s talking about Trump’s behavior.

This is has been copied and pasted before.

from OP's post

Trump wants to use the apprehended immigrants as if they are wild animals to release them in "sanctuary cities" to punish Democrats and blue states!!! WTF!

OP is taking liberties with Trump's wording. OK, Trump used the word, animals, in regard to MS 13 (he claimed). People didn't believe him, as they claimed he used the term to describe ALL migrants. fine . . . (I'm not a Trump supporter, but I do look at the hypocrisy stemming from both sides.)

So OP then used some charged language - the use of "wild animals" and "punish."

OP "softened" the blow by inserting "as if," which isn't a direct comparison. But the comparison is there nonetheless.

So on a psychological level, OP is indeed characterizing these folks as animals who will punish all the liberals. But OP deflects by blaming Trump.

A truly compassionate liberal would have questioned Trump's motives w/o using harsh word choice.

And let's just call a spade a spade, folks. The point of sanctuary cities was to allow illegal immigrants to feel comfortable around police (and other service workers) w/o fear of some sort of retribution. So of course these welcoming environments would be number one choices in relocation efforts.

I was called a liar b/c of something I apparently said about sanctuary cities - but was never given the specifics. (I was only attacked, which isn't a way to argue.) Therefore, I'm addressing this topic here, as it's fitting.

The issue was Trump wanting to treat humans like pawns. Is that really that difficult for you to comprehend?

No, we GET it. You don't.

The point is that DESPITE Trump's MOTIVATION, if liberals are so compassionate, you included, that hate toward Trump would be channeled into good. In other words, your hate will amount to nothing other than wasted energy.

Take that energy and begin thinking of ways to introduce these folks into the community.

b/c they WILL enter welcoming communities

So you're getting what you asked for. Who cares what Trump thinks or says? He isn't changing! But YOU ALL can indeed make good on your word.

Now get to work!

I already know how this will impact my life - my job in particular. But I'm not obsessing over Trump's motivation.

Great. Send them. We will support them. As we’ve said again and again.

Yes, we all know Trump and Miller will continue to be amoral POSs who look for ways to punish Dems. And you will continue to support them and defend them given that you’re also an amoral POS. You all deserve each other.

The stupidity on these threads is astonishing.

I did NOT vote for Trump. Yet, if I disagree with the hypocrisy of the liberal, I'm a Trumpster.

love the name-calling - I'm a piece of sh*t. Thanks!

Now get to work! lots of work to accomplish in a short period

You support Trump. You put him on office. You defend him. He’s yours.

Great. Tell Trump to gas up the buses.

Can you even read? PP said she did not vote for Trump, but because she doesn’t agree with liberals, you insist she did (vote for him). This lunacy is why you have become the laughingstock of this country. Guess what? Plenty of people who didn’t actually vote for Trump may very well do so in 2020 because nutters like you make the alternative completely unacceptable.
-DP

I didn’t say she voted for him.

I said she supports him (vs HRC). Puts him in office (didn’t vote or voted 3rd party), and defends him (see above).

What was untrue?

You’re an idiot - that much is true.