Checking people’s backgrounds

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am wondering the opposite, how can I find out if some thirsty person is violating my privacy so I can sue out of the wazoo?

Aren't you funny?. You would end up paying court fees for whomever you sue. There is nothing illegal about this. There is nothing injurious to you unless someone spreads rumours that are untrue.

No, they would pay my court fees b/c had they minded their own business I wouldn’t have any costs at all and neither would they. There are plenty of injuries people can claim after someone violates their privacy. Do you know how many people fall victim to fraud, the mental stress of having to reverse engineer how someone with no cause targeted them in addition to reputation if the info was shared. Google is your friend and so is really good attorney…go on and get you one, something tells me you might need it.

Tell us about your law degree and please explain to us what it means that someone violates your privacy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Reread the OP. This person wants something more than public info. This is not a question about the public sources that literally everyone uses. When you go searching for private sources of information (my mind goes to health, financials, employment, etc, but what OP is specifically looking for is undefined) you need consent and is grounds for a civil suit. That’s not hard to understand.

But it is ridiculously hard to prove. How would you know that someone did that? How do you prove it?

[Anonymous]

If you have cleans hands you have nothing to worry about.

[Anonymous]

Don't trust flash. Any person who spends a lot on expensive clothes, jewelry, cars etc and they want you to know about it are likely fronting.

When my spouse and I moved into an expensive somewhat prestigious neighborhood we saw the snottiest expensive car driving neighbors lose their houses to their greed. In 5 years we saw 3 neighbors on our short street lose their houses and 2 others on streets nearby. In every case but one they were absolute idiots with money and bragged about how much they had not realizing most of the neighbors around them were far wealthier.

[Anonymous]

Try to find out how much they are in to gambling, day trading, poker etc. I know a lot of guys who are blowing too much money with gambling related addictions.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am wondering the opposite, how can I find out if some thirsty person is violating my privacy so I can sue out of the wazoo?

Aren't you funny?. You would end up paying court fees for whomever you sue. There is nothing illegal about this. There is nothing injurious to you unless someone spreads rumours that are untrue.

No, they would pay my court fees b/c had they minded their own business I wouldn’t have any costs at all and neither would they. There are plenty of injuries people can claim after someone violates their privacy. Do you know how many people fall victim to fraud, the mental stress of having to reverse engineer how someone with no cause targeted them in addition to reputation if the info was shared. Google is your friend and so is really good attorney…go on and get you one, something tells me you might need it.

Tell us about your law degree and please explain to us what it means that someone violates your privacy.

People is clueless and has no idea how law works. I keep asking what standing he would have and I don’t think he knows what that means.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reread the OP. This person wants something more than public info. This is not a question about the public sources that literally everyone uses. When you go searching for private sources of information (my mind goes to health, financials, employment, etc, but what OP is specifically looking for is undefined) you need consent and is grounds for a civil suit. That’s not hard to understand.

But it is ridiculously hard to prove. How would you know that someone did that? How do you prove it?

It’s also not true. Another ignorant moron who has no idea how any of this works.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am wondering the opposite, how can I find out if some thirsty person is violating my privacy so I can sue out of the wazoo?

Aren't you funny?. You would end up paying court fees for whomever you sue. There is nothing illegal about this. There is nothing injurious to you unless someone spreads rumours that are untrue.

No, they would pay my court fees b/c had they minded their own business I wouldn’t have any costs at all and neither would they. There are plenty of injuries people can claim after someone violates their privacy. Do you know how many people fall victim to fraud, the mental stress of having to reverse engineer how someone with no cause targeted them in addition to reputation if the info was shared. Google is your friend and so is really good attorney…go on and get you one, something tells me you might need it.

Tell us about your law degree and please explain to us what it means that someone violates your privacy.

People is clueless and has no idea how law works. I keep asking what standing he would have and I don’t think he knows what that means.

I don’t think you know what subject verb conjugation means but I am the one who is clueless.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:
Don't trust flash. Any person who spends a lot on expensive clothes, jewelry, cars etc and they want you to know about it are likely fronting.

When my spouse and I moved into an expensive somewhat prestigious neighborhood we saw the snottiest expensive car driving neighbors lose their houses to their greed. In 5 years we saw 3 neighbors on our short street lose their houses and 2 others on streets nearby. In every case but one they were absolute idiots with money and bragged about how much they had not realizing most of the neighbors around them were far wealthier.

What kind of bag will I choose? Birkins look amazing with a big fat settlement check in them.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Are there services that are actually legitimate and worth spending money on where you can check a person‘s background? I know there are ways to look up court cases and real estate information but I just want to dig a little deeper.

The services like, Been Verified just do a search of the same publicly available sources you can search yourself and do a better job.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Employment is a justifiable reason that you give some kind of consent for a background check to be conducted. Any unjustifiable intrusion into someone’s personal life w/o consent is grounds for a lawsuit…then you get a bag!…you get a bag!…you get a bag!🤑😁

Don't quit your day job, Caveman Lawyer. Checking available public resources on someone does not require consent and certainly isn't subject to a lawsuit. Go sue your credit reporting agencies.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am wondering the opposite, how can I find out if some thirsty person is violating my privacy so I can sue out of the wazoo?

Aren't you funny?. You would end up paying court fees for whomever you sue. There is nothing illegal about this. There is nothing injurious to you unless someone spreads rumours that are untrue.

No, they would pay my court fees b/c had they minded their own business I wouldn’t have any costs at all and neither would they. There are plenty of injuries people can claim after someone violates their privacy. Do you know how many people fall victim to fraud, the mental stress of having to reverse engineer how someone with no cause targeted them in addition to reputation if the info was shared. Google is your friend and so is really good attorney…go on and get you one, something tells me you might need it.

Tell us about your law degree and please explain to us what it means that someone violates your privacy.

People is clueless and has no idea how law works. I keep asking what standing he would have and I don’t think he knows what that means.

I don’t think you know what subject verb conjugation means but I am the one who is clueless.

Obviously I meant to say PP and my phone autocorrected. You are very much clueless about what the law is.