Fetterman - Oz Debate — anyone keeping tabs on this?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pin this for when Oz and Mastriani claim fraud on November 9th and 10th...

Damn, look at that “I already voted” tab.

Maybe yes, maybe no.
If 2016 taught you anything it should be that people lie on polls because they don't want to look like a jerk

And 2018 and 2020 taught you what?

Polls in 2020 had democrats comfortably taking the senate. Gideon is still wondering what happened.

And they did in fact take control of the Senate.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pin this for when Oz and Mastriani claim fraud on November 9th and 10th...

Damn, look at that “I already voted” tab.

Maybe yes, maybe no.
If 2016 taught you anything it should be that people lie on polls because they don't want to look like a jerk

And 2018 and 2020 taught you what?

Polls in 2020 had democrats comfortably taking the senate. Gideon is still wondering what happened.

And they did in fact take control of the Senate.

comfortably is the key word. None of their policy goals ever even got a vote, instead we got a bloated infrastructure bill that required the coal industry's best friend to sign off

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pin this for when Oz and Mastriani claim fraud on November 9th and 10th...

Damn, look at that “I already voted” tab.

Maybe yes, maybe no.
If 2016 taught you anything it should be that people lie on polls because they don't want to look like a jerk

And 2018 and 2020 taught you what?

Polls in 2020 had democrats comfortably taking the senate. Gideon is still wondering what happened.

And they did in fact take control of the Senate.

comfortably is the key word. None of their policy goals ever even got a vote, instead we got a bloated infrastructure bill that required the coal industry's best friend to sign off

The 538 forecast pegged 51-49 and 52-48 as the most likely outcomes, with 50-50 as pretty close. Anything above 52 was pretty unlikely. Seems like they did a good job to me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pin this for when Oz and Mastriani claim fraud on November 9th and 10th...

Damn, look at that “I already voted” tab.

Maybe yes, maybe no.
If 2016 taught you anything it should be that people lie on polls because they don't want to look like a jerk

And 2018 and 2020 taught you what?

Polls in 2020 had democrats comfortably taking the senate. Gideon is still wondering what happened.

And they did in fact take control of the Senate.

comfortably is the key word. None of their policy goals ever even got a vote, instead we got a bloated infrastructure bill that required the coal industry's best friend to sign off

The 538 forecast pegged 51-49 and 52-48 as the most likely outcomes, with 50-50 as pretty close. Anything above 52 was pretty unlikely. Seems like they did a good job to me.

50-50 meant voting rights never happened.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pin this for when Oz and Mastriani claim fraud on November 9th and 10th...

Damn, look at that “I already voted” tab.

Maybe yes, maybe no.
If 2016 taught you anything it should be that people lie on polls because they don't want to look like a jerk

And 2018 and 2020 taught you what?

Polls in 2020 had democrats comfortably taking the senate. Gideon is still wondering what happened.

And they did in fact take control of the Senate.

comfortably is the key word. None of their policy goals ever even got a vote, instead we got a bloated infrastructure bill that required the coal industry's best friend to sign off

The 538 forecast pegged 51-49 and 52-48 as the most likely outcomes, with 50-50 as pretty close. Anything above 52 was pretty unlikely. Seems like they did a good job to me.

50-50 meant voting rights never happened.

Wouldn't have happened at 51-49 either.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pin this for when Oz and Mastriani claim fraud on November 9th and 10th...

Damn, look at that “I already voted” tab.

Maybe yes, maybe no.
If 2016 taught you anything it should be that people lie on polls because they don't want to look like a jerk

And 2018 and 2020 taught you what?

Polls in 2020 had democrats comfortably taking the senate. Gideon is still wondering what happened.

And they did in fact take control of the Senate.

comfortably is the key word. None of their policy goals ever even got a vote, instead we got a bloated infrastructure bill that required the coal industry's best friend to sign off

The 538 forecast pegged 51-49 and 52-48 as the most likely outcomes, with 50-50 as pretty close. Anything above 52 was pretty unlikely. Seems like they did a good job to me.

50-50 meant voting rights never happened.

Wouldn't have happened at 51-49 either.

it might have with 52. We'll never know now

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Pin this for when Oz and Mastriani claim fraud on November 9th and 10th...

Damn, look at that “I already voted” tab.

Maybe yes, maybe no.
If 2016 taught you anything it should be that people lie on polls because they don't want to look like a jerk

And 2018 and 2020 taught you what?

Polls in 2020 had democrats comfortably taking the senate. Gideon is still wondering what happened.

And they did in fact take control of the Senate.

comfortably is the key word. None of their policy goals ever even got a vote, instead we got a bloated infrastructure bill that required the coal industry's best friend to sign off

The 538 forecast pegged 51-49 and 52-48 as the most likely outcomes, with 50-50 as pretty close. Anything above 52 was pretty unlikely. Seems like they did a good job to me.

50-50 meant voting rights never happened.

Wouldn't have happened at 51-49 either.

it might have with 52. We'll never know now

Possibly, but that was at the outer edge of what was likely per the polls. The polls were pretty good overall for 2020 senate races.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

I think it’s hilarious that nobody can point to a single accomplishment that qualifies fetterman for the office……not one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s hilarious that nobody can point to a single accomplishment that qualifies fetterman for the office……not one.

Plenty of posts have pointed to plenty of qualifications. You are laughing in denial.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s hilarious that nobody can point to a single accomplishment that qualifies fetterman for the office……not one.

Fetterman was unimpressive at his peak and now has health issues that further reduce his ability to do the job. Oz is sketchy. Pennsylvania doesnt have good choices.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s hilarious that nobody can point to a single accomplishment that qualifies fetterman for the office……not one.

Plenty of posts have pointed to plenty of qualifications. You are laughing in denial.

Actually laughing at useless posters like you who continue to provide no evidence of accomplishment

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s hilarious that nobody can point to a single accomplishment that qualifies fetterman for the office……not one.

Plenty of posts have pointed to plenty of qualifications. You are laughing in denial.

Actually laughing at useless posters like you who continue to provide no evidence of accomplishment

There have been plenty of posts. You don’t want a serious discussion, so why bother with buffoons like you?
What has your hero Oz done by the way, other than serve in the Turkish armed forces and shop at Wegner’s?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I think it’s hilarious that nobody can point to a single accomplishment that qualifies fetterman for the office……not one.

Plenty of posts have pointed to plenty of qualifications. You are laughing in denial.

Actually laughing at useless posters like you who continue to provide no evidence of accomplishment

There have been plenty of posts. You don’t want a serious discussion, so why bother with buffoons like you?
What has your hero Oz done by the way, other than serve in the Turkish armed forces and shop at Wegner’s?

Well, Oz did teach Pennsylvanians the meaning of crudités. Does that count for something?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

Curious. Are in PA? And, what do you like about Oz? I simply can't imagine a snake oil salesman as my chosen representative in the Senate. We watched him screw over chubby America to make a buck for years. Why do you think he won't screw over you for the same? He doesn't even have any real values of his own. It's NUTTY.