If most people who follow BOE news aren't on Twitter anymore, why post there anymore? Organizations follow the majority of their clients / population. It's how capitalism works. |
That’s, like, your opinion, man. But not especially rational. |
Bless your heart. It’s the opposite. Its influence has been waning for more than a year. It’s essentially unusable, unreliable and irrelevant today. |
The Dude would support this move by the BOE. You just look silly paraphrasing him in support of X. |
I remember Scott Joftus posting here during his brief tenure on the board. Then he got voted out. |
|
I do wonder who is left on MoCo Xitter to qualify as "many of you" for the BoE. As for the idea that BoE members should post on DCUM by name so that DCUM posters can have "meaningful, substantive exchanges"? 1. They don't get paid enough for that. 2. Even assuming that such a thing were possible on DCUM, which: lol. |
The BOE heard otherwise in just a short time since their silly decision. How you like them apples? |
| Just curious (as a person that uses no social media), what type of school info are you receiving on X? or FB etc. I assume I am not missing anything. I have two kids in different HSs and we seem to be ok. |
DP. No, the PP was correct about Xitter being essentially unusable, unreliable, and irrelevant. The BoE is unfortunately just not all that great at leadership. |
Yeah man. And Kamala was going to win Iowa by 9 points. Any other mindless lib talking points you wish to toss out there? |
(see the PP's post in case anyone was wondering what Xitter is like these days and why the BoE might have wanted to get off it) |
Or, the folks wondering could just, I don’t know, actually go to the BOE’s X page and see for themselves the horror that it represents. Oh wait, 99% of their posts don’t have any comments or responses at all and those that do are nearly all civil and polite. |