| Yes. Can't even go into McDonalds with kids |
+1 that guy isn’t shady at all, have any of you been there and talked to him? He’s going to bring in a professional management company that will stock more snacks and other convenience items. I’m glad to have a closer option than Rodman’s for that stuff since the CVS closed down |
You have this completely backwards. The out of boundary students are backfill because the schools have excess capacity due to all the wealthy Ward 3 residents who send their kids to private school and would regardless of the composition of student at the public schools. Sure, there's some number of people who send their kids to private school because they see black kids at Wilson and go into a racist tizzy, but they're not the cause of it, they're being reactionary to it. |
You embarrass yourself. Truly. |
You stun the crowd with this insight and powerful rejoinder. Sincerely. |
Is Jackson-Reed (current name, not Wilson PP) not still massively overenrolled? I have never heard of it having 'excess capacity". That's a head scratcher. It has extremely wide boundary lines and a high quantity of feeder schools. Jackson-Reed has universally acknowledged great college placements (for some) and also a massive achievement gap. Problematic. |
There were 2100 kids at J-R this year in a building with a capacity of 1850 (in reality its capacity is 1550, but DCPS has mysteriously added 300 to the capacity over the years, probably to get the fire marshal off its back). So yes, massively over-enrolled. MacArthur will help a little, but J-R still will be overcrowded. |
It is massively overenrolled. The other poster is doing something that's unfortunately extremely common here - spreading misinformation to hide real problems that students in the city face, and making baseless accusations of racism against anyone who wants the city to address the issues. Here's the Jackson-Reed school newspaper this past year talking about how bad overcrowding got:
https://thejackson-reedbeacon.com/19841/news/jackson-reed-adds-portables-as-overcrowding-worsens/ Seeing the school overenrolled by hundreds of students, to the point that kids are being taught inside storage rooms, and then claiming people "send their kids to private school because they see black kids at Wilson" is simply crazy. And anyone who knows anything about Jackson-Reed will tell you how the school can't find enough teachers for all these students, and some students miss a year in a subject because of it. This is with over 1/3 of the students coming from out of boundary, likely from feeder rights. If someone gets an out of boundary slot at an underenrolled elementary D.C. gives them an out of boundary slot at an overenrolled middle school which gives them an out of boundary slot at a severely overenrolled highschool. If D.C. wants to keep feeder rights, they need to at least give appropriate resources towards the issues it causes. Right now, we have a local highschool where out of boundary students are crowding out in-boundary students. |
We all know what college kids look like. Generally, they’ve showered in the last 24 hours and their clothes are visibly dirty and don’t stink. |
| For what it's worth, and I realize this is a tangent, but the J-R posts prompted the thought: I don't think portable classrooms on their own are indicative of a problem. My MCPS elementary school had portable classrooms nearly 40 years ago. Seemed fine then. |
DC is exponentially better than it was 30 years ago. If you disagree then you haven't lived in the city during the transformation. Sure, there is an increase in crime recently, but DC has become a world class city with robust development/amenities. It is one of the largest concentrations of wealth in the United States. To those that hate the development, move to a small midwestern city. Change is necessary and good. |
|
NP. Obviously some of the rise in issues in places like Tenleytown are the result of nationwide or citywide trends. But, I think that a lot of Ward 3 folks don't realize that quite a bit of it is also the consequence of their own NIMBYism and resistance to development.
Cities are incapable of remaining static. There is a constant cycle of depreciation and redevelopment going on, and Ward 3 has worked for decades to ensure that most of that redevelopment happens elsewhere. As other neighborhoods grow more dense and open many new businesses, they draw foot traffic away from the older commercial districts. This leads to a decline in the number and quality of businesses that can remain viable in the older districts. And, unless there is pretty high residential density (to quote Jane Jacobs, "eyes on the street") this decline also provides for the kind of space that is easily occupied by individuals who create quality of life issues for other residents. It can easily become a self-reinforcing cycle of disinvestment and decline. This isn't a new story for DC, it's basically what happened to H Street and U Street in the 1950s when the desegregation of downtown businesses led to a large decline in foot traffic there. Obviously the subsequent riots didn't help, but it took many decades for those business corridors to recover, and they only really took off when new residential development led to an increase in residential density. In the long run, I worry that Ward 3 might start to look more like Wards 7 and 8, where beautiful but low density neighborhoods aren't enough to sustain strong business districts, and the result has been that residents there are both underserved and less safe. I know that there are plans for redevelopment in places like Friendship Heights, but the scale and scope of what's planned (a single 5 over two with a TJ Maxx) doesn't seem like it's nearly enough to stem the underlying forces of decline. |
I mean, what’s there to say about someone griping about installing playgrounds and pools? |
I always have to wonder where the "there's no development in Ward 3" crowd gets its information from (probably GGW, which isn't exactly reliable these days). It's just so lazy. A massive residential development (City Ridge) just opened in Tenleytown, and another massive residential development is soon to open right next to it. The Mazza redevelopment will have 320 residential units, which -- sure -- isn't enough by itself but it's still 320 units! Other developments that are soon to go up: 5500 Wisconsin (380 units), Friendship Center (350 units), the old Fox 5 site (214 units) and Lisner Home (~130 units). Plus whatever happens to the CCDC core on Connecticut, which will add hundreds of units to the pipeline. But please, keep saying "TheRE's nO dEVelOpMeNT iN wArD 3!!!!" You sound so edgy and informed. |
Try to follow along: don't take national parkland out of commission for Murch's portable trailers, artificial turf soccer field, or a pool. Pur these lovely things elsewhere, on city-owned land. |