Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 4

[Anonymous]

I don’t think any of the Meghan haters know how “media” or PR work… and the weird fixation on Sunshine Sachs is borderline unhinged. Newsflash: every public figure has “PR”, including the royal family.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will she be a normal peasant girl or a Duchess girl?!

I don't know, but it's guaranteed she'll be a black girl.

Great! That’s good to know!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will she be a normal peasant girl or a Duchess girl?!

I don't know, but it's guaranteed she'll be a black girl.

NP. This speaks volumes about who is motivated to post on this thread. It will probably get removed, but sometimes I wish the racist comments stayed to paint an accurate picture behind so much of the animosity and obsession with this woman. And please don’t reply and pretend this was meant to be positive.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will she be a normal peasant girl or a Duchess girl?!

I don't know, but it's guaranteed she'll be a black girl.

NP. This speaks volumes about who is motivated to post on this thread. It will probably get removed, but sometimes I wish the racist comments stayed to paint an accurate picture behind so much of the animosity and obsession with this woman. And please don’t reply and pretend this was meant to be positive.

It could be racist but not necessarily. I suspect PP is pointing out that MM has figured out that it’s currently both fashionable and profitable for your work to portray “diverse” characters. I’m guessing PP is more cynical than racist.

The boy who cried Racism stuff doesn’t actually do anything to fight real racism.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I like that they're giving back to the local community and focusing big donation campaigns on U.S. charities that need their aid

Harvest Home LA just got multiple pallets of diapers thanks to Meghan & Harry's connection to Proctor and Gamble. Harvest focuses only on housing pregnant women and their children who have nowhere else to go. These are things the community needs with record inflation and unemployment.

https://www.instagram.com/harvesthomela/

Ok spammer who works for them

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Narcissism is just a personality. Meghan is using it for the good

i hope this is true. but seriously, how many times can she squeeze in "Duchess of Sussex" in one press release?

LOL! She hangs in to that title like a limpet.

Bc she is nothing on her own and the crown has cut her off but she is still trying to bank on her expired connection to royalty

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Oprah interview was nominated for an Emmy.

Because of Oprah not them. Oprah drew thank out and led them down the garden path far beyond anything that they should have said into territory that wasn’t even true. It really exposed MM for the terrible opportunistic liar she really is. Unfortunately most people in the USA don’t know enough about British royal protocol to realize that the accusations or racism that MM leveled in regards to her son having a title were completely spurious and shameful. It is a uniform rule that great grandchildren of the sovereign not in line for the throne do not get a title. Eugenie and Beatrices children don’t have titles either. This was a bald faced lie and both MM and PH knew it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oprah interview was nominated for an Emmy.

Because of Oprah not them. Oprah drew thank out and led them down the garden path far beyond anything that they should have said into territory that wasn’t even true. It really exposed MM for the terrible opportunistic liar she really is. Unfortunately most people in the USA don’t know enough about British royal protocol to realize that the accusations or racism that MM leveled in regards to her son having a title were completely spurious and shameful. It is a uniform rule that great grandchildren of the sovereign not in line for the throne do not get a title. Eugenie and Beatrices children don’t have titles either. This was a bald faced lie and both MM and PH knew it.

Eugenie and Beatrice don't have a father that hates them, so... and their father is not going to be king.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oprah interview was nominated for an Emmy.

Because of Oprah not them. Oprah drew thank out and led them down the garden path far beyond anything that they should have said into territory that wasn’t even true. It really exposed MM for the terrible opportunistic liar she really is. Unfortunately most people in the USA don’t know enough about British royal protocol to realize that the accusations or racism that MM leveled in regards to her son having a title were completely spurious and shameful. It is a uniform rule that great grandchildren of the sovereign not in line for the throne do not get a title. Eugenie and Beatrices children don’t have titles either. This was a bald faced lie and both MM and PH knew it.

I'd be careful about throwing around accusations of ignorance.

Eugenie and Beatrice both have the title of princess. They are the grandchildren, not great grandchildren, of the sovereign. They are princesses because their father is the male child of the sovereign.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will she be a normal peasant girl or a Duchess girl?!

I don't know, but it's guaranteed she'll be a black girl.

NP. This speaks volumes about who is motivated to post on this thread. It will probably get removed, but sometimes I wish the racist comments stayed to paint an accurate picture behind so much of the animosity and obsession with this woman. And please don’t reply and pretend this was meant to be positive.

It could be racist but not necessarily. I suspect PP is pointing out that MM has figured out that it’s currently both fashionable and profitable for your work to portray “diverse” characters. I’m guessing PP is more cynical than racist.

The boy who cried Racism stuff doesn’t actually do anything to fight real racism.

DP. Representation is not the same thing as “the boy who cried racism” stuff.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oprah interview was nominated for an Emmy.

Because of Oprah not them. Oprah drew thank out and led them down the garden path far beyond anything that they should have said into territory that wasn’t even true. It really exposed MM for the terrible opportunistic liar she really is. Unfortunately most people in the USA don’t know enough about British royal protocol to realize that the accusations or racism that MM leveled in regards to her son having a title were completely spurious and shameful. It is a uniform rule that great grandchildren of the sovereign not in line for the throne do not get a title. Eugenie and Beatrices children don’t have titles either. This was a bald faced lie and both MM and PH knew it.

I'd be careful about throwing around accusations of ignorance.

Eugenie and Beatrice both have the title of princess. They are the grandchildren, not great grandchildren, of the sovereign. They are princesses because their father is the male child of the sovereign.

They are princesses because their dad stomped his feet and demanded the titles.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Oprah interview was nominated for an Emmy.

Because of Oprah not them. Oprah drew thank out and led them down the garden path far beyond anything that they should have said into territory that wasn’t even true. It really exposed MM for the terrible opportunistic liar she really is. Unfortunately most people in the USA don’t know enough about British royal protocol to realize that the accusations or racism that MM leveled in regards to her son having a title were completely spurious and shameful. It is a uniform rule that great grandchildren of the sovereign not in line for the throne do not get a title. Eugenie and Beatrices children don’t have titles either. This was a bald faced lie and both MM and PH knew it.

I'd be careful about throwing around accusations of ignorance.

Eugenie and Beatrice both have the title of princess. They are the grandchildren, not great grandchildren, of the sovereign. They are princesses because their father is the male child of the sovereign.

They are princesses because their dad stomped his feet and demanded the titles.

No, Andrew didn't have to stomp his feet.

They were situated exactly like Archie-- the child of a male child of the monarch-- which entitled them to be princesses. Andrew is the male son of the reigning monarch. Harry is the male son of the next monarch, so his children would be entitled to be prince/princess when Charles ascends to the throne.

For your edification:

"So why are Beatrice and Eugenie princesses?

In 1917, the Queen’s grandfather King George V issued a written order that stated that only royal offspring in the direct line of succession could be made a prince or princess and receive titles of His or Her Royal Highness (HRH).

The Letters Patent said: “The children of any Sovereign of these Realms and the children of the sons of any such Sovereign and the eldest living son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales shall have and at all times hold and enjoy the style, title or attribute of Royal Highness with their titular dignity of Prince or Princess prefixed to their respective Christian names or with their other titles of honour’.

It added: “’…the grandchildren of the sons of any such sovereign in the direct male line (save only the eldest living son of the eldest son of the Prince of Wales) shall have and enjoy in all occasions the style and title enjoyed by the children of dukes of these our realms.’

The rules means only sons and daughters of the monarch and the children of the sons are entitled to be called prince or princess."

This has been explained to you lunkheads dozens of times in these hundreds of pages of threads. God forbid you actually learn something that challenges your misguided beliefs.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will she be a normal peasant girl or a Duchess girl?!

I don't know, but it's guaranteed she'll be a black girl.

NP. This speaks volumes about who is motivated to post on this thread. It will probably get removed, but sometimes I wish the racist comments stayed to paint an accurate picture behind so much of the animosity and obsession with this woman. And please don’t reply and pretend this was meant to be positive.

It could be racist but not necessarily. I suspect PP is pointing out that MM has figured out that it’s currently both fashionable and profitable for your work to portray “diverse” characters. I’m guessing PP is more cynical than racist.

The boy who cried Racism stuff doesn’t actually do anything to fight real racism.

DP. Representation is not the same thing as “the boy who cried racism” stuff.

No one said it was, dear.

[Anonymous]

She is toxic and he is a victim

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:She is toxic and he is a victim

Agree 1,000 percent. As most of us think exactly this.