Indictment of Southern Policy Law Center

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

“Major role” is a lie and doing a whole lot of work there.

[Anonymous]

Of course they paid informants, how else would they get so much insider information? Right-wing extremists are notorious for informing on each other over ideological differences or plain old greed. Most people move up the ranks to grift this gullible base so why not get additional income as an informant?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Of course they paid informants, how else would they get so much insider information? Right-wing extremists are notorious for informing on each other over ideological differences or plain old greed. Most people move up the ranks to grift this gullible base so why not get additional income as an informant?

Paying informants is one thing. Encouraging violence is another.

There were organizations there who were stirring the pot on the left. How much money did SPLC give them? That said, most of the people protesting the event were sincere--but were there also people stirring violence?

I watched the event that day on Cspan. It was pretty wild in the streets. Was this encouraged by SPLC? Looked like Antifa types.

Of course, there is no excuse for the driver who killed the peaceful protester. But, there were others who were not so peaceful.

I'd love to know who came up with the "unite the right" idea. Stupid from the start. I think it began with those who did not want the monuments destroyed--but turned very dark with the "unite the right."

[Anonymous]

Omg anyone who thinks the Southern Poverty Law Center is a racist. They’re fighting the good fight.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course they paid informants, how else would they get so much insider information? Right-wing extremists are notorious for informing on each other over ideological differences or plain old greed. Most people move up the ranks to grift this gullible base so why not get additional income as an informant?

Paying informants is one thing. Encouraging violence is another.

There were organizations there who were stirring the pot on the left. How much money did SPLC give them? That said, most of the people protesting the event were sincere--but were there also people stirring violence?

I watched the event that day on Cspan. It was pretty wild in the streets. Was this encouraged by SPLC? Looked like Antifa types.

Of course, there is no excuse for the driver who killed the peaceful protester. But, there were others who were not so peaceful.

I'd love to know who came up with the "unite the right" idea. Stupid from the start. I think it began with those who did not want the monuments destroyed--but turned very dark with the "unite the right."

You’re in luck because a federal jury already determined that it was Jason Kessler, Richard Spencer, and Christopher Cantwell.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2021/11/23/charlottesville-verdict-live-updates/

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course they paid informants, how else would they get so much insider information? Right-wing extremists are notorious for informing on each other over ideological differences or plain old greed. Most people move up the ranks to grift this gullible base so why not get additional income as an informant?

Paying informants is one thing. Encouraging violence is another.

There were organizations there who were stirring the pot on the left. How much money did SPLC give them? That said, most of the people protesting the event were sincere--but were there also people stirring violence?

I watched the event that day on Cspan. It was pretty wild in the streets. Was this encouraged by SPLC? Looked like Antifa types.

Of course, there is no excuse for the driver who killed the peaceful protester. But, there were others who were not so peaceful.

I'd love to know who came up with the "unite the right" idea. Stupid from the start. I think it began with those who did not want the monuments destroyed--but turned very dark with the "unite the right."

They didn’t pay anyone to do anything violent. The only thing they pay for is information.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course they paid informants, how else would they get so much insider information? Right-wing extremists are notorious for informing on each other over ideological differences or plain old greed. Most people move up the ranks to grift this gullible base so why not get additional income as an informant?

Paying informants is one thing. Encouraging violence is another.

There were organizations there who were stirring the pot on the left. How much money did SPLC give them? That said, most of the people protesting the event were sincere--but were there also people stirring violence?

I watched the event that day on Cspan. It was pretty wild in the streets. Was this encouraged by SPLC? Looked like Antifa types.

Of course, there is no excuse for the driver who killed the peaceful protester. But, there were others who were not so peaceful.

I'd love to know who came up with the "unite the right" idea. Stupid from the start. I think it began with those who did not want the monuments destroyed--but turned very dark with the "unite the right."

So all the neo Nazis don't really exist they are just working for non-profits?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

“Major role” is a lie and doing a whole lot of work there.

No, it’s really not. But you shills and bots are doing a lot of on-the-clock work trying to rewrite history.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course they paid informants, how else would they get so much insider information? Right-wing extremists are notorious for informing on each other over ideological differences or plain old greed. Most people move up the ranks to grift this gullible base so why not get additional income as an informant?

Paying informants is one thing. Encouraging violence is another.

There were organizations there who were stirring the pot on the left. How much money did SPLC give them? That said, most of the people protesting the event were sincere--but were there also people stirring violence?

I watched the event that day on Cspan. It was pretty wild in the streets. Was this encouraged by SPLC? Looked like Antifa types.

Of course, there is no excuse for the driver who killed the peaceful protester. But, there were others who were not so peaceful.

I'd love to know who came up with the "unite the right" idea. Stupid from the start. I think it began with those who did not want the monuments destroyed--but turned very dark with the "unite the right."

So all the neo Nazis don't really exist they are just working for non-profits?

Correct. A handful of low IQ unemployed mentally ill losers being exploited by does not warrant A1 coverage and presidential stump speeches. It’s all fake.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

“Major role” is a lie and doing a whole lot of work there.

No, it’s really not. But you shills and bots are doing a lot of on-the-clock work trying to rewrite history.

You call me a bot and then cite “Western Lens”? Come on. There’s no evidence that SPLC “bankrolled” that or any event. I know it inspired Biden to run and then beat Trump like a drum and y’all are still big mad about that, but evidence about who was responsible for that event came out in the aforementioned federal trial and SPLC was not found liable.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Of course they paid informants, how else would they get so much insider information? Right-wing extremists are notorious for informing on each other over ideological differences or plain old greed. Most people move up the ranks to grift this gullible base so why not get additional income as an informant?

Paying informants is one thing. Encouraging violence is another.

There were organizations there who were stirring the pot on the left. How much money did SPLC give them? That said, most of the people protesting the event were sincere--but were there also people stirring violence?

I watched the event that day on Cspan. It was pretty wild in the streets. Was this encouraged by SPLC? Looked like Antifa types.

Of course, there is no excuse for the driver who killed the peaceful protester. But, there were others who were not so peaceful.

I'd love to know who came up with the "unite the right" idea. Stupid from the start. I think it began with those who did not want the monuments destroyed--but turned very dark with the "unite the right."

So all the neo Nazis don't really exist they are just working for non-profits?

Correct. A handful of low IQ unemployed mentally ill losers being exploited does not warrant A1 coverage and presidential stump speeches. It’s all fake.

These obvious hoaxes made it the FBI director’s obsession, too.

[Anonymous]

This fake crap happens all over.

My daughter was an undergraduate at UMich in 2015 and 2016 when 3 viral alleged “hate crime” incidents were committed and blamed on far-right extremism. Huge protests, multi-million giveaways, and the president of the university blamed Trump and MAGA.

Police fairly quickly discovered all 3 were hoaxes - committed by a middle aged black man, a college aged white girl, and a college aged Muslim girl on a student visa. Of course the fact they were hoaxes got 1/100th the original viral coverage received.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This fake crap happens all over.

My daughter was an undergraduate at UMich in 2015 and 2016 when 3 viral alleged “hate crime” incidents were committed and blamed on far-right extremism. Huge protests, multi-million giveaways, and the president of the university blamed Trump and MAGA.

Police fairly quickly discovered all 3 were hoaxes - committed by a middle aged black man, a college aged white girl, and a college aged Muslim girl on a student visa. Of course the fact they were hoaxes got 1/100th the original viral coverage received.

So you are arguing there is no far right extremism??

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This fake crap happens all over.

My daughter was an undergraduate at UMich in 2015 and 2016 when 3 viral alleged “hate crime” incidents were committed and blamed on far-right extremism. Huge protests, multi-million giveaways, and the president of the university blamed Trump and MAGA.

Police fairly quickly discovered all 3 were hoaxes - committed by a middle aged black man, a college aged white girl, and a college aged Muslim girl on a student visa. Of course the fact they were hoaxes got 1/100th the original viral coverage received.

So you are arguing there is no far right extremism??

Yep. All fake to keep us scared, divided and conquered. Create fake boogeymen so the masses never collectively focus on the real boogeymen.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This fake crap happens all over.

My daughter was an undergraduate at UMich in 2015 and 2016 when 3 viral alleged “hate crime” incidents were committed and blamed on far-right extremism. Huge protests, multi-million giveaways, and the president of the university blamed Trump and MAGA.

Police fairly quickly discovered all 3 were hoaxes - committed by a middle aged black man, a college aged white girl, and a college aged Muslim girl on a student visa. Of course the fact they were hoaxes got 1/100th the original viral coverage received.

And here is an example of someone on the right who did the same. So what?

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5614824-gop-staffer-anti-maga-attack-hoax/