Who should the next Superintendent be?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who's on the list?

Who said there's a list? Y'all are dreaming if you think this BOE is going to push Taylor out.

Won't there be a new BOE in a year?

There'll be a half-new BOE in December.

That last half-new BOE we elected didn't change the dynamics of MCPS. Why do you think this new crop will?

Didn't say that it would.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:This is why no one wants the job.

Exactly! This board has called for the removal of every Superintendent we’ve had since I found it about 16 years ago. It’s like clockwork.

[Anonymous]

The county is too big, there's to many entrenched staff who throw up roadblocks to meaningfull education, and too many entitled parents who think policies for the entire system should revolve around their child.

Then there's the salary, which some believe is too large and others believe is too small (and Jack Smith and Monifa McKnight who bilked the county for money they did not earn)

The reality is, no one competent would take the job

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:The county is too big, there's to many entrenched staff who throw up roadblocks to meaningfull education, and too many entitled parents who think policies for the entire system should revolve around their child.

Then there's the salary, which some believe is too large and others believe is too small (and Jack Smith and Monifa McKnight who bilked the county for money they did not earn)

The reality is, no one competent would take the job

What can be done to make the county "smaller?"

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The county is too big, there's to many entrenched staff who throw up roadblocks to meaningfull education, and too many entitled parents who think policies for the entire system should revolve around their child.

Then there's the salary, which some believe is too large and others believe is too small (and Jack Smith and Monifa McKnight who bilked the county for money they did not earn)

The reality is, no one competent would take the job

What can be done to make the county "smaller?"

This comes up every snow day. Yes, the county is big. Perhaps "too big." No, that's not going to change.

[Anonymous]

Nothing, because splitting in North/South or East/West will have everyone who cares about diversity, which should be all of us, quite upset. And there are no plans to split the county

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Nothing, because splitting in North/South or East/West will have everyone who cares about diversity, which should be all of us, quite upset. And there are no plans to split the county

You do realize that with the regional program model, which has superboundaries built into it that students cannot cross, that MCPS has already split the county up, right?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing, because splitting in North/South or East/West will have everyone who cares about diversity, which should be all of us, quite upset. And there are no plans to split the county

You do realize that with the regional program model, which has superboundaries built into it that students cannot cross, that MCPS has already split the county up, right?

You do realize that the majority of students never go to school outside their home boundaries so the regional program model “superboundaries” don’t really create an issue?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:We’re going to be outed as too toxic to touch.

That ship has already boarded and sailed.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why no one wants the job.

Exactly! This board has called for the removal of every Superintendent we’ve had since I found it about 16 years ago. It’s like clockwork.

They’ll never be satisfied. They can’t even come up with an unanimous priority for the system.

We’ll end up with interims for years and then whoever no one else wants.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some who can make sure that MCPS submits the virtual learning plan for snow emergencies that it said it would do in 2024.

Submit for public comment? Sure. And it should be rejected if it looks like anything like what MCPS has done in the past.

Obviously, public comment will be a blood sport. Whoever screams the loudest will drown out any sensible reflection on the plan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Who's on the list?

Who said there's a list? Y'all are dreaming if you think this BOE is going to push Taylor out.

I think he'll resign in under a year.

That's the only way he'll go, is if he wants to go.

Wait until his crap regional programming initiative fails - the calls for getting rid of him will be loud.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why no one wants the job.

Exactly! This board has called for the removal of every Superintendent we’ve had since I found it about 16 years ago. It’s like clockwork.

You know what else they have done? They have done every superintendent selection in secret behind closed doors. There is no reason for that. Lots of school districts have an open hiring process for superintendents. They hold forums with the candidates and let the public ask questions. Large school systems do this. There is no excuse for MCPS not doing this.

The BOE holds a secret selection process, the candidates are never known (stop saying no one applies the names are never public) and the BOE votes in secret.

Remember during the Magruder shooting McKnight was interviewing in secret BOE meetings in College Park.

Remember when the BOE selected someone who immediately withdrew when his name was announced because of public concerns about inexperience? Remember the one that immediately withdrew because of financial issues?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why no one wants the job.

Exactly! This board has called for the removal of every Superintendent we’ve had since I found it about 16 years ago. It’s like clockwork.

You know what else they have done? They have done every superintendent selection in secret behind closed doors. There is no reason for that. Lots of school districts have an open hiring process for superintendents. They hold forums with the candidates and let the public ask questions. Large school systems do this. There is no excuse for MCPS not doing this.

The BOE holds a secret selection process, the candidates are never known (stop saying no one applies the names are never public) and the BOE votes in secret.

Remember during the Magruder shooting McKnight was interviewing in secret BOE meetings in College Park.

Remember when the BOE selected someone who immediately withdrew when his name was announced because of public concerns about inexperience? Remember the one that immediately withdrew because of financial issues?

Speak up

[Anonymous]

County is too big for one Super. Divide it North South or East West