Forum Index
»
Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)
Where did you get 27%? |
By my calculation the magazine shows a 29 percent admit rate to UVA, not 27, but still that’s a pretty big discrepancy from SCHEV. The magazine doesn’t include private school students applying as Arlington residents, but I can’t see that affecting the numbers this much. So I too have to question the accuracy of the magazine’s numbers. As for the comparison to the Bethesda schools on the other thread, it’s worth noting that there are five times as many Ivy League applications coming out of the Bethesda schools, probably because, as others have suggested, the allure of UVA is so high in NOVA schools that many Ivy caliber candidates simply don’t apply to Ivies and apply instead to UVA. |
+1. I know UMd has gotten better, but outside of this immediate area it simply doesn't have the reputation of UVa. I expect my kids will apply to UVa, but if I lived in Maryland, UMd would hold little appeal. |
|
SCHEV says 406 Arlington residents applied to UVA last year and 144 got in. The magazine says 389 public school kids applied and 113 got in. So that means that 17 non-public school kids applied and 31 of them got in -- almost two acceptances to UVA per private school application. I knew private school kids had an edge, but not that much, ha ha.
There's also the TJ factor, of course. Some of the 406 applications reported by SCHEV would be Arlington residents attending TJ, and presumably most got in. Still, no matter how you slice it, 17 more kids applied UVA from Arlington than the magazine reports, and 31 more Arlington residents got in. So the bottom line is that the magazine's numbers are clearly inaccurate. |
It looks like it was 118 applications (not 138) and three acceptances to 2 schools (Cornell and Penn). It's possible that only two Yorktown students were admitted to those schools. Given North Arlington demographics and how often people claim to move from DC for the schools, there's no way that isn't a disappointing outcome. |
|
Why does moving "for the schools" = my kid must go to an Ivy? Some people really don't care. Or some might care a little but are in that spot where they can't afford those schools but make to much to get financial aid so they figure it's not worth applying when their kid will be fine at a strong state school or a lower-tier private that gives great merit aid (IME this is a lot of Arlington families). But those who do care a LOT about Ivy admission find it impossible to believe that others don't think it's super important. So this is an argument that will circle around endlessly. |
I'm the poster from 9:38. Putting aside STEM, which I admit I have close to zero experience with, I feel pretty comfortable with that assessment. It depends also on what you think the goal of the program is. If it's to teach kids how to look, talk, and act like our nation's current crop of meritocratic sociopaths and form a network of relationships they can leverage for future gain, they are VERY effective. But the value-add in terms of knowledge gained, no. You have to be a very specific kind of smart to get in in the first place, but if you look at things like grade inflation, the percentage gaining honors, the vanishingly small drop-out rate, it's clear that these institutions don't see academic rigor as a core element of the undergraduate experience. They suffer from the same things that other large universities do, except even more so. The professors are hired for being superstar researchers who are looking to avoid teaching, the graduate students are administering coursework that keeps essay-writing to a minimum in order to keep grading manageable, and the students are all hard-charging go-getters who have never failed at anything and will contest any possible bad grade. Why should overworked TA or superstar professor go to the mat every time a kid wants their B+ turned to an A-? That's not what they're paid for. So grade inflation is worse there than at many other places. I don't mean to single these institutions out; obviously they are seen as the best for a reason and most every other institution has huge, glaring problems that I could also go on about at length. But I think it's worth noting that when people hold up HYP as the Holy Grail of college admission, they are advancing a pretty narrow, frankly twisted view of what undergraduate education should be. |
I am a government attorney. Which I guess is not glamorous but it was the sole reason I wanted to go to school in DC. I have wanted to work for the government as long as I can remember. I am not saying community college is for everyone, but community college may be a smart choice for many (I was not a bad student in HS, I had almost a 4.0 GPA and took AP classes, I just had zero desire to go to a 4 year university right after). |
| What do Arlington parents who live in the Yorktown district need to do to make sure their kids can go to W-L instead? |
Move to the W-L zone. There's only a limited number of transfers available and no guarantees. |
One thing is clear: there are very few gunners in Arlington (at least successful ones), so you're living out your dream, PP. |
Thanks, but that costs money. We wish we’d known how crappy Yorktown is before buying in 22207. It seems like IB at W-L would be better. Sigh. |
Eh, maybe you should have been smart enough to research schools before buying a house. |
| The Arlington apologists can try to rationalize this all they want. The fact remains that Arlington's stats just aren't impressive. Does anyone have FCPS stats? I can't find them. Look at Bethesda. Much better stats. Arlingtonians want to talk up the UVa factor, but a significant portion of the Bethesda population is getting into UVa too---as out-of-staters, nonetheless. And Bethesda's admission rate to William and Mary is virtually equal to Arlington's. How is it that out-of-state Bethesda is yielding the same admissions result as in-state Arlington???? |