A warning letter from 375 top scientists

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is this not addressed to China?

We can't control what China does. Hell, our own potential POTUS doesn't even believe in it.

Who do you think made China as wealthy as it is, Einstein?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of us who understand the impacts of climate change are NOT trump voters. Those who are trump voters don't care. And then there are the odd third party voter who totally understands the impact of climate change, income inequality etc BUT they hate Hillary, so climate and income inequality be damned. Let Trump come and make both the issues much worse than what george W did. But hey they are so much about INTEGRITY and principles that they vote for Gary Johnson who is for oligarchy and Unchecked abuse of climate.

No, there are many of us who are Trump voters who understand the science (I am in a scientific field myself) and know that climate change is a big issue. But if you think voting for Hillary is the answer to this problem -- let alone many others that are of even larger and more immediate concern -- you're nuts.

+1,000,000

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of us who understand the impacts of climate change are NOT trump voters. Those who are trump voters don't care. And then there are the odd third party voter who totally understands the impact of climate change, income inequality etc BUT they hate Hillary, so climate and income inequality be damned. Let Trump come and make both the issues much worse than what george W did. But hey they are so much about INTEGRITY and principles that they vote for Gary Johnson who is for oligarchy and Unchecked abuse of climate.

No, there are many of us who are Trump voters who understand the science (I am in a scientific field myself) and know that climate change is a big issue. But if you think voting for Hillary is the answer to this problem -- let alone many others that are of even larger and more immediate concern -- you're nuts.

What are the larger and more immediate concern that you trust Donald Trump to solve?

Terrorism and national safety is my number one, number two and through number 25 on my list of concerns. Everything else gravy.

So make sure you vote for the guy with the hair trigger temper who can't go five minutes without giving ISIS a nice juicy quote for their next recruitment video.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of us who understand the impacts of climate change are NOT trump voters. Those who are trump voters don't care. And then there are the odd third party voter who totally understands the impact of climate change, income inequality etc BUT they hate Hillary, so climate and income inequality be damned. Let Trump come and make both the issues much worse than what george W did. But hey they are so much about INTEGRITY and principles that they vote for Gary Johnson who is for oligarchy and Unchecked abuse of climate.

No, there are many of us who are Trump voters who understand the science (I am in a scientific field myself) and know that climate change is a big issue. But if you think voting for Hillary is the answer to this problem -- let alone many others that are of even larger and more immediate concern -- you're nuts.

What are the larger and more immediate concern that you trust Donald Trump to solve?

Terrorism and national safety is my number one, number two and through number 25 on my list of concerns. Everything else gravy.

So make sure you vote for the guy with the hair trigger temper who can't go five minutes without giving ISIS a nice juicy quote for their next recruitment video.

You go vote for the gal who will do nothing about terror attacks, but she will discuss when exactly can a bomb in NYC be called a bomb.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is this not addressed to China?

We can't control what China does. Hell, our own potential POTUS doesn't even believe in it.

Who do you think made China as wealthy as it is, Einstein?

? I have no idea what you're talking about. "WHO" made china wealthy? Their own people?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is this not addressed to China?

We can't control what China does. Hell, our own potential POTUS doesn't even believe in it.

Who do you think made China as wealthy as it is, Einstein?

? I have no idea what you're talking about. "WHO" made china wealthy? Their own people?

No, not the chinese people. In the minds of the "America the exceptional" folks, even making its enemy and largest donor great, is something America does because it is generous.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of us who understand the impacts of climate change are NOT trump voters. Those who are trump voters don't care. And then there are the odd third party voter who totally understands the impact of climate change, income inequality etc BUT they hate Hillary, so climate and income inequality be damned. Let Trump come and make both the issues much worse than what george W did. But hey they are so much about INTEGRITY and principles that they vote for Gary Johnson who is for oligarchy and Unchecked abuse of climate.

No, there are many of us who are Trump voters who understand the science (I am in a scientific field myself) and know that climate change is a big issue. But if you think voting for Hillary is the answer to this problem -- let alone many others that are of even larger and more immediate concern -- you're nuts.

What are the larger and more immediate concern that you trust Donald Trump to solve?

Terrorism and national safety is my number one, number two and through number 25 on my list of concerns. Everything else gravy.

So make sure you vote for the guy with the hair trigger temper who can't go five minutes without giving ISIS a nice juicy quote for their next recruitment video.

You go vote for the gal who will do nothing about terror attacks, but she will discuss when exactly can a bomb in NYC be called a bomb.

+1

I'll take him over her on this issue any day.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of us who understand the impacts of climate change are NOT trump voters. Those who are trump voters don't care. And then there are the odd third party voter who totally understands the impact of climate change, income inequality etc BUT they hate Hillary, so climate and income inequality be damned. Let Trump come and make both the issues much worse than what george W did. But hey they are so much about INTEGRITY and principles that they vote for Gary Johnson who is for oligarchy and Unchecked abuse of climate.

No, there are many of us who are Trump voters who understand the science (I am in a scientific field myself) and know that climate change is a big issue. But if you think voting for Hillary is the answer to this problem -- let alone many others that are of even larger and more immediate concern -- you're nuts.

What are the larger and more immediate concern that you trust Donald Trump to solve?

Terrorism and national safety is my number one, number two and through number 25 on my list of concerns. Everything else gravy.

In a simplistic way, sure. But have you investigated the links between climate change and terrorism? Would you not consider Louisiana flooding on a widespread scale and widespread drought and food shortages to be linked to national safety? You should. You have about 0.02% of being affected by terrorism, and a 100% chance of being affected by climate change. It's like living in a house with unsecured guns and little kids and worrying about wifi.

I have an expensive beach house ocean front in Florida, so yes, thank you for the lecture. I am very concerned about climate change and am well aware of the effect that it will "personally" have on me. I am also aware that massive flooding is indeed linked to national security. However, the loss to me "personally" is nothing compared to the growing threat of terrorism by Islamic radicals that is infiltrating this country. If you don't see that, it's because you don't want to.

No, it's because it's never going to be as big a problem as global warming. It just isn't.

Islamophobia will for sure give it a nice toe hold here and there.

Yeah. Ask your friends in Europe about that one.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of us who understand the impacts of climate change are NOT trump voters. Those who are trump voters don't care. And then there are the odd third party voter who totally understands the impact of climate change, income inequality etc BUT they hate Hillary, so climate and income inequality be damned. Let Trump come and make both the issues much worse than what george W did. But hey they are so much about INTEGRITY and principles that they vote for Gary Johnson who is for oligarchy and Unchecked abuse of climate.

No, there are many of us who are Trump voters who understand the science (I am in a scientific field myself) and know that climate change is a big issue. But if you think voting for Hillary is the answer to this problem -- let alone many others that are of even larger and more immediate concern -- you're nuts.

Yeah the immediate concern is even more tax cuts to the wealthy like himself and a stupid HIGH BUDGET wall that is only an election ploy and will never be built. What else does he have as policy, deporting illegals has already been softened to deporting ONLy criminal elements, same as Obama. His Climate change policy is chinese Hoax. His solution to income inequality is tax cuts to the rich and the wall. His solution to more jobs is tax cuts to the rich and the wall.

The trade war is another election ploy because if China is punished, China will punish USA back by throwing out American companies in China, a market of 1.3 billion. Millions will lose jobs in the USA when there is trade war with China.

China as a state barely can keep itself one entity. True now and true in the past. But Noooo, the USA can't expect any country to follow agreed to trade rules....

Trump speaks to this actual problem and wins over voters.

China and India are the only two continuing civilizations that have successfully re-invented themselves in similar shape and form for centuries. To this day they have preserved their distinct culture, language and philosophies. The greeks, the romans, the british, the french have all fallen after a short (in historical years) peak. I think America has joined these civilizational giants as the third force. The point is throughout human history until 1850s India and China have been the top two economies in the world. after a break of 150 years, Now China is back at #1, USA is #2 and India is at #3. Look how fast china evolves itself when faced with an issue. They have the worlds largest and biggest in everything. Anyone who thinks China will collapse have no idea about how China has survived for 5000 years. They adapt to what works very quickly. Thats the mark of a survivor. India is like a jelly. Even their philosophy and religion is very flexible and adaptable.

After a couple of hundred years? You're funny!

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is this not addressed to China?

We can't control what China does. Hell, our own potential POTUS doesn't even believe in it.

Suppose you get a POTUS who "believes" in it. What's next? Are you really itching so badly to subsidize our beach communities? I know, I know, the rich, the job creators are super important But come on. The rest of the world will be grappling with water shortages, so heck yeah, this should be addressed to China and India.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of us who understand the impacts of climate change are NOT trump voters. Those who are trump voters don't care. And then there are the odd third party voter who totally understands the impact of climate change, income inequality etc BUT they hate Hillary, so climate and income inequality be damned. Let Trump come and make both the issues much worse than what george W did. But hey they are so much about INTEGRITY and principles that they vote for Gary Johnson who is for oligarchy and Unchecked abuse of climate.

No, there are many of us who are Trump voters who understand the science (I am in a scientific field myself) and know that climate change is a big issue. But if you think voting for Hillary is the answer to this problem -- let alone many others that are of even larger and more immediate concern -- you're nuts.

What are the larger and more immediate concern that you trust Donald Trump to solve?

Terrorism and national safety is my number one, number two and through number 25 on my list of concerns. Everything else gravy.

In a simplistic way, sure. But have you investigated the links between climate change and terrorism? Would you not consider Louisiana flooding on a widespread scale and widespread drought and food shortages to be linked to national safety? You should. You have about 0.02% of being affected by terrorism, and a 100% chance of being affected by climate change. It's like living in a house with unsecured guns and little kids and worrying about wifi.

I have an expensive beach house ocean front in Florida, so yes, thank you for the lecture. I am very concerned about climate change and am well aware of the effect that it will "personally" have on me. I am also aware that massive flooding is indeed linked to national security. However, the loss to me "personally" is nothing compared to the growing threat of terrorism by Islamic radicals that is infiltrating this country. If you don't see that, it's because you don't want to.

No, it's because it's never going to be as big a problem as global warming. It just isn't.

Islamophobia will for sure give it a nice toe hold here and there.

Yeah. Ask your friends in Europe about that one.

Yeah, bro. Still isn't as big a problem as global warming. Not even a little bit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of us who understand the impacts of climate change are NOT trump voters. Those who are trump voters don't care. And then there are the odd third party voter who totally understands the impact of climate change, income inequality etc BUT they hate Hillary, so climate and income inequality be damned. Let Trump come and make both the issues much worse than what george W did. But hey they are so much about INTEGRITY and principles that they vote for Gary Johnson who is for oligarchy and Unchecked abuse of climate.

No, there are many of us who are Trump voters who understand the science (I am in a scientific field myself) and know that climate change is a big issue. But if you think voting for Hillary is the answer to this problem -- let alone many others that are of even larger and more immediate concern -- you're nuts.

What are the larger and more immediate concern that you trust Donald Trump to solve?

Terrorism and national safety is my number one, number two and through number 25 on my list of concerns. Everything else gravy.

So make sure you vote for the guy with the hair trigger temper who can't go five minutes without giving ISIS a nice juicy quote for their next recruitment video.

You go vote for the gal who will do nothing about terror attacks, but she will discuss when exactly can a bomb in NYC be called a bomb.

What would you have had the candidate do? I mean, I know you blame her personally for everything that happened during her tenure as SoS, including your stubbed toe that one morning that one time, even as you probably credit Bush with getting Osama, but what? You want her to don a bulletproof vest and a badge and go hunt down the suspect? It's unclear what you expect.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of us who understand the impacts of climate change are NOT trump voters. Those who are trump voters don't care. And then there are the odd third party voter who totally understands the impact of climate change, income inequality etc BUT they hate Hillary, so climate and income inequality be damned. Let Trump come and make both the issues much worse than what george W did. But hey they are so much about INTEGRITY and principles that they vote for Gary Johnson who is for oligarchy and Unchecked abuse of climate.

No, there are many of us who are Trump voters who understand the science (I am in a scientific field myself) and know that climate change is a big issue. But if you think voting for Hillary is the answer to this problem -- let alone many others that are of even larger and more immediate concern -- you're nuts.

What are the larger and more immediate concern that you trust Donald Trump to solve?

Terrorism and national safety is my number one, number two and through number 25 on my list of concerns. Everything else gravy.

So make sure you vote for the guy with the hair trigger temper who can't go five minutes without giving ISIS a nice juicy quote for their next recruitment video.

You go vote for the gal who will do nothing about terror attacks, but she will discuss when exactly can a bomb in NYC be called a bomb.

What would you have had the candidate do? I mean, I know you blame her personally for everything that happened during her tenure as SoS, including your stubbed toe that one morning that one time, even as you probably credit Bush with getting Osama, but what? You want her to don a bulletproof vest and a badge and go hunt down the suspect? It's unclear what you expect.

NP. For one thing, I expect her to call a spade a spade. An Islamic Radical an Islamic Radical. That is of course forbidden in her world.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of us who understand the impacts of climate change are NOT trump voters. Those who are trump voters don't care. And then there are the odd third party voter who totally understands the impact of climate change, income inequality etc BUT they hate Hillary, so climate and income inequality be damned. Let Trump come and make both the issues much worse than what george W did. But hey they are so much about INTEGRITY and principles that they vote for Gary Johnson who is for oligarchy and Unchecked abuse of climate.

No, there are many of us who are Trump voters who understand the science (I am in a scientific field myself) and know that climate change is a big issue. But if you think voting for Hillary is the answer to this problem -- let alone many others that are of even larger and more immediate concern -- you're nuts.

What are the larger and more immediate concern that you trust Donald Trump to solve?

Terrorism and national safety is my number one, number two and through number 25 on my list of concerns. Everything else gravy.

So make sure you vote for the guy with the hair trigger temper who can't go five minutes without giving ISIS a nice juicy quote for their next recruitment video.

You go vote for the gal who will do nothing about terror attacks, but she will discuss when exactly can a bomb in NYC be called a bomb.

What would you have had the candidate do? I mean, I know you blame her personally for everything that happened during her tenure as SoS, including your stubbed toe that one morning that one time, even as you probably credit Bush with getting Osama, but what? You want her to don a bulletproof vest and a badge and go hunt down the suspect? It's unclear what you expect.

NP. For one thing, I expect her to call a spade a spade. An Islamic Radical an Islamic Radical. That is of course forbidden in her world.

+1
And, blame the actual terrorists for terror - not the maker of an “awful video.”

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Why is this not addressed to China?

We can't control what China does. Hell, our own potential POTUS doesn't even believe in it.

Suppose you get a POTUS who "believes" in it. What's next? Are you really itching so badly to subsidize our beach communities? I know, I know, the rich, the job creators are super important But come on. The rest of the world will be grappling with water shortages, so heck yeah, this should be addressed to China and India.

We need to address issues in our own country, too. If you have a POTUS who doesn't believe in global warming, then not only will this issue not be addressed in this country, but, the POTUS certainly won't be bringing it up with China and India.

So, using your line of reasoning, that we should be addressing this with India and China, we really shouldn't elect Trump.

What I want is a POTUS who won't have policies that will add to global warming.