Meghan Markle and Prince Harry News and Updates Part 4

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Narcissism is just a personality. Meghan is using it for the good

i hope this is true. but seriously, how many times can she squeeze in "Duchess of Sussex" in one press release?

LOL! She hangs in to that title like a limpet.

I hope she hangs onto it for a long time. It helps to bring on millions of dollars to charities. Good for them and great for the people they have helped.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Narcissism is just a personality. Meghan is using it for the good

i hope this is true. but seriously, how many times can she squeeze in "Duchess of Sussex" in one press release?

LOL! She hangs in to that title like a limpet.

I hope she hangs onto it for a long time. It helps to bring on millions of dollars to charities. Good for them and great for the people they have helped.

It will be fun to see their hypocrisy continue.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Second Archwell Netflix production announced - PEARL.

This will join Heart of Invictus as a Sussex-executive produced feature.

A riveting storyline

An impressive list of people working on the series though. Good for them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:I like that they're giving back to the local community and focusing big donation campaigns on U.S. charities that need their aid

Harvest Home LA just got multiple pallets of diapers thanks to Meghan & Harry's connection to Proctor and Gamble. Harvest focuses only on housing pregnant women and their children who have nowhere else to go. These are things the community needs with record inflation and unemployment.

https://www.instagram.com/harvesthomela/

I don’t understand why Proctor and Gamble don’t just give directly to Harvest Home? Why label it as Archewell when it’s really from Proctor and Gamble?

[Anonymous]

Oprah interview was nominated for an Emmy.

[Anonymous]

It’s the publicity. If Proctor and Gamble gave diapers to a random homeless shelter nobody would care. Because they are allied with Archewell, and the media follows everything Meghan and Harry do, it’s getting media coverage everywhere which gets tons of publicity for p&g and the shelter. It is the definition of using their fame for good. Whether or not the Sussexes “deserve” to be famous, they are, and they are using that fame to make an impact.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s the publicity. If Proctor and Gamble gave diapers to a random homeless shelter nobody would care. Because they are allied with Archewell, and the media follows everything Meghan and Harry do, it’s getting media coverage everywhere which gets tons of publicity for p&g and the shelter. It is the definition of using their fame for good. Whether or not the Sussexes “deserve” to be famous, they are, and they are using that fame to make an impact.

+1. This is why (to me) all the kvetching about them wanting to be famous rings hollow. They already are! And they could certainly find ways to just lead rich people lives if they wanted. But that would be an incredible waste of influence. They have incredible notoriety and to NOT use it to do things like this would be like a moral failing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It’s the publicity. If Proctor and Gamble gave diapers to a random homeless shelter nobody would care. Because they are allied with Archewell, and the media follows everything Meghan and Harry do, it’s getting media coverage everywhere which gets tons of publicity for p&g and the shelter. It is the definition of using their fame for good. Whether or not the Sussexes “deserve” to be famous, they are, and they are using that fame to make an impact.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I like that they're giving back to the local community and focusing big donation campaigns on U.S. charities that need their aid

Harvest Home LA just got multiple pallets of diapers thanks to Meghan & Harry's connection to Proctor and Gamble. Harvest focuses only on housing pregnant women and their children who have nowhere else to go. These are things the community needs with record inflation and unemployment.

https://www.instagram.com/harvesthomela/

I don’t understand why Proctor and Gamble don’t just give directly to Harvest Home? Why label it as Archewell when it’s really from Proctor and Gamble?

Taxes

[Anonymous]

clarification - tax avoidance on the part of the Sussexes. PG gets a tax break and the Sussexes get tax avoidance through foundation.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the publicity. If Proctor and Gamble gave diapers to a random homeless shelter nobody would care. Because they are allied with Archewell, and the media follows everything Meghan and Harry do, it’s getting media coverage everywhere which gets tons of publicity for p&g and the shelter. It is the definition of using their fame for good. Whether or not the Sussexes “deserve” to be famous, they are, and they are using that fame to make an impact.

+1. This is why (to me) all the kvetching about them wanting to be famous rings hollow. They already are! And they could certainly find ways to just lead rich people lives if they wanted. But that would be an incredible waste of influence. They have incredible notoriety and to NOT use it to do things like this would be like a moral failing.

Noblesse oblige?

No, acting like a prince and duchess in California isn't required of them. They left their job. They quit. They may have a hard time remembering that but we remember.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the publicity. If Proctor and Gamble gave diapers to a random homeless shelter nobody would care. Because they are allied with Archewell, and the media follows everything Meghan and Harry do, it’s getting media coverage everywhere which gets tons of publicity for p&g and the shelter. It is the definition of using their fame for good. Whether or not the Sussexes “deserve” to be famous, they are, and they are using that fame to make an impact.

+1. This is why (to me) all the kvetching about them wanting to be famous rings hollow. They already are! And they could certainly find ways to just lead rich people lives if they wanted. But that would be an incredible waste of influence. They have incredible notoriety and to NOT use it to do things like this would be like a moral failing.

Noblesse oblige?

No, acting like a prince and duchess in California isn't required of them. They left their job. They quit. They may have a hard time remembering that but we remember.

NP. Oh, we know you remember. We've got 4 different threads totaling hundred of pages documenting how you remember every little thing.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s the publicity. If Proctor and Gamble gave diapers to a random homeless shelter nobody would care. Because they are allied with Archewell, and the media follows everything Meghan and Harry do, it’s getting media coverage everywhere which gets tons of publicity for p&g and the shelter. It is the definition of using their fame for good. Whether or not the Sussexes “deserve” to be famous, they are, and they are using that fame to make an impact.

+1. This is why (to me) all the kvetching about them wanting to be famous rings hollow. They already are! And they could certainly find ways to just lead rich people lives if they wanted. But that would be an incredible waste of influence. They have incredible notoriety and to NOT use it to do things like this would be like a moral failing.

Noblesse oblige?

No, acting like a prince and duchess in California isn't required of them. They left their job. They quit. They may have a hard time remembering that but we remember.

NP. Oh, we know you remember. We've got 4 different threads totaling hundred of pages documenting how you remember every little thing.

Hello new poster. Sounds like you're unfamiliar with those 4 different threads, where 90% of the posts were off-topic posts attacking others. This thread is on topic. No attack posts.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:clarification - tax avoidance on the part of the Sussexes. PG gets a tax break and the Sussexes get tax avoidance through foundation.

How?
Queen and all of the extended royal family is exempted from paying taxes according to British law.
If you want to dodge taxes, then the Trump and Hillary way is to use Delaware, blind trusts and everything else you can think of. Just ask Romney

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:clarification - tax avoidance on the part of the Sussexes. PG gets a tax break and the Sussexes get tax avoidance through foundation.

How?
Queen and all of the extended royal family is exempted from paying taxes according to British law.
If you want to dodge taxes, then the Trump and Hillary way is to use Delaware, blind trusts and everything else you can think of. Just ask Romney

DP. The Duchess of Sussex is an American citizen and owes taxes to the US. And in a few years, Just Harry will too.