How is the Supreme Court confirmation going to go?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mazie Hirono has to be the biggest idiot on the Judiciary Committee.

I wish ACB would give Mazie a nice big eye roll, just as Mazie did to her. But Barrett is classier than that.

No, she’s not. She is sht all over RBG’s legacy.

Hilarious, using your children as props is mega or MAGA-classy.

The children of every other recent nominee with children have attended their hearings. So what’s your point again?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mazie Hirono has to be the biggest idiot on the Judiciary Committee.

Oink oink oink, misogynist pig.

Ooh, I’ll be sure to use this every single time you liberals bash women you don’t like (ie conservatives). Hypocritical pig.
DP

Well, you are using sexist language to demean a learned senator of color...I critique Amy Covid-B on her record. Never called her dumb, so oink oink on.

You’re talking to different people, as indicated by the DP. At any rate, I agree with the PP. Mazie is a complete idiot and always has been.

Now do tell - how is calling her an idiot any different from Democrats calling conservative women “idiots, stupid, dumb,” and worse? You’ve been calling Barrett “Amy COVID-B”. I take it you think you’re cute, but in reality you’re just showing yourself to be the moron you really are.

Well, she was the reason for a superspreader event. Them's the facts. DP.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

What a dope.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mazie is wasting any opportunity to land a punch.

Mazie just wasted 30 minutes of everyone’s time. She’s a pompous twit.

Well, grassley had had dementia for decades and should have retired. Crapo is appropriately named. Ted Cruz is the biggest ssshole to ever serve in Congress.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

What a dope.

It's not a bad question, if you've paid any attention to the judiciary.
Unfortunately.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mazie Hirono has to be the biggest idiot on the Judiciary Committee.

Oink oink oink, misogynist pig.

Ooh, I’ll be sure to use this every single time you liberals bash women you don’t like (ie conservatives). Hypocritical pig.
DP

Well, you are using sexist language to demean a learned senator of color...I critique Amy Covid-B on her record. Never called her dumb, so oink oink on.

You’re talking to different people, as indicated by the DP. At any rate, I agree with the PP. Mazie is a complete idiot and always has been.

Now do tell - how is calling her an idiot any different from Democrats calling conservative women “idiots, stupid, dumb,” and worse? You’ve been calling Barrett “Amy COVID-B”. I take it you think you’re cute, but in reality you’re just showing yourself to be the moron you really are.

Well, she was the reason for a superspreader event. Them's the facts. DP.

Really? Please post those “facts” stating she was responsible for the COVID spread at that event.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mazie Hirono has to be the biggest idiot on the Judiciary Committee.

Oink oink oink, misogynist pig.

Ooh, I’ll be sure to use this every single time you liberals bash women you don’t like (ie conservatives). Hypocritical pig.
DP

Well, you are using sexist language to demean a learned senator of color...I critique Amy Covid-B on her record. Never called her dumb, so oink oink on.

You’re talking to different people, as indicated by the DP. At any rate, I agree with the PP. Mazie is a complete idiot and always has been.

Now do tell - how is calling her an idiot any different from Democrats calling conservative women “idiots, stupid, dumb,” and worse? You’ve been calling Barrett “Amy COVID-B”. I take it you think you’re cute, but in reality you’re just showing yourself to be the moron you really are.

Well, she was the reason for a superspreader event. Them's the facts. DP.

Really? Please post those “facts” stating she was responsible for the COVID spread at that event.

You are certifiable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

I’m one of the PPs who’s not fond of Hirono, but she asks that question of every single judicial nominee.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mazie Hirono has to be the biggest idiot on the Judiciary Committee.

Oink oink oink, misogynist pig.

Ooh, I’ll be sure to use this every single time you liberals bash women you don’t like (ie conservatives). Hypocritical pig.
DP

Well, you are using sexist language to demean a learned senator of color...I critique Amy Covid-B on her record. Never called her dumb, so oink oink on.

You’re talking to different people, as indicated by the DP. At any rate, I agree with the PP. Mazie is a complete idiot and always has been.

Now do tell - how is calling her an idiot any different from Democrats calling conservative women “idiots, stupid, dumb,” and worse? You’ve been calling Barrett “Amy COVID-B”. I take it you think you’re cute, but in reality you’re just showing yourself to be the moron you really are.

Well, she was the reason for a superspreader event. Them's the facts. DP.

Really? Please post those “facts” stating she was responsible for the COVID spread at that event.

LOL. You're obviously not a lawyer. Read what I said and read what you said. Carefully.

Maybe you should sit out discussions about these hearings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Just handled Corey nicely on the racial epithet case.

Because it's couldn't possibly be a hostile work environment if they called you the N-word AFTER they had already decided to fire you.

[Anonymous]

I love how she doesn’t need notes to rattle off in-depth thoughts. She’s just completely relying on her memory and knowledge. Very impressive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I love how she doesn’t need notes to rattle off in-depth thoughts. She’s just completely relying on her memory and knowledge. Very impressive.

It's not hard to remember to give non-answers and obfuscate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

What a dope.

Why? A legitimate question. Someone should have asked Kavanaugh. Someone should ask her if she always obeys her husband and if she has ever had sex for pleasure because her religion days women have sex only to procreate.

Barrett's voice is more annoying than laura trauvalen.

[Anonymous]

Any Covid-Barrett is not qualified for a SCOTUS seat. She’s a cult member. She won’t call Roe a super-precedent, and is overall disingenuous in her answers. Let’s not pick on her voice - this is classic sexist BS.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why? A legitimate question. Someone should have asked Kavanaugh. Someone should ask her if she always obeys her husband and if she has ever had sex for pleasure because her religion days women have sex only to procreate.

Barrett's voice is more annoying than laura trauvalen.