S/O Resentment by Men of Easier Access to Sex by Women

[Anonymous]

Men have been socialized to believe if they are smart, athletic, etc they will go to a good college, be successful and find a hot wife that will screw them a lot.

Women are socialized to believe that if they are hot and mildly intelligent they will get a man with money and be set. As long as she screws him a lot. And a lot is nebulous and a moving target, just to keep her guessing.

The men that fall into this trap spend their whole lives feeling sorry for themselves and making self destructive decisions, because that is not reality. They claim it's "biological" when it is actually psychological.

Women self destruct for other reasons.

The happy couples never bought into this BS, gave lower expectations, a better perspective on life and are thankful for what they have.

A good dose of cancer, losing a child or serious Heath issues can knock somebody straight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This whole stupid thread comes down to 1 basic fact of biology: Men (on average) have MUCH larger libido than women (on average). Therefore, women almost never pursue sex: their drive is not powerful enough, and why should they when surrounded by pursuing males.

The counterbalance is that women (on average) have a MUCH greater need to "relate" than men (on average). What I mean by "relate" here is to be in a relationship, to talk, communicate, to have non-sexual intimacy with a male.

Hence, as was stated earlier: women are the gatekeepers of sex, men are the gatekeepers of relationships. Men offer to be in a relationship to gain access to sex; women offer sex to gain access to a relationship. In this way, all is balanced and fair.

You're mentally stunted.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This whole stupid thread comes down to 1 basic fact of biology: Men (on average) have MUCH larger libido than women (on average). Therefore, women almost never pursue sex: their drive is not powerful enough, and why should they when surrounded by pursuing males.

The counterbalance is that women (on average) have a MUCH greater need to "relate" than men (on average). What I mean by "relate" here is to be in a relationship, to talk, communicate, to have non-sexual intimacy with a male.

Hence, as was stated earlier: women are the gatekeepers of sex, men are the gatekeepers of relationships. Men offer to be in a relationship to gain access to sex; women offer sex to gain access to a relationship. In this way, all is balanced and fair.

You're mentally stunted.

I don't agree with the last sentence, but most of the rest of it is true.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Men have been socialized to believe if they are smart, athletic, etc they will go to a good college, be successful and find a hot enough wife that will screw them a lot.

Women are socialized to believe that if they are hot and mildly intelligent they will get a man with money and be set. As long as she screws him a lot. And a lot is nebulous and a moving target, just to keep her guessing. That there is only just so many rich enough unicorns is never a consideration.

The men that fall into this trap spend their whole lives feeling sorry for themselves and making self destructive decisions, because that is not reality. They claim it's "biological" when it is actually psychological.

Women self destruct for other reasons.

The happy couples never bought into this BS, gave lower expectations, a better perspective on life and are thankful for what they have.

A good dose of cancer, losing a child or serious Heath issues can knock somebody straight.

Fixed part of it for you. The rest is junk.

[Anonymous]

Women have known that men are easy for thousands of years. Men are just beginning to realize this. Oh you poor boys, we don't really mind.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Women have known that men are easy for thousands of years. Men are just beginning to realize this. Oh you poor boys, we don't really mind.

What? Since when is this a secret? Everybody knows men are easy! So what? Most women (excluding SuperMOMs of DCUM) are easy too, you just need to know how.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Women have known that men are easy for thousands of years. Men are just beginning to realize this. Oh you poor boys, we don't really mind.

Speak for yourself. Before I was married, I was relatively selective. You don't want to stick it in crazy.

[Anonymous]

This kind of resentment seems to have been fuel for the guy who killed 10 people in Toronto.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-43883052

Alek Minassian - charged on Tuesday with 10 counts of murder and 13 counts of attempted murder - also referred to the misogynistic "incel" Reddit group.

Police say the 25-year-old intentionally drove a rental van into pedestrians on a busy pavement.

The suspect was arrested several streets away after a tense standoff with police.

The 10 dead and 14 wounded are "predominantly" women, ranging in age from their 20s to their 80s, police say.
. . .
The suspect's Facebook post, which the social network has confirmed as real, praised Elliott Rodger, a 22-year-old from California who killed six people in a 2014 shooting rampage through Isla Vista, California, before turning the gun on himself.

It read: "The Incel Rebellion has already begun! We will overthrow all the Chads and Stacys! All hail the Supreme Gentleman Elliot Rodger!"

[Anonymous]

A few thoughts:

1. It's nonsensical to say that women have the "advantage" of easier access to sex. Speaking for myself, I don't see it as an advantage. If I had easier access to good sex, or to people I actually wanted to have sex with, then the word advantage might make sense. Sure, I could find someone to f*ck right now on Tinder or whatever the kids are using these days, but what would be the advantage for me? I am extremely unlikely to find the experience worthwhile.

2. The fact is that more attractive people have easier access to sex (i.e., good sex with people they find attractive). Our culture teaches the entitled schlubby self-proclaimed "nice guys" who whine about women being gatekeepers of sex that every man deserves a hottie - because non-hotties and/or (god forbid!) fat chicks simply don't count as sexual beings. They only pursue women who are way out of their league physically and they wonder why they can't get laid. On the other hand, I don't hear a lot of women complaining that superhawtsexy people only want to date other superhawtsexy people. I mean, duh.

3. You don't just get what you want in life because you want it. If you want someone, you have to be able to offer them something they want. "I have a penis" is not a sufficiently compelling offer for most women. If you don't understand why not, you're probably a terrible lay.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:A few thoughts:

1. It's nonsensical to say that women have the "advantage" of easier access to sex. Speaking for myself, I don't see it as an advantage. If I had easier access to good sex, or to people I actually wanted to have sex with, then the word advantage might make sense. Sure, I could find someone to f*ck right now on Tinder or whatever the kids are using these days, but what would be the advantage for me? I am extremely unlikely to find the experience worthwhile.

2. The fact is that more attractive people have easier access to sex (i.e., good sex with people they find attractive). Our culture teaches the entitled schlubby self-proclaimed "nice guys" who whine about women being gatekeepers of sex that every man deserves a hottie - because non-hotties and/or (god forbid!) fat chicks simply don't count as sexual beings. They only pursue women who are way out of their league physically and they wonder why they can't get laid. On the other hand, I don't hear a lot of women complaining that superhawtsexy people only want to date other superhawtsexy people. I mean, duh.

3. You don't just get what you want in life because you want it. If you want someone, you have to be able to offer them something they want. "I have a penis" is not a sufficiently compelling offer for most women. If you don't understand why not, you're probably a terrible lay.

It's still an advantage. A woman of average looks has a broader pool of men she can choose from for sex than a man of average looks. You might be right that this advantage does you no good because, even with the expanded pool, you don't want to have sex with any of them. Still, if I give person A $10 to buy dinner and person B $0.50 to buy dinner, person A still has an advantage even if she won't eat anything other than champagne and caviar.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A few thoughts:

1. It's nonsensical to say that women have the "advantage" of easier access to sex. Speaking for myself, I don't see it as an advantage. If I had easier access to good sex, or to people I actually wanted to have sex with, then the word advantage might make sense. Sure, I could find someone to f*ck right now on Tinder or whatever the kids are using these days, but what would be the advantage for me? I am extremely unlikely to find the experience worthwhile.

2. The fact is that more attractive people have easier access to sex (i.e., good sex with people they find attractive). Our culture teaches the entitled schlubby self-proclaimed "nice guys" who whine about women being gatekeepers of sex that every man deserves a hottie - because non-hotties and/or (god forbid!) fat chicks simply don't count as sexual beings. They only pursue women who are way out of their league physically and they wonder why they can't get laid. On the other hand, I don't hear a lot of women complaining that superhawtsexy people only want to date other superhawtsexy people. I mean, duh.

3. You don't just get what you want in life because you want it. If you want someone, you have to be able to offer them something they want. "I have a penis" is not a sufficiently compelling offer for most women. If you don't understand why not, you're probably a terrible lay.

It's still an advantage. A woman of average looks has a broader pool of men she can choose from for sex than a man of average looks. You might be right that this advantage does you no good because, even with the expanded pool, you don't want to have sex with any of them. Still, if I give person A $10 to buy dinner and person B $0.50 to buy dinner, person A still has an advantage even if she won't eat anything other than champagne and caviar.

I disagree with you. A man of average looks, but with money, will always be able to date up if he chooses. Not so for a woman. I see this a lot in DC.

Signed, a woman.

[Anonymous]

Dating up and sex are two different things.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are chasing after 10% of the guys while men are chasing after 60% of the women.

I’d say men are chasing after 75 percent of the ladies. Women chase about 10 percent of the guys until they hit a certain age where they are desperate for marriage and it shifts to about 35 percent. An attractive woman at work will be coveted by and potentially harassed by 70 percent of male coworkers.

The fact that women are chasing 10% of the men is destabilizing our society

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A few thoughts:

1. It's nonsensical to say that women have the "advantage" of easier access to sex. Speaking for myself, I don't see it as an advantage. If I had easier access to good sex, or to people I actually wanted to have sex with, then the word advantage might make sense. Sure, I could find someone to f*ck right now on Tinder or whatever the kids are using these days, but what would be the advantage for me? I am extremely unlikely to find the experience worthwhile.

2. The fact is that more attractive people have easier access to sex (i.e., good sex with people they find attractive). Our culture teaches the entitled schlubby self-proclaimed "nice guys" who whine about women being gatekeepers of sex that every man deserves a hottie - because non-hotties and/or (god forbid!) fat chicks simply don't count as sexual beings. They only pursue women who are way out of their league physically and they wonder why they can't get laid. On the other hand, I don't hear a lot of women complaining that superhawtsexy people only want to date other superhawtsexy people. I mean, duh.

3. You don't just get what you want in life because you want it. If you want someone, you have to be able to offer them something they want. "I have a penis" is not a sufficiently compelling offer for most women. If you don't understand why not, you're probably a terrible lay.

It's still an advantage. A woman of average looks has a broader pool of men she can choose from for sex than a man of average looks. You might be right that this advantage does you no good because, even with the expanded pool, you don't want to have sex with any of them. Still, if I give person A $10 to buy dinner and person B $0.50 to buy dinner, person A still has an advantage even if she won't eat anything other than champagne and caviar.

I disagree with you. A man of average looks, but with money, will always be able to date up if he chooses. Not so for a woman. I see this a lot in DC.

Signed, a woman.

If he has money it’s not dating up. It’s the woman who is dating up by definition.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Women are chasing after 10% of the guys while men are chasing after 60% of the women.

I’d say men are chasing after 75 percent of the ladies. Women chase about 10 percent of the guys until they hit a certain age where they are desperate for marriage and it shifts to about 35 percent. An attractive woman at work will be coveted by and potentially harassed by 70 percent of male coworkers.

The fact that women are chasing 10% of the men is destabilizing our society

you sound unbalanced.