That's actually another misconception of cheaters. Often they still want the emotional connection with their spouse and they *are* heartbroken when they divorce. Especially if they regret cheating once they are caught or when it sinks in that they really are getting a divorce. But it is true that they don't value their marriage as much as somebody who chooses not to cheat. |
Sorry, I mean I *don't* usually see a place for blame when somebody doesn't desire sex. |
OP still needs to move on. She isn't making anyone here feel guilty |
True. These type of people can only blame others. They don’t have self-awareness and always point fingers to justify their deceit. It’s akin to talking to a wall. Life and karma will take care of them. |
The prior PP gets it. The immediate PP is clueless. My message has always been to DECLARE THE MARRIAGE OPEN. That's a 12 second conversation. There is zero dishonesty in saving your sexless marriage in this way. Please take all of your off topic "they still get sex at home" rants to a different thread about cheating. This is NOT a cheating thread! This is a sexless marriage thread. Likewise, any statistic about "happy in the marriage" is irrelevant. The only thing that is relevant is whether or not there is a normal active sex life. THAT is what makes a marriage sexless. This is a thread about how to save a sexless marriage. Stop trying to obfuscate this thread with alternate statistics or exceptionally rare scenarios (for example: man has plenty of sex at home yet still he cheats). Start a new thread if you want to have that discussion. |
|
OP this is nothing new, I'm sure most know it.
When I was cheated on he was immediately dead to me. It certainly didn't save anything, lol. All I can add, a outsider isn't worth losing your spouse, kids, and finances over. Years ago I worked in family court, I can't tell you how many men cried foul at all the consequences of their cheating. Women too, but mostly men who didn't want to accept the domino effect. I'm sure when they were cheating though it was a different story, lol. |
If you weren’t blindly following your own narrative like our current President, you would see what the immediate pp said in the first paragraph. It mirrors the “discussing options and intentions in an honest manner” e.g.., have balls, face the issue directly and don’t do something behind someone’s back. That’s a weak p@ssy way out. |
+100 |
But you skipped a crucial detail. What was your marital sex life BEFORE he cheated? If you had lost interest such that his sexual needs were no longer being met, then your marriage was already on the fast track to divorce BEFORE he cheated. So his cheating in fact DID save your low sex marriage. Whatever happened in family courts is not a consequence of cheating, it's a consequence of the sexless marriage which preceded the cheating. |
Huh? What could be a more direct/honest/ballsy/direct-facing/non-weak-pussy than DECLARING YOUR MARRIAGE OPEN ?? |
Working on your marriage in a vulnerable manner. BOOM |
What if you tried to work on the marriage for years, but the sexless with-holding spouse is simply uninterested? |
See there you go, President. You ASSUME once again, it had to be the result of a sexless marriage. We had sex multiple times per week. |
Did you really just say that? It's like you think a man would reach the stage of DECLARING THE MARRIAGE OPEN without first having a long series of escalating conversations about why she does not want sex. Saving your sexless marriage by cheating (or declaring it open) does not spontaneously happen inside a vacuum. And unless you are advocating rape, there is only so much the normal libido could / should do. |
Yours is a rare special case. Sorry for your betrayal, but go start a thread about cheating because this is a sexless marriage thread, not a cheating thread. |