Nor do the men who impose these dark ages requirements on women in the name of religion. |
| I find it weird and make assumptions when I see them. I am noticing more and more of them in MoCo. However I feel the same way about religious Jews who wear wigs. |
You are no different from these men - so glad you agree. |
This is incorrect, though nicely spun. Full on niqab and burka came about as a necessity to prevent wives and women from being stolen. It was (and still is in in some parts) common practice in the Islamic world for the Caliphs and Emirs to steal the wives of others whenever and however wanted. How do you think those harems got so filled with hundreds of women? Did they apply for the position? LOL. The triple talaq aided in this since it was easy to force or torture the husband into a super simple divorce if necessary. |
Is there the clothing police that will jail you if you're not dressed to their liking? Did they get sentenced to death for their clothes? Is it a state sanctioned crime? |
What an idiot. Where do you get your information from, A Thousand and One Nights? First, no, the niqab did not come about to prevent wife-stealing. Get into your thick head that you cannot kidnap and enslave other Muslims. So while slavery and human trade, primarily in women, was commonplace in the Islamic world, none of these women were Muslim as you cannot enslave other Muslims. Second, harems were filled with non-Muslim women captured during wars. The triple talaq provision does not apply to prisoners of war because the act of capture invalidates marriage, and because only Muslims divorce via talaq. Captured women were non-Muslim, and their divorce practices were different. Finally, triple talaq is a non-Muslim illusion since a single talaq suffices for divorce. There is no need for a triple utterance. |
| I go out of my way to be nice to women wearing the hijab, but I also view it as rather anti-feminist, the same way I view orthodox women who cover their hair, Mennonite women who wear those little white bonnets, or catholic women who continue to wear veils at mass. I wouldn't hire any of those women to care for my children, for instance, as I would assume they do not share my values respecting women's rights I would hire them for a job where those particular values don't matter, however. |
Seriously? You are quite judgemental. Don't you think so? You are assuming that every woman of faith is anti-feminist? What is feminism to you? Please help me understand it. Because last I checked, I thought it had nothing to do with the way women dress up. OP here, and I must say I'm quite disgusted by some comments. the intent of this post was not about arguing whether hijab is mentioned in Quran or not... And for those thinking of Hijabis as oppressed women, I beg you to get to know a Muslim on a personal level and find out for yourself. I was born into a Muslim family, quite liberal honestly ...I started wearing the scarf because of personal and religious beliefs...I'm sorry to disappoint you but neither my father nor my DH had anything to do With my decision. In fact, I would have felt oppressed if DH were to be against my decision. Someone asked how I feel when I see women not covered and wearing revealing clothes: my answer is I don't think about it. I grew up not wearing a scarf...and I still have family members not wearing it...so it doesn't matter to me...just because I'm fully covered, I don't except everybody to be the same. |
|
NP here who has been following this thread but hasn't commented yet.
OP, I don't see how you can write "the intent of my post was not to discuss whether hijab was mentioned in the Quran." It wasn't, as you know. Hijab/niqab are not mentioned in the Quran. That is unavoidably going to color the views that you asked for. A natural extension of this is to ask why, then, women do wear hijab or niqab. It seems hypocritical to fein surprise, as you're doing, that many attribute the veil to patriarchal cultures or to family oppression, and ask why you can't demonstrate modesty without it. You can't close your eyes to this long-standing, global debate about the veil. |
PP again. You say your parents and DH didn't force you. But you still listened to a bunch of turbans from very patriarchal cultures. I'm guessing you aren't looking for a pat on the back from DCUM--in your first post you basically acknowledged you knew the responses you were going to get here (and nobody even mentioned terrorism and the whole awful Trump line). Were you thinking that victimhood is an easy way to validate your decision? This leaves a bad taste in my mouth. |
This just kills me -- he is wearing shorts, a tee shirt and flipflops, while she is bundled up like a sofa on a moving truck. |
| I feel sorry for them. Around age 16 in the US, those girls get broken in to that men come first, and they better obey. Its just sad. |
|
You should think twice about wearing the scarf to cover your hair. I am not a Muslim, and I used to think of it as an accessory. I became friends with a Muslim woman who would cover her hair, young and foreign born but got along well with Americans. Over time, I learned that she was so controlled by her husband. There was the scarf, she had to wear very baggy clothes, she had to call him if she were going out to lunch with others, he wouldn't let her drive out of state by herself, and other things. And if you met him you would never guess about all the little and big things he controlled. They seemed normal except she wore the scarf.
There are decent guys that are Muslim, but they are also very influenced by their families and they get social pressure to go with what the family does. |
|
OP here,
I thank you for your responses. Not looking for validation or a pat on my back. But thanks for the thought!! Hijab was mentioned in the Quran, and for those that would like to think otherwise, it's your choice. Hence, why I said in the first place I'm not going to start this conversation. I'm not here to convince anyone to convert or believe in Hijab. |
OK OP, why don't you give us the passage in question, in the translation of your choice. Several of us have read this passage and disagree with you. It's ludicrous to keep parroting "it's in there but I refuse to discuss it." |