Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:If the worst thing that happens during your time in high school is that your head gets shaved, then you probably had a great time. Its a hair cut people; these kids aren't being forced to do anything that could actually harm them in any way. Lacrosse is a tough sport, so it is probably fair to say that any kid good enough to make the team as a freshman will not be permanently scarred from an ugly hair cut they had to wear for a day. If your kid really had a huge issue with it then his hair will not get touched, but you should be aware that if thats the case, your kid is probably the biggest pussy on the team and all the upperclassman probably thought he was a loser anyway. What's next for you softies? It's really sad when kids get cut, so should there no longer be a varsity team? Team sports can make unathletic people feel unathletic, so should we do away with team sports altogether? How about you listen to the kid who just posted saying that he was there for four years and never once met a freshman (himself included) that was against the ritual. Boys will be boys; you can either accept this dictum and stop bashing a hair cut ritual, or you can continue bitching and moaning about a silly harmless tradition. If you choose the latter I suggest you sending your kid(s) to GDS, Maret, St. Andrews...etc. Moreover, instead of wasting time on this blog, you over-protective parents of future 35-year-old virgins should probably do something useful, like, say, monitoring your child's phone record and internet history--wouldn't want him to do anything cool with his life.
Well, for a while I was inclined to pay attention to things like national hazing websites. But now, your caring post that wants to help save people from raising "35-year-old virgins" has changed my mind.
Oh, wait, no, you have just further succeeded in convincing people that lacrosse boys (and maybe SSSAS) boys are nasty-minded, prejudiced little jerks.
Good job!
Thanks for the compliment, I wrote on this blog to show the world what lacrosse boys do--what nasty minds we have! I'm not condoning hazing, but the fact of the matter is that a funny haircut is not hazing. To me, and to most normal people who didn't eat their lunch in the bathroom in high school, hazing is not something as trivial as a dumb haircut. You blow and your kid probably isn't cool either.
I'll ignore the silly cheap shots and give this a try. Look, hazing sounds fun -- until it isn't. The line between hazing and bullying is a thin one. There's a lot of research on it. Adults need to protect adolescents from it, because adolescents and young men generally don't have the judgment to draw the lines or stay on the right side of them.
I don't really blame older kids for giving funny haircuts and I definitely don't blame younger kids for wanting them. I played college sports and we had initiation rituals -- the kind that could have ended up (but thank god they didn't) in someone choking on their own vomit and dying. If the funny haircuts are cool with the community, the mystery gets lost, and generally (not always, of course) there is some escalation -- whether next year, or a couple years from now -- to something that proves your toughness even more than the haircut. Or maybe the guys giving the haircuts in high school are doing something else in college -- something that could see them getting thrown off a team (Google Franklin & Marshall women's lacrosse and hazing), arrested, or, even worse, spending a lifetime of regret over someone getting hurt.
I don't think we'll agree over this, but I do want you to try to understand where at least one adult (and one who played DI lacrosse) is coming from, in arguing that schools and coaches should try to stamp out this kind of ritual, whether or not it gets the "h" label on it or not.