Candace Owens Twitter account suspended for racist tweets, hahahaha!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk were also accosted yesterday when eating breakfast in Philadelphia. This is becoming the tactic of the left.

I love Charlie Kirk’s tweet in response to this attack:

"My favorite part of the last 24 hours has been seeing white liberals tell a black conservative @RealCandaceO she is a white supremacist because she was praising a black police force against white liberals trashing a city that is 44% black"

+1,000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk were also accosted yesterday when eating breakfast in Philadelphia. This is becoming the tactic of the left.

I love Charlie Kirk’s tweet in response to this attack:

"My favorite part of the last 24 hours has been seeing white liberals tell a black conservative @RealCandaceO she is a white supremacist because she was praising a black police force against white liberals trashing a city that is 44% black"

All you guys talk about is identity politics. Why don't you do something useful besides navel gaze about how aggrieved you are?

We'll stop talking about identity politics when the left stops turning issues into identity politics.

No you won't, because the left doesn't do that.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
-DP

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Much like DCUM, a lot of Twitter's moderation is a result of user reports. If the original tweets were not reported, but Owens' were, that would account for the disparate actions on Twitter's part. I would not be surprised if Owens' own followers reported her tweets in the hope that they could provoke Twitter into exactly this response. But, sure, let's keep up the charade that Twitter and the NY Times are anti-white.

Mia the it a moderator‘s job to review the situation? That’s what moderating is. Knee jerk decision making has no place in moderation

LOL! Do you think someone at Twitter is looking at every tweet? It's the same thing here. Someone posts something that nobody reports and I don't know about it. Then, someone posts something else that gets reported. I look at it and remove it and some whiny right-winger (nine out of ten times anyway) comes along and complains. That's just reality.

Context is everything and so is personal bias. Scripts can be written to reflect that bias

The key is that someone looks at it. That someone looking at Jeong's tweets chose to do nothing, and someone else looking at Owen's tweets suspended her account. Owen's actions were to prove that there is systemic bias in how Tweeter's real live actual people moderate tweets and accounts, and she was proven right.

Yes, and the fact that none of Jeong’s readers felt her disgusting comments were racist tells us everything we need to know about them, too.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Much like DCUM, a lot of Twitter's moderation is a result of user reports. If the original tweets were not reported, but Owens' were, that would account for the disparate actions on Twitter's part. I would not be surprised if Owens' own followers reported her tweets in the hope that they could provoke Twitter into exactly this response. But, sure, let's keep up the charade that Twitter and the NY Times are anti-white.

Mia the it a moderator‘s job to review the situation? That’s what moderating is. Knee jerk decision making has no place in moderation

Plus, the issue with the NYT isn't so much that it is anti.-white, but that it applies different standards to its writers depending on whether they tweet anti-white racist crap or anti-black racist crap. I really wish we could explore this fully, and without the moderator or any other liberal accusing us of being alt-right racists simoly for pointing out the discrepancy.

Oh, please. White people have enjoyed special privilege and standards for hundreds of years in this country. Most of those protections were enshrined into LAW for most of this country's history. Would it kill you to just shut it for once and stop complaining about things not being 100 percent exactly the same? You are an effing embarrassment to white people.

- white person

More excuses for a minority who tweets disgusting anti-white hate speech. If you call that type of behavior racist if a white person tweeted the same crap about a minority, then it's racist in the reverse too. Can't have it both ways, and all the posturing and excuse-making just don't cut it.

But as I said, it's not just this one racist. It's the bias of the NYT, echoing the bias of liberals such as yourself, that racist hate speech is forgivable or excusable when it's anti-white, but deserving of termination when it's anti-black.

Exactly. I’m embarrassed for the PP and anyone who claims that racist comments are acceptable when directed at white people. And liberals wonder why so many people consider themselves independents these days. Who wants to be associated with the nutters that so many liberals have become? Not me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:Much like DCUM, a lot of Twitter's moderation is a result of user reports. If the original tweets were not reported, but Owens' were, that would account for the disparate actions on Twitter's part. I would not be surprised if Owens' own followers reported her tweets in the hope that they could provoke Twitter into exactly this response. But, sure, let's keep up the charade that Twitter and the NY Times are anti-white.

Mia the it a moderator‘s job to review the situation? That’s what moderating is. Knee jerk decision making has no place in moderation

Plus, the issue with the NYT isn't so much that it is anti.-white, but that it applies different standards to its writers depending on whether they tweet anti-white racist crap or anti-black racist crap. I really wish we could explore this fully, and without the moderator or any other liberal accusing us of being alt-right racists simoly for pointing out the discrepancy.

Oh, please. White people have enjoyed special privilege and standards for hundreds of years in this country. Most of those protections were enshrined into LAW for most of this country's history. Would it kill you to just shut it for once and stop complaining about things not being 100 percent exactly the same? You are an effing embarrassment to white people.

- white person

....and I think you are an embarrassment to white people. If you are opposed to racism, as you claim, call it out wherever it occurs. Not only when it's against the specific groups liberals shouldn't be subjected to hate speech.

Again. It's super easy to call for equality when you're now the aggrieved party. White fragility, aka snowflake syndrome. Don't you dare do unto me what we did unto you for all those centuries.

DP. So your “solution” is to turn around and be racist assholes as some sort of revenge therapy/fantasy? Good luck with that tactic. You, and people who think like this, are sick human beings.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hateful is hateful, no matter the target’s race. Sarah Jeong’s tweets spanned years, and, while a few were satirical, they were mostly offensive and hate-filled. The NY Times is either too incompetent to have done its due diligence on her, or it implicitly accepts her stance. Either way, it loses its credibility.

+1

+100

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A man on Twitter went through all of her tweets. They are here:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1025437806775226368.html

Wow. I couldn't stomach going through that entire batch, but the sheer volume of her tweets tell me there's more than merely satire going on. Someone who is just "poking fun" does not go on that extensive a rampage, and keep it up for that length of time.

And fine. Freedom of speech and all that. But she should not be on the editorial staff of (one of) the country's most prominent newspapers.

Actually most of those are clearly satirical. Some are very funny, I loved her tweetstorm about an app to help white people cook rice.

Clearly the problem here is that many of you have no sense of humor.

So the next time a white person tweets about "dumbass f'cking black people pissing oll over the the internet like dogs" or that maybe "blacks will become extinct and that was [her] plan all along" or has a hashtag "cancel black people," to quote just three of hundreds, you will think it's funny?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hateful is hateful, no matter the target’s race. Sarah Jeong’s tweets spanned years, and, while a few were satirical, they were mostly offensive and hate-filled. The NY Times is either too incompetent to have done its due diligence on her, or it implicitly accepts her stance. Either way, it loses its credibility.

Would we even be talking about these tweets if someone hadn't dug them up?

Where's the fairness in that? These were made years ago, and no one was aware of them until someone went back and found them. At some point, you have to stop focusing on what someone said years ago and start focusing on the motives of those who went back to the past and brought all this out.

What were THEIR motivations for doing this? Isn't it with those people that the real racism is found here? They went back to the past to find stuff to attack someone in the present.

That's inexcusable.

So the people who FOUND the tweets are the racists?!?!

Not the person who MADE them.... but the people who brought them to everyone's attention. You're telling me THEY are the guilty parties here?


Really?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So we're being told to ignore white supremacists today, and let them practice their free speech. But when someone exercises their free speech by tweeting insulting things about white people, we're supposed to go apoplectic? That doesn't make a lot of sense, unless you're a white supremacist.

Free speech, yes. Being appointed to the NY Times editorial board, no. There are many talented young, minority women who could offer a fresh perspective, but they chose her. Obviously no white supremacist should be granted a position on that board, either. But that goes without saying.

Agreed. And it's amazing how liberals, in an attempt to deflect from this, are attacking those who point out the double standard as having some devious motive.

It's also a given, among liberals, that one cannot say a critical word about a POC, no matter how justifiable it is given his or her behavior, without being called a racist.

THIS. Thank you for pointing this out. The whole liberal mindset is one of hypocrisy and idiocy. Makes me marvel that there was once a sane Democratic Party under Bill Clinton. Those days are long gone.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hateful is hateful, no matter the target’s race. Sarah Jeong’s tweets spanned years, and, while a few were satirical, they were mostly offensive and hate-filled. The NY Times is either too incompetent to have done its due diligence on her, or it implicitly accepts her stance. Either way, it loses its credibility.

Would we even be talking about these tweets if someone hadn't dug them up?

Where's the fairness in that? These were made years ago, and no one was aware of them until someone went back and found them. At some point, you have to stop focusing on what someone said years ago and start focusing on the motives of those who went back to the past and brought all this out.

What were THEIR motivations for doing this? Isn't it with those people that the real racism is found here? They went back to the past to find stuff to attack someone in the present.

That's inexcusable.

So the people who FOUND the tweets are the racists?!?!

Not the person who MADE them.... but the people who brought them to everyone's attention. You're telling me THEY are the guilty parties here?


Really?

Unreal, isn't it? I was attacked as an "alt-right racist" on this forum simply for bringing up the fact of the racist tweets!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A man on Twitter went through all of her tweets. They are here:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1025437806775226368.html

How long will it take Jeff to apologize for the insinuation that you were making up Jeong’s disgusting history of racist tweets? Unbelievable.

[Anonymous]

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A man on Twitter went through all of her tweets. They are here:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1025437806775226368.html

Wow. I couldn't stomach going through that entire batch, but the sheer volume of her tweets tell me there's more than merely satire going on. Someone who is just "poking fun" does not go on that extensive a rampage, and keep it up for that length of time.

And fine. Freedom of speech and all that. But she should not be on the editorial staff of (one of) the country's most prominent newspapers.

Actually most of those are clearly satirical. Some are very funny, I loved her tweetstorm about an app to help white people cook rice.

Clearly the problem here is that many of you have no sense of humor.

OMG. Jeff, you didn’t disappoint.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A man on Twitter went through all of her tweets. They are here:
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1025437806775226368.html

How long will it take Jeff to apologize for the insinuation that you were making up Jeong’s disgusting history of racist tweets? Unbelievable.

Forever and a day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

jsteele wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Please provide evidence to support your allegation or I will delete your post because it is false.

I find it disengenuos that anyone active on social media was not aware of her (Jeong’s) vile and racist tweets.

But true to form since it was a minority member posting them it’s obviously quite all right and in fact demanding of protection.

Shame on you, rather than fact check you went straight to defending her and her hate.

To be honest, I still haven't seen a tweet that in context was hateful. I think you need to consider your own reaction and maybe the thickness (or lack thereof) your skin.

This is a new low for you Jeff, to see the kind of stuff you find funny.

+1
Can you imagine the hot minute it would take for a post to be deleted here if it used Jeong’s exact words but replaced “white” with black, Hispanic, Muslim, etc.? What a joke.

[Anonymous]

This thread is like an unending cascade of vomit.