Roger Stone's Time in the Barrel
![[Post New]](/jforum/templates/default/images/icon_minipost_new.gif){kind=icon}
Anonymous
|
Where is the collusion? No collusion?
Are they all process crimes, again? |
Anonymous
| He’s been arrested |
Anonymous
Why is he tampering with witnesses? What is he trying to cover up? Duh. You all keep up with this but don't examine precedent of how these types of cases are unrolled. |
Anonymous
FBI arrested Stone. |
Anonymous
Read the indictment. Here I'll help: Stone “was contacted by senior Trump campaign officials to inquire about future releases” of stolen information by Wikileaks |
Anonymous
Assange-STONE informed senior Trump Campaign officials that he had information indicating Organization 1 had documents whose release would be damaging to the Clinton Campaign. The head of Organization 1 was located at all relevant times at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London Stone was the link between Turmp-Pence16 and Wikileaks. Who do you suppose the Organization1 contacts might be? |
Anonymous
I’m unfamiliar with this “process crimes” term that you use. |
Anonymous
And who is the “senior Trump campaign official” that’s implicated in directly colluding with Wikileaks via Roger Stone? |
Anonymous
Crime is crime. Crime about crime is still crime. Trump 2016 was one big crime. |
Anonymous
|
Anonymous
It's a made up term by Trump supporters to create the impression that these aren't "real" crimes. |
Anonymous
| Process crimes is exactly what was said on Fox and Friends this morning. As though there’s nothing to see here. For those of you who still don’t believe Fox is in Trump’s pocket, pay attention. I flip on Fox for a few minutes each morning to see how they are covering these stories and it’s mind boggling. |
Anonymous
| There may be more low level indictments, but I think Bob Mueller is getting closer to the top. |
Anonymous
Process crimes.... crimes that only exist because of the investigation itself. |
Anonymous
|