A warning letter from 375 top scientists

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Those of us who understand the impacts of climate change are NOT trump voters. Those who are trump voters don't care. And then there are the odd third party voter who totally understands the impact of climate change, income inequality etc BUT they hate Hillary, so climate and income inequality be damned. Let Trump come and make both the issues much worse than what george W did. But hey they are so much about INTEGRITY and principles that they vote for Gary Johnson who is for oligarchy and Unchecked abuse of climate.

It's not that I don't care it's that your agenda lost its truth when actual numbers started to be tossed out. Listen to all the scientists not the a select few who agree with your position. Then we can have a conversation.

[Anonymous]

Some scientist say we are beyond the point of no return in terms of co2 levels. We are certainly not going to start reducing levels in the next 15 years. What you are proposing is just going to cause more suffering if developing countries can't burn fossil fuels. We have to adapt to the climate. Who knows what happens when the next ice age comes? I would be worse than global warming.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of us who understand the impacts of climate change are NOT trump voters. Those who are trump voters don't care. And then there are the odd third party voter who totally understands the impact of climate change, income inequality etc BUT they hate Hillary, so climate and income inequality be damned. Let Trump come and make both the issues much worse than what george W did. But hey they are so much about INTEGRITY and principles that they vote for Gary Johnson who is for oligarchy and Unchecked abuse of climate.

It's not that I don't care it's that your agenda lost its truth when actual numbers started to be tossed out. Listen to all the scientists not the a select few who agree with your position. Then we can have a conversation.

Even those rare scientists who are skeptical of the mainstream consensus that humans have increased green house gas emissions, have to admit the earth is on a clear warming trend. Why do you give equal consideration to scientists heavily funded by fossil fuel interests? (Clean energy companies are tiny and poor compared to big oil and coal)

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of us who understand the impacts of climate change are NOT trump voters. Those who are trump voters don't care. And then there are the odd third party voter who totally understands the impact of climate change, income inequality etc BUT they hate Hillary, so climate and income inequality be damned. Let Trump come and make both the issues much worse than what george W did. But hey they are so much about INTEGRITY and principles that they vote for Gary Johnson who is for oligarchy and Unchecked abuse of climate.

No, there are many of us who are Trump voters who understand the science (I am in a scientific field myself) and know that climate change is a big issue. But if you think voting for Hillary is the answer to this problem -- let alone many others that are of even larger and more immediate concern -- you're nuts.

What are the larger and more immediate concern that you trust Donald Trump to solve?

Terrorism and national safety is my number one, number two and through number 25 on my list of concerns. Everything else gravy.

In a simplistic way, sure. But have you investigated the links between climate change and terrorism? Would you not consider Louisiana flooding on a widespread scale and widespread drought and food shortages to be linked to national safety? You should. You have about 0.02% of being affected by terrorism, and a 100% chance of being affected by climate change. It's like living in a house with unsecured guns and little kids and worrying about wifi.

I have an expensive beach house ocean front in Florida, so yes, thank you for the lecture. I am very concerned about climate change and am well aware of the effect that it will "personally" have on me. I am also aware that massive flooding is indeed linked to national security. However, the loss to me "personally" is nothing compared to the growing threat of terrorism by Islamic radicals that is infiltrating this country. If you don't see that, it's because you don't want to.

So what about the drought in Syria? Do you think it had any effect on the stability of the region and the turn to terrorism. Sure it isn't a one to one correlation but climate change is linked to terrorism

LOL Bullshit.

But, if you'd like to help out, can I interest you in buying some carbon offsets?

Forget climate change for a sec. Do you think the drought there had anything to do with the resulting unrest?

Why should I forget climate change? Becuase it's inconvenient for you???