Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Child killed by Neighborhood Watch captain while walking home"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If George Zimmerman minded his own business, didn't stalk Travyon, then there would have been no altercation. Trayvon had every right to fight back. This changes nothing. As people keep repeatedly pointing out, you don't get to start a fight and then cry foul that you were injured. I hope he WAS injured.[/quote] You are assuming that GZ was "stalking" -- or approaching TM in a threatening manner. Is it "stalking" if I see you walking on the sidewalk in front of my house and walk toward you? You are making assumptions that GZ was chasing TM with a gun loaded and exposed. That's one scenario. But there are other possible scenarios where TM was walking and GZ walked in his direction so that he would be able to direct the police (whom he called to the scene). It IS legal for someone to approach another person and say "what are you doing here?" That's not starting a fight. We don't know who started the fight yet -- but that is the only issue that matters in determing whether it was self defense. Unless there is evidence that GZ took the gun out and pointed it at TM, none of the approaching or talking behavior matters at all. The only issue is who made it a physical attack. If TM didn't like how GZ was asking him questions and TM threw a punch at GZ, then under Florida law GZ apparently had the right to shoot TM. I'm not saying that I'm happy about that law or the fact that TM has lost his life as a result of a fight. BUT, the PP who keeps saying GZ was "stalking" TM with a gun is making assumptions that are not supported by evidence to date. What's the difference b/t "stalking" and walking up to someone or trying to catch up with someone who is ahead of you? Stalking requires the intent to create fear in another or the intent to do harm. The fact that GZ called the police non-emergency line to get police to help him check this fellow out would undermine any argument that GZ was actually "stalking" TM. GZ was "investigating" someone who he thought looked out of place. What happened once GZ and TM met -- well, that's still to be determined, but please let go of your emotionally inflammatory language and look at the facts.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics