Jonah Hill

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m admittedly a Jonah Hill fan, but I seriously don’t get it.

Everything I read was basically just a calm and respectful statement of his “boundaries” in a relationship. Not something I personally would be cool with, but this idea that it was somehow “abusive” is crazy. The ex was free to decide any time if they were a good match or not.

We routinely defend women for having preferences—whether it’s wealth, height, certain type of career, liking or not liking certain hobbies or activities, drinker or non-drinker, etc. And if some MRA incel gets mad about that (surely because he doesn’t fit the criteria), he’s rightly condemned. Women don’t have to give a guy a chance if he’s a short, fat, unemployed pothead who plays video games all day.

JH doesn’t want a girlfriend who poses publicly in bikinis, or frolics in the ocean with other guys. So what? I suspect there are many people, men and women, who would feel uncomfortable with that in their partner.

Then he shouldn’t have started dating a surfer.

It sounds like he came to that realization, doesn't it? And acted accordingly.

After screwing her for X years and wasting X years of her life. Then hopping in the sack with a random woman and immediately getting her pregnant. What a great guy.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He dated a surfer and he wants her to stop being in a bathing suit with men.

She dated a guy who did a whole series on therapy and being insecure and want him to be secure.

Lol to both of them,

You do realize that surfers don't actually surf in bikinis, right? They wear wet suits on the boards.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He’s a fake feminist control freak. If he wanted her to essentially give up what is/was her career, he needed to marry her. Of course he wasn’t going to ever do that.

We're married, now change? That's a recipe for disaster. At least he put it out in front what he wanted. Nobody wants a bait and switch.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m admittedly a Jonah Hill fan, but I seriously don’t get it.

Everything I read was basically just a calm and respectful statement of his “boundaries” in a relationship. Not something I personally would be cool with, but this idea that it was somehow “abusive” is crazy. The ex was free to decide any time if they were a good match or not.

We routinely defend women for having preferences—whether it’s wealth, height, certain type of career, liking or not liking certain hobbies or activities, drinker or non-drinker, etc. And if some MRA incel gets mad about that (surely because he doesn’t fit the criteria), he’s rightly condemned. Women don’t have to give a guy a chance if he’s a short, fat, unemployed pothead who plays video games all day.

JH doesn’t want a girlfriend who poses publicly in bikinis, or frolics in the ocean with other guys. So what? I suspect there are many people, men and women, who would feel uncomfortable with that in their partner.

Then he shouldn’t have started dating a surfer.

It sounds like he came to that realization, doesn't it? And acted accordingly.

But apparently he slid into her DMs after she posted a bathing suit pic, so he is a massive hypocrite. And certainly his expectations for a mate are entirely unrealistic.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m admittedly a Jonah Hill fan, but I seriously don’t get it.

Everything I read was basically just a calm and respectful statement of his “boundaries” in a relationship. Not something I personally would be cool with, but this idea that it was somehow “abusive” is crazy. The ex was free to decide any time if they were a good match or not.

We routinely defend women for having preferences—whether it’s wealth, height, certain type of career, liking or not liking certain hobbies or activities, drinker or non-drinker, etc. And if some MRA incel gets mad about that (surely because he doesn’t fit the criteria), he’s rightly condemned. Women don’t have to give a guy a chance if he’s a short, fat, unemployed pothead who plays video games all day.

JH doesn’t want a girlfriend who poses publicly in bikinis, or frolics in the ocean with other guys. So what? I suspect there are many people, men and women, who would feel uncomfortable with that in their partner.

Then he shouldn’t have started dating a surfer.

It sounds like he came to that realization, doesn't it? And acted accordingly.

But apparently he slid into her DMs after she posted a bathing suit pic, so he is a massive hypocrite. And certainly his expectations for a mate are entirely unrealistic.

Seriously. Who changes their behavior with the opposite sex just because they are in a relationship?

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m admittedly a Jonah Hill fan, but I seriously don’t get it.

Everything I read was basically just a calm and respectful statement of his “boundaries” in a relationship. Not something I personally would be cool with, but this idea that it was somehow “abusive” is crazy. The ex was free to decide any time if they were a good match or not.

We routinely defend women for having preferences—whether it’s wealth, height, certain type of career, liking or not liking certain hobbies or activities, drinker or non-drinker, etc. And if some MRA incel gets mad about that (surely because he doesn’t fit the criteria), he’s rightly condemned. Women don’t have to give a guy a chance if he’s a short, fat, unemployed pothead who plays video games all day.

JH doesn’t want a girlfriend who poses publicly in bikinis, or frolics in the ocean with other guys. So what? I suspect there are many people, men and women, who would feel uncomfortable with that in their partner.

Then he shouldn’t have started dating a surfer.

It sounds like he came to that realization, doesn't it? And acted accordingly.

But apparently he slid into her DMs after she posted a bathing suit pic, so he is a massive hypocrite. And certainly his expectations for a mate are entirely unrealistic.

Right, he contacted her precisely because she's hot then resents her for same, expecting her not to interact with her male peers at all. What a weirdo loser.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m admittedly a Jonah Hill fan, but I seriously don’t get it.

Everything I read was basically just a calm and respectful statement of his “boundaries” in a relationship. Not something I personally would be cool with, but this idea that it was somehow “abusive” is crazy. The ex was free to decide any time if they were a good match or not.

We routinely defend women for having preferences—whether it’s wealth, height, certain type of career, liking or not liking certain hobbies or activities, drinker or non-drinker, etc. And if some MRA incel gets mad about that (surely because he doesn’t fit the criteria), he’s rightly condemned. Women don’t have to give a guy a chance if he’s a short, fat, unemployed pothead who plays video games all day.

JH doesn’t want a girlfriend who poses publicly in bikinis, or frolics in the ocean with other guys. So what? I suspect there are many people, men and women, who would feel uncomfortable with that in their partner.

Then he shouldn’t have started dating a surfer.

It sounds like he came to that realization, doesn't it? And acted accordingly.

After screwing her for X years and wasting X years of her life. Then hopping in the sack with a random woman and immediately getting her pregnant. What a great guy.

Years? I thought they were together 4 months. Which seems to me to be just about the right amount of time to realize someone is not for you and get out.

You wouldn't be projecting your own shit, would you? Because it sounds like you're projecting your own shit.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m admittedly a Jonah Hill fan, but I seriously don’t get it.

Everything I read was basically just a calm and respectful statement of his “boundaries” in a relationship. Not something I personally would be cool with, but this idea that it was somehow “abusive” is crazy. The ex was free to decide any time if they were a good match or not.

We routinely defend women for having preferences—whether it’s wealth, height, certain type of career, liking or not liking certain hobbies or activities, drinker or non-drinker, etc. And if some MRA incel gets mad about that (surely because he doesn’t fit the criteria), he’s rightly condemned. Women don’t have to give a guy a chance if he’s a short, fat, unemployed pothead who plays video games all day.

JH doesn’t want a girlfriend who poses publicly in bikinis, or frolics in the ocean with other guys. So what? I suspect there are many people, men and women, who would feel uncomfortable with that in their partner.

Then he shouldn’t have started dating a surfer.

It sounds like he came to that realization, doesn't it? And acted accordingly.

But apparently he slid into her DMs after she posted a bathing suit pic, so he is a massive hypocrite. And certainly his expectations for a mate are entirely unrealistic.

Right, he contacted her precisely because she's hot then resents her for same, expecting her not to interact with her male peers at all. What a weirdo loser.

He's obviously massively insecure. I mean, I would be too, if I looked like him.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:Follow HouseInHabit. She uncovers it all, as always. Ex-girlfriend is bi-polar surfer/model looking for PR a year after they broke up and he has moved on. His texts are actually very encouraging and sane.

HouseinHabit is full-on Qanon. She's so disgustingly anti-women, it's appalling. Literally the only woman she has ever supported in her supposed "investigative journalism" is Ghislaine Maxwell.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He dated a surfer and he wants her to stop being in a bathing suit with men.

She dated a guy who did a whole series on therapy and being insecure and want him to be secure.

Lol to both of them,

You do realize that surfers don't actually surf in bikinis, right? They wear wet suits on the boards.

Lifelong surfer here. This is so ignorant. Surfers wear wetsuits AND bikinis depending on conditions. Along with boardshorts, rashguards, one pieces, etc.

[Anonymous]

He’s a fat Hollywood a$$hole.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing I think people in this thread are glossing over is that social media engagement is effectively her job/a major part of her job. Following his rules would be akin to asking her to quit her job and become financially dependent on him after only a few months of dating. Which is creepy and weird.

I still think she should never have released these, but his “boundaries” (not boundaries at all, rules for her life) were not reasonable.

So that means that you shouldn't date Jonah Hill. But he isn't wrong for laying out what he wants in a mate. It's really not that unusual for a rich man to want his spouse to quit her work and be available for him full-time, and many women are happy with that lifestyle. Not my jam, but also not my role to criticize other people's choices.

It would be better for him to find someone who doesn't have a lot going on in their life, then, not someone who is successful in their own right. Women aren't butterflies, to be caught and pinned to a board. Some men are really gross in their attitudes towards women.

I've literally never heard of this lady before. She is a surfing instructor. And no shade on that-- but one of those hobby jobs that often leads to being a SAHM. Men intentionally look for women like this, who don't have a lot of professional drive, because they will adjust easier to SAHM life. Which is fine, and SAHMs are also real people who are not dead bugs on a board. If Jonah had married her and then laid out his expectations, I would agree. But he did it in the early dating phase, which is the right time for her to make an informed choice.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One thing I think people in this thread are glossing over is that social media engagement is effectively her job/a major part of her job. Following his rules would be akin to asking her to quit her job and become financially dependent on him after only a few months of dating. Which is creepy and weird.

I still think she should never have released these, but his “boundaries” (not boundaries at all, rules for her life) were not reasonable.

So that means that you shouldn't date Jonah Hill. But he isn't wrong for laying out what he wants in a mate. It's really not that unusual for a rich man to want his spouse to quit her work and be available for him full-time, and many women are happy with that lifestyle. Not my jam, but also not my role to criticize other people's choices.

It would be better for him to find someone who doesn't have a lot going on in their life, then, not someone who is successful in their own right. Women aren't butterflies, to be caught and pinned to a board. Some men are really gross in their attitudes towards women.

I've literally never heard of this lady before. She is a surfing instructor. And no shade on that-- but one of those hobby jobs that often leads to being a SAHM. Men intentionally look for women like this, who don't have a lot of professional drive, because they will adjust easier to SAHM life. Which is fine, and SAHMs are also real people who are not dead bugs on a board. If Jonah had married her and then laid out his expectations, I would agree. But he did it in the early dating phase, which is the right time for her to make an informed choice.

Where are you getting that’s she’s a surfing “instructor”? She’s a competitive surfer and law student.

[Anonymous]

Jonah Hill sucks. But I thought we already knew this.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:He’s a fat Hollywood a$$hole.

And nepo baby. I find him disgusting and hate how he's been shoved down our throats for the last 20 years. He's gross.