new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of us, on those multi-day Kavanaugh threads at the time, who said, the FBI wasn't investigating the allegations fully and were pooh-poohed by the apologists, I hope we come to a point where Kavanaugh is impeached for lying to the Senate committee.

Oh, and who paid his 6 figures debts?

+1
+1
+1
+1
+1

He’s a criminal and should be facing disbarment.

Why didn’t this person come forward during the Senate hearings? Nancy Pelosi was calling everyone she had ever met to get more on Kavanaugh. When her hand curated witness proved not credible, she had to start the prices again. The Dems must really be worried about Biden and Warren.

My thoughts exactly.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is I'm sure is the least popular opinion on DCUM, but I did not find Ford's account believable. At all.

Kav is one of the most politically despised people in the history of America and haters will stop at nothing to destroy him. As such, we can expect random unverifiable allegations of the most heinous nature from time to time. It does not reflect well on anyone.

I don't find you believable. You hate liberals so much that you will stop at nothing to tear down victims.

What do you mean when you say you don't find be believable? You don't believe I have this opinion?

[Anonymous]

I think it’s nice that Long Dong Silver has Beer Bong Bretty to hang out with.

Disgraceful.

[Anonymous]

Anyone who partied or was in Greek life in college has ridiculous stories like this. The craziest boys, by far, were the hockey team.

And let's keep them off the SC. There are plenty who were not pulling out their genitals or attempting to rape women (believe it or not). But you probably didn't know that.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I have zero respect for BK after his shady financial dealings, and his cringe-worthy, red-faced outburst at his own hearing. He wasn't and will never be Supreme Court Justice material. I don't trust him.

BUT.

The article says he was pushed by friends?
Then how is that his fault?
Or was his fault taking his pants down?
If so, come on. It's vulgar, but what do you expect at a frat party? Those things reek.

I think Ms. Ford had a case of sexual assault all right, but it could not be confirmed by credible witnesses, which is unfortunate.

This new thing is really reaching. I understand a picture has emerged of his unthinking, impulsive and sexually opportunistic college days, but... there isn't very much there, to be honest.

As was already known, this just shows that the FBI didn't investigate anything, as they were supposed to have done, to placate Flake.

PP you replied to. With the testimony provided, I'm not sure I would want my dollars to go to an FBI investigation over such a minor event. Rape? Most definitely. This? No. I must be missing something, but I don't get the outrage at all.

I couldn’t agree more.
-DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:this time they come from a man who says he saw kavanaugh shove his penis into a womaj’s face at a college party

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/461436-kavanaugh-accused-of-more-unwanted-sexual-contact-by-former

“Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh was hit with another accusation of unwanted sexual contact by a male classmate who said he witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself and press his genitals against a woman without her consent.

The New York Times reported Saturday that the latest allegation, which has until not been public, was reported to the FBI during Kavanaugh's Supreme Court confirmation process last year but was not investigated by the FBI.

In the Times report, two FBI officials told the newspaper that a Yale classmate of Kavanaugh's, D.C.-based nonprofit owner Max Stier, said that he had witnessed Kavanaugh expose himself at a party before other students pushed Kavanaugh's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent.

The Hill has reached out to the Supreme Court for comment.”

Ok, let me get this straight....

1) BK exposed himself at a party.

2) Other students "pushed" BK's genitals into the hand of a female student, apparently without her consent

So, the other students somehow managed to "push" his genitals into the open (I'm assuming) hand of a girl without her consent? She was standing there, right next to BK, with her hand open in just the right spot so that others could "push" his junk into her hand?

Then, he told the FBI but did not tell any of the Dem senators who were like heat seeking missiles, looking for anything to pin on him?

He literally couldn’t keep it in his pants. This is 100% on the dirtbag with his pants unzipped.

Well... if you believe a 30+ year old allegation by a guy who may or may not have witnessed this. Obviously, you do. I’m extremely skeptical it happened at all.
-DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is I'm sure is the least popular opinion on DCUM, but I did not find Ford's account believable. At all.

Kav is one of the most politically despised people in the history of America and haters will stop at nothing to destroy him. As such, we can expect random unverifiable allegations of the most heinous nature from time to time. It does not reflect well on anyone.

Eh. I wasn't really that interested in Ford, one way or the other. I was interested in Kavanaugh's more recent professional past and his behavior during the hearings.

Didn't pass muster, any of it. Which Republicans all knew and didn't care about. And they had their pick, could have put forward anyone. Insulting that they picked him and stuck with him. They deserve to lose the Senate for it.

Genuine question - what recent professional acts do you feel did not pass muster? I was under the impression he had a pretty spotless record.

Yep. He did and does have a sterling professional and personal reputation. He was lauded by everyone he’s ever worked with, mentored, or befriended. That’s enough for me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is this a reaction to Ford's lawyer's comments about Ford's motivation in speaking out against Kavanaugh which were brought to light last week?

Probably. Damage control.

+1
Wow wow wow. Disgusting.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I have zero respect for BK after his shady financial dealings, and his cringe-worthy, red-faced outburst at his own hearing. He wasn't and will never be Supreme Court Justice material. I don't trust him.

BUT.

The article says he was pushed by friends?
Then how is that his fault?
Or was his fault taking his pants down?
If so, come on. It's vulgar, but what do you expect at a frat party? Those things reek.

I think Ms. Ford had a case of sexual assault all right, but it could not be confirmed by credible witnesses, which is unfortunate.

This new thing is really reaching. I understand a picture has emerged of his unthinking, impulsive and sexually opportunistic college days, but... there isn't very much there, to be honest.

You’re basically saying ‘boys will be boys’ - and you don’t even realize it. And you expect a corroborating witness to attempted rape, which never happens. This is what women had to deal with 50 years ago. And this is why women then and now don’t come forward.

I am most certainly not, because I have a boy and he does not fit that idiotic stereotype. Please don't make assumptions about me. I don't make any about you.

BK is not professionally worthy of being on the Supreme Court. BK showed himself to be unworthy of pretty much any job with his sorry spectacle at his hearing. BK was a habitual, libidinous, drunk partier in his early adulthood. So? If Ms. Ford couldn't convince the committee that he sexually assaulted her, don't you understand that this latest occurrence is nothing at all?

Seriously, if you'd all step back a bit, you'd see it.

[Anonymous]

Jane Mayer and Ronan Farrow reported on much of this at the time, including that the FBI investigation was a sham.

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/senate-democrats-investigate-a-new-allegation-of-sexual-misconduct-from-the-supreme-court-nominee-brett-kavanaughs-college-years-deborah-ramirez

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/will-the-fbi-ignore-testimonies-from-kavanaughs-former-classmates

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is I'm sure is the least popular opinion on DCUM, but I did not find Ford's account believable. At all.

Kav is one of the most politically despised people in the history of America and haters will stop at nothing to destroy him. As such, we can expect random unverifiable allegations of the most heinous nature from time to time. It does not reflect well on anyone.

I don't find you believable. You hate liberals so much that you will stop at nothing to tear down victims.

What do you mean when you say you don't find be believable? You don't believe I have this opinion?

No I don’t.

[Anonymous]

Swinging dicks at a frat party 30 years ago? I literally could not care less.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
I have zero respect for BK after his shady financial dealings, and his cringe-worthy, red-faced outburst at his own hearing. He wasn't and will never be Supreme Court Justice material. I don't trust him.

BUT.

The article says he was pushed by friends?
Then how is that his fault?
Or was his fault taking his pants down?
If so, come on. It's vulgar, but what do you expect at a frat party? Those things reek.

I think Ms. Ford had a case of sexual assault all right, but it could not be confirmed by credible witnesses, which is unfortunate.

This new thing is really reaching. I understand a picture has emerged of his unthinking, impulsive and sexually opportunistic college days, but... there isn't very much there, to be honest.

You’re basically saying ‘boys will be boys’ - and you don’t even realize it. And you expect a corroborating witness to attempted rape, which never happens. This is what women had to deal with 50 years ago. And this is why women then and now don’t come forward.

I am most certainly not, because I have a boy and he does not fit that idiotic stereotype. Please don't make assumptions about me. I don't make any about you.

BK is not professionally worthy of being on the Supreme Court. BK showed himself to be unworthy of pretty much any job with his sorry spectacle at his hearing. BK was a habitual, libidinous, drunk partier in his early adulthood. So? If Ms. Ford couldn't convince the committee that he sexually assaulted her, don't you understand that this latest occurrence is nothing at all?

Seriously, if you'd all step back a bit, you'd see it.

I didn’t promote a stereotype - you did (‘How is that his fault?’, ‘What do you expect at a frat party?’, ‘sexually opportunistic college days’). That equates to ‘boys will be boys’. And I didn’t make any assumptions about you or your offspring (at least that I put in writing). Don’t you understand that your standard of proof for sexual assault (convincing a bunch of totally biased fossilized Republican male Senators determined to push through their right wing agenda) is ridiculous? Seriously, if you’d stand back a bit you’d see it - or is that too patronizing?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Swinging dicks at a frat party 30 years ago? I literally could not care less.

+1

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For those of us, on those multi-day Kavanaugh threads at the time, who said, the FBI wasn't investigating the allegations fully and were pooh-poohed by the apologists, I hope we come to a point where Kavanaugh is impeached for lying to the Senate committee.

Oh, and who paid his 6 figures debts?

+1
+1
+1
+1
+1

He’s a criminal and should be facing disbarment.

Why didn’t this person come forward during the Senate hearings? Nancy Pelosi was calling everyone she had ever met to get more on Kavanaugh. When her hand curated witness proved not credible, she had to start the prices again. The Dems must really be worried about Biden and Warren.

Please read 21:34, accept that you’re wrong about this and spend some time pondering what else you might be wrong about.

Lots.

Gosh, this little thing called the MSM would have been happy to tell Stier's story, but I guess his Stanford law degree taught him a little bit about libel.