Official Brett Kavanaugh Thread

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
I would like to state the obvious here -

What the heck was Georgetown Prep thinking by allowing the publication of misogynistic and racist drivel in the yearbook? Not only were girls' names dragged in the mud in very obvious ways, but apparently there were KKK references in there (not Brett).

I hope the administrators, teachers and parents at all these privileged Catholic Schools are paying close attention: CLEAN UP YOUR GAME.

After a major scandal in '84, they did. A little bit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like liberals have already decided he's guilty:

"This boy groped me, at a party around 35 years ago, not sure where the house was exactly, and not sure when either, and there are no witnesses, and I'm not sure how I got there, and I don't know how I got home, but trust me....he did it."

OK, he's guilty! Next!

You’re... way behind. Perhaps it’s because you’re slow.

And you with the insults.... Perhaps it's because you're a libster.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like liberals have already decided he's guilty:

"This boy groped me, at a party around 35 years ago, not sure where the house was exactly, and not sure when either, and there are no witnesses, and I'm not sure how I got there, and I don't know how I got home, but trust me....he did it."

OK, he's guilty! Next!

Guilty? This isn't a criminal proceeding. It's a job interview. I have decided that there is probable cause to believe that Kavanaugh engaged in this pattern of behavior. That justifies a more thorough investigation than a one day hearing that doesn't involve Mark Ford testifying under oath or, in the alternative, kicking Kavanaugh to the curb and hiring someone else. If I was hiring someone for my company, I sure as hell wouldn't dismiss these allegations just because he denied it. That'd leave your company wide open to a negligent hiring claim when the sexual harassment claims started flying.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like liberals have already decided he's guilty:

"This boy groped me, at a party around 35 years ago, not sure where the house was exactly, and not sure when either, and there are no witnesses, and I'm not sure how I got there, and I don't know how I got home, but trust me....he did it."

OK, he's guilty! Next!

And yet his response is like, "no i couldn't have done this I wasn't at this very specific party at this very specific place"

Comparable example

Larla: mommmmmmm, larlo took my cookie

Mom: which cookie did he take?

Larla: I dont knowwww

Mom: where did he take it from

Larla: I dont knowwww

Mom: Larlo did you take Larlas cookie?

Larlo: No I did take larlas oreos from her plate on the counter. Why would you think that? I would never do that stop asking me any more questions!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like liberals have already decided he's guilty:

"This boy groped me, at a party around 35 years ago, not sure where the house was exactly, and not sure when either, and there are no witnesses, and I'm not sure how I got there, and I don't know how I got home, but trust me....he did it."

OK, he's guilty! Next!

It's the radical feminist effort to criminalize all straight male conduct. Women with husbands, fathers, sons, brothers etc. should be slamming this down, whether it's against Democrats like Al Franken or Republicans like Trump or Kavanaugh.

Do any of you “crimiinzalize all straight male conduct” doorknobs know how completely antisocial and sexually inept this kind of stuff makes you sound? Pinning a girl down while you grope her is sexual assault, not “straight male conduct.” Waggling your penis at a girl at a party is not “straight male conduct,” it’s the conduct of a criminal. No wonder you guys post so much. No one will date you. Even now!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh likes to cite the 65 high schoolers supporting him. Well already 900 Yale alumnae have signed a letter supporting his accuser. The Virgin Kegger is losing the numbers game.

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/408117-hundreds-of-yale-alumnae-sign-open-letter-supporting-new

Unlike the Yale alumnae, the 65 people actually KNOW the man they are talking about.

Keep up, moron. Front page of the NYT, one of the 65 has her name plastered across the GP yearbook with the insinuation that she slept with many boys, including our friend Brett. SHE DID NOT KNOW THIS WHEN SHE SIGNED THE LETTER, and know feels completely betrayed.

ok so it's 64 to 0 instead of 65 to 0. Moron.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My heart broke for Renate Dolphin in that New York Times story about the "Renate Alumni" entries in the Gtown yearbook. They were bragging about having sex with that poor girl, and they had a rhyme about her:

"Michael Walsh, another Georgetown Prep alumnus, also listed himself on his personal yearbook page as a “Renate Alumnus.” Alongside some song lyrics, he included a short poem: “You need a date / and it’s getting late / so don’t hesitate / to call Renate.”
. . .
Ms. Dolphin was aware that members of Judge Kavanaugh’s clique were reciting that poem, according to a person familiar with her thinking. She told the football players that she found it offensive, believing it made her seem like a cheap date, and she asked them to stop."

What a bunch of entitled assholes. They're like every 80s James Spader character rolled into one.

That poem is a lot less offensive than I would have expected

Having a poem made about you is just bad, whatever it is. Remember, she didn't even go to the school.

No girls went to the school. SMH.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Kavanaugh likes to cite the 65 high schoolers supporting him. Well already 900 Yale alumnae have signed a letter supporting his accuser. The Virgin Kegger is losing the numbers game.

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/408117-hundreds-of-yale-alumnae-sign-open-letter-supporting-new

Unlike the Yale alumnae, the 65 people actually KNOW the man they are talking about.

Keep up, moron. Front page of the NYT, one of the 65 has her name plastered across the GP yearbook with the insinuation that she slept with many boys, including our friend Brett. SHE DID NOT KNOW THIS WHEN SHE SIGNED THE LETTER, and know feels completely betrayed.

ok so it's 64 to 0 instead of 65 to 0. Moron.

Not 0, because there was this one letter, and this other letter, as well as this other letter...oh, never mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like liberals have already decided he's guilty:

"This boy groped me, at a party around 35 years ago, not sure where the house was exactly, and not sure when either, and there are no witnesses, and I'm not sure how I got there, and I don't know how I got home, but trust me....he did it."

OK, he's guilty! Next!

And yet his response is like, "no i couldn't have done this I wasn't at this very specific party at this very specific place"

Comparable example

Larla: mommmmmmm, larlo took my cookie

Mom: which cookie did he take?

Larla: I dont knowwww

Mom: where did he take it from

Larla: I dont knowwww

Mom: Larlo did you take Larlas cookie?

Larlo: No I did take larlas oreos from her plate on the counter. Why would you think that? I would never do that stop asking me any more questions!

More like,
“I left some cookies somewhere in the kitchen, but I can’t find them. Did you eat them, Brett?”
“The dozen chocolate chip cookies that you left by the refrigerator that Dad accidentally covered up with his newspaper and you put the bread in front of this morning effectively hiding it? No. I didn’t eat those cookies. But don’t look into it. It was Garrett. From next door. He has brown hair like I do. He did it. The cookies are mean, lying cookies and I want a fair trial so I already called Grandma and she agrees I’m a good boy and I didn’t eat the dozen chocolate chip cookies that were under a newspaper and behind a loaf of bread.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like liberals have already decided he's guilty:

"This boy groped me, at a party around 35 years ago, not sure where the house was exactly, and not sure when either, and there are no witnesses, and I'm not sure how I got there, and I don't know how I got home, but trust me....he did it."

OK, he's guilty! Next!

Guilty? This isn't a criminal proceeding. It's a job interview. I have decided that there is probable cause to believe that Kavanaugh engaged in this pattern of behavior. That justifies a more thorough investigation than a one day hearing that doesn't involve Mark Ford testifying under oath or, in the alternative, kicking Kavanaugh to the curb and hiring someone else. If I was hiring someone for my company, I sure as hell wouldn't dismiss these allegations just because he denied it. That'd leave your company wide open to a negligent hiring claim when the sexual harassment claims started flying.

I'm not dismissing them. There's a hearing coming up. My point is that liberals are talking as if he's guilty already. There were just a slew of Dems on the news saying "I believe her." They've already decided he's guilty, and they haven't even heard her (or him) yet testify yet.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:My heart broke for Renate Dolphin in that New York Times story about the "Renate Alumni" entries in the Gtown yearbook. They were bragging about having sex with that poor girl, and they had a rhyme about her:

"Michael Walsh, another Georgetown Prep alumnus, also listed himself on his personal yearbook page as a “Renate Alumnus.” Alongside some song lyrics, he included a short poem: “You need a date / and it’s getting late / so don’t hesitate / to call Renate.”
. . .
Ms. Dolphin was aware that members of Judge Kavanaugh’s clique were reciting that poem, according to a person familiar with her thinking. She told the football players that she found it offensive, believing it made her seem like a cheap date, and she asked them to stop."

What a bunch of entitled assholes. They're like every 80s James Spader character rolled into one.

That poem is a lot less offensive than I would have expected

How about the eight teenaged boys posing together with the caption “Renate alumni”? Their claim is that they never, ever meant anything by it and it was a 35 year old joke at school, so it has nothing to do with Renate Schroeder Dolphin.

These boys are most disgusting sluts I have ever seen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like liberals have already decided he's guilty:

"This boy groped me, at a party around 35 years ago, not sure where the house was exactly, and not sure when either, and there are no witnesses, and I'm not sure how I got there, and I don't know how I got home, but trust me....he did it."

OK, he's guilty! Next!

Guilty? This isn't a criminal proceeding. It's a job interview. I have decided that there is probable cause to believe that Kavanaugh engaged in this pattern of behavior. That justifies a more thorough investigation than a one day hearing that doesn't involve Mark Ford testifying under oath or, in the alternative, kicking Kavanaugh to the curb and hiring someone else. If I was hiring someone for my company, I sure as hell wouldn't dismiss these allegations just because he denied it. That'd leave your company wide open to a negligent hiring claim when the sexual harassment claims started flying.

I'm not dismissing them. There's a hearing coming up. My point is that liberals are talking as if he's guilty already. There were just a slew of Dems on the news saying "I believe her." They've already decided he's guilty, and they haven't even heard her (or him) yet testify yet.

Because testimony doesn't matter to liberals. Conservative white man (actually any white man) is automatically guilty just for existing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like liberals have already decided he's guilty:

"This boy groped me, at a party around 35 years ago, not sure where the house was exactly, and not sure when either, and there are no witnesses, and I'm not sure how I got there, and I don't know how I got home, but trust me....he did it."

OK, he's guilty! Next!

Guilty? This isn't a criminal proceeding. It's a job interview. I have decided that there is probable cause to believe that Kavanaugh engaged in this pattern of behavior. That justifies a more thorough investigation than a one day hearing that doesn't involve Mark Ford testifying under oath or, in the alternative, kicking Kavanaugh to the curb and hiring someone else. If I was hiring someone for my company, I sure as hell wouldn't dismiss these allegations just because he denied it. That'd leave your company wide open to a negligent hiring claim when the sexual harassment claims started flying.

I'm not dismissing them. There's a hearing coming up. My point is that liberals are talking as if he's guilty already. There were just a slew of Dems on the news saying "I believe her." They've already decided he's guilty, and they haven't even heard her (or him) yet testify yet.

For th last time, it’s not a question of guilt. It’s a question of suitability for a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the land. At this point, he’s clearly qualified.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like liberals have already decided he's guilty:

"This boy groped me, at a party around 35 years ago, not sure where the house was exactly, and not sure when either, and there are no witnesses, and I'm not sure how I got there, and I don't know how I got home, but trust me....he did it."

OK, he's guilty! Next!

Guilty? This isn't a criminal proceeding. It's a job interview. I have decided that there is probable cause to believe that Kavanaugh engaged in this pattern of behavior. That justifies a more thorough investigation than a one day hearing that doesn't involve Mark Ford testifying under oath or, in the alternative, kicking Kavanaugh to the curb and hiring someone else. If I was hiring someone for my company, I sure as hell wouldn't dismiss these allegations just because he denied it. That'd leave your company wide open to a negligent hiring claim when the sexual harassment claims started flying.

I'm not dismissing them. There's a hearing coming up. My point is that liberals are talking as if he's guilty already. There were just a slew of Dems on the news saying "I believe her." They've already decided he's guilty, and they haven't even heard her (or him) yet testify yet.

I suppose that's worse than McConnell saying that Kavanaugh will be confirmed, or Graham saying that nothing she says will change his mind. Or maybe equally as bad?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like liberals have already decided he's guilty:

"This boy groped me, at a party around 35 years ago, not sure where the house was exactly, and not sure when either, and there are no witnesses, and I'm not sure how I got there, and I don't know how I got home, but trust me....he did it."

OK, he's guilty! Next!

Guilty? This isn't a criminal proceeding. It's a job interview. I have decided that there is probable cause to believe that Kavanaugh engaged in this pattern of behavior. That justifies a more thorough investigation than a one day hearing that doesn't involve Mark Ford testifying under oath or, in the alternative, kicking Kavanaugh to the curb and hiring someone else. If I was hiring someone for my company, I sure as hell wouldn't dismiss these allegations just because he denied it. That'd leave your company wide open to a negligent hiring claim when the sexual harassment claims started flying.

I'm not dismissing them. There's a hearing coming up. My point is that liberals are talking as if he's guilty already. There were just a slew of Dems on the news saying "I believe her." They've already decided he's guilty, and they haven't even heard her (or him) yet testify yet.

For th last time, it’s not a question of guilt. It’s a question of suitability for a lifetime appointment to the highest court in the land. At this point, he’s clearly qualified.

His judgment is terrible. That's a major disqualification.