Did you not read the actual press release in the Elle article that was issued by Kensington Palace, with Harry's royal "H" featured prominently at the top? Here's a link from the official royal UK site: https://www.royal.uk/statement-communications-secretary-prince-harry |
Yes honey. I did read that. I'm waiting for the I love her article. You got that? |
White People. Strange fruit you are! I'm going to assume you are white because you assumed I am black. No one is "claiming this as victory for black women black people"! Why would anyone do that? She is beautiful woman, who hopefully met her prince. No one is claiming her. I'm just trying to figure out the black identify test? What makes someone a black? If she wants to identify as white. Great! But we all know that white people like you won't let her (Just like you guys wouldn't let Tiger) That one drop rule lives on forever... |
A letter is more or less forgotten by the general public. This article will garner more attention and will be remembered for the duration of this relationship and possibly longer. Meghan's face is all on this she's the only one who will deal with the embarrassment if things don't work out. I hope they do. Harry not so much. Defending her was great, but that was then and this is now. He needs to put his face to his claims. |
Honey you very clearly are black. The kind of black person constantly seeking white approval. That one drop rule would say Meghan is black. She isn't. She doesn't have two black parents. She's biracially and that's okay. And before you say it Obama wasn't black either, he was biracial. TIger was multiracial. |
There is so much stupid in your line of argumentation that I don't know how to help you. You must know nothing at all about the weight and import of official statements from a freaking palace compared to a sanctioned article. The press statement is official, it must use language that hews more formal but it is a remarkable move with epic impact. |
+1 The royal threads bring out hate-filled, absolute idiots (including the PP who keeps going on about Meghan and Serena being "white identified"). There's no use trying to bother with the weirdo arguing that a press statement put out by Kensington palace about a relatively-new relationship is not a huge deal- more impactful than any article. |
I definitely feel like this is where things are headed. Harry and Meghan will boost the RF's public approval and be the new philanthropic couple. |
Yes. Glamorous, jet setting royal couple mingling with the world's elite. Take pretty pictures in nice clothes and give people something to aspire to. I loveit!! That said she seems pretty manipulative and territorial she's going to get that ring. It's the best thing that will ever happen to her. |
Manipulative and territorial? How so? If you mean manipulative in the sense of calculating and media savvy, yes, I agree. But she's an actress and that comes along with the career. Plus, I think that's an actual benefit for the future wife of a prince, especially in a royal family that plays the press game heavily. |
I am black, I never said I wasn't! She is BLACK and she is WHITE. The way you the way you are defending biracial-ness, one would think, you think one should be ashamed to claim the black(or the white) part of one's heritage...Are you saying that? Is that what you are saying? Cause I'm not sure what you are arguing with me about? In my posts I was wondering why someone said she (as well as Serena Williams) self identified as white. She identifies as biracial, I'm cool with that. Maybe you want it to be a win for you? And for the record (maybe you are too young, or maybe I'm too old) but the one drop rule is alive and hasn't gone anywhere. Barak Obama will tell you that himself, on many occasions he said he identified as black. Nonetheless, being biracial is not a shield from the wrath of white racism and bigotry. |
PP you're disgusting. NP here. Where in the hell do you get this crap? "Serena is white identified" WTH kind of stupidity is this? |
Meghan Markle is incredibly cute -- classic girl next door. But "objectively beautiful"?? I can't think of many women who world deserve that title. Aishwarya Rai, Naomi Campbell, Christy Turlington, and Faye Dunaway in their twenties, and Monica Bellucci always... but Meghan Markle? No. |
I can't believe she's 36. She looks 27!! |
NP. I think she is. Much more so than her future Sister in Law. If you've ever seen un photo shopped pics of her, you'd know that Kate is not beautiful. More like attractive for someone ten years older than her. Girlfriend's got a LOT of wrinkles already, poor thing. She must not have good genes in that regard or else spent a lot of time in the sun in her youth. |