A warning letter from 375 top scientists

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of us who understand the impacts of climate change are NOT trump voters. Those who are trump voters don't care. And then there are the odd third party voter who totally understands the impact of climate change, income inequality etc BUT they hate Hillary, so climate and income inequality be damned. Let Trump come and make both the issues much worse than what george W did. But hey they are so much about INTEGRITY and principles that they vote for Gary Johnson who is for oligarchy and Unchecked abuse of climate.

No, there are many of us who are Trump voters who understand the science (I am in a scientific field myself) and know that climate change is a big issue. But if you think voting for Hillary is the answer to this problem -- let alone many others that are of even larger and more immediate concern -- you're nuts.

What are the larger and more immediate concern that you trust Donald Trump to solve?

Terrorism and national safety is my number one, number two and through number 25 on my list of concerns. Everything else gravy.

So make sure you vote for the guy with the hair trigger temper who can't go five minutes without giving ISIS a nice juicy quote for their next recruitment video.

You go vote for the gal who will do nothing about terror attacks, but she will discuss when exactly can a bomb in NYC be called a bomb.

What would you have had the candidate do? I mean, I know you blame her personally for everything that happened during her tenure as SoS, including your stubbed toe that one morning that one time, even as you probably credit Bush with getting Osama, but what? You want her to don a bulletproof vest and a badge and go hunt down the suspect? It's unclear what you expect.

NP. For one thing, I expect her to call a spade a spade. An Islamic Radical an Islamic Radical. That is of course forbidden in her world.

The difference between a inciter and someone running a government is that the there are responsibilities for someone running a government. You can't incite even more violence by blaming the entire muslim american community. The perps own father called FBI, that won't happen if you indicate ISLAM is reason for violence. If ISLAM indeed is reason for muslim americans becoming radical, then there will millions more muslims including the old father would be involved.

You can't blame blame Christianity for what Robert Dear did. You can't all whites as anti-minority for what few million white racist bigots and supremacists do. So Trump doesn't care because he is an inciter and thats why he is terrible for governing because he dosn't have the temperament.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of us who understand the impacts of climate change are NOT trump voters. Those who are trump voters don't care. And then there are the odd third party voter who totally understands the impact of climate change, income inequality etc BUT they hate Hillary, so climate and income inequality be damned. Let Trump come and make both the issues much worse than what george W did. But hey they are so much about INTEGRITY and principles that they vote for Gary Johnson who is for oligarchy and Unchecked abuse of climate.

No, there are many of us who are Trump voters who understand the science (I am in a scientific field myself) and know that climate change is a big issue. But if you think voting for Hillary is the answer to this problem -- let alone many others that are of even larger and more immediate concern -- you're nuts.

What are the larger and more immediate concern that you trust Donald Trump to solve?

Terrorism and national safety is my number one, number two and through number 25 on my list of concerns. Everything else gravy.

So make sure you vote for the guy with the hair trigger temper who can't go five minutes without giving ISIS a nice juicy quote for their next recruitment video.

You go vote for the gal who will do nothing about terror attacks, but she will discuss when exactly can a bomb in NYC be called a bomb.

What would you have had the candidate do? I mean, I know you blame her personally for everything that happened during her tenure as SoS, including your stubbed toe that one morning that one time, even as you probably credit Bush with getting Osama, but what? You want her to don a bulletproof vest and a badge and go hunt down the suspect? It's unclear what you expect.

NP. For one thing, I expect her to call a spade a spade. An Islamic Radical an Islamic Radical. That is of course forbidden in her world.

The difference between a inciter and someone running a government is that the there are responsibilities for someone running a government. You can't incite even more violence by blaming the entire muslim american community. The perps own father called FBI, that won't happen if you indicate ISLAM is reason for violence. If ISLAM indeed is reason for muslim americans becoming radical, then there will millions more muslims including the old father would be involved.

You can't blame blame Christianity for what Robert Dear did. You can't all whites as anti-minority for what few million white racist bigots and supremacists do. So Trump doesn't care because he is an inciter and thats why he is terrible for governing because he dosn't have the temperament.

Oh, please. Nice attempt at rationalization.
There is a difference between Islam and Radical Islamic ideology. Even Muslims recognize that.
Just like Christians condemn people who act violently because the “Bible told them to do it.”

[Anonymous]

You don't think that if there were a group of thousands of people following what they said in the old testament with stonings for punishments there wouldn't be people blaming Christianity.

[Anonymous]

These people are actually following what is written in the koran and taking it word for word.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:These people are actually following what is written in the koran and taking it word for word.

No, most of the terrorist have not read Koran themselves (and I am pretty sure you have not either) - they are driven by the propaganda perpetrated by the terrorist organization that

non-Muslims are all against Muslims and out to get them

Koran tells them to wipe out the non-Muslims (wrong interpretation of Koran)

The more times the educated world provides examples of the first rationale (like the way Trump is promoting all Muslims in one hateful group and wants to use racial profiling against Muslims USA citizens), the more legitimate the second rationale becomes.

[Anonymous]

I find it bizarre how a thread topic on climate change morphs into when a POTUS candidate calls an attack terrorism. Did you all post in the wrong thread?

Do Trump supporters do this because you know that Trump can't win an argument about climate change?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Why is this not addressed to China?

Does it matter in this case? One would have to believe climate change is real to encourage China to take some responsibility and curb their emissions. Trump is a denier so Vhina does not matter to him in this regard. His focus with China is on trade.

[Anonymous]

The "scientists" need to worry a little less about the climate and a little more about this...






http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-02/fukushima-radiation-has-contaminated-entire-pacific-ocean-and-its-going-get-worse


.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The "scientists" need to worry a little less about the climate and a little more about this...






http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-02/fukushima-radiation-has-contaminated-entire-pacific-ocean-and-its-going-get-worse

According to that article, "TEPCO is a subsidiary of General Electric (also known as GE), one of the largest companies in the world, which has considerable control over numerous news corporations and politicians alike."

So ugghh...yeah...ain't nobody gonna be saying anything about Fukushima.

[Anonymous]

It's not about saying... it's about doing. Got it?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:It's not about saying... it's about doing. Got it?

Oh I got it, sure, but I'm not holding my breath waiting for somebody to TELL General Electric to do anything.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The "scientists" need to worry a little less about the climate and a little more about this...






http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-10-02/fukushima-radiation-has-contaminated-entire-pacific-ocean-and-its-going-get-worse

From zero hedge?

And why should scientists do anything that wingnuts like you request when you don't believe their findings ever, anyway? You're that guy who takes a picture of snow and posts it on Facebook with a caption about "what global warming?"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of us who understand the impacts of climate change are NOT trump voters. Those who are trump voters don't care. And then there are the odd third party voter who totally understands the impact of climate change, income inequality etc BUT they hate Hillary, so climate and income inequality be damned. Let Trump come and make both the issues much worse than what george W did. But hey they are so much about INTEGRITY and principles that they vote for Gary Johnson who is for oligarchy and Unchecked abuse of climate.

No, there are many of us who are Trump voters who understand the science (I am in a scientific field myself) and know that climate change is a big issue. But if you think voting for Hillary is the answer to this problem -- let alone many others that are of even larger and more immediate concern -- you're nuts.

What are the larger and more immediate concern that you trust Donald Trump to solve?

Terrorism and national safety is my number one, number two and through number 25 on my list of concerns. Everything else gravy.

In a simplistic way, sure. But have you investigated the links between climate change and terrorism? Would you not consider Louisiana flooding on a widespread scale and widespread drought and food shortages to be linked to national safety? You should. You have about 0.02% of being affected by terrorism, and a 100% chance of being affected by climate change. It's like living in a house with unsecured guns and little kids and worrying about wifi.

I have an expensive beach house ocean front in Florida, so yes, thank you for the lecture. I am very concerned about climate change and am well aware of the effect that it will "personally" have on me. I am also aware that massive flooding is indeed linked to national security. However, the loss to me "personally" is nothing compared to the growing threat of terrorism by Islamic radicals that is infiltrating this country. If you don't see that, it's because you don't want to.

So what about the drought in Syria? Do you think it had any effect on the stability of the region and the turn to terrorism. Sure it isn't a one to one correlation but climate change is linked to terrorism

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of us who understand the impacts of climate change are NOT trump voters. Those who are trump voters don't care. And then there are the odd third party voter who totally understands the impact of climate change, income inequality etc BUT they hate Hillary, so climate and income inequality be damned. Let Trump come and make both the issues much worse than what george W did. But hey they are so much about INTEGRITY and principles that they vote for Gary Johnson who is for oligarchy and Unchecked abuse of climate.

No, there are many of us who are Trump voters who understand the science (I am in a scientific field myself) and know that climate change is a big issue. But if you think voting for Hillary is the answer to this problem -- let alone many others that are of even larger and more immediate concern -- you're nuts.

What are the larger and more immediate concern that you trust Donald Trump to solve?

Terrorism and national safety is my number one, number two and through number 25 on my list of concerns. Everything else gravy.

In a simplistic way, sure. But have you investigated the links between climate change and terrorism? Would you not consider Louisiana flooding on a widespread scale and widespread drought and food shortages to be linked to national safety? You should. You have about 0.02% of being affected by terrorism, and a 100% chance of being affected by climate change. It's like living in a house with unsecured guns and little kids and worrying about wifi.

I have an expensive beach house ocean front in Florida, so yes, thank you for the lecture. I am very concerned about climate change and am well aware of the effect that it will "personally" have on me. I am also aware that massive flooding is indeed linked to national security. However, the loss to me "personally" is nothing compared to the growing threat of terrorism by Islamic radicals that is infiltrating this country. If you don't see that, it's because you don't want to.

So what about the drought in Syria? Do you think it had any effect on the stability of the region and the turn to terrorism. Sure it isn't a one to one correlation but climate change is linked to terrorism

LOL Bullshit.

But, if you'd like to help out, can I interest you in buying some carbon offsets?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Those of us who understand the impacts of climate change are NOT trump voters. Those who are trump voters don't care. And then there are the odd third party voter who totally understands the impact of climate change, income inequality etc BUT they hate Hillary, so climate and income inequality be damned. Let Trump come and make both the issues much worse than what george W did. But hey they are so much about INTEGRITY and principles that they vote for Gary Johnson who is for oligarchy and Unchecked abuse of climate.

No, there are many of us who are Trump voters who understand the science (I am in a scientific field myself) and know that climate change is a big issue. But if you think voting for Hillary is the answer to this problem -- let alone many others that are of even larger and more immediate concern -- you're nuts.

What are the larger and more immediate concern that you trust Donald Trump to solve?

Terrorism and national safety is my number one, number two and through number 25 on my list of concerns. Everything else gravy.

In a simplistic way, sure. But have you investigated the links between climate change and terrorism? Would you not consider Louisiana flooding on a widespread scale and widespread drought and food shortages to be linked to national safety? You should. You have about 0.02% of being affected by terrorism, and a 100% chance of being affected by climate change. It's like living in a house with unsecured guns and little kids and worrying about wifi.

I have an expensive beach house ocean front in Florida, so yes, thank you for the lecture. I am very concerned about climate change and am well aware of the effect that it will "personally" have on me. I am also aware that massive flooding is indeed linked to national security. However, the loss to me "personally" is nothing compared to the growing threat of terrorism by Islamic radicals that is infiltrating this country. If you don't see that, it's because you don't want to.

So what about the drought in Syria? Do you think it had any effect on the stability of the region and the turn to terrorism. Sure it isn't a one to one correlation but climate change is linked to terrorism

LOL Bullshit.

But, if you'd like to help out, can I interest you in buying some carbon offsets?

Forget climate change for a sec. Do you think the drought there had anything to do with the resulting unrest?