Indictment of Southern Policy Law Center

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This fake crap happens all over.

My daughter was an undergraduate at UMich in 2015 and 2016 when 3 viral alleged “hate crime” incidents were committed and blamed on far-right extremism. Huge protests, multi-million giveaways, and the president of the university blamed Trump and MAGA.

Police fairly quickly discovered all 3 were hoaxes - committed by a middle aged black man, a college aged white girl, and a college aged Muslim girl on a student visa. Of course the fact they were hoaxes got 1/100th the original viral coverage received.

So you are arguing there is no far right extremism??

Yep. All fake to keep us scared, divided and conquered. Create fake boogeymen so the masses never collectively focus on the real boogeymen.

I think the exposed Young Republican chats or TPUSA chapter chats disagree with your fake boogeyman claims.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/14/private-chat-among-young-gop-club-members-00592146

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article314988093.html

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

“Major role” is a lie and doing a whole lot of work there.

No, it’s really not. But you shills and bots are doing a lot of on-the-clock work trying to rewrite history.

You call me a bot and then cite “Western Lens”? Come on. There’s no evidence that SPLC “bankrolled” that or any event. I know it inspired Biden to run and then beat Trump like a drum and y’all are still big mad about that, but evidence about who was responsible for that event came out in the aforementioned federal trial and SPLC was not found liable.

MAGA does not care about evidence, just vibes. Their statements do not fit the actual claims in the legal document.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This fake crap happens all over.

My daughter was an undergraduate at UMich in 2015 and 2016 when 3 viral alleged “hate crime” incidents were committed and blamed on far-right extremism. Huge protests, multi-million giveaways, and the president of the university blamed Trump and MAGA.

Police fairly quickly discovered all 3 were hoaxes - committed by a middle aged black man, a college aged white girl, and a college aged Muslim girl on a student visa. Of course the fact they were hoaxes got 1/100th the original viral coverage received.

So you are arguing there is no far right extremism??

Yep. All fake to keep us scared, divided and conquered. Create fake boogeymen so the masses never collectively focus on the real boogeymen.

I think the exposed Young Republican chats or TPUSA chapter chats disagree with your fake boogeyman claims.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/14/private-chat-among-young-gop-club-members-00592146

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article314988093.html

DP to add, if you want to call out real boogeymen, let's see Republican outrage over Trump's World Liberty Foundation scam, ya hypocrites.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you mean the

Southern POVERTY Law Center?

Yes. Posters on this thread aren't the most informed.

DCUM’s finest

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This fake crap happens all over.

My daughter was an undergraduate at UMich in 2015 and 2016 when 3 viral alleged “hate crime” incidents were committed and blamed on far-right extremism. Huge protests, multi-million giveaways, and the president of the university blamed Trump and MAGA.

Police fairly quickly discovered all 3 were hoaxes - committed by a middle aged black man, a college aged white girl, and a college aged Muslim girl on a student visa. Of course the fact they were hoaxes got 1/100th the original viral coverage received.

So you are arguing there is no far right extremism??

Yep. All fake to keep us scared, divided and conquered. Create fake boogeymen so the masses never collectively focus on the real boogeymen.

So the 3%, Proud Boys, and Oath Keepers are liberal low IQ non-profit employees?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Omg anyone who thinks the Southern Poverty Law Center is a racist. They’re fighting the good fight.

The thing is, the people who have their agenda say stuff like "people who are bringing racism up as a topic are the real racists!"

Also, Obama caused racism because it was the first time in some people's lives that they were forced to accept that a person of color could outflank them from top to bottom and in all other directions because some God religion etc.

Spoiler: those people didn't expect that they were wrong, so they somehow sort of galvanized their white Jesus bumper sticker movement and Russia's troll farms (and others) were all in

Technology evolved to support the bad governments and it's getting worse every day.

To the point where videos created 20 years ago are already now being assailed as "AI" even when the tech wasn't available at the time

Or, they're being re-vamped to look like AI. The whole goal is to get everyone distrusting everyone and each group pointing at each other like they're the real Spiderman or something

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do you mean the

Southern POVERTY Law Center?

Yes. Posters on this thread aren't the most informed.

DCUM’s finest

This board is a super interesting combination of actual low key DC participants and bots

But I find the bots interesting in some ways because they definitely aren't convincing anyone here, but they seem to workshop their game here anyway

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the cringy “alt right” was their synthetic creation and the weirdos walking around MAGA events with a brand new Nazi flag were paid plants to create a photo op and stoke viral outrage?

Are you all incapable of understanding the concept of a few informants in a giant group? So strange. Law enforcement has been familiar with this concept for years and yet you struggle.

Even McPaper understands

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course they paid informants, how else would they get so much insider information? Right-wing extremists are notorious for informing on each other over ideological differences or plain old greed. Most people move up the ranks to grift this gullible base so why not get additional income as an informant?

Because it provides very wrong incentives to informants. If your income depends on you seeing things, you are going to see those things. This is particularly true in the shady world of informants.

I’m honestly kind of shocked at all the left-leaning people who are excusing the practice of paying informants and then going even further and using that paid information to fundraise, regardless of the accuracy of the information and regardless of the larger social impact. If Turning Point USA (say) was doing the same thing in reverse, there would be howls of fury and attempts to bring criminal charges. It is okay to say that SPLC is in the wrong here. Just because it’s an organization on your side doesn’t mean it can’t and shouldn’t be indicted.

It’s the sign the organization has lost its way entirely, and I say that as a donor.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So the cringy “alt right” was their synthetic creation and the weirdos walking around MAGA events with a brand new Nazi flag were paid plants to create a photo op and stoke viral outrage?

Are you all incapable of understanding the concept of a few informants in a giant group? So strange. Law enforcement has been familiar with this concept for years and yet you struggle.

Even McPaper understands

SPLC is not the government and isn’t subject to the same FOIA and other legal obligations that the government is. It’s a ridiculous comparison, made to excuse behavior that’s flatly wrong.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This fake crap happens all over.

My daughter was an undergraduate at UMich in 2015 and 2016 when 3 viral alleged “hate crime” incidents were committed and blamed on far-right extremism. Huge protests, multi-million giveaways, and the president of the university blamed Trump and MAGA.

Police fairly quickly discovered all 3 were hoaxes - committed by a middle aged black man, a college aged white girl, and a college aged Muslim girl on a student visa. Of course the fact they were hoaxes got 1/100th the original viral coverage received.

So you are arguing there is no far right extremism??

Yep. All fake to keep us scared, divided and conquered. Create fake boogeymen so the masses never collectively focus on the real boogeymen.

I think the exposed Young Republican chats or TPUSA chapter chats disagree with your fake boogeyman claims.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/14/private-chat-among-young-gop-club-members-00592146

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article314988093.html

DP to add, if you want to call out real boogeymen, let's see Republican outrage over Trump's World Liberty Foundation scam, ya hypocrites.

As a three-time Trump voter, I'm outraged by his unbridled scams. However, Dems can't complain because they lied so much about him (e.g., Russiagate) that he's now bulletproof--no one will believe anything the media claims any more.

As for the indictment, even Alex Jones knew SPLC was funding this stuff years ago. It's not a secret but too many Dems have sought censorship and are now shocked by a little bit of sunlight. Guys, the call is coming from inside your house. SPLC's wire fraud deserves to be punished and it's past time for a little bit of accountability. Stuff like this is why Bondi was fired, by the way.

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This fake crap happens all over.

My daughter was an undergraduate at UMich in 2015 and 2016 when 3 viral alleged “hate crime” incidents were committed and blamed on far-right extremism. Huge protests, multi-million giveaways, and the president of the university blamed Trump and MAGA.

Police fairly quickly discovered all 3 were hoaxes - committed by a middle aged black man, a college aged white girl, and a college aged Muslim girl on a student visa. Of course the fact they were hoaxes got 1/100th the original viral coverage received.

So you are arguing there is no far right extremism??

Yep. All fake to keep us scared, divided and conquered. Create fake boogeymen so the masses never collectively focus on the real boogeymen.

I think the exposed Young Republican chats or TPUSA chapter chats disagree with your fake boogeyman claims.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/14/private-chat-among-young-gop-club-members-00592146

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article314988093.html

DP to add, if you want to call out real boogeymen, let's see Republican outrage over Trump's World Liberty Foundation scam, ya hypocrites.

As a three-time Trump voter, I'm outraged by his unbridled scams. However, Dems can't complain because they lied so much about him (e.g., Russiagate) that he's now bulletproof--no one will believe anything the media claims any more.

As for the indictment, even Alex Jones knew SPLC was funding this stuff years ago. It's not a secret but too many Dems have sought censorship and are now shocked by a little bit of sunlight. Guys, the call is coming from inside your house. SPLC's wire fraud deserves to be punished and it's past time for a little bit of accountability. Stuff like this is why Bondi was fired, by the way.

Wait, you still believe that Trump wasn’t compromised by Russia and that they didn’t interfere in the 2016 election?


Lmao

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This fake crap happens all over.

My daughter was an undergraduate at UMich in 2015 and 2016 when 3 viral alleged “hate crime” incidents were committed and blamed on far-right extremism. Huge protests, multi-million giveaways, and the president of the university blamed Trump and MAGA.

Police fairly quickly discovered all 3 were hoaxes - committed by a middle aged black man, a college aged white girl, and a college aged Muslim girl on a student visa. Of course the fact they were hoaxes got 1/100th the original viral coverage received.

So you are arguing there is no far right extremism??

Yep. All fake to keep us scared, divided and conquered. Create fake boogeymen so the masses never collectively focus on the real boogeymen.

I think the exposed Young Republican chats or TPUSA chapter chats disagree with your fake boogeyman claims.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/10/14/private-chat-among-young-gop-club-members-00592146

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article314988093.html

DP to add, if you want to call out real boogeymen, let's see Republican outrage over Trump's World Liberty Foundation scam, ya hypocrites.

As a three-time Trump voter, I'm outraged by his unbridled scams. However, Dems can't complain because they lied so much about him (e.g., Russiagate) that he's now bulletproof--no one will believe anything the media claims any more.

As for the indictment, even Alex Jones knew SPLC was funding this stuff years ago. It's not a secret but too many Dems have sought censorship and are now shocked by a little bit of sunlight. Guys, the call is coming from inside your house. SPLC's wire fraud deserves to be punished and it's past time for a little bit of accountability. Stuff like this is why Bondi was fired, by the way.

Wait, you still believe that Trump wasn’t compromised by Russia and that they didn’t interfere in the 2016 election?


Lmao

Trump is clearly compromised, but you're not paying attention if you think it was by Russians. You need only look at his actions during his second term to see who owns his butt. Better yet, you can see by the ways he's finally increasing his personal wealth in office through particular types of scams that he's in cahoots with the same group.

The idea there was interference in the 2016 election is so absurd you really shouldn't admit having ever believed it. It's like saying you think COVID came from a wet market. It's ok--most people can't do the basic reasoning to figure things out independently. Just realize that's who you are instead of embarrassing yourself with dated theories.