Trump wanted to release immigration detainees onto the streets of “sanctuary cities"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Tell us why Sanctuary and Sanctuary-like cities/counties shouldn't participate in incoming immigrant receipt please? We all need to participate in helping imho.

No one is saying they shouldn’t help, we’re saying that that help should be provided through an organized system that allows everyone to manage it safely, and that decisions should be made based on what’s more efficient and effective rather than using people as pawns to score political points. Basically, make good choices that aren’t motivated by sticking it to someone else, because the latter is just poor governance.

organized system
huh

ok - So here are the areas for which you all need to create plans:

This means that you need
- housing
- a larger allocation for ESOL (and maybe sped, which is harder to identify when language is an obstacle)
- (regarding schools) more bilingual counselors
- easy access to social services (wrap around services, for example, to help with transitioning, and healthcare)
- help with employing newcomers and . . .

- a raise in taxes

Are you ready?

Are all the judges we are supposed to "send to the border" volunteers? Or do they cost $$? How about the doctors?

Crickets. Libs are all talk and no action.

They HATE President Trump because he’s all about getting goals done. That’s exactly how good business people succeed.

On the other hand, career politicians like Biden are all about smooth talking, and zero action. That’s why in his entire lifetime, he can’t point to one. damn. thing. he got DONE. He’d do more of the same in the WH — nothing — especially since he’s so old now. Sniffing girls up under his nose is about all he can do.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:And again, isnt it time for UN assistance rather than massively rearranging how we prioritize US resources? Only a small percentage of these visitors qualify for asylum. There are camps all over the world processing refugees. Many people wait years. Meanwhile, while proper processing folks we could also examine our quotas and means for legal entry - we need legal migrants (seasonal workers) and immigrants. Legal.

That is ridiculous. CPB has a $14 billion annual budget and plenty of personnel and contractors. They should be able to handle this surge at the border quite easily, but instead they spend most of their time and money working on a ridiculously expensive and pointless construction project because some idiot promised to build a wall and make Mexico pay for it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You know who else are members of society? Immigrants. You know, those people whose families you want to rip apart, throw their children in prison camps, and dump to a tent city in the Sonorra desert. But don't let that interrupt your sanctimonious delusions.

Speaking of tents, have you seen the homeless living in tents in LA? I can repost the pic if you like.

And don't forget the 40,000 homeless veterans in the US. You would think that this "small" number could be addressed. After all, how many people have been entering the country illegally recently?

Oh wait- here's some information from BBC.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44319094

It's impossible to say for certain but apprehensions made by US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents provide one measure.

CBP made a total of 396,579 apprehensions on the south-western border in fiscal year 2018, and 303,916 in 2017.

So yeah - I'd say 300,000 is a lot more than 40,000.

Here's your homework since you need practice in critical thinking: Look at the stats of the homeless in the US.

You're welcome.

LOL. I love when the MAGA poopyheads start to talk about homeless people. AS IF THEY ACTUALLY CARED ABOUT THEM.

I am annoyed when posters
1) use emojis as though they're 12 year old kids texting their friends,
2) use childish (and weird) words like "poopyheads" to address other posters &
3) most importantly, incorrectly ASSume that anyone using statistics/evidence to prove we have far too many internal problems to address is a Trump supporter.

Guess what, Einstein? I'm an Independent (and former D) who did NOT vote for Trump.

Now float away to La La Land where life is all about cotton candy and red roses.

"Poopyhead" is better than the alternatives. I agree it's not great though - it doesn't fully capture the essence of your personality.

And you put him in office, so you own him.

Well, I guess reading is NOT fundamental in your case.

I'll end here b/c I saw your thousands of emojis you posted. very mature and enlightened of you - I'm impressed by your stamina and immaturity.

I did put him in office, and I do gladly own him.
Now, with that little tidbit out of the way, how soon can we start dumping illegals in sanctuary cities? We’re starting this weekend in Florida no?

Floridian here - PLEASE do it. You understand we are a purple state here and whoever wins Florida wins it all.

So GO FOR IT mfers.

You DO realize they a. Can’t vote, and b. Are a net drain on the economy?
Enjoy your overcrowded schools and Mara Salvachuca.

The gutter-mouth liberal you're talking to does NOT realize that. Hence, it's a brilliant idea of Trump's. Let them see the results of the liberal policies they're pushing.

Reminds me of when I was 5 years old and shopping with my mother. I told I wanted her to buy the can with the green picture on it, and she told me that was spinach and that I wouldn't like it once I tasted it. I said, "I want spinach! I'm going to like it!" And so my mom told me she would buy it, but that I had to eat it. She did, and I hated it with the first bite. but I had to eat the entire portion, because that was our deal.

Never forgot that lesson. It's time we teach the libs the same lesson.

I love when the anger old nutters start spewing hate as if we care. You are a joke.

I love it with the foolish young idiots are so full of hate that they respond with a meaningless post.

And remember the "as if we care" line. Believe me, you'll care plenty on Election Night when Trump wins again.

Exactly. I can already hear their hysterics. LOL.

Hearing voices again? You should really mention that to your doctor.

If your dirt-bag President makes it another 2 years (doubtful), then he will be CRUSHED on election night.

LOL.

Hillary for president! LOL!

Are the voices telling you to support Hillary? Let the voices know that she hasn’t been a candidate for 2-1/2 years and it’s time to get over her.

Dp. How can we? She's the keynote at a premier e-security forum and sells tickets online and would accept the invitation to the opening of an envelope.

Wow. That must be so rough for you.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And again, isnt it time for UN assistance rather than massively rearranging how we prioritize US resources? Only a small percentage of these visitors qualify for asylum. There are camps all over the world processing refugees. Many people wait years. Meanwhile, while proper processing folks we could also examine our quotas and means for legal entry - we need legal migrants (seasonal workers) and immigrants. Legal.

That is ridiculous. CPB has a $14 billion annual budget and plenty of personnel and contractors. They should be able to handle this surge at the border quite easily, but instead they spend most of their time and money working on a ridiculously expensive and pointless construction project because some idiot promised to build a wall and make Mexico pay for it.

Can you deal in facts? How much would it cost to run a refugee camp with housing, medics, lawyers aid, spiritual houses, schools etc. Then to add additional judges to process all cases more rapidly? How much of the CPD money is being spent building a wall? You said most? Also, I thought it was illegal for us to "hold' families or what not? I'm saying build comfortable refugee camps (as many people in America today passed through) and hold those families, for years even, until processed or their claims denied.