Exclusive: Key House Democratic chairman requests Trump's tax returns

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump's lawyers say the Ways and Means committee only wants his tax returns for the purpose of damaging him politically. What could be so damaging about his taxes? Gillibrand and Klobuchar released their tax returns, and they haven't been damaged. Why is Trump different?

Perhaps your level of rabid hate for Trump is what's different. You Libs simply want to nail him... no matter what.

Why not find a candidate who can actually win the WH fair and square?

This is fair and square. Why not elect someone who has nothing to hide in his taxes?

First you need to nominate someone who you believe has a chance. Who would that be?

[Anonymous]

Assume it shows he’s not as wealthy, so? Will he suddenly not be President? Will he suddenly not be married? What’s the big moment you expect?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump's lawyers say the Ways and Means committee only wants his tax returns for the purpose of damaging him politically. What could be so damaging about his taxes? Gillibrand and Klobuchar released their tax returns, and they haven't been damaged. Why is Trump different?

Perhaps your level of rabid hate for Trump is what's different. You Libs simply want to nail him... no matter what.

Why not find a candidate who can actually win the WH fair and square?

This is fair and square. Why not elect someone who has nothing to hide in his taxes?

First you need to nominate someone who you believe has a chance. Who would that be?

Anyone who upholds patriotic tradition and discloses their tax returns as a show of respect to the American people.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Assume it shows he’s not as wealthy, so? Will he suddenly not be President? Will he suddenly not be married? What’s the big moment you expect?

No to all of the above. So why is he so afraid to release his taxes?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Assume it shows he’s not as wealthy, so? Will he suddenly not be President? Will he suddenly not be married? What’s the big moment you expect?

No to all of the above. So why is he so afraid to release his taxes?

Maybe because he just does not have to, maybe it’s that simple. There is no rule that a candidate has to disclose them, so he doesn’t want to. I swear it’s like telling a 5 year old they can’t have a cookie. "But why not?’ Because I said no.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Assume it shows he’s not as wealthy, so? Will he suddenly not be President? Will he suddenly not be married? What’s the big moment you expect?

No to all of the above. So why is he so afraid to release his taxes?

Maybe because he just does not have to, maybe it’s that simple. There is no rule that a candidate has to disclose them, so he doesn’t want to. I swear it’s like telling a 5 year old they can’t have a cookie. "But why not?’ Because I said no.

That's a big "maybe". Or maybe it's something much more sinister. This is a legitimate concern.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Assume it shows he’s not as wealthy, so? Will he suddenly not be President? Will he suddenly not be married? What’s the big moment you expect?

No to all of the above. So why is he so afraid to release his taxes?

Maybe because he just does not have to, maybe it’s that simple. There is no rule that a candidate has to disclose them, so he doesn’t want to. I swear it’s like telling a 5 year old they can’t have a cookie. "But why not?’ Because I said no.

Then why lie and say you will through the whole campaign season?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump's lawyers say the Ways and Means committee only wants his tax returns for the purpose of damaging him politically. What could be so damaging about his taxes? Gillibrand and Klobuchar released their tax returns, and they haven't been damaged. Why is Trump different?

Perhaps your level of rabid hate for Trump is what's different. You Libs simply want to nail him... no matter what.

Why not find a candidate who can actually win the WH fair and square?

Sure. You go with that. Perhaps next time - if we have one - you can find a candidate who can win fair and square. And who isn’t a Russian asset.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump's lawyers say the Ways and Means committee only wants his tax returns for the purpose of damaging him politically. What could be so damaging about his taxes? Gillibrand and Klobuchar released their tax returns, and they haven't been damaged. Why is Trump different?

Perhaps your level of rabid hate for Trump is what's different. You Libs simply want to nail him... no matter what.

Why not find a candidate who can actually win the WH fair and square?

Sure. You go with that. Perhaps next time - if we have one - you can find a candidate who can win fair and square. And who isn’t a Russian asset.

+1

Because "I love Wikileaks" was so fair and square /s

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump's lawyers say the Ways and Means committee only wants his tax returns for the purpose of damaging him politically. What could be so damaging about his taxes? Gillibrand and Klobuchar released their tax returns, and they haven't been damaged. Why is Trump different?

Perhaps your level of rabid hate for Trump is what's different. You Libs simply want to nail him... no matter what.

Why not find a candidate who can actually win the WH fair and square?

Sure. You go with that. Perhaps next time - if we have one - you can find a candidate who can win fair and square. And who isn’t a Russian asset.

And how much exactly did the Russian government pay him for his speeches?

Hint: Please answer. You can do it.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump's lawyers say the Ways and Means committee only wants his tax returns for the purpose of damaging him politically. What could be so damaging about his taxes? Gillibrand and Klobuchar released their tax returns, and they haven't been damaged. Why is Trump different?

Perhaps your level of rabid hate for Trump is what's different. You Libs simply want to nail him... no matter what.

Why not find a candidate who can actually win the WH fair and square?

Sure. You go with that. Perhaps next time - if we have one - you can find a candidate who can win fair and square. And who isn’t a Russian asset.

And how much exactly did the Russian government pay him for his speeches?

Hint: Please answer. You can do it.

Hint: They didn’t pay him for speeches. They paid him for actions - like removing sanctions, and he has been happy to oblige. And for denying that Russia had anything to do with interfering in our elections and attempting to create chaos in our country and anywhere else that they can. And for preventing any attempt to clean up our elections. And let’s not forget the millions Trump stood to make on hotels in Russia. Combine that with the extensive blackmail material that Russia undoubtedly has on Trump, and the multiple secret meetings that Trump has had with Putin and his representatives, and any sentient human being can see that there’s something wrong with this picture. Trump is a cheap date; it didn’t take much to bribe him to betray our country.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump's lawyers say the Ways and Means committee only wants his tax returns for the purpose of damaging him politically. What could be so damaging about his taxes? Gillibrand and Klobuchar released their tax returns, and they haven't been damaged. Why is Trump different?

Perhaps your level of rabid hate for Trump is what's different. You Libs simply want to nail him... no matter what.

Why not find a candidate who can actually win the WH fair and square?

Sure. You go with that. Perhaps next time - if we have one - you can find a candidate who can win fair and square. And who isn’t a Russian asset.

And how much exactly did the Russian government pay him for his speeches?

Hint: Please answer. You can do it.

If we had his taxes, we could get a sense, but he has been washing Russian money for decades, so billions?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Assume it shows he’s not as wealthy, so? Will he suddenly not be President? Will he suddenly not be married? What’s the big moment you expect?

No to all of the above. So why is he so afraid to release his taxes?

Maybe because he just does not have to, maybe it’s that simple. There is no rule that a candidate has to disclose them, so he doesn’t want to. I swear it’s like telling a 5 year old they can’t have a cookie. "But why not?’ Because I said no.

That's a big "maybe". Or maybe it's something much more sinister. This is a legitimate concern.

Maybe it’s this, maybe it’s that. Maybe it’s nothing like the mueller report.

Just because you think there must be something there, doesn’t mean there is. He said no you can’t see them, he is allowed to say that. Throwing a tantrum doesn’t help.

Can I see your returns?

[Anonymous]

https://www.newsweek.com/trump-biographer-whos-seen-presidents-tax-returns-urges-democrats-go-back-15-1386758

Trump's biographer, who has seen his taxes, urges investigators to go back 15 years to see some really shady stuff and find the nature of his relationship with Russia.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Assume it shows he’s not as wealthy, so? Will he suddenly not be President? Will he suddenly not be married? What’s the big moment you expect?

No to all of the above. So why is he so afraid to release his taxes?

Maybe because he just does not have to, maybe it’s that simple. There is no rule that a candidate has to disclose them, so he doesn’t want to. I swear it’s like telling a 5 year old they can’t have a cookie. "But why not?’ Because I said no.

That's a big "maybe". Or maybe it's something much more sinister. This is a legitimate concern.

Maybe it’s this, maybe it’s that. Maybe it’s nothing like the mueller report.

Just because you think there must be something there, doesn’t mean there is. He said no you can’t see them, he is allowed to say that. Throwing a tantrum doesn’t help.

Can I see your returns?

He’s not allowed to say no to the House’s Ways & Means Committee though. The law is clear.