Prince Harry and Meghan in Near Catastrophic Car Chase in NYC

[Anonymous]

Oh no! Anyways…what’s everyone up to this weekend? Looks like Sunday will be nice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who was taking care of their children?

Who takes care of your children when you go to work or on date night with your significant other?

Of course, hiring someone to watch a child when you are unavailable is normal. The suggestion here is that Harry and Meghan do not take care of their own children regularly. I'm not suggesting this alone is wrong or bad -- millions of people have fulltime help so they can work. I suspect Harry and Meghan have fulltime nannies who watch and take care of the children.

Especially since, by his own admission, Harry requires an hour+ of meditation daily just to keep his sanity.

An hour doesn't appear to be doing very well. Perhaps he should increase to two hours.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:They are upset that Buckingham Palace has not issued a public statement in support of them.

What would the palace even say? They didn’t witness the incident.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Remember when Barack and Michelle Obama came to NYC and had dinner at Blue Stone Barns and…nothing happened? Or when the UN convenes? Or when any number of celebrities and movie stars who are 100000000 more famous than this sad paid are just walking down the street or seen at the theater or dining out at the same restaurants as normal people? No paps, no chases, no press releases. These two as such brazen transparent liars.

Obama. Really? Obama is surrounded by armed secret service men’s and women who would not hesitate to pull the trigger if someone got even remotely close. UN are also protected. Remember when those people protesting the Turkish President got the asses whipped by Turkish secret service right here in DC. Paparazzi not messing with them.

H & M also had security with them. As others have pointed out, if they cared about not being seen they would hire a car with tinted windows like everyone who actually practices what they preach. Instead they want us to believe that this couple who cannot stop shouting about their privacy hail a NYC yellow cab after an awards dinner at which she was an honoree?

It's clearly staged.

This is the woman who rolled down her window in the UK so she could be seen despite the risk to herself and Prince Harry.

[Anonymous]

It wasn’t about being seen! It was about being followed to a private residence for the night!

[Anonymous]

This is the South Park episode literally come to life. I'm kind of amazed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know if I believe it. I think it's another ploy for attention.

Yep. She is freaking out about how irrelevant she is and she desperately needs to remind everyone that she's Diana #2. Lol.

So irrelevant you are 24 pages deep in a thread about her. Stop, you are a stan. It's ok to admit that you love and adore her.

...you need help.

Like, if you actually believe the Grifters of Sussex are being hounded by paps in cars in a city where that's next to impossible, in the era of the Internet where dozens of passers-by and motorists would've confirmed it, in an era of surveillance where there are cameras EVERYWHERE (and paparazzi know that, and she's not worth the trouble), you need help.

This is not the Nineties. Very few celebrities today command the kind of glittering rock-star status Princess Diana had, and paparazzi don't chase people through the streets anymore precisely because of what happened to Princess Diana.

They attended some random event where I saw a Hertz sign. Hardly glamorous enough to chase for photos. She doesn't have the shine of a princess, and she knows it, and she's making up a sick lie because she wants people to believe she's a reincarnation of Diana or something. People like her need help.

Here is a perfect take in Meghan, the Wannabe queen of hearts of Wonderland!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12098661/amp/MAUREEN-CALLAHANs-hand-account-Meghans-word-salad-appearance-New-York-award-gala.html?ito=smartnews

That is so perfectly written!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t about being seen! It was about being followed to a private residence for the night!

Don’t the paparazzi know where all the nyc celebs live?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t about being seen! It was about being followed to a private residence for the night!

As opposed to a hotel? What difference would it make? It's NYC. Home to plenty of world famous celebs and celebrity visitors. The Prince and Princess of Wales visited New York not long ago. They coped.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know if I believe it. I think it's another ploy for attention.

Yep. She is freaking out about how irrelevant she is and she desperately needs to remind everyone that she's Diana #2. Lol.

So irrelevant you are 24 pages deep in a thread about her. Stop, you are a stan. It's ok to admit that you love and adore her.

...you need help.

Like, if you actually believe the Grifters of Sussex are being hounded by paps in cars in a city where that's next to impossible, in the era of the Internet where dozens of passers-by and motorists would've confirmed it, in an era of surveillance where there are cameras EVERYWHERE (and paparazzi know that, and she's not worth the trouble), you need help.

This is not the Nineties. Very few celebrities today command the kind of glittering rock-star status Princess Diana had, and paparazzi don't chase people through the streets anymore precisely because of what happened to Princess Diana.

They attended some random event where I saw a Hertz sign. Hardly glamorous enough to chase for photos. She doesn't have the shine of a princess, and she knows it, and she's making up a sick lie because she wants people to believe she's a reincarnation of Diana or something. People like her need help.

Here is a perfect take in Meghan, the Wannabe queen of hearts of Wonderland!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12098661/amp/MAUREEN-CALLAHANs-hand-account-Meghans-word-salad-appearance-New-York-award-gala.html?ito=smartnews

That is so perfectly written!

Quote from the above:

“Here, in real time, we observed Meghan’s inability to read a room. She thanked the ‘other honorees’ without naming them.

‘Congratulations,’ she said, ‘and frankly, well deserved.’

It was all so smug and supercilious, this glorified podcaster telling these boots-on-the-ground activists — no matter what one thinks of their politics — that they had, in fact, earned their place on the same stage as the great Meghan Markle.”

Yiiiiiiiiiiiiiikes.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It wasn’t about being seen! It was about being followed to a private residence for the night!

As opposed to a hotel? What difference would it make? It's NYC. Home to plenty of world famous celebs and celebrity visitors. The Prince and Princess of Wales visited New York not long ago. They coped.

But they have security! Meghan (and Harry) have no way to retain competent security! Apparently! Because their go-to moves included the Hertz entry and taking 2 extra hours to get home…

Guys, (Harry and) Meghan are in grave danger. Very grave, very danger. What does “coped” even mean in these circumstances, I ask you?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who was taking care of their children?

Who takes care of your children when you go to work or on date night with your significant other?

The undocumented immigrant nanny.

My husband and I never went 3,000 miles from my children. I would have brought them with me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Sadly, the real reason his mother died was that her driver had a high blood alcohol level. He was driving while impaired and made some very bad decisions. If the driver of that car had not been drinking before getting behind the wheel, there very well may not have been a crash that night.

I'm rather fascinated with the evolution of this theory.

I watched the story unfold when the crash happened. The driver's family and friends emphatically stated he was NOT A DRINKER, NEVER DRANK, WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN DRUNK.

And yet, the official statements placed the blame on a dead man (who couldn't defend himself) for having a high alcohol level.

Veeerrryyy interesting, if you ask me. Diana was an inconvenient problem for the BRF.

This^. A man who friends and family swear didn’t drink was all of a sudden a drunk on the one night he was chauffeuring the former Prince of England. Not believable except for those individuals who want to believe a lie over the truth.

Which Prince of England?

princess

[Anonymous]

Somehow Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds manage. Pretty sure the paps know where they live…TSwift visits nyc a lot too without issue…

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't know if I believe it. I think it's another ploy for attention.

Yep. She is freaking out about how irrelevant she is and she desperately needs to remind everyone that she's Diana #2. Lol.

So irrelevant you are 24 pages deep in a thread about her. Stop, you are a stan. It's ok to admit that you love and adore her.

...you need help.

Like, if you actually believe the Grifters of Sussex are being hounded by paps in cars in a city where that's next to impossible, in the era of the Internet where dozens of passers-by and motorists would've confirmed it, in an era of surveillance where there are cameras EVERYWHERE (and paparazzi know that, and she's not worth the trouble), you need help.

This is not the Nineties. Very few celebrities today command the kind of glittering rock-star status Princess Diana had, and paparazzi don't chase people through the streets anymore precisely because of what happened to Princess Diana.

They attended some random event where I saw a Hertz sign. Hardly glamorous enough to chase for photos. She doesn't have the shine of a princess, and she knows it, and she's making up a sick lie because she wants people to believe she's a reincarnation of Diana or something. People like her need help.

Here is a perfect take in Meghan, the Wannabe queen of hearts of Wonderland!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12098661/amp/MAUREEN-CALLAHANs-hand-account-Meghans-word-salad-appearance-New-York-award-gala.html?ito=smartnews

That is so perfectly written!

Disagree. It’s too mean to be funny. And the author reaches (for instance Meghan never called Kate “Waity Katy” the British tabloids did). You gotta be balanced with the snark.