Trump wanted to release immigration detainees onto the streets of “sanctuary cities"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This thread is great in showing how hypocritical liberals are:

1) Stop saying bad things about undocumented workers! They add to the economy in which they live, and don't harm anybody. That's why we need sanctuary cities to protect them from people who are against them.

2) If Trump puts illegal immigrants in Florida, he will harm the communities where they settle! How will he win votes when he tries to harm communities by putting illegal aliens among us?

He will lose votes if voters PERCEIVE this as a bad thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGA demonstrate on a daily basis that they are indeed amoral scum. You don’t want to be called that? Stop being a spiteful, hateful a-hole who celebrates the lies and corruption of this administration.

You had a moment of glory when your king of spiteful a-holes was POTUS but he will be gone. And you will be forgotten. If anything, you will be a shameful reminder of how ugly people can get. But most people will be happy to forget about this dark time. And trash like you.

^^^ It is vital that we keep the party of people who think like this out of power. I'm sure Hitler thought the Jews were scum and trash and a-holes, too.

The Jews were persecuted because of the *immutable* trait of their ethnicity, even though their ethnicity didn’t harm anyone. You are despised because of your *choice* to be a hateful bigot who does cause harm to other people. You could choose to stop acting like a hateful deplorable at any time and people would stop despising you, but you don’t. So don’t trivialize the Holocaust, you anti-Semite. The rest of us aren’t stupid enough to fall for your low-rent tactics.

The liberals are the ones who started the Holocaust comparisons with all their Trump and Hitler crap. Some liberals have even called Jews Nazis on this forum! Did you call those liberals anti-Semites, too?

I am quite concerned that the liberal tactic has devolved into demonizing and delegitimizing voters who didn't vote for the Democrat. Talk about low-rent tactics! My god!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Let me try to lay this out for you one more time:

- The people who, like me, are not terrified of undocumented immigrants recognize are also not terrified that new undocumented immigrants will come to our communities. We were also never, ever, ever going to vote for Donald Trump. So he gains/loses nothing by putting them in our communities.

- The people who, unlike me, hate undocumented immigrants will be horrified by Donald Trump putting them in their communities. Those people, who might have voted for Trump, will now wonder why they should give their vote to the guy who keeps punching them.

Florida is, again, a purple state - and by most reckonings, the most important state. It's hard for me to see how this is a smart move. But perhaps in the game of 957,000,000 dimensional chess it's an excellent move.

Yes. A poor tactical move.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGA demonstrate on a daily basis that they are indeed amoral scum. You don’t want to be called that? Stop being a spiteful, hateful a-hole who celebrates the lies and corruption of this administration.

You had a moment of glory when your king of spiteful a-holes was POTUS but he will be gone. And you will be forgotten. If anything, you will be a shameful reminder of how ugly people can get. But most people will be happy to forget about this dark time. And trash like you.

^^^ It is vital that we keep the party of people who think like this out of power. I'm sure Hitler thought the Jews were scum and trash and a-holes, too.

The Jews were persecuted because of the *immutable* trait of their ethnicity, even though their ethnicity didn’t harm anyone. You are despised because of your *choice* to be a hateful bigot who does cause harm to other people. You could choose to stop acting like a hateful deplorable at any time and people would stop despising you, but you don’t. So don’t trivialize the Holocaust, you anti-Semite. The rest of us aren’t stupid enough to fall for your low-rent tactics.

The liberals are the ones who started the Holocaust comparisons with all their Trump and Hitler crap. Some liberals have even called Jews Nazis on this forum! Did you call those liberals anti-Semites, too?

I am quite concerned that the liberal tactic has devolved into demonizing and delegitimizing voters who didn't vote for the Democrat. Talk about low-rent tactics! My god!

No one forced 7:20 to imply Ds are Hitler. 7:20 gets the credit for acting like a sh1thead all on her own.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:MAGA demonstrate on a daily basis that they are indeed amoral scum. You don’t want to be called that? Stop being a spiteful, hateful a-hole who celebrates the lies and corruption of this administration.

You had a moment of glory when your king of spiteful a-holes was POTUS but he will be gone. And you will be forgotten. If anything, you will be a shameful reminder of how ugly people can get. But most people will be happy to forget about this dark time. And trash like you.

^^^ It is vital that we keep the party of people who think like this out of power. I'm sure Hitler thought the Jews were scum and trash and a-holes, too.

The Jews were persecuted because of the *immutable* trait of their ethnicity, even though their ethnicity didn’t harm anyone. You are despised because of your *choice* to be a hateful bigot who does cause harm to other people. You could choose to stop acting like a hateful deplorable at any time and people would stop despising you, but you don’t. So don’t trivialize the Holocaust, you anti-Semite. The rest of us aren’t stupid enough to fall for your low-rent tactics.

The liberals are the ones who started the Holocaust comparisons with all their Trump and Hitler crap. Some liberals have even called Jews Nazis on this forum! Did you call those liberals anti-Semites, too?

I am quite concerned that the liberal tactic has devolved into demonizing and delegitimizing voters who didn't vote for the Democrat. Talk about low-rent tactics! My god!

Let me get you your fainting chair and some smelling salts.

[Anonymous]

Tell us why Sanctuary and Sanctuary-like cities/counties shouldn't participate in incoming immigrant receipt please? We all need to participate in helping imho.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tell us why Sanctuary and Sanctuary-like cities/counties shouldn't participate in incoming immigrant receipt please? We all need to participate in helping imho.

Sure. Bring them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Tell us why Sanctuary and Sanctuary-like cities/counties shouldn't participate in incoming immigrant receipt please? We all need to participate in helping imho.

No one is saying they shouldn’t help, we’re saying that that help should be provided through an organized system that allows everyone to manage it safely, and that decisions should be made based on what’s more efficient and effective rather than using people as pawns to score political points. Basically, make good choices that aren’t motivated by sticking it to someone else, because the latter is just poor governance.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tell us why Sanctuary and Sanctuary-like cities/counties shouldn't participate in incoming immigrant receipt please? We all need to participate in helping imho.

Sure. Bring them.

Great - and thanks.


much luck!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tell us why Sanctuary and Sanctuary-like cities/counties shouldn't participate in incoming immigrant receipt please? We all need to participate in helping imho.

No one is saying they shouldn’t help, we’re saying that that help should be provided through an organized system that allows everyone to manage it safely, and that decisions should be made based on what’s more efficient and effective rather than using people as pawns to score political points. Basically, make good choices that aren’t motivated by sticking it to someone else, because the latter is just poor governance.

organized system
huh

ok - So here are the areas for which you all need to create plans:

This means that you need
- housing
- a larger allocation for ESOL (and maybe sped, which is harder to identify when language is an obstacle)
- (regarding schools) more bilingual counselors
- easy access to social services (wrap around services, for example, to help with transitioning, and healthcare)
- help with employing newcomers and . . .

- a raise in taxes

Are you ready?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tell us why Sanctuary and Sanctuary-like cities/counties shouldn't participate in incoming immigrant receipt please? We all need to participate in helping imho.

No one is saying they shouldn’t help, we’re saying that that help should be provided through an organized system that allows everyone to manage it safely, and that decisions should be made based on what’s more efficient and effective rather than using people as pawns to score political points. Basically, make good choices that aren’t motivated by sticking it to someone else, because the latter is just poor governance.

organized system
huh

ok - So here are the areas for which you all need to create plans:

This means that you need
- housing
- a larger allocation for ESOL (and maybe sped, which is harder to identify when language is an obstacle)
- (regarding schools) more bilingual counselors
- easy access to social services (wrap around services, for example, to help with transitioning, and healthcare)
- help with employing newcomers and . . .

- a raise in taxes

Are you ready?

I’m ready! I’m just gonna use Obama’s plan!
Oh wait....

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tell us why Sanctuary and Sanctuary-like cities/counties shouldn't participate in incoming immigrant receipt please? We all need to participate in helping imho.

No one is saying they shouldn’t help, we’re saying that that help should be provided through an organized system that allows everyone to manage it safely, and that decisions should be made based on what’s more efficient and effective rather than using people as pawns to score political points. Basically, make good choices that aren’t motivated by sticking it to someone else, because the latter is just poor governance.

organized system
huh

ok - So here are the areas for which you all need to create plans:

This means that you need
- housing
- a larger allocation for ESOL (and maybe sped, which is harder to identify when language is an obstacle)
- (regarding schools) more bilingual counselors
- easy access to social services (wrap around services, for example, to help with transitioning, and healthcare)
- help with employing newcomers and . . .

- a raise in taxes

Are you ready?

Are all the judges we are supposed to "send to the border" volunteers? Or do they cost $$? How about the doctors?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You know who else are members of society? Immigrants. You know, those people whose families you want to rip apart, throw their children in prison camps, and dump to a tent city in the Sonorra desert. But don't let that interrupt your sanctimonious delusions.

Speaking of tents, have you seen the homeless living in tents in LA? I can repost the pic if you like.

And don't forget the 40,000 homeless veterans in the US. You would think that this "small" number could be addressed. After all, how many people have been entering the country illegally recently?

Oh wait- here's some information from BBC.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44319094

It's impossible to say for certain but apprehensions made by US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents provide one measure.

CBP made a total of 396,579 apprehensions on the south-western border in fiscal year 2018, and 303,916 in 2017.

So yeah - I'd say 300,000 is a lot more than 40,000.

Here's your homework since you need practice in critical thinking: Look at the stats of the homeless in the US.

You're welcome.

LOL. I love when the MAGA poopyheads start to talk about homeless people. AS IF THEY ACTUALLY CARED ABOUT THEM.

I am annoyed when posters
1) use emojis as though they're 12 year old kids texting their friends,
2) use childish (and weird) words like "poopyheads" to address other posters &
3) most importantly, incorrectly ASSume that anyone using statistics/evidence to prove we have far too many internal problems to address is a Trump supporter.

Guess what, Einstein? I'm an Independent (and former D) who did NOT vote for Trump.

Now float away to La La Land where life is all about cotton candy and red roses.

"Poopyhead" is better than the alternatives. I agree it's not great though - it doesn't fully capture the essence of your personality.

And you put him in office, so you own him.

Well, I guess reading is NOT fundamental in your case.

I'll end here b/c I saw your thousands of emojis you posted. very mature and enlightened of you - I'm impressed by your stamina and immaturity.

I did put him in office, and I do gladly own him.
Now, with that little tidbit out of the way, how soon can we start dumping illegals in sanctuary cities? We’re starting this weekend in Florida no?

Floridian here - PLEASE do it. You understand we are a purple state here and whoever wins Florida wins it all.

So GO FOR IT mfers.

You DO realize they a. Can’t vote, and b. Are a net drain on the economy?
Enjoy your overcrowded schools and Mara Salvachuca.

The gutter-mouth liberal you're talking to does NOT realize that. Hence, it's a brilliant idea of Trump's. Let them see the results of the liberal policies they're pushing.

Reminds me of when I was 5 years old and shopping with my mother. I told I wanted her to buy the can with the green picture on it, and she told me that was spinach and that I wouldn't like it once I tasted it. I said, "I want spinach! I'm going to like it!" And so my mom told me she would buy it, but that I had to eat it. She did, and I hated it with the first bite. but I had to eat the entire portion, because that was our deal.

Never forgot that lesson. It's time we teach the libs the same lesson.

I love when the anger old nutters start spewing hate as if we care. You are a joke.

I love it with the foolish young idiots are so full of hate that they respond with a meaningless post.

And remember the "as if we care" line. Believe me, you'll care plenty on Election Night when Trump wins again.

Exactly. I can already hear their hysterics. LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You know who else are members of society? Immigrants. You know, those people whose families you want to rip apart, throw their children in prison camps, and dump to a tent city in the Sonorra desert. But don't let that interrupt your sanctimonious delusions.

Speaking of tents, have you seen the homeless living in tents in LA? I can repost the pic if you like.

And don't forget the 40,000 homeless veterans in the US. You would think that this "small" number could be addressed. After all, how many people have been entering the country illegally recently?

Oh wait- here's some information from BBC.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44319094

It's impossible to say for certain but apprehensions made by US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents provide one measure.

CBP made a total of 396,579 apprehensions on the south-western border in fiscal year 2018, and 303,916 in 2017.

So yeah - I'd say 300,000 is a lot more than 40,000.

Here's your homework since you need practice in critical thinking: Look at the stats of the homeless in the US.

You're welcome.

LOL. I love when the MAGA poopyheads start to talk about homeless people. AS IF THEY ACTUALLY CARED ABOUT THEM.

I am annoyed when posters
1) use emojis as though they're 12 year old kids texting their friends,
2) use childish (and weird) words like "poopyheads" to address other posters &
3) most importantly, incorrectly ASSume that anyone using statistics/evidence to prove we have far too many internal problems to address is a Trump supporter.

Guess what, Einstein? I'm an Independent (and former D) who did NOT vote for Trump.

Now float away to La La Land where life is all about cotton candy and red roses.

"Poopyhead" is better than the alternatives. I agree it's not great though - it doesn't fully capture the essence of your personality.

And you put him in office, so you own him.

Well, I guess reading is NOT fundamental in your case.

I'll end here b/c I saw your thousands of emojis you posted. very mature and enlightened of you - I'm impressed by your stamina and immaturity.

I did put him in office, and I do gladly own him.
Now, with that little tidbit out of the way, how soon can we start dumping illegals in sanctuary cities? We’re starting this weekend in Florida no?

Floridian here - PLEASE do it. You understand we are a purple state here and whoever wins Florida wins it all.

So GO FOR IT mfers.

You DO realize they a. Can’t vote, and b. Are a net drain on the economy?
Enjoy your overcrowded schools and Mara Salvachuca.

The gutter-mouth liberal you're talking to does NOT realize that. Hence, it's a brilliant idea of Trump's. Let them see the results of the liberal policies they're pushing.

Reminds me of when I was 5 years old and shopping with my mother. I told I wanted her to buy the can with the green picture on it, and she told me that was spinach and that I wouldn't like it once I tasted it. I said, "I want spinach! I'm going to like it!" And so my mom told me she would buy it, but that I had to eat it. She did, and I hated it with the first bite. but I had to eat the entire portion, because that was our deal.

Never forgot that lesson. It's time we teach the libs the same lesson.

I love when the anger old nutters start spewing hate as if we care. You are a joke.

I love it with the foolish young idiots are so full of hate that they respond with a meaningless post.

And remember the "as if we care" line. Believe me, you'll care plenty on Election Night when Trump wins again.

Exactly. I can already hear their hysterics. LOL.

Hearing voices again? You should really mention that to your doctor.

If your dirt-bag President makes it another 2 years (doubtful), then he will be CRUSHED on election night.

LOL.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tell us why Sanctuary and Sanctuary-like cities/counties shouldn't participate in incoming immigrant receipt please? We all need to participate in helping imho.

No one is saying they shouldn’t help, we’re saying that that help should be provided through an organized system that allows everyone to manage it safely, and that decisions should be made based on what’s more efficient and effective rather than using people as pawns to score political points. Basically, make good choices that aren’t motivated by sticking it to someone else, because the latter is just poor governance.

We’d love that for the border.