Isn't it strange that trump never mentions the "assassination attempt" from a year ago?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Um good point

Great observation. There’s why Time selected this photo. They are making a statement

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He mentions it - that's bad!
He doesn't mention it - that's bad!
It was staged - that's bad!
The bullet didn't even hit him - that's bad!
I see a scar - that's bad!
No scar - that's bad!

So why is there no mark at all, absolutely nothing, on that ear again?

God is a perfect healer.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He mentions it - that's bad!
He doesn't mention it - that's bad!
It was staged - that's bad!
The bullet didn't even hit him - that's bad!
I see a scar - that's bad!
No scar - that's bad!

So why is there no mark at all, absolutely nothing, on that ear again?

God is a perfect healer.

God seems to be having a hard time healing the bruises on the back of his hand.

[Anonymous]

Don't know, but if the bullet fragment was very small, perhaps it struck the fleshy part of the ear, causing blood, but no lasting scar? I'm not a plastic surgeon, so this is mere speculation.

[Anonymous]

Was it ever determined what caused the bullet to fragment? The gentleman seated behind Trump was not so fortunate.

[Anonymous]

No scar on that ear where, supposedly, the bullet nicked.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He mentions it - that's bad!
He doesn't mention it - that's bad!
It was staged - that's bad!
The bullet didn't even hit him - that's bad!
I see a scar - that's bad!
No scar - that's bad!

So why is there no mark at all, absolutely nothing, on that ear again?

God is a perfect healer.

Particularly when this assassination attempt was as fake as trump's orange tan.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Um good point

I love this picture. The light shining through the thinning hair. The pristine, fully intact "perfect" ear. The neck.

Yep.