Child killed by Neighborhood Watch captain while walking home
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
Anonymous
|
BOOM GOES THE DYNAMITE
Medical report says Zimmerman had broken nose, other injuries after fight http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/16/justice/florida-teen-shooting/index.html?hpt=hp_t1 Autopsy results show Trayvon Martin had injuries to his knuckles http://www.wftv.com/news/news/local/autopsy-results-show-trayvon-martin-had-injuries-h/nN6gs/ How come no outrage? This thug was a menace. |
Anonymous
I thought standing your ground was legal in FLA. If someone pursues you through a dark street with a gun, aren't you justified in defending yourself? |
Anonymous
|
Anonymous
If I had a bigoted jackass he would post just like that. |
Anonymous
It's interesting that on the day and night of the shooting, Zimmerman was checked by police and ER personnel who did not believe that he required medical assistance. They didn't even put a bandaid on his head. And yet, THE NEXT DAY, he has 2 black eyes, a fractured nose and 2 lacerations on the back of his head. So, why were those injuries so serious the next day, but not in the first 12 hours after the incident? And if you look at the video of Zimmerman being led into the police station, there are no visible lacerations or blood on the back of his head, no signs of black eyes or fractured nose (not even a nose bleed) on his face. The question is when did those injuries take place? Mr. Zimmerman's story still has some issues. |
Anonymous
You were there? Tell us more |
Anonymous
|
It's interesting that on the day and night of the shooting, Zimmerman was checked by police and ER personnel who did not believe that he required medical assistance. They didn't even put a bandaid on his head. And yet, THE NEXT DAY, he has 2 black eyes, a fractured nose and 2 lacerations on the back of his head. So, why were those injuries so serious the next day, but not in the first 12 hours after the incident? And if you look at the video of Zimmerman being led into the police station, there are no visible lacerations or blood on the back of his head, no signs of black eyes or fractured nose (not even a nose bleed) on his face. The question is when did those injuries take place? Mr. Zimmerman's story still has some issues. I’m pro-trayvon. But there was a video released recently that did show blood on Zimmerman’s head when he was taken to the police station. |
Anonymous
| If George Zimmerman minded his own business, didn't stalk Travyon, then there would have been no altercation. Trayvon had every right to fight back. This changes nothing. As people keep repeatedly pointing out, you don't get to start a fight and then cry foul that you were injured. I hope he WAS injured. |
Anonymous
If trayvon didnt cut through a neighbor hood and disrespect a place he was a guest to he wouldnt be dead. 
|
Anonymous
|
Anonymous
You are an utter joke of a human being. |
Anonymous
truth hurts? Those are all true statements, pictures and his twitter handle |
Anonymous
No it doesn't. No, they aren't. But you're right, the truth might hurt you that you are a joke. |
Anonymous
You are assuming that GZ was "stalking" -- or approaching TM in a threatening manner. Is it "stalking" if I see you walking on the sidewalk in front of my house and walk toward you? You are making assumptions that GZ was chasing TM with a gun loaded and exposed. That's one scenario. But there are other possible scenarios where TM was walking and GZ walked in his direction so that he would be able to direct the police (whom he called to the scene). It IS legal for someone to approach another person and say "what are you doing here?" That's not starting a fight. We don't know who started the fight yet -- but that is the only issue that matters in determing whether it was self defense. Unless there is evidence that GZ took the gun out and pointed it at TM, none of the approaching or talking behavior matters at all. The only issue is who made it a physical attack. If TM didn't like how GZ was asking him questions and TM threw a punch at GZ, then under Florida law GZ apparently had the right to shoot TM. I'm not saying that I'm happy about that law or the fact that TM has lost his life as a result of a fight. BUT, the PP who keeps saying GZ was "stalking" TM with a gun is making assumptions that are not supported by evidence to date. What's the difference b/t "stalking" and walking up to someone or trying to catch up with someone who is ahead of you? Stalking requires the intent to create fear in another or the intent to do harm. The fact that GZ called the police non-emergency line to get police to help him check this fellow out would undermine any argument that GZ was actually "stalking" TM. GZ was "investigating" someone who he thought looked out of place. What happened once GZ and TM met -- well, that's still to be determined, but please let go of your emotionally inflammatory language and look at the facts. |